Alexandra M Miller1, Luca Szalontay2, Nancy Bouvier3, Katherine Hill3, Hamza Ahmad3, Johnathan Rafailov4, Alex J Lee5, M Irene Rodriguez-Sanchez3, Onur Yildirim6, Arti Patel4, Tejus A Bale7, Jamal K Benhamida7, Ryma Benayed7, Maria E Arcila7, Maria Donzelli8, Ira J Dunkel8, Stephen W Gilheeney8, Yasmin Khakoo8, Kim Kramer8, Sameer F Sait8, Jeffrey P Greenfield9,10,11,12, Mark M Souweidane9,10,11,12, Sofia Haque6, Audrey Mauguen13, Michael F Berger4,7,5, Ingo K Mellinghoff5,14, Matthias A Karajannis8,9. 1. Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA. 2. Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA. 3. Pediatric Translational Medicine Program, Department of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA. 4. Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA. 5. Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA. 6. Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA. 7. Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA. 8. Department of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA. 9. Department of Pediatrics, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA. 10. Department of Neurosurgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA. 11. Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA. 12. Department of Neurological Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA. 13. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA. 14. Department of Pharmacology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Safe sampling of central nervous system tumor tissue for diagnostic purposes may be difficult if not impossible, especially in pediatric patients, and an unmet need exists to develop less invasive diagnostic tests. METHODS: We report our clinical experience with minimally invasive molecular diagnostics using a clinically validated assay for sequencing of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cell-free DNA (cfDNA). All CSF samples were collected as part of clinical care, and results reported to both clinicians and patients/families. RESULTS: We analyzed 64 CSF samples from 45 pediatric, adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients (pediatric = 25; AYA = 20) with primary and recurrent brain tumors across 12 histopathological subtypes including high-grade glioma (n = 10), medulloblastoma (n = 10), pineoblastoma (n = 5), low-grade glioma (n = 4), diffuse leptomeningeal glioneuronal tumor (DLGNT) (n = 4), retinoblastoma (n = 4), ependymoma (n = 3), and other (n = 5). Somatic alterations were detected in 30/64 samples (46.9%) and in at least one sample per unique patient in 21/45 patients (46.6%). CSF cfDNA positivity was strongly associated with the presence of disseminated disease at the time of collection (81.5% of samples from patients with disseminated disease were positive). No association was seen between CSF cfDNA positivity and the timing of CSF collection during the patient's disease course. CONCLUSIONS: We identified three general categories where CSF cfDNA testing provided additional relevant diagnostic, prognostic, and/or therapeutic information, impacting clinical assessment and decision making: (1) diagnosis and/or identification of actionable alterations; (2) monitor response to therapy; and (3) tracking tumor evolution. Our findings support broader implementation of clinical CSF cfDNA testing in this population to improve care.
BACKGROUND: Safe sampling of central nervous system tumor tissue for diagnostic purposes may be difficult if not impossible, especially in pediatric patients, and an unmet need exists to develop less invasive diagnostic tests. METHODS: We report our clinical experience with minimally invasive molecular diagnostics using a clinically validated assay for sequencing of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cell-free DNA (cfDNA). All CSF samples were collected as part of clinical care, and results reported to both clinicians and patients/families. RESULTS: We analyzed 64 CSF samples from 45 pediatric, adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients (pediatric = 25; AYA = 20) with primary and recurrent brain tumors across 12 histopathological subtypes including high-grade glioma (n = 10), medulloblastoma (n = 10), pineoblastoma (n = 5), low-grade glioma (n = 4), diffuse leptomeningeal glioneuronal tumor (DLGNT) (n = 4), retinoblastoma (n = 4), ependymoma (n = 3), and other (n = 5). Somatic alterations were detected in 30/64 samples (46.9%) and in at least one sample per unique patient in 21/45 patients (46.6%). CSF cfDNA positivity was strongly associated with the presence of disseminated disease at the time of collection (81.5% of samples from patients with disseminated disease were positive). No association was seen between CSF cfDNA positivity and the timing of CSF collection during the patient's disease course. CONCLUSIONS: We identified three general categories where CSF cfDNA testing provided additional relevant diagnostic, prognostic, and/or therapeutic information, impacting clinical assessment and decision making: (1) diagnosis and/or identification of actionable alterations; (2) monitor response to therapy; and (3) tracking tumor evolution. Our findings support broader implementation of clinical CSF cfDNA testing in this population to improve care.
Authors: Yama W L Zheng; K C Allen Chan; Hao Sun; Peiyong Jiang; Xiaoxi Su; Eric Z Chen; Fiona M F Lun; Emily C W Hung; Vincent Lee; John Wong; Paul B S Lai; Chi-Kong Li; Rossa W K Chiu; Y M Dennis Lo Journal: Clin Chem Date: 2011-11-03 Impact factor: 8.327
Authors: Andrea Sottoriva; Inmaculada Spiteri; Sara G M Piccirillo; Anestis Touloumis; V Peter Collins; John C Marioni; Christina Curtis; Colin Watts; Simon Tavaré Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2013-02-14 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Eshini Panditharatna; Lindsay B Kilburn; Mariam S Aboian; Madhuri Kambhampati; Heather Gordish-Dressman; Suresh N Magge; Nalin Gupta; John S Myseros; Eugene I Hwang; Cassie Kline; John R Crawford; Katherine E Warren; Soonmee Cha; Winnie S Liang; Michael E Berens; Roger J Packer; Adam C Resnick; Michael Prados; Sabine Mueller; Javad Nazarian Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2018-10-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Xiaochong Wu; Paul A Northcott; Adrian Dubuc; Adam J Dupuy; David J H Shih; Hendrik Witt; Sidney Croul; Eric Bouffet; Daniel W Fults; Charles G Eberhart; Livia Garzia; Timothy Van Meter; David Zagzag; Nada Jabado; Jeremy Schwartzentruber; Jacek Majewski; Todd E Scheetz; Stefan M Pfister; Andrey Korshunov; Xiao-Nan Li; Stephen W Scherer; Yoon-Jae Cho; Keiko Akagi; Tobey J MacDonald; Jan Koster; Martin G McCabe; Aaron L Sarver; V Peter Collins; William A Weiss; David A Largaespada; Lara S Collier; Michael D Taylor Journal: Nature Date: 2012-02-15 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Leticia De Mattos-Arruda; Regina Mayor; Charlotte K Y Ng; Britta Weigelt; Francisco Martínez-Ricarte; Davis Torrejon; Mafalda Oliveira; Alexandra Arias; Carolina Raventos; Jiabin Tang; Elena Guerini-Rocco; Elena Martínez-Sáez; Sergio Lois; Oscar Marín; Xavier de la Cruz; Salvatore Piscuoglio; Russel Towers; Ana Vivancos; Vicente Peg; Santiago Ramon y Cajal; Joan Carles; Jordi Rodon; María González-Cao; Josep Tabernero; Enriqueta Felip; Joan Sahuquillo; Michael F Berger; Javier Cortes; Jorge S Reis-Filho; Joan Seoane Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2015-11-10 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Mary Jane Lim-Fat; Maria Macdonald; Sarah Lapointe; Seth Andrew Climans; Chantel Cacciotti; Manik Chahal; Sebastien Perreault; Derek S Tsang; Andrew Gao; Stephen Yip; Julia Keith; Julie Bennett; Vijay Ramaswamy; Jay Detsky; Uri Tabori; Sunit Das; Cynthia Hawkins Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2022-09-23 Impact factor: 5.738