| Literature DB >> 35153738 |
Chiara Bonzano1,2, Sara Olivari1,2, Carlo Alberto Cutolo1,2, Angelo Macrì2, Daniele Sindaco1,2, Davide Borroni3, Elisabetta Bonzano4,5, Carlo Enrico Traverso1,2.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) to detect the wound healing process as per monitoring the effectiveness of cenegermin to treat moderate to severe neurotrophic keratoplasty.Entities:
Keywords: anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT); autologous serum; cenegermin; corneal diseases; neurotrophic keratoplasty; ocular pharmacology; pharmacological targets; rh-NGF
Year: 2022 PMID: 35153738 PMCID: PMC8832138 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.760507
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pharmacol ISSN: 1663-9812 Impact factor: 5.810
FIGURE 1Corneal wound healing of pediatric NK (rh-NGF Case 1) imaged with a multimodal approach. Yellow arrows point at the edges of the epithelial fronts in the photograph obtained at baseline with diffuse white light (A), with fluorescein staining (green) photograph obtained under cobalt-blue light illumination (B), and points to the epithelial edges in the OCT scan over the thinnest area at baseline (C). (D–F) Images acquired at the end of the treatment at Week 8, and the green arrows show a residual paracentral corneal epithelial hyperplasia. About 1 month later, OCT scan (G) reveals complete regression of the corneal epithelial hyperplasia.
FIGURE 2Residual corneal epithelial hyperplasia (blue arrows) of NK (rh-NGF Case 4) at Week 8 (A). Cross-line OCT (B) confirms the epithelial hyperplasia (green arrows) in the horizontal (C) and vertical (D) scans.
Ocular and demographic characteristics of the treated cases and the control group, *measured by AS-OCT.
| N | Age | Gender | Eye | Underlying cause | NK (stage) | Healing time (weeks) | Post-TP CT* (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||||
|
| ||||||||
| 1 | 7 | M | OS | Neurosurgical procedure | 2 | 3 | 73.2 | |
| 2 | 47 | M | OD | Neurosurgical procedure | 2 | 4 | 31.9 | |
| 3 | 88 | F | OD | Herpetic eye disease | 2 | 3 | 20.6 | |
| 4 | 46 | F | OD | Corneal hypoesthesia | 2 | 4 | 54.8 | |
| 5 | 74 | F | OS | keratoplasty | 2 | 4 | 50 | |
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
| ||||||||
| 6 | 76 | F | OD | DM/keratoplasty | 3 (IIIa) | 5 | 53 | |
| 7 | 64 | M | OD | Herpetic eye disease | 3 (IIIa) | 3 | 81.5 | |
| 8 | 76 | F | OS | Herpetic eye disease | 3 (IIIa) | 4 | 73.2 | |
| 9 | 58 | F | OS | Ocular surgery | 3 (IIIa) | 4 | 69.5 | |
| 10 | 45 | M | OD | Ocular surgery | 3 (IIIa) | 5 | 96.2 | |
| 11 | 86 | F | OS | Polyneuropathy | 3 (IIIa) | 3 | 62 | |
| 12 | 39 | M | OD | Ocular surface injury (Chemical burn) | 3 (IIIa) | 4 | 65.3 | |
| 13 | 61 | F | OD | Ocular surgery | 3 (IIIb) | 4 | 85 | |
| 14 | 53 | F | OD | Ocular surgery | 3 (IIIb) | 4 | 90.4 | |
| 15 | 79 | F | OS | Glaucoma medication (drops) | 3 (IIIb) | 4 | 85.6 | |
| 16 | 75 | F | OS | Herpetic eye disease | 3 (IIIb) | 4 | 74 | |
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
| ||||||||
|
| ||||||||
| 1 | 81 | M | OS | Herpetic eye disease | 2 | 8 | 14 | |
| 2 | 68 | F | OD | Corneal hypoesthesia | 2 | 7 | 10 | |
| 3 | 70 | F | OD | Herpetic eye disease | 2 | 7 | 13.9 | |
| 4 | 61 | F | OD | Glaucoma medication (drops) | 2 | 3 | 9.5 | |
| 5 | 80 | F | OS | Herpetic eye disease | 2 | 5 | 9.1 | |
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
| ||||||||
| 6 | 69 | F | OD | Severe dry eye | 3 (IIIa) | 3 | 12.4 | |
| 7 | 77 | F | OS | Severe dry eye | 3 (IIIa) | 4 | 15 | |
| 8 | 86 | M | OS | Ocular surgery | 3 (IIIa) | 8 | 16 | |
| 9 | 74 | F | OS | Herpetic eye disease | 3 (IIIa) | 8 | 18 | |
| 10 | 84 | F | OD | Ocular surgery | 3 (IIIa) | 8 | 17 | |
| 11 | 47 | M | OD | Neurosurgical procedure | 3 (IIIa) | 7 | 23.9 | |
| 12 | 53 | F | OS | Polyneuropathy | 3 (IIIa) | 6 | 11 | |
| 13 | 56 | M | OS | keratoplasty | 3 (IIIa) | 4 | 19 | |
| 14 | 77 | F | OD | Severe dry eye | 3 (IIIa) | 5 | 16 | |
| 15 | 13 | M | OS | Ocular surgery | 3 (IIIb) | 3 | 18 | |
| 16 | 79 | F | OD | Neurosurgical procedure | 3 (IIIb) | 8 | 13 | |
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
| |||||
n=number, SD=standard deviation, PT CT* (%)= post-treatment percentage increase in corneal thickness
Participant baseline characteristics demonstrating that there were no significant differences in patient demographics between the treatment and historical control groups.
| Baseline characteristics | rh-NGF ( | As ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 60.9 ± 21.1 (7–88) | 67.2 ± 18.4 (13–86) | 0.13 |
|
| 0.67 | ||
| Male | 5 (31.2%) | 5 (31.2%) | |
| Female | 11 (68.8%) | 11 (68.8%) | |
|
| |||
| Neurosurgical procedure | 2 | 2 | |
| Ocular surgery | 4 | 3 | |
| keratoplasty | 2 | 1 | |
| Herpetic eye disease | 4 | 4 | |
| Corneal hypoesthesia | 1 | 1 | |
| Ocular surface injury (chemical burn) | 1 | — | |
| Glaucoma medication (drops) | 1 | 1 | |
| Polyneuropathy | 1 | 1 | |
| Severe dry eye | — | 3 |
n = number, SD = standard deviation.
FIGURE 3Corneal wound healing AS-OCT detail. First corneal epithelial hypertrophy filled the thinning area, then scar tissue formed (A), and the corneal stroma thickness gradually improved (B) (green arrow points to corneal epithelium; yellow arrow points to corneal stroma).
FIGURE 4Corneal wound healing of neurotrophic corneal ulcer (rh-NGF Case 6) imaged with a multimodal approach. Yellow arrows point at the edges of the epithelial fronts in the photograph obtained at baseline with diffuse white light (A), with fluorescein staining (green) photograph obtained under cobalt-blue light illumination (B), and points to the ulcer area in the OCT scan detected over the thinnest area at baseline (C). (D–F) Images show the progression at Week 4, and the yellow arrows point to the epithelial edges. (G–I) Images were acquired at the end of the treatment at Week 8. The white arrows point to the change in CT detected by the AS-OCT scan (C,F,I).
GRAPH 1Scattergram representing the association between pre-treatment CT and gain in CT at the end of the treatment.
Linear regression analysis. Outcome: percentage change in CT at the end of cenegermin treatment.
| Coefficient | 95% CI |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years | −0.35 | −0.88 to 0.18 | 0.179 |
| Gender, female | −9.35 | −33.60 to 14.90 | 0.422 |
| Healing time, weeks | 4.88 | −14.12 to 23.87 | 0.591 |
| Area pre-treatment, mm2 | 0.04 | −0.15 to 0.24 | 0.631 |
| CT pre-treatment, μm | −0.15 | −0.28 to −0.02 | 0.035 |
GRAPH 2Box plot representing the difference of percentage AS-OCT increase in corneal thickness between the cenegermin (rh-NGF) group and the AS group.
GRAPH 3Comparison chart of the mean CT at each time point during the treatment period (8 weeks) between the cenegermin group (orange line), the AS group (gray line), and 16 healthy corneas (blue line).