Literature DB >> 3515427

Liquid gold: low-osmolality contrast media.

R I White, W J Halden.   

Abstract

The use of low-osmolality versus high-osmolality contrast media is debated. The authors conclude that more studies need to be performed before the high cost of low-osmolality contrast media can justifiably be passed on to the patient population.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  1986        PMID： 3515427     DOI： 10.1148/radiology.159.2.3515427

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN： 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  6 in total

1.  Nonionic contrast media: economic analysis and health policy development.

Authors:  V Goel; R B Deber; A S Detsky
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1989-02-15       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 2.  Should nonionic radiographic contrast media be given to all patients?

Authors:  P S Parfrey; B C Cramer; P J McManamon
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1988-03-15       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Reactions to contrast media and steroid pretreatment.

Authors:  J F Reidy
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1988-03-19

4.  Comparison of Hexabrix 320 and Hexabrix 250 in aortoperipheral arteriography: towards cheaper low osmolar contrast media?

Authors:  P F Joyce; M O'Neill; E Kweka; Q M Bajwa
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1989 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 5.  The clinical application of radiopharmaceuticals.

Authors:  N E Leeds
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Hemodynamic effects of high versus low-osmolar contrast media for ventriculography in severe aortic stenosis.

Authors:  C R Lambert; C J Pepine
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.740
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.