Literature DB >> 35150407

Frame-wise detection of surgeon stress levels during laparoscopic training using kinematic data.

Yi Zheng1, Grey Leonard2, Herbert Zeh2, Ann Majewicz Fey3,2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Excessive stress experienced by the surgeon can have a negative effect on the surgeon's technical skills. The goal of this study is to evaluate and validate a deep learning framework for real-time detection of stressed surgical movements using kinematic data.
METHODS: 30 medical students were recruited as the subjects to perform a modified peg transfer task and were randomized into two groups, a control group (n=15) and a stressed group (n=15) that completed the task under deteriorating, simulated stressful conditions. To classify stressed movements, we first developed an attention-based Long-Short-Term-Memory recurrent neural network (LSTM) trained to classify normal/stressed trials and obtain the contribution of each data frame to the stress level classification. Next, we extracted the important frames from each trial and used another LSTM network to implement the frame-wise classification of normal and stressed movements.
RESULTS: The classification between normal and stressed trials using attention-based LSTM model reached an overall accuracy of 75.86% under Leave-One-User-Out (LOUO) cross-validation. The second LSTM classifier was able to distinguish between the typical normal and stressed movement with an accuracy of 74.96% with an 8-second observation under LOUO. Finally, the normal and stressed movements in stressed trials could be classified with the accuracy of 68.18% with a 16-second observation under LOUO.
CONCLUSION: In this study, we extracted the movements which are more likely to be affected by stress and validated the feasibility of using LSTM and kinematic data for frame-wise detection of stress level during laparoscopic training. The proposed classifier could be potentially be integrated with robot-assisted surgery platforms for stress management purposes.
© 2022. CARS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Deep learning; Laparoscopic surgery; Motion analysis; Surgical stress

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35150407     DOI: 10.1007/s11548-022-02568-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg        ISSN: 1861-6410            Impact factor:   2.924


  9 in total

1.  A prospective randomized trial on heart rate variability of the surgical team during laparoscopic and conventional sigmoid resection.

Authors:  B Böhm; N Rötting; W Schwenk; S Grebe; U Mansmann
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2001-03

2.  Performing laparoscopic surgery is significantly more stressful for the surgeon than open surgery.

Authors:  R Berguer; W D Smith; Y H Chung
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Managing intraoperative stress: what do surgeons want from a crisis training program?

Authors:  Sonal Arora; Nick Sevdalis; Debra Nestel; Tanya Tierney; Maria Woloshynowych; Roger Kneebone
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Stress impairs psychomotor performance in novice laparoscopic surgeons.

Authors:  Sonal Arora; Nick Sevdalis; Rajesh Aggarwal; Pramudith Sirimanna; Ara Darzi; Roger Kneebone
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Long short-term memory.

Authors:  S Hochreiter; J Schmidhuber
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  1997-11-15       Impact factor: 2.026

6.  Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents.

Authors:  J A Martin; G Regehr; R Reznick; H MacRae; J Murnaghan; C Hutchison; M Brown
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  What stress coping strategies are surgeons relying upon during surgery?

Authors:  Nicholas E Anton; Paul N Montero; Lisa D Howley; Charles Brown; Dimitrios Stefanidis
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2015-05-23       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Neural Machine Translation with Deep Attention.

Authors:  Biao Zhang; Deyi Xiong; Jinsong Su
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 6.226

9.  Task-Level vs. Segment-Level Quantitative Metrics for Surgical Skill Assessment.

Authors:  S Swaroop Vedula; Anand Malpani; Narges Ahmidi; Sanjeev Khudanpur; Gregory Hager; Chi Chiung Grace Chen
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 2.891

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.