Literature DB >> 18346394

Allergic contact dermatitis from medical adhesive bandages in patients who report having a reaction to medical bandages.

Travis J Widman1, Holly Oostman, Frances J Storrs.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Medical adhesive bandages are extensively used in both inpatient and outpatient medicine. However, few reports describing proven allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) from medical adhesive bandages exist in the literature. These reports do not adequately correspond to the frequency that patients report having an "allergy" to medical adhesive bandages.
OBJECTIVE: To determine if there is a chemical present in medical adhesive bandages that causes ACD in people who identify themselves as having an "allergy" to medical adhesive bandages.
METHODS: Twenty-six patients were enrolled and underwent patch testing with our standard trays (104 chemicals) and a customized adhesive tray (54 chemicals and 10 tapes and bandages in their whole form).
RESULTS: We were able to identify an allergen in four patients that was related to their presumed adhesive allergy (Mastisol, neomycin/bacitracin [two different patients], and cortisone-10 cream, respectively). However, there were no positive allergic reactions to the tapes or bandages or any relevant allergic reactions to our customized adhesive tray. Eight (73%) of the 11 patients who had the bandage or tape left on for 7 days had an irritant reaction.
CONCLUSION: We feel that the perceived reactions are not secondary to ACD but instead are due to an irritant contact dermatitis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18346394

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dermatitis        ISSN: 1710-3568            Impact factor:   4.845


  7 in total

1.  Knowledge of Surgery-Related Allergic Contact Dermatitis among Florida Dermatological Surgeons: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Panta Rouhani; Robert S Kirsner; Antoine Amado; Lora E Fleming; Keyvan Nouri; Sharon E Jacob
Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol       Date:  2009-11

Review 2.  Transdermal rivastigmine: management of cutaneous adverse events and review of the literature.

Authors:  Jill Greenspoon; Nathan Herrmann; David N Adam
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 3.  Materials, Devices, and Systems of On-Skin Electrodes for Electrophysiological Monitoring and Human-Machine Interfaces.

Authors:  Hao Wu; Ganguang Yang; Kanhao Zhu; Shaoyu Liu; Wei Guo; Zhuo Jiang; Zhuo Li
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 16.806

4.  Rivastigmine transdermal patch skin tolerability: results of a 1-year clinical trial in patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Cummings; Martin R Farlow; Xiangyi Meng; Sibel Tekin; Jason T Olin
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.859

5.  Evaluation of healing outcomes combining a novel polymer formulation with autologous skin cell suspension to treat deep partial and full thickness wounds in a porcine model: a pilot study.

Authors:  Bonnie C Carney; Mary A Oliver; Metecan Erdi; Liam D Kirkpatrick; Stephen P Tranchina; Selim Rozyyev; John W Keyloun; Michele S Saruwatari; John L Daristotle; Lauren T Moffatt; Peter Kofinas; Anthony D Sandler; Jeffrey W Shupp
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 2.609

6.  Pressure-Sensitive Tissue Adhesion and Biodegradation of Viscoelastic Polymer Blends.

Authors:  John L Daristotle; Shadden T Zaki; Lung W Lau; Omar B Ayyub; Massi Djouini; Priya Srinivasan; Metecan Erdi; Anthony D Sandler; Peter Kofinas
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 9.229

Review 7.  Management of Moisture-Associated Skin Damage: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Kevin Y Woo; Dimitri Beeckman; Debashish Chakravarthy
Journal:  Adv Skin Wound Care       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.347

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.