| Literature DB >> 35150081 |
Alessandro R Mazza1, Elizabeth Skoropata1, Yogesh Sharma1,2, Jason Lapano1, Thomas W Heitmann3, Brianna L Musico4, Veerle Keppens4, Zheng Gai5, John W Freeland6, Timothy R Charlton7, Matthew Brahlek1, Adriana Moreo1,8, Elbio Dagotto1,8, Thomas Z Ward1.
Abstract
In magnetic systems, spin and exchange disorder can provide access to quantum criticality, frustration, and spin dynamics, but broad tunability of these responses and a deeper understanding of strong limit disorder are lacking. Here, it is demonstrated that high entropy oxides present a previously unexplored route to designing materials in which the presence of strong local compositional disorder may be exploited to generate tunable magnetic behaviors-from macroscopically ordered states to frustration-driven dynamic spin interactions. Single-crystal La(Cr0.2 Mn0.2 Fe0.2 Co0.2 Ni0.2 )O3 films are used as a model system hosting a magnetic sublattice with a high degree of microstate disorder in the form of site-to-site spin and exchange type inhomogeneity. A classical Heisenberg model simplified to represent the highest probability microstates well describes how compositionally disordered systems can paradoxically host magnetic uniformity and demonstrates a path toward continuous control over ordering types and critical temperatures. Model-predicted materials are synthesized and found to possess an incipient quantum critical point when magnetic ordering types are designed to be in direct competition, this leads to highly controllable exchange bias behaviors previously accessible only in intentionally designed bilayer heterojunctions.Entities:
Keywords: disorder; exchange bias; frustration; high entropy oxides; magnetism
Year: 2022 PMID: 35150081 PMCID: PMC8981892 DOI: 10.1002/advs.202200391
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Adv Sci (Weinh) ISSN: 2198-3844 Impact factor: 16.806
Figure 1Observation of G‐type antiferromagnetic ordering in L5BO bulk and film. a) Temperature‐dependent neutron diffraction of bulk polycrystalline L5BO sample shows the (½ ½ ½) peak emerges and increases in intensity with decreasing temperature which is consistent with the onset G‐type antiferromagnetism. No other temperature‐dependent peaks are observed and the structural (0 0 1) peak is included for reference. b) Neutron diffraction data taken for the order parameter of the (½ ½ ½) peak in a L5BO single‐crystal film on an LSAT substrate show the onset of magnetic order emerging near the predicted Neel temperature.
Figure 2Comparison of ABO3 transition metal oxides’ magnetic behaviors. a) Magnetic ordering type and transition temperatures for lanthanide transition metal oxides show the wide range of functional phase space accessible by changing the B‐site cation. Red denotes ferromagnets and blue denotes antiferromagnets. b) Comparison of calculated spin structure factor S(k AFM) at wavevector k AFM = (π, π, π) versus temperature, T/J, where J is taken as 82 K, for LaFeO3, LaNiO3, and entropy‐stabilized La(Cr0.2Mn0.2Fe0.2Co0.2Ni0.2)O3. The model matches known transition behaviors for the simple ternary compounds and predicts a G‐type antiferromagnetic ordering in the L5BO system with a T N ≈ 210 K.
Figure 3Predictive modeling and experimental validation of magnetic phase diagram as a function of increasing Mn concentration. a) Spin structure factor S(k max) calculated by varying the % of Mn with the other four elements equally distributed in %, where k max is either (0,0,0) (FM, red) or (π, π, π) (AFM, blue) and obtained using Monte Carlo on a 10 × 10 × 10 cluster. At 40% Mn, both AFM and FM orders are percolated in the spin structure, which is why both order parameters are presented in the plot. b) The phase diagram derived from the computational model as a function of Mn content. c) Field cooled and zero field cooled temperature‐dependent magnetization taken under 1 kOe field for experimentally synthesized films.
Figure 4Exchange bias responses in each of the compositions with corresponding representative cross‐sections from the 10 × 10 × 10 Monte Carlo simulations. Magnetization loops taken at 2 K after field cooling under +/−7 T; a) L5BO with 20% Mn concentration shows a vertical loop offset; b) 40% Mn concentration shows a horizontal loop shift associated with traditional exchange bias response; c) 60% Mn concentration shows no measurable loop offset after field cooling. The corresponding snapshots of calculated (J · ) cross‐sections help visualize how the local magnetic structure drives exchange bias responses, as local AFM (blue), FM (red), and near degenerate (lightly shaded) superexchange values evolve with Mn concentration. d) 20% Mn presents a fully percolated AFM state with small regions of unpercolated FM. e) 40% Mn has percolated AFM and FM phase coexistence. f) 60% Mn has percolated FM but discontinuous unpercolated AFM.