Literature DB >> 26190252

Synthetic rubber surface as an alternative to concrete to improve welfare and performance of finishing beef cattle reared on fully slatted flooring.

M Brscic1, R Ricci1, P Prevedello1, C Lonardi1, R De Nardi1, B Contiero1, F Gottardo1, G Cozzi1.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare a fully slatted concrete floor (concrete slatted (CS)) with the same floor on which synthetic rubber slats were placed on the concrete slats (rubber slatted (RS)) as housing solution for finishing beef cattle. The present study involved five commercial beef cattle farms in which the floor of at least three pens was kept as fully slatted, and in an equal number of pens a rubber cover was placed on the floor, tightly matching the gap profile of the concrete slats to allow the drainage of manure. A total of 326 finishing beef bulls were used (153 on CS and 173 on RS), and regardless of the floor treatment animals were housed in groups of 6 to 12 bulls/pen with a space allowance of 3.1 ± 0.2 m2/bull. Bulls had similar initial live weights (422.3 kg on CS and 425.0 kg on RS), but bulls on RS were heavier at the end of the finishing period with a higher average daily gain than bulls kept on CS (1.53 v. 1.46 kg/day; P<0.05). The proportion of bulls treated for locomotor problems was lower in RS pens compared with CS. Rubber covering prevented the occurrence of bursitis, but it increased the odds for hoof overgrowth at end of the finishing period. Hoof overgrowth detected in vivo in bulls on RS was confirmed at the slaughterhouse by the longer dorsal wall and diagonal lengths of the hoof as well as by a more acute toe angle. Compared with bulls on CS, bulls on RS showed less inactivity and resting time, increased social interactions, decreased abnormal lying down and unsuccessful attempts to lie down, as well as shortened the time for lying down. Bulls in RS pens were dirtier compared with those in CS pens, likely due to the draining gaps being reduced to 11.6 ± 1.2% of the total pen surface compared with the 16.9 ± 1.7% in CS pens. This study gave further evidence about the positive effects of the RS floor on growth performance and welfare of finishing beef cattle, although compromising cleanliness and hoof overgrowth.

Entities:  

Keywords:  beef cattle; rubber covering; slatted floor; welfare

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26190252     DOI: 10.1017/S1751731115000592

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Animal        ISSN: 1751-7311            Impact factor:   3.240


  5 in total

1.  Effects of rubber matting on feedlot cattle growth performance, locomotion, and carcass characteristics in slatted floor facilities.

Authors:  Cody R Dawson; Parker A Henley; Adam R Schroeder; William T Meteer; Courtney A Hayes; Tara L Felix; Daniel W Shike; Joshua C McCann
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 3.338

2.  Health, behaviour and growth performance of Charolais and Limousin bulls fattened on different types of flooring.

Authors:  L Magrin; F Gottardo; M Brscic; B Contiero; G Cozzi
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Effects of Fermented Manure Bedding Thickness on Bulls' Growth, Behavior, and Welfare as Well as Barn Gases Concentration in the Barn.

Authors:  Kaifeng Niu; Xinxin Zhang; Chao Chen; Liguo Yang
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  Does Flooring Substrate Impact Kennel and Dog Cleanliness in Commercial Breeding Facilities?

Authors:  Judith Stella; Moriah Hurt; Amy Bauer; Paulo Gomes; Audrey Ruple; Alan Beck; Candace Croney
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-04-21       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 5.  A Scoping Review: The Impact of Housing Systems and Environmental Features on Beef Cattle Welfare.

Authors:  Rachel M Park; Margaret Foster; Courtney L Daigle
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 2.752

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.