Literature DB >> 3130990

Hemodynamic effects of high versus low-osmolar contrast media for ventriculography in severe aortic stenosis.

C R Lambert1, C J Pepine.   

Abstract

The hemodynamic effects of high- (diatrizoate meglumine/sodium) and low- (iopamidol) osmolar contrast administration for left ventriculography were compared in 15 patients with severe aortic valve stenosis. Patients were similar with respect to aortic valve gradient, aortic valve area, age, body surface area, and baseline hemodynamics as well as associated coronary disease and valvular insufficiency. Administration of diatrizoate meglumine/sodium was associated with a 22% increase in heart rate, and marked (27%) decrease in left ventricular systolic pressure, with a small (15%) increase in left ventricular end diastolic pressure. In contrast, administration of larger volumes of iopamidol was associated with only a slight (9%) increase in heart rate, a small (6%) decrease in left ventricular systolic pressure, and a smaller (6%) increase in left ventricular end diastolic pressure. In patients with severe aortic valve stenosis iopamidol may offer a safer hemodynamic profile than diatrizoate meglumine/sodium.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3130990     DOI: 10.1007/bf02577016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol        ISSN: 0174-1551            Impact factor:   2.740


  8 in total

1.  Aortic stenosis, sudden death, and the left ventricular baroceptors.

Authors:  A M Johnson
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1971-01

2.  Liquid gold: low-osmolality contrast media.

Authors:  R I White; W J Halden
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Safer, more expensive iodinated contrast agents: how do we decide?

Authors:  G L Wolf
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Clinical superiority of a new nonionic contrast agent (iopamidol) for cardiac angiography.

Authors:  E W Gertz; J A Wisneski; D Chiu; J R Akin; C Hu
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 5.  A survey of contrast media used in coronary angiography.

Authors:  A Weikl; M Hubmann
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 2.740

6.  Left ventriculography in aortic stenosis.

Authors:  D Crochet; H Petitier
Journal:  Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn       Date:  1982

7.  Comparison of the electrocardiographic and hemodynamic responses to ionic and nonionic radiocontrast media during left ventriculography: a randomized double-blind study.

Authors:  D N Salem; M A Konstam; J M Isner; J D Bonin
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 4.749

8.  Changes in left ventricular diastolic function after left ventriculography: a comparison with iopamidol and urografin.

Authors:  M Tani; S Handa; S Noma; S Kojima; R Miyamori; T Miyazaki; H Yoshino; S Ohnishi; H Yamazaki; Y Nakamura
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 4.749

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.