BACKGROUND: Little is known about acute stress in surgery although it is recognized to impair human performance in safety-critical industries. This study aimed to establish a direct empirical link between stress and psychomotor performance of novice surgeons. METHODS: Eighteen participants completed this cross-sectional study. Participants carried out laparoscopic tasks on a MIST-VR simulator. Validated dexterity parameters were obtained from MIST-VR (path length, time taken, number of errors). Stress was assessed using the validated Imperial Stress Assessment Tool (ISAT). This captured stress subjectively using the State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) questionnaire and objectively using salivary cortisol and mean and maximum heart rate. RESULTS: Regarding technical performance, median values obtained were 55.12 s (range = 22.9-99.8) for time taken, 4.83 (range = 3-7) for economy of motion, and 88.0 (range = 35-175) for number of errors made. Subjective stress (STAI) correlated with economy of motion (r = 0.53, p = 0.042) and number of errors (r = 0.51, p = 0.034). Objective stress (mean and maximum heart rate) correlated with time taken (r = 0.62, p = 0.004), economy of motion (r = 0.55, p = 0.048), and number of errors (r = 0.67, p = 0.012). CONCLUSION: This is the first study to demonstrate through direct correlation that stress impairs surgical performance on a simulator. Training in managing stress may be required to minimize these deleterious consequences and improve patient care.
BACKGROUND: Little is known about acute stress in surgery although it is recognized to impair human performance in safety-critical industries. This study aimed to establish a direct empirical link between stress and psychomotor performance of novice surgeons. METHODS: Eighteen participants completed this cross-sectional study. Participants carried out laparoscopic tasks on a MIST-VR simulator. Validated dexterity parameters were obtained from MIST-VR (path length, time taken, number of errors). Stress was assessed using the validated Imperial Stress Assessment Tool (ISAT). This captured stress subjectively using the State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) questionnaire and objectively using salivary cortisol and mean and maximum heart rate. RESULTS: Regarding technical performance, median values obtained were 55.12 s (range = 22.9-99.8) for time taken, 4.83 (range = 3-7) for economy of motion, and 88.0 (range = 35-175) for number of errors made. Subjective stress (STAI) correlated with economy of motion (r = 0.53, p = 0.042) and number of errors (r = 0.51, p = 0.034). Objective stress (mean and maximum heart rate) correlated with time taken (r = 0.62, p = 0.004), economy of motion (r = 0.55, p = 0.048), and number of errors (r = 0.67, p = 0.012). CONCLUSION: This is the first study to demonstrate through direct correlation that stress impairs surgical performance on a simulator. Training in managing stress may be required to minimize these deleterious consequences and improve patient care.
Authors: Sonal Arora; Nick Sevdalis; Debra Nestel; Maria Woloshynowych; Ara Darzi; Roger Kneebone Journal: Surgery Date: 2009-12-14 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Michael P Müller; Mike Hänsel; Andreas Fichtner; Florian Hardt; Sören Weber; Clemens Kirschbaum; Sebastian Rüder; Felix Walcher; Thea Koch; Christoph Eich Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2009-05-21 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Nick Sevdalis; Helen W L Wong; Sonal Arora; Kamal Nagpal; Andrew Healey; George B Hanna; Charles A Vincent Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2012-04-27 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Blair T Crewther; Kunal Shetty; Delaram Jarchi; Shaun Selvadurai; Christian J Cook; Daniel R Leff; Ara Darzi; Guang-Zhong Yang Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2015-10-20 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Stephanie J Russ; Ian Morrison; Cheryl Bell; Jeremy Charles Morse; Rhoda Katharine Mackenzie; Marie K Johnston Journal: BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn Date: 2018-10-04
Authors: Carter C Lebares; Amy O Hershberger; Ekaterina V Guvva; Aditi Desai; James Mitchell; Wen Shen; Linda M Reilly; Kevin L Delucchi; Patricia S O'Sullivan; Nancy L Ascher; Hobart W Harris Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2018-10-17 Impact factor: 14.766