Literature DB >> 35151510

Evaluation of healing outcomes combining a novel polymer formulation with autologous skin cell suspension to treat deep partial and full thickness wounds in a porcine model: a pilot study.

Bonnie C Carney1, Mary A Oliver2, Metecan Erdi3, Liam D Kirkpatrick2, Stephen P Tranchina2, Selim Rozyyev4, John W Keyloun5, Michele S Saruwatari6, John L Daristotle7, Lauren T Moffatt1, Peter Kofinas3, Anthony D Sandler4, Jeffrey W Shupp8.   

Abstract

Autologous skin cell suspensions (ASCS) can treat burns of varying depths with the advantage of reduced donor site wound burden. The current standard primary dressing for ASCS is a nonabsorbant, non-adherent, perforated film (control) which has limited conformability over heterogeneous wound beds and allows for run-off of the ASCS. To address these concerns, a novel spray-on polymer formulation was tested as a potential primary dressing in porcine deep partial thickness (DPT) and full thickness (FT) wounds. It was hypothesized that the polymer would perform as well as control dressing when evaluating wound healing and scarring. DPT or FT wounds were treated with either a spray-on poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) and poly(lactide-co-caprolactone) (PLCL) formulation or control ASCS dressings. Throughout the experimental time course (to day 50), we found no significant differences between polymer and control wounds in % re-epithelialization, graft-loss, epidermal or dermal thickness, or % dermal cellularity in either model. Pigmentation, erythema, elasticity, and trans-epidermal water loss (TEWL), were not significantly altered between the treatment groups, but differences between healing wounds/scars and un-injured skin were observed. No cytotoxic effect was observed in ASCS incubated with the PLGA and PLCL polymers. These data suggest that the novel spray-on polymer is a viable option as a primary dressing, with improved ease of application and conformation to irregular wounds. Polymer formulation and application technique should be a subject of future research.
Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autologous skin cell suspension; Burn wound healing; Hypertrophic scarring; Skin grafting; Solution-blow spinning polymer; Wound dressings

Year:  2022        PMID: 35151510      PMCID: PMC9300815          DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2022.01.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Burns        ISSN: 0305-4179            Impact factor:   2.609


  29 in total

1.  Bioresorbable nanofiber-based systems for wound healing and drug delivery: optimization of fabrication parameters.

Authors:  Dhirendra S Katti; Kyle W Robinson; Frank K Ko; Cato T Laurencin
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2004-08-15       Impact factor: 3.368

Review 2.  The hormonal regulation of cutaneous wound healing.

Authors:  Stephen C Gilliver; Jason J Ashworth; Gillian S Ashcroft
Journal:  Clin Dermatol       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.541

3.  Variations in Burn Excision and Grafting: A Survey of the American Burn Association.

Authors:  Jacqueline S Israel; David G Greenhalgh; Angela L Gibson
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2017 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 1.845

4.  Graft loss: Review of a single burn center's experience and proposal of a graft loss grading scale.

Authors:  Lauren B Nosanov; Melissa M McLawhorn; Lamisa Hassan; Taryn E Travis; Shawn Tejiram; Laura S Johnson; Lauren T Moffatt; Jeffrey W Shupp
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 2.192

5.  Sequential excision and grafting of the burn injuries of 1507 patients treated between 1967 and 1986: end results and the determinants of death.

Authors:  F T Caldwell; B H Wallace; J B Cone
Journal:  J Burn Care Rehabil       Date:  1996 Mar-Apr

Review 6.  Surgical treatment and management of the severely burn patient: Review and update.

Authors:  P Gacto-Sanchez
Journal:  Med Intensiva       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 2.491

7.  Allergic contact dermatitis from medical adhesive bandages in patients who report having a reaction to medical bandages.

Authors:  Travis J Widman; Holly Oostman; Frances J Storrs
Journal:  Dermatitis       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.845

8.  A Review of the Fundamental Principles and Applications of Solution Blow Spinning.

Authors:  John L Daristotle; Adam M Behrens; Anthony D Sandler; Peter Kofinas
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 9.229

9.  Biodegradable, Tissue Adhesive Polyester Blends for Safe, Complete Wound Healing.

Authors:  John L Daristotle; Metecan Erdi; Lung W Lau; Shadden T Zaki; Priya Srinivasan; Manogna Balabhadrapatruni; Omar B Ayyub; Anthony D Sandler; Peter Kofinas
Journal:  ACS Biomater Sci Eng       Date:  2021-07-29

10.  A Comparative Study of the ReCell® Device and Autologous Spit-Thickness Meshed Skin Graft in the Treatment of Acute Burn Injuries.

Authors:  James Hill Holmes Iv; Joseph A Molnar; Jeffrey E Carter; James Hwang; Bruce A Cairns; Booker T King; David J Smith; C Wayne Cruse; Kevin N Foster; Michael D Peck; Rajiv Sood; Michael J Feldman; Marion H Jordan; David W Mozingo; David G Greenhalgh; Tina L Palmieri; John A Griswold; Sharmila Dissanaike; William L Hickerson
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 1.845

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.