| Literature DB >> 35154245 |
Dan-Yan Zhuang1, Shu-Xia Ding2, Fei Wang1, Xiang-Chun Yang1, Xiao-Li Pan1, You-Wei Bao1, Li-Ming Zhou3, Hai-Bo Li1.
Abstract
Isobutyryl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency (IBDHD, MIM: #611283) is a rare autosomal recessive hereditary disease, which is caused by genetic mutations of acyl-CoA dehydrogenase (ACAD) 8 and associated with valine catabolism. Here, tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) was applied to screen 302,993 neonates for inherited metabolic diseases (IMD) in Ningbo of China from 2017 to 2020. The results suggest that 198 newborns (0.7‰) were initially screened positive for IBDHD with C4-Carnitine, and 27 cases (0.1‰) were re-screened positive. Genetic diagnosis was performed on 21 of the 27 cases. Seven compound heterozygous variations, three biallelic variations, and one heterozygous variation of ACAD8 were found with a pathogenicity rate of 33.3% (7/21). In addition, seven biallelic variations, one heterozygous variation of acyl-CoA dehydrogenase short chain (ACADS), and one biallelic variation of acyl-CoA dehydrogenase short/branched chain (ACADSB) was detected. Further research showed that ACAD8 mutations of 11 IBDHD cases distributed in six different exons with total 14 mutation sites. Five of which were known suspected pathogenic sites (c.286G > A, c.553C > T, c.1000C > T, c.409G > A, c.500del) and six were novel mutation sites: c.911A > T, c.904C > T, c.826G > A, c.995T > C, c.1166G > A, c.1165C > T. This finding enriched the mutation spectrum of ACAD8 in IBDHD.Entities:
Keywords: ACAD8; IBDHD; genetic mutations; inherited metabolic diseases; tandem mass spectrometry
Year: 2022 PMID: 35154245 PMCID: PMC8831754 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2021.791869
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Genet ISSN: 1664-8021 Impact factor: 4.599
FIGURE 1Flow chart of newborn screening and diagnosis.
Results of tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) and urine GCMS analysis of 10 cases of IBDHD.
| No | Sex | Testing time | MS-MS (μmol/L) | GCMS | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C4 (0.08–0.51) | C4/C2 (0–0.05) | C4/C3 (0.04–0.046) | 3-hydroxypropionic acid-2 (0–1.1) | Isobutyrylglycine-1 (0–0.4) | Lactic acid (0.8–4.7) | |||
| 1 | Girl | 4 d | 1.58 ↑ | 0.10 ↑ | 1.35 ↑ | — | — | — |
| 30 d | 1.01 | 0.12 ↑ | 1.29 ↑ | 1.75 ↑ | 0.14 | 2.82 | ||
| 2 y | 1.73 ↑ | 0.19 ↑ | 1.53 ↑ | — | — | — | ||
| 2 | Girl | 4 d | 1.23 ↑ | 0.09 ↑ | 0.97 ↑ | — | — | — |
| 18 d | 0.89 ↑ | 0.13 ↑ | 1.29 ↑ | 2.56 ↑ | 0.0 | 10.27 ↑ | ||
| 30 d | 1.12 ↑ | 0.13 ↑ | 1.17 ↑ | — | — | — | ||
| 3 | Boy | 4 d | 1.63 ↑ | 0.08 ↑ | 1.48 ↑ | — | — | — |
| 19 d | 1.03 ↑ | 0.14 ↑ | 2.57 ↑ | 0.96 | 1.08 ↑ | 2.21 | ||
| 4 | Girl | 5 d | 1.87 ↑ | 0.14 ↑ | 2.05 ↑ | — | — | — |
| 19 d | 1.68 ↑ | 0.15 ↑ | 1.54 ↑ | 6.73 ↑ | 0.0 | 93.27 ↑ | ||
| 3 M | 3.33 ↑ | 0.13 ↑ | 1.67 ↑ | — | — | — | ||
| 6 M | 3.94 ↑ | 0.21 ↑ | 1.57 ↑ | — | — | — | ||
| 5 | Girl | 3 d | 1.53 ↑ | 0.09 ↑ | 1.02 ↑ | — | — | — |
| 19 d | 1.67 ↑ | 0.31 ↑ | 1.88 ↑ | 8.12 ↑ | 0.68 ↑ | 14.96 ↑ | ||
| 6 M | 2.94 ↑ | 0.05 ↑ | 1.51 ↑ | — | — | — | ||
| 6 | Girl | 6 d | 1.80 ↑ | 0.24 ↑ | 2.28 ↑ | — | — | — |
| 30 d | 1.27 ↑ | 0.23 ↑ | 1.79 ↑ | 12.52 ↑ | 1.0 ↑ | 5.51 ↑ | ||
| 7 | Boy | 4 d | 1.90 ↑ | 0.12 ↑ | 1.64 ↑ | — | — | — |
| 35 d | 1.64 ↑ | 1.14 ↑ | 1.74 ↑ | 3.56 ↑ | 0.4 | 3.38 | ||
| 45 d | 1.57 ↑ | 0.08 ↑ | 1.19 ↑ | — | — | — | ||
| 8 | Girl | 4 d | 1.26 ↑ | 0.08 ↑ | 0.84 ↑ | — | — | — |
| 38 d | 1.16 ↑ | 0.14 ↑ | 1.27 ↑ | 5.96 ↑ | 0.0 | 14.62 ↑ | ||
| 45 d | 1.25 ↑ | 0.11 ↑ | 1.13 ↑ | — | — | — | ||
| 3 y | 1.48 ↑ | 0.20 ↑ | 1.63 ↑ | — | — | — | ||
| 9 | Girl | 3 d | 1.65 ↑ | 0.10 ↑ | 1.49 ↑ | — | — | — |
| 30 d | 0.98 ↑ | 0.15 ↑ | 1.63 ↑ | 1.93 ↑ | 0.0 | 6.75 ↑ | ||
| 3 M | 1.50 ↑ | 0.08 ↑ | 1.03 ↑ | — | — | — | ||
| 3 Y | 1.76 ↑ | 0.19 ↑ | 1.57 ↑ | — | — | — | ||
| 10 | Girl | 3 d | 1.46 ↑ | 0.07 ↑ | 0.95 ↑ | — | — | — |
| 13 d | 0.80 ↑ | 0.08 ↑ | 0.78 ↑ | 6.89 ↑ | 0.0 | 14.12 ↑ | ||
| 45 d | 0.91 ↑ | 0.06 ↑ | 0.57 ↑ | — | — | — | ||
| 3 Y | 1.20 ↑ | 0.09 ↑ | 0.71 ↑ | — | — | — | ||
Results of ACAD8 gene mutation in 10 cases and follow up.
| No | Location | Mutation site | Mutation type | Amino acid change | Pathogenicity | Variation type | Verification | Follow-up |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P1 | Exon8 |
| Compound heterozygous | p.Q304L | VUS | Missense | Maternal | Her brother has the same genotype as her |
| Exon8 |
| p.R302W | VUS | Missense | Paternal | |||
| P2 | Exon4 | c.443C > T | Compound heterozygous | p.P148L | VUS | Missense | — | |
| Exon7 |
| p.G276R | VUS | Missense | — | |||
| P3 | Exon3 | c.286G > A | Compound heterozygous | p.G96S | LP | Missense | — | |
| Exon10 | c.1176G > T | p.R392S | VUS | Missense | — | |||
| P4 | Exon9 |
| Compound heterozygous | p.M332T | VUS | Missense | Paternal | |
| Exon10 |
| p.R389Q | VUS | Missense | Maternal | |||
| P5 | Exon3 | c.286G > A | Compound heterozygous | p.G96S | LP | Missense | Maternal | |
| Exon5 | c.553C > T | p.L185F | LP | Missense | Paternal | |||
| P6 | Exon3 | c.286G > A | Compound heterozygous | p.G96S | LP | Missense | — | Growth retardation, and gradually return to normal |
| Exon10 |
| p.R389W | VUS | Missense | — | |||
| P7 | Exon3 | c.286G > A | Compound heterozygous | p.G96S | LP | Missense | Maternal | |
| Exon9 | c.1000C > T | p.R334C | LP | Missense | Paternal | |||
| P8 | Exon3 | c.286G > A | Compound heterozygous | p.G96S | LP | Missense | Maternal | |
| Exon5 | c.500del | p.S167Mfs*7 | LP | Frameshift | Paternal | |||
| P9 | Exon3 | c.286G > A | Compound heterozygous | p.G96S | LP | Missense | Paternal | Only mild growth retardation, no other symptoms |
| Exon4 | c.409G > A | p.G137R | LP | Missense | Maternal | |||
| P10 | Exon3 | c.286G > A | Compound heterozygous | p.G96S | LP | Missense | Maternal | |
| Exon5 | c.557A > G | p.N186S | VUS | Missense | Paternal |
Note: Mutation sites not reported in the literature are shown in bold. VUS, means variant of unknown significance; LP, means possible pathogenic variant.
FIGURE 2The location, type and frequency of ACAD8 mutations in 10 patients with IBD. Note: •means missense mutation; ▪indicates a frameshift mutation after.
Follow-up status of six patients who refused NGS testing.
| No | Sex | C4 concentration (μmol/L) | Until 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Girl | 0.78/3 d | 0.37/2 m | Normally |
| 2 | Girl | 1.84/3 d | 2.4/1y4 m | Vitamin deficiency, diagnosed rickets, get back to normal |
| 3 | Boy | 1.34/3 d | 0.8/2 m | Loss to follow-up |
| 4 | Girl | 0.55/3 d | 0.51/2 m | Notmally |
| 5 | Girl | 0.89/3 d | 1.12/1 m | Notmally |
| 6 | Boy | 1.12/3 d | 2.65/1 m | Notmally |