Literature DB >> 35148402

Effects of rubber matting on feedlot cattle growth performance, locomotion, and carcass characteristics in slatted floor facilities.

Cody R Dawson1, Parker A Henley1, Adam R Schroeder1, William T Meteer1, Courtney A Hayes2, Tara L Felix1, Daniel W Shike1, Joshua C McCann1.   

Abstract

The objective was to determine effects of old and new rubber matting in a slatted, indoor cattle feeding facility on cattle growth performance, locomotion, and carcass characteristics. In experiment 1, fall-born Angus × Simmental steers (N = 207; body weight = 222 ± 38 kg) were blocked by weight and assigned to 32 pens. Pens were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 treatments: no matting/concrete (CONC1), 12-yr-old Animat Pebble matting (OLD1), new Animat Maxgrip matting (MG), and new Animat Pebble matting (PEB1). Steers were fed a common diet for 209 d with a minimum stocking density of 3.40 m2 per animal. Final body weight (BW) and average daily gain (ADG) were affected (P = 0.02 and P < 0.01, respectively) by treatment with steers on PEB1 finishing heaviest with the greatest growth, MG and CONC1 intermediate, and OLD1 finishing at the lightest final BW with the least growth. Flooring treatment did not affect overall dry matter intake (DMI; P = 0.16) or gain to feed ratio (G:F; P = 0.94). Flooring treatment did not affect (P ≥ 0.19) any carcass traits. Locomotion scores (LS) were affected (P < 0.01) by flooring treatment with CONC1 having the worst mobility while OLD1, MG, and PEB1 were similar (P ≥ 0.24). Locomotion score had a day effect (P < 0.01) where cattle gait and mobility worsened as days on feed increased. In experiment 2, fall-born Angus × Simmental steers (N = 189; BW = 352 ± 43 kg) were blocked by weight and assigned to 21 pens. Pens were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 treatments: no matting/concrete (CONC2), 15-yr-old Animat Pebble matting (OLD2), and new Animat Pebble matting (PEB2). Steers were fed a common diet for 152 d with a stocking density of 2.65 m2 per steer. After 152 d on feed, flooring treatment did not affect (P ≥ 0.30) BW, ADG, or DMI nor did treatment affect (P ≥ 0.17) carcass traits. However, steers housed on OLD2 or PEB2 had improved locomotion scores (P = 0.02) compared with steers housed on CONC2. Locomotion score had a day effect (P < 0.01) as cattle gait and mobility worsened with greater number of days on feed, regardless of treatment. Overall, results suggest that new rubber matting increased ADG and HCW during a 209-d trial when cattle were stocked at 3.4 m2 in small pens and that rubber matting regardless of age improved cattle locomotion scores in slatted indoor feeding facilities.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  locomotion score; slatted flooring; space allowance; stocking density

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35148402      PMCID: PMC9030117          DOI: 10.1093/jas/skac041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.338


  15 in total

1.  Effect of space allowance and floor type on performance, welfare and physiological measurements of finishing beef heifers.

Authors:  M P Keane; M McGee; E G O'Riordan; A K Kelly; B Earley
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 2.  Design and analysis of pen studies in the animal sciences.

Authors:  N R St-Pierre
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.034

3.  The effects of different flooring types on the behavior, health, and welfare of finishing beef steers.

Authors:  M R P Elmore; M F Elischer; M C Claeys; E A Pajor
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Synthetic rubber surface as an alternative to concrete to improve welfare and performance of finishing beef cattle reared on fully slatted flooring.

Authors:  M Brscic; R Ricci; P Prevedello; C Lonardi; R De Nardi; B Contiero; F Gottardo; G Cozzi
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Assessment of welfare of finishing beef cattle kept on different types of floor after short- or long-term housing.

Authors:  M Brscic; F Gottardo; E Tessitore; L Guzzo; R Ricci; G Cozzi
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Alternative solutions to the concrete fully-slatted floor for the housing of finishing beef cattle: effects on growth performance, health of the locomotor system and behaviour.

Authors:  G Cozzi; E Tessitore; B Contiero; R Ricci; F Gottardo; M Brscic
Journal:  Vet J       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 2.688

7.  Effects of roughness and compressibility of flooring on cow locomotion.

Authors:  J Rushen; A M de Passillé
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.034

Review 8.  A Scoping Review: The Impact of Housing Systems and Environmental Features on Beef Cattle Welfare.

Authors:  Rachel M Park; Margaret Foster; Courtney L Daigle
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 2.752

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.