Iurii Chubak1,2, Stanard Mebwe Pachong3, Kurt Kremer3, Christos N Likos1, Jan Smrek1. 1. Faculty of Physics, University of Vienna, Boltzmanngasse 5, A-1090 Vienna, Austria. 2. Physico-Chimie des Électrolytes et Nanosystèmes Interfaciaux, Sorbonne Université CNRS, F-75005 Paris, France. 3. Max Planck Institute for Polymer Research, Ackermannweg 10, 55128 Mainz, Germany.
Abstract
We study active topological glass under spherical confinement, allowing us to exceed the chain lengths simulated previously and determine the critical exponents of the arrested conformations. We find a previously unresolved "tank-treading" dynamic mode of active segments along the ring contour. This mode can enhance active-passive phase separation in the state of active topological glass when both diffusional and conformational relaxation of the rings are significantly suppressed. Within the observational time, we see no systematic trends in the positioning of the separated active domains within the confining sphere. The arrested state exhibits coherent stochastic rotations. We discuss possible connections of the conformational and dynamic features of the system to chromosomes enclosed in the nucleus of a living cell.
We study active topological glass under spherical confinement, allowing us to exceed the chain lengths simulated previously and determine the critical exponents of the arrested conformations. We find a previously unresolved "tank-treading" dynamic mode of active segments along the ring contour. This mode can enhance active-passive phase separation in the state of active topological glass when both diffusional and conformational relaxation of the rings are significantly suppressed. Within the observational time, we see no systematic trends in the positioning of the separated active domains within the confining sphere. The arrested state exhibits coherent stochastic rotations. We discuss possible connections of the conformational and dynamic features of the system to chromosomes enclosed in the nucleus of a living cell.
Active
topological glass (ATG) is a state of matter composed of
polymers with fixed, circular, unknotted topology that vitrifies upon
turning a block of monomers active and fluidizes reversibly.[1] Unlike classical glasses, where the transition
is driven by temperature or density, ATG results from physical, tight,
threading entanglements, generated and maintained by the activity
of polymer segments. The activity acting on the ring segments, modeled
here as stronger-than-thermal fluctuations, triggers a directed snakelike
motion that overcomes entropically unfavorable states and results
in significantly enhanced inter-ring threading.[2] A topological glass is hypothesized to exist also in equilibrium
solutions of sufficiently long ring polymers, where rings naturally
thread (pierce through each other’s opening). However, the
conjectured critical ring length is currently beyond experimental
or computational reach.[3−5] Although the ATG exhibits accessible critical ring
lengths, a formidable challenge in simulating these systems stems
from the large system sizes that are necessary to avoid self-threading
of significantly elongated partly active rings due to periodic boundary
conditions.[1] To overcome this difficulty,
a much smaller system confined to an impenetrable cavity can be simulated.
In analogy to classical glasses, where the confinement affects the
vitrification mechanism and shifts the glass transition temperature
in comparison to the bulk value,[6,7] it is pertinent to ask
the question whether the ATG, the existence of which relies on highly
extended configurations that promote intermolecular entanglement,
can exist in such a strong confinement at all.Besides the ATG,
the confined melt of uncrossable polymer rings
with active segments has an interesting biological connection. The equilibrium melt of rings exhibits conformational properties
consistent with the large-scale, population-averaged properties of
chromatin fiber in the interphase nuclei of higher eukaryotes.[8−10] In detail, the territorial segregation of distinct chains, the critical
exponents ν = 1/3 and γ ≃ 1.1 governing the scaling
of the gyration radius R(s) ∼ sν and the probability of end-contacts P(s) ∼ s–γ of a segment of length s, respectively, coincide
for the two systems and characterize the so-called fractal (crumpled)
globule conformations.[11] However, similarly
to partly active rings, chromatin is out of equilibrium on smaller
scales as well. Various processes, such as transcription or loop extrusion,
inject energy into the system by the action of respective molecular
machines on the chromatin fiber. Fluorescence experiments[12] and the related analytical theory[13] suggest that some active events at small scales
render fluctuations with thermal spectrum at an effective temperature
about twice higher than the ambient one. As an additional gain of
our investigation of the confined ATG, we can assess if it can be
consistent with the fractal globule model, since both of the latter
represent some aspects of the chromatin conformations in space and
time.First, we explore the static and dynamic properties of
the long,
confined, partly active, nonconcatenated rings in a melt. We find,
in agreement with the bulk ATG, arrested conformations in confined
systems with a small number of polymer chains. The ability to simulate
longer rings than in the bulk allows us to assess in more detail the
conformational and scaling properties of the chains in the nonequilibrium
glassy state. We discover that intermediate-length ring segments feature
conformations consistent with a mean-field statistics of a self-avoiding
random walk (ν = 0.588, γ = 1.75). The territorial structure
of the fractal globule is distorted and we observe active–passive
microphase-separated domains and large-scale correlated motion arising
from the glassy phase due to the activity-induced topological constraints.
Finally, we observe tank-treading of active segments along the ring
contour in the glass that acts to enhance active–passive phase
separation when both the chain’s diffusion and the conformational
rearrangements are suppressed.
Simulation Details
We use the well-established model,[14−16] in which the excluded
volume interaction between any two monomers is described by a repulsive
and shifted Lennard-Jones potentialwhere θ(x) is the Heaviside
step function, σ is the bead’s diameter, and ε
sets the energy scale. As in ref (10), the same potential was used for the interaction
between monomers and the confining sphere of radius R that was modeled as a smooth, structureless, purely repulsive barrier.
The radius R is fixed by the total monomer density
ρ = 0.85σ–3 for all systems (Table ). Typically, R is about 2.5–2.7 times larger than the equilibrium
radius of gyration of the confined chains (Table ). The polymer bonds were modeled by a finitely
extensible nonlinear elastic (FENE) potentialwhere K = 30.0ε/σ2 and rmax = 1.5σ. These
parameters make the chains essentially noncrossable. We also used
the angular bending potentialwith the parameter kθ = 1.5ε
to induce a higher stiffness that corresponds
to a lower entanglement length Ne = 28
± 1 at the studied monomer density ρ.[15]
Table 1
Size and Shape Properties of Partially
Active Rings in a Confining Spherea
N
Nh
R/σ
⟨Rg2⟩/σ2
⟨Ree2⟩/σ2
⟨Ree2⟩/⟨Rg2⟩
⟨λ1⟩/⟨λ3⟩
⟨λ2⟩/⟨λ3⟩
⟨Rg2⟩/R2
⟨Ree2⟩/R2
200
25
13.72
62.4(0.7)
164.8(6.2)
2.64
12.0(0.7)
4.3(0.2)
0.33
0.87
400
50
17.29
129.3(0.6)
304.4(6.2)
2.34
6.5(0.4)
3.1(0.7)
0.41
1.01
800
100
21.78
227.7(0.5)
468.6(3.1)
2.05
4.6(0.2)
2.7(0.8)
0.47
0.98
1600
200
27.44
376.1(0.7)
810.8(4.7)
2.15
3.5(0.5)
2.2(0.1)
0.49
1.07
The
mean values as well as their
standard errors (indicated in the parentheses) were estimated in the
steady states. N is the polymer length, Nh is the number of active (hot) monomers, and R is the radius of the sphere. and are the mean-square radius of gyration
and the mean-square spanning distance between monomers N/2 apart, respectively. λ (i = 1, 2, 3; λ1 ≥ λ2 ≥ λ3) are the eigenvalues of the gyration
tensor.
Table 3
Size and Shape Properties
of the Equilibrium
Confined Ringsa
N
R/σ
⟨Rg2⟩/σ2
⟨Re2⟩/σ2
⟨Ree2⟩/⟨Rg2⟩
⟨λ1⟩/⟨λ3⟩
⟨λ2⟩/⟨λ3⟩
200
13.72
26.4(0.2)
73.4(0.6)
2.8
5.64(0.04)
2.25(0.01)
400
17.29
44.4(0.7)
120.7(2.5)
2.7
5.24(0.08)
2.14(0.02)
800
21.78
73.1(1.1)
195.4(3.8)
2.7
4.93(0.10)
2.06(0.01)
1600
27.44
120.5(2.8)
320.2(10.4)
2.7
4.89(0.12)
2.03(0.02)
N is the polymer
length and R is the radius of the confining sphere, is the mean-square radius of gyration, is the mean-square distance between
two
monomers separated by the contour length N/2, and
λ (i = 1, 2, 3)
are the eigenvalues of the gyration tensor ordered such that λ1 ≥ λ2 ≥ λ3. The value in parentheses indicates the standard error. Adapted
from ref (10).
The
mean values as well as their
standard errors (indicated in the parentheses) were estimated in the
steady states. N is the polymer length, Nh is the number of active (hot) monomers, and R is the radius of the sphere. and are the mean-square radius of gyration
and the mean-square spanning distance between monomers N/2 apart, respectively. λ (i = 1, 2, 3; λ1 ≥ λ2 ≥ λ3) are the eigenvalues of the gyration
tensor.Our simulations
start from well-equilibrated configurations of
completely passive ring polymer melts in spherical confinement produced
in ref (10). Each system
contains M = 46 ring polymer chains, each of length N (N = 200, 400, 800, and 1600, corresponding
to chain entanglement number Z = N/Ne = 7, 14, 28, and 57), the longest
being 4 times longer than the system in ref (1). At time t = 0, the activity was introduced by coupling a consecutive segment
of length N/8 on each ring to a Langevin thermostat
at temperature Th = 3.0ε, whereas
the rest of the ring is still maintained at Tc = 1.0ε by another Langevin heat bath. We choose this
value of Th = 3Tc, despite the experimental indications of active fluctuations
being only about twice the thermal fluctuations. The reason is that
the heat flux between the active and passive constituents establishes
effective temperatures that are in between the temperatures set by
the thermostat. The effective temperatures (measured by the mean kinetic
energy) would be the ones measured in the experiments and have the
correct ratio of about 2.[2] The equation
of motion of the systems were integrated using the LAMMPS simulation
package[17] and the velocity Verlet integration
scheme with the time step δt = 0.005τ
and the damping constant γ = 2/3τ–1,
where τ = σ(m/ε)1/2.The Langevin thermostat in spherical confinement can induce stochastic
values of angular momentum that affect the real dynamics of the system.
This effect can be neutralized by zeroing periodically the total angular
momentum during the simulations, as done in equilibrium simulations
in ref (10). In the
present case, unlike in the equilibrium simulations,[10] we do not perform this operation due to the nonequilibrium
character of the studied system as well as the potential global flows
that can arise in active matter states. When compared to dynamic equilibrium
quantities across this work, we also used trajectories produced in
a similar fashion without zeroing the angular momentum. We note, however,
that the difference in dynamic relaxation times in equilibrium simulations
with and without zeroing the angular momentum is rather small.
Conformational Properties
When the activity is switched
on, after about 105τ,
the chains start to expand from their equilibrium sizes until they
reach a steady state after (2–3) × 106τ.
The time of the onset of the chain stretching does not significantly
depend on N because it is related to local threading
constraints. The steady state is characterized by a significantly
enhanced mean-square radius of gyration (see the snapshot
of a chain in Figure d, the time evolution
of in Figure a, and Table for a shape parameter comparison).
The steady states exhibit
a rugged distribution of (Figure b), despite averaging over
about 107τ,
time that is more than 1 order of magnitude above the equilibrium
diffusion times for N ≤ 800. This shows that
the individual chains are not able to change their conformations significantly,
being essentially frozen in the same state, and points to a nonergodic
behavior. When averaged over 10 independent runs, a smoother distribution
is recovered, as shown for N = 200 in Figure b.
Figure 1
Size and threading properties.
(a) Evolution of the ring’s after the activity
onset at t = 0 for systems with different N. (b) Distribution
of in the steady
state. The distributions
are time-averaged over the steady state and the one for the N = 200 system is averaged also over 10 independent runs.
(c) Evolution of the mean number of threaded neighbors. (d) Conformation
of a partly active ring with N = 1600 at the end
of the simulation run. The active and passive monomers are shown with
orange and gray, respectively. In parts a and c, the dashed lines
of the respective colors indicate the values in equivalent equilibrium
ring melts.[10]
Size and threading properties.
(a) Evolution of the ring’s after the activity
onset at t = 0 for systems with different N. (b) Distribution
of in the steady
state. The distributions
are time-averaged over the steady state and the one for the N = 200 system is averaged also over 10 independent runs.
(c) Evolution of the mean number of threaded neighbors. (d) Conformation
of a partly active ring with N = 1600 at the end
of the simulation run. The active and passive monomers are shown with
orange and gray, respectively. In parts a and c, the dashed lines
of the respective colors indicate the values in equivalent equilibrium
ring melts.[10]The stretching due to the snakelike motion after the activity onset
is caused by the strong dynamic asymmetry between the active and the
passive segments, apparently triggered by nonequilibrium phase separation.[1,2,18] The dynamics of the mutual ring
threading coincides with the stretching dynamics and exhibits markedly
enhanced numbers of threaded neighbors ntn by a single ring in the steady state in comparison to equilibrium
(Figure c), as we
showed by analyzing piercings of rings through other rings’
minimal surfaces.[1,10,19−21] This method has been used successfully to analyze
threading constraints for systems containing ring polymers in[10,19,21] and out of equilibrium.[1,2,20] The essence of the method is
an unambiguous definition of the threading as the intersection of
a rings contour with a minimal disklike surface spanned on another
ring. For the details on practical implementation of the algorithm,
we refer the reader to refs (1) and (20). Interestingly, the number of threaded neighbors is the same as
for the active topological glass in the bulk,[1] despite the different ring shape (compare Tables and 2). For the longest rings, each ring practically threads all the
other rings in the system.
Table 2
Size and Shape Properties
of the Partially
Active Rings in Bulka
N
Nh
⟨Rg2⟩/σ2
⟨Re2⟩/σ2
⟨Ree2⟩/⟨Rg2⟩
⟨λ1⟩/⟨λ3⟩
⟨λ2⟩/⟨λ3⟩
100
13
18.1(0.1)
54.9(0.1)
3.0
7.3(0.1)
2.34(0.01)
200
25
65.2(0.3)
203.5(3.8)
3.1
12.4(0.1)
2.81(0.01)
400
50
182.1(0.7)
566.1(2.1)
3.1
14.2(0.2)
3.03(0.02)
N is the polymer
length and Nh is the number of active
(hot) monomers. is the mean-square radius of gyration, is the mean-square distance between
two
monomers separated by the contour length N/2, and
λ (i = 1, 2, 3)
are the eigenvalues of the gyration tensor ordered such that λ1 ≥ λ2 ≥ λ3. The value in parentheses indicates the standard error. Adapted
from ref (2).
N is the polymer
length and Nh is the number of active
(hot) monomers. is the mean-square radius of gyration, is the mean-square distance between
two
monomers separated by the contour length N/2, and
λ (i = 1, 2, 3)
are the eigenvalues of the gyration tensor ordered such that λ1 ≥ λ2 ≥ λ3. The value in parentheses indicates the standard error. Adapted
from ref (2).N is the polymer
length and R is the radius of the confining sphere, is the mean-square radius of gyration, is the mean-square distance between
two
monomers separated by the contour length N/2, and
λ (i = 1, 2, 3)
are the eigenvalues of the gyration tensor ordered such that λ1 ≥ λ2 ≥ λ3. The value in parentheses indicates the standard error. Adapted
from ref (10).In comparison to the bulk ATG,[1] the
confined rings here are significantly less expanded in terms of Rg and the ratio of the two biggest eigenvalues
of the gyration tensor (Figure a and compare Tables and 2 for N = 400).
Note that the seeming compact scaling of the active confined rings,
as seen in Figure a, is not due to their internal structure (Figure b–d), but just because the confining
radius R scales with N1/3 as the systems of different N were simulated with
the same number of chains and the same density.
Figure 2
Conformational properties.
(a) Comparison of the scaling of the
radius of gyration with the ring length N for different
systems. The results for the confined active rings are from the present
work, the confined equilibrium rings are from ref (10), the bulk equilibrium
are from ref (15),
and the bulk active rings are from ref (1). The equilibrium scaling with the exponent ν
= 1/3 is shown as well as the crossover with
the “effective exponent” 2/5.
(b) The contact probability P(s)
for different N. At intermediate distances {s/(N/2) ∈ [10–2; 10–1]} and for long rings we recover the exponent
γ close to 1.75, consistent with the self-avoiding random walk
configurations. (c) The mean-square internal distance ⟨d2(s)⟩ for different N. (d) The mean-square internal distance ⟨d2(s)⟩ multiplied by s–2×0.588 and normalized by the mean-square
end-to-end distance (Table ). The broadening plateau for the rings of N ≥ 400 shows the asymptotic self-avoiding regime.
The legend in parts c and d is the same as that in part b.
Conformational properties.
(a) Comparison of the scaling of the
radius of gyration with the ring length N for different
systems. The results for the confined active rings are from the present
work, the confined equilibrium rings are from ref (10), the bulk equilibrium
are from ref (15),
and the bulk active rings are from ref (1). The equilibrium scaling with the exponent ν
= 1/3 is shown as well as the crossover with
the “effective exponent” 2/5.
(b) The contact probability P(s)
for different N. At intermediate distances {s/(N/2) ∈ [10–2; 10–1]} and for long rings we recover the exponent
γ close to 1.75, consistent with the self-avoiding random walk
configurations. (c) The mean-square internal distance ⟨d2(s)⟩ for different N. (d) The mean-square internal distance ⟨d2(s)⟩ multiplied by s–2×0.588 and normalized by the mean-square
end-to-end distance (Table ). The broadening plateau for the rings of N ≥ 400 shows the asymptotic self-avoiding regime.
The legend in parts c and d is the same as that in part b.As compared to the equilibrium case[10] and seen in Figure b, the rings are highly stretched and exhibit a scaling of the contact
probability P(s) ∼ s–γ with the exponent γ close
to 1.75 at intermediate distances {s/(N/2) ∈ [10–2; 10–1]} and
a plateau at largest distances, signifying the loss of correlation
due to reflections of rings from the walls. P(s) was computed as the probability of finding the end points
of a segment s at distance below 21/6σ
and averaged over the segment’s position within a ring and
over different rings in the steady state. Due to the phase separation
of the hot and cold segments and the doubly folded chain structure, P(s) features a nonmonotonic character.
Resolving the contact probability for the active and the passive case
separately, we found exponents 1.2–1.33 for the active part
and 1.75 for the passive one (see Figure ). While the former is consistent with a
crumpled globule with a relatively smooth interface (due to microphase
separation),[9] the latter has self-avoiding
walklike features. The exponent γ = 1.75 at intermediate s is consistent with a mean-field estimate of γ = νd ≃ 1.76, with ν = 0.588 and d = 3 being the dimensions of space.[9] This estimate neglects correlation effects in isolated self-avoiding
walks, which when taken into account yield an asymptotic scaling exponent
γ ≃ 2.18.[22] We surmise that
the difference is not coincidental and can be caused by two effects:
(i) the length scale at which we observe the scaling is not long enough
to display the true asymptotic scaling or (ii) partial screening of
the excluded volume caused by the presence of other chains in the
melt can alter the exponent. We leave the resolution of these interesting
facts for future studies.
Figure 3
Segment-resolved contact probability. P(s) was computed separately for hot (solid
lines) and cold
(dotted lines) segments. The dotted lines have been shifted vertically
by 1 decade for clarity.
Segment-resolved contact probability. P(s) was computed separately for hot (solid
lines) and cold
(dotted lines) segments. The dotted lines have been shifted vertically
by 1 decade for clarity.The observed ring conformations
are mostly doubly folded (e.g.,
see Figure d) and
the change in the shape parameters (Table ) is due to “reflections” from
the walls. This can be seen in the mean-square internal distance ⟨d2(s)⟩ of the longest
rings (Figure c) being
a nonmonotonic function of the contour length. ⟨d2(s)⟩ was computed as the mean
square end-to-end vector of a segment of length s averaged over its position within a ring and over different rings
in the steady state. As shown in Figure d, at intermediate distances {s/(N/2) ∈ [10–2; 10–1]} we recover the self-avoiding walk scaling exponent
0.588 for the longer (N ≥ 400) rings, in agreement
with the results for P(s) in Figure b. In summary, the
stretched conformations and the different profile of the contact probability
signifies the loss of the original crumpled globule characteristics
of equilibrium rings.[9]
Active–Passive Microphase Separation
The chosen model
parameters trigger active–passive microphase
separation in all the systems.[2,18,23] Note that this is not an effect of different stiffnesses of the
active/passive blocks but a genuine nonequilibrium effect (as evidenced
by a comparison to simulations of mixtures of chains with different
stiffnesses[18,24] and also by the agreement of
the simulations[2,18] with the analytical result for
the dependence of the critical activity ratio on polymer length[25]). We track the degree of phase separation by
the order parameter Φ(t) = x(t)/x(0) – 1, where x(t) is the number fraction of interchain
like-particles (particles of the same type, but belonging to different
chains) in a rc = 21/6σ
neighborhood of a given monomer at a given time t, averaged over monomers (Figure a). The initial increase of the order parameter precedes
the ring stretching and threading dynamics, supporting the conjecture
in ref (2) that the
separation tendency is a precursor of the formation of the glass.
The phase separation is dynamic in nature, showing intervals of a
single mostly hot region, but also subsequent dissociation into several
hot blobs (Supporting Video 1) reminiscent
of the dynamics of activity-driven colloidal crystals.[26] When the shape properties arrive at a steady
state, there are several hot blobs (see the inset of Figure d) and we still observe them
occasionally exchanging hot particles. We discover that these are
the consequence of a rare tank-treading motion of some of the rings,
by which the hot segment joins the hot phase without changing the
overall shape of the ring and the system as a whole. The squared (“end-to-end”)
distance between an active
and a passive monomer
separated by a segment of length N/2 in Figure b shows that the
tank-treading, a tangential motion of the hot segment along the ring’s
contour, is indeed observed. Strikingly, in contrast to classical
polymer glasses, where each monomer is caged by its neighbors, the
tank-treading mechanism in ATG can enhance active–passive phase
separation even when both conformational and diffusional relaxation
of polymers are not possible.
Figure 4
Phase separation. (a) Time evolution of the
phase separation order
parameter Φ(t). (b) Time dependence of for one of the rings illustrating tank-treading
motion. (c) Radial distribution of cold (blue), hot (yellow), and
all (green) monomers within the enclosing sphere for the system with N = 200 (averaged over 10 independent runs). (d) Radial
distributions of hot monomers. Inset: phase-separated regions of hot
monomers (cold not shown for clarity) for the system with N = 1600.
Phase separation. (a) Time evolution of the
phase separation order
parameter Φ(t). (b) Time dependence of for one of the rings illustrating tank-treading
motion. (c) Radial distribution of cold (blue), hot (yellow), and
all (green) monomers within the enclosing sphere for the system with N = 200 (averaged over 10 independent runs). (d) Radial
distributions of hot monomers. Inset: phase-separated regions of hot
monomers (cold not shown for clarity) for the system with N = 1600.Two studies[27,28] report a preferential positioning
of hot monomers within the confining volume, central or peripheral
depending on the overall density.[27,28] In contrast
to our work, these works do not report activity-enhanced topological
constraints and the resulting arrested dynamics (possibly as the consequence
of using a single linear chain[27] or cross-linked
chains with short active segments[28]). To
assess the positioning in our arrested steady states
we computed the radial density distribution of the hot monomers averaged
over 10 different runs for N = 200. It displays confinement-induced
layering at the wall as in equilibrium,[10] and another broad maximum around R/2 (Figure c). However, the
analysis of single runs for N = 200 and for other N values shows that the positioning of hot monomers is history-dependent,
arrested by the topological constraints, and allows for both internal
or peripheral locations (Figure d) in contrast to a preference for central locations
of active monomers in a different polymer model in ref (28).
Dynamics
and Relaxation
In Figure we report
dynamical and relaxation properties of rings in the system with N = 200 (averaged over 10 independent runs). We focus on
the steady-state dynamics by computing the mean-square displacements
of the ring’s center of mass, g3(t):where t0 is the initial time point chosen as the onset of the steady
state (3 × 106τ in the case of active rings
and 0 for equilibrium systems), ttot is
the total simulation time, R is the position of the ring’s
center of mass with respect to the global center of mass, and the
angled brackets ⟨...⟩ mean averaging over different
rings. As shown in Figure a, the late-stage (steady-state) dynamics of the ring’s
center of mass is much slower than in the equilibrium case,[10] with negligible relative displacements between
the rings g3,rel(t),
with the latter defined as follows:where t0 and ttot are as
above, d is the relative distance between
the centers of mass of rings i and j and the ⟨...⟩ is the
average over all possible ring pairs in the system. Importantly, g3,rel(t) is invariant under
overall constant global rotations and shows that the relative ring’s
motion essentially stalls. The systems with longer rings display the
same behavior. In confined systems, g3(t) saturates at a constant value; for the rings
with N = 200, we find that g3(t→∞) ≈
0.4R2, which is about 2 times smaller
than in the equivalent equilibrium case (Figure a). This arises mostly from extremely elongated
and practically frozen rings conformations, due to which the exploration
of the available volume is significantly suppressed (Supporting Video 2).
Figure 5
Dynamics and relaxation. Comparison of the nonequilibrium
system
(blue) with the equilibrium one (yellow). (a) Mean-square displacements
of the ring’s center of mass g3 normalized by the squared sphere’s radius R2 of N = 200 (solid lines). The relative
mean-square displacement g3,rel(t) (dashed). (b) Terminal autocorrelation function for the
system with N = 200. (c) The relaxation time of the
terminal autocorrelation function, τuu = ∫dt⟨u(t)·u(0)⟩, for equilibrium (yellow
circles) and nonequilibrium active (blue squares) confined rings of
different length N. The data for equilibrium confined
rings was taken from ref (10). (d) Normalized autocorrelation function for for N = 200. For comparison,
the autocorrelations of the squared “end-to-end” (i.e.,
between an active and a passive monomer separated by segment length N/2) distance (solid green)
and the TACF (dashed gray)
are shown. In all cases, we subtract the mean value squared and normalize
the autocorrelation functions to unity at time zero.
Dynamics and relaxation. Comparison of the nonequilibrium
system
(blue) with the equilibrium one (yellow). (a) Mean-square displacements
of the ring’s center of mass g3 normalized by the squared sphere’s radius R2 of N = 200 (solid lines). The relative
mean-square displacement g3,rel(t) (dashed). (b) Terminal autocorrelation function for the
system with N = 200. (c) The relaxation time of the
terminal autocorrelation function, τuu = ∫dt⟨u(t)·u(0)⟩, for equilibrium (yellow
circles) and nonequilibrium active (blue squares) confined rings of
different length N. The data for equilibrium confined
rings was taken from ref (10). (d) Normalized autocorrelation function for for N = 200. For comparison,
the autocorrelations of the squared “end-to-end” (i.e.,
between an active and a passive monomer separated by segment length N/2) distance (solid green)
and the TACF (dashed gray)
are shown. In all cases, we subtract the mean value squared and normalize
the autocorrelation functions to unity at time zero.In Figure b, we
characterize the ring structural relaxation by considering the terminal
autocorrelation function (TACF) ⟨u(t)·u(0)⟩, where u(t) is the unit vector connecting two monomers separated by contour
distance N/2, and the average is taken over all such
monomer configurations within a ring and time.[16,29] As seen in Figure b,c, the decorrelation time of the TACF τuu = ∫dt⟨u(t)·u(0)⟩ is about 3 times longer
than in the counterpart equilibrium cases. In the steady state, the
rings are found in a heavily threaded arrangement with their configurations
being essentially frozen, as evidenced by the static properties in Figure . Since in the steady
state the relative ring displacements are marginal (Figure a), ⟨u(t)·u(0)⟩ can decorrelate either
through internal conformational ring relaxation or collective system
rotations.In what follows, we show that the main pathway that
contributes
to the decorrelation of the TACF are correlated, stochastic rotations
of the whole system. The other possible decorrelation mechanism is
the internal ring rearrangements, caused by the local explorations
of the hot segments or tank-treading motion. To show that these do
not dominate, we show in Figure d that the normalized autocorrelation function for
the ring’s , C(t),
fully decorrelates at a later time (≈2 × 106τ) compared to the TACF (≈6 × 105τ)
and features a 3 decades long logarithmic decay. This contrasts with
the equilibrium behavior, where both structural quantities and ⟨u(t)·u(0)⟩ decorrelate
at about the same time
(yellow curves in Figure b,d). Although the size of the rings essentially stays the
same during the TACF relaxation, there remains the possibility of
tank-treading motion that can significantly impact the TACF decorrelation
but keep the overall size given by Rg fixed.
We show that the tank-treading does not significantly impact the terminal
relaxation by computing the autocorrelation function for the squared
end-to-end distance (Figure d). Although it decorrelates
slightly faster than the
one for , its relaxation
time is still larger than
that of the TACF. Therefore, collective, stochastic rotations provide
the dominant contribution to the TACF decorrelation, whereas its relaxation
time scale can be used as an estimate for the rotational diffusion
time (the presence of such global, correlated rotations is visible
in both Supporting Videos).Global
rotations lead to correlated particle displacements, as
detailed by computing the spatiotemporal correlation function similarly
to[12,30]where Δr(t,Δt) is
the displacement
of the ith monomer in lag time Δt starting from time t, Δr(t,Δt) = r(t+Δt) – r(t), and r(t) = |r(t) – r(t)|. Numerically, Cs(r;Δt) was computed
with a spatial resolution of 0.6σ. The angular brackets represent
averaging over time, in the active case only over the steady state.
In the active system, the correlation decays significantly slower
in comparison to equilibrium and there is a strong anticorrelation
at longer lag times at the opposing positions in the spherical confinement
(r > R), as seen in Figure a–c. In part,
this is
a consequence of the Langevin dynamics that induces stochastic angular
momentum also in equilibrium (Figure c). However, the anticorrelation is much more pronounced
in the active topological glass state and almost nonexistent in equilibrium
with zeroed angular momentum (Figure b). Finally, the pronounced correlation of particle
displacements in the active case results in the increased effective
correlation length compared to the passive system (Figure d). Note that in
the definition of Lcorr the correlation
function (eq ) was normalized
by its value at the first spatial bin considered with r ∈ [0.6σ, 1.2σ] centered at rmin = 0.9σ.
Figure 6
Spatiotemporal displacement correlation. The
correlation function Cs(r;Δt) (eq ) for N = 200 in the case of (a) active confined
rings, (b) equilibrium
rings with zeroing of the system’s angular momentum, and (c)
equilibrium rings without zeroing of the angular momentum. The equilibrium
systems are taken from ref (10). For a given Δt, the shown spatiotemporal
correlation functions are normalized by their value at the r-bin centered at rmin = 0.9σ.
(d) The correlation length scaled with the confinement radius R as a function
of the lag time Δt for the latter three cases.
Spatiotemporal displacement correlation. The
correlation function Cs(r;Δt) (eq ) for N = 200 in the case of (a) active confined
rings, (b) equilibrium
rings with zeroing of the system’s angular momentum, and (c)
equilibrium rings without zeroing of the angular momentum. The equilibrium
systems are taken from ref (10). For a given Δt, the shown spatiotemporal
correlation functions are normalized by their value at the r-bin centered at rmin = 0.9σ.
(d) The correlation length scaled with the confinement radius R as a function
of the lag time Δt for the latter three cases.
Discussion
The
ATG represents a novel class of polymer glass. The activity-enhanced
topological constraints inhibit the center of mass diffusion of the
rings, as well as their conformational relaxation, but allow for displacements
of the monomers along the contour of the rings. As we have shown here,
this tank-treading diffusion can alter the underlying microphase separation
but does not seem to affect the overall stability of the ATG. Given
the ATG formation mechanism, by which the active segment pulls tight
the topological constraints,[1,2] one could naïvely
expect the ATG to fluidize when the active segment tank-treads significantly
along the contour. We hypothesize that the stability is maintained
by the high number of “redundant” constraints each chain
has with other chains, which then do not allow for a simple unthreading.
For the system to liquidify again, many unthreading events would have
to occur sequentially in the opposite order of their formation. The
microphase separation tendencies colocalize active segments, making
it highly unlikely for these to tank-tread independently and to alter
the stability. Yet, to judge this picture more work has to be done.
In particular, we would need to understand better the geometrical
and topological nature and the spatial distribution of the constraints
and their role in the ATG stability. Despite the fact that a number
of threading detection methods already exist,[31−33] none so far
is tuned to detect all the latter aspects. Such a tool would help
to clarify also the conjectured existence of topological glass in
equilibrium, where it should arise in the limit of long rings, as
suggested by simulations[3−5] and analytical works.[34,35] A theory for the ATG is highly desirable, but an extension of the
equilibrium works is not straightforward because they rely on the
compact equilibrium ring conformations. As we detail in this work,
the conformations of rings in ATG are not compact but highly stretched,
self-avoiding, and walklike (therefore the topological constraints
are also likely very distinct from equilibrium). Another related intriguing
result that merits future investigations is the different scaling
of the contact probability of true self-avoiding walk (γ ≃
2.18) and the one we found in ATG conformations (γ ≃
1.75) that is consistent with the simple estimate νd.Let us now turn to a discussion of a possible connection
of the
large correlated motions (rotational diffusion) in ATG and coherent
motion of chromatin on the micron scale, observed in refs (12) and (36), interpreted also as rotations
of the nucleus interior.[37] Various mechanisms
involving activity have been proposed to cause large-scale correlated
motions.[28,30,38−42] The works[30,39,41] focus on the spatiotemporal correlations and found large-scale correlated
motions, but of different origins. In ref (30), the correlated domains coincide with the microphase
separated domains due to preferential intradomain interaction, and
the (thermal-like) activity opposes the coherence, similarly to ref (40). The correlated motion
in ref (39) comes from
the coupling of the hydrodynamic flow due to contractile motor activity
and the nematic ordering of the chromatin fiber (not yet observed).
The contractile motor activity in ref (41) generates the correlated motion as a result
of a high number of cross-links (interactions) between chromatin fibers
and chromatin and a deformable nuclear envelope. Moreover, the nature
of the correlated motion can depend on the form of the activity (e.g.,
thermal-like or force dipoles), and distinct active correlations can
arise even along the contour of a single phantom (no nonbonded interactions)
chain.[43] Last but not least, apart from
the role of activity in correlated motions, other, passive mechanisms
are possible.[44,45] The latter work also highlights
glassy features of the chromatin dynamics, such as dynamic heterogeneity.Clearly, our simplified system is not directly applicable to chromatin
(e.g., the large-scale conformational data are different). Nevertheless,
the confined ATG shows yet another mechanism how correlated motion
can arise: the activity enhances the entanglement between neighboring
domains that forces them to move in a correlated fashion. In contrast
to the chromatin models in refs (30) and (41), where the large-scale dynamical coherence arises from
explicit interaction potentials or cross-links, here we show that
the activity-induced entanglement can mediate the correlated motion
as well. As we do not model chromatin in detail, we can compare just
qualitatively the dynamical features of the correlated motion: in
ATG we observe correlation length to be larger with activity than
in the passive case (Figure d), which is consistent with refs (12), (36), and (41) but contrasts
with ref (30). However,
the correlation length is monotonically increasing and saturating
with time, which is consistent with some cases in ref (36), but nonmonotonic correlation
length has been observed in other cases at longer time lags.[12,30,36,41]More work is necessary to find out if other types of topological
glass (dynamic correlations arising from entanglements) can be consistent
with conformational data. At length scales below 1 Mbp the chromatin
has nontrivial topology (due to cohesin-mediated loops)[46] and therefore might be subject to mutual threading
topological constraints. Simulations with finer resolution and diverse
distribution of the active segments would be necessary to give a satisfactory
answer to the connection. A notable work in this context[30] uses active sites distributed along the polymer
according to the epigenetic information on a given chromosome that
is modeled as an uncrossable chain with initially fractal–globule
large-scale conformational properties. However, the work does not
report entanglements or conformational changes of the active segments.
Despite some active segments being long enough (20–80 beads)
for activity-driven microphase separation,[18] the relatively lower density, in comparison to ours, and a differential
interaction of the active and the inactive chromatin types could suppress
or obscure the activity-driven conformational changes we see in ATG.
Also for these reasons a more detailed understanding of topological
constraints in dense mixtures of active–passive copolymers
with nontrivial topology is of major importance. A step in that direction
would be to construct a phase diagram (in terms of activity contrast,
density, and block lengths) of the ATG.From the materials research
perspective, active copolymers represent
a very promising direction in macromolecular science. The interplay
of topology, activity, and (active) microphase separation promises
a concurrent control of the entanglement, dynamics, and the morphology
of the system. The ATG is a prototypical example of this broader class
of prospective materials. Our work shows that the ATG can be efficiently
explored at a significantly reduced computational costs in confinement.
We characterized the chain static properties and discovered the tank-treading
relaxation mechanism that, however, does not seem to affect the glass
stability but only the phase-separation properties. A more detailed
understanding of the topological constraints maintaining the ATG stability
should be gained in future to experimentally synthesize ATG and fully
characterize this novel dynamical transition.