Literature DB >> 35150617

Differences in nanoscale organization of regulatory active and inactive human chromatin.

Katharina Brandstetter1, Tilo Zülske2, Tobias Ragoczy3, David Hörl1, Miguel Guirao-Ortiz1, Clemens Steinek1, Toby Barnes4, Gabriela Stumberger1, Jonathan Schwach1, Eric Haugen3, Eric Rynes3, Philipp Korber4, John A Stamatoyannopoulos5, Heinrich Leonhardt1, Gero Wedemann6, Hartmann Harz7.   

Abstract

Methodological advances in conformation capture techniques have fundamentally changed our understanding of chromatin architecture. However, the nanoscale organization of chromatin and its cell-to-cell variance are less studied. Analyzing genome-wide data from 733 human cell and tissue samples, we identified 2 prototypical regions that exhibit high or absent hypersensitivity to deoxyribonuclease I, respectively. These regulatory active or inactive regions were examined in the lymphoblast cell line K562 by using high-throughput super-resolution microscopy. In both regions, we systematically measured the physical distance of 2 fluorescence in situ hybridization spots spaced by only 5 kb of DNA. Unexpectedly, the resulting distance distributions range from very compact to almost elongated configurations of more than 200-nm length for both the active and inactive regions. Monte Carlo simulations of a coarse-grained model of these chromatin regions based on published data of nucleosome occupancy in K562 cells were performed to understand the underlying mechanisms. There was no parameter set for the simulation model that can explain the microscopically measured distance distributions. Obviously, the chromatin state given by the strength of internucleosomal interaction, nucleosome occupancy, or amount of histone H1 differs from cell to cell, which results in the observed broad distance distributions. This large variability was not expected, especially in inactive regions. The results for the mechanisms for different distance distributions on this scale are important for understanding the contacts that mediate gene regulation. Microscopic measurements show that the inactive region investigated here is expected to be embedded in a more compact chromatin environment. The simulation results of this region require an increase in the strength of internucleosomal interactions. It may be speculated that the higher density of chromatin is caused by the increased internucleosomal interaction strength.
Copyright © 2022 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35150617      PMCID: PMC8943813          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2022.02.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  99 in total

1.  The fractal globule as a model of chromatin architecture in the cell.

Authors:  Leonid A Mirny
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 5.239

2.  GROMACS 4:  Algorithms for Highly Efficient, Load-Balanced, and Scalable Molecular Simulation.

Authors:  Berk Hess; Carsten Kutzner; David van der Spoel; Erik Lindahl
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 6.006

3.  Histone acetylation increases chromatin accessibility.

Authors:  Sabine M Görisch; Malte Wachsmuth; Katalin Fejes Tóth; Peter Lichter; Karsten Rippe
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2005-11-29       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 4.  Facultative heterochromatin: is there a distinctive molecular signature?

Authors:  Patrick Trojer; Danny Reinberg
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2007-10-12       Impact factor: 17.970

5.  High speed of fork progression induces DNA replication stress and genomic instability.

Authors:  Apolinar Maya-Mendoza; Pavel Moudry; Joanna Maria Merchut-Maya; MyungHee Lee; Robert Strauss; Jiri Bartek
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Histone Acetylation Regulates Chromatin Accessibility: Role of H4K16 in Inter-nucleosome Interaction.

Authors:  Ruihan Zhang; Jochen Erler; Jörg Langowski
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Dynamic Organization of Chromatin Domains Revealed by Super-Resolution Live-Cell Imaging.

Authors:  Tadasu Nozaki; Ryosuke Imai; Mai Tanbo; Ryosuke Nagashima; Sachiko Tamura; Tomomi Tani; Yasumasa Joti; Masaru Tomita; Kayo Hibino; Masato T Kanemaki; Kerstin S Wendt; Yasushi Okada; Takeharu Nagai; Kazuhiro Maeshima
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 17.970

8.  Open and closed domains in the mouse genome are configured as 10-nm chromatin fibres.

Authors:  Eden Fussner; Mike Strauss; Ugljesa Djuric; Ren Li; Kashif Ahmed; Michael Hart; James Ellis; David P Bazett-Jones
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 8.807

9.  DNA loop extrusion by human cohesin.

Authors:  Iain F Davidson; Benedikt Bauer; Daniela Goetz; Wen Tang; Gordana Wutz; Jan-Michael Peters
Journal:  Science       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Quantitative imaging of chromatin decompaction in living cells.

Authors:  Elisa Dultz; Roberta Mancini; Guido Polles; Pascal Vallotton; Frank Alber; Karsten Weis
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 4.138

View more
  1 in total

1.  Reconstituted TAD-size chromatin fibers feature heterogeneous nucleosome clusters.

Authors:  Nikolay Korolev; Anatoly Zinchenko; Aghil Soman; Qinming Chen; Sook Yi Wong; Nikolay V Berezhnoy; Rajib Basak; Johan R C van der Maarel; John van Noort; Lars Nordenskiöld
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 4.996

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.