| Literature DB >> 35147263 |
Lukas Wisgrill1,2, Nanna Fyhrquist2,3, Joseph Ndika3, Laura Paalanen4,5, Angelika Berger1, Tiina Laatikainen4,5, Piia Karisola3, Tari Haahtela6, Harri Alenius2,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In allergic patients, clinical symptoms caused by pollen remind of symptoms triggered by viral respiratory infections, which are also the main cause of asthmatic exacerbations. In patients sensitized to birch pollen, Bet v 1 is the major symptom-causing allergen. Immune mechanisms driving Bet v 1-related responses of human blood cells have not been fully characterized.Entities:
Keywords: Bet v 1; birch allergy; dendritic cells; immune network; macrophages; systems immunology
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35147263 PMCID: PMC9540660 DOI: 10.1111/cea.14108
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Exp Allergy ISSN: 0954-7894 Impact factor: 5.401
Clinical symptoms and sensitization characteristics of the 71 teenaged subjects in the Finnish Karelia
| Study subjects ( | ||
|---|---|---|
| Clinical disease and allergic symptoms |
BIRCH pollen allergic, birch‐specific IgE ≥0.35 kUA/l ( |
Not allergic to birch pollen, birch‐specific IgE <0.35 kUA/l ( |
| Physician‐diagnosed asthma, | 6 (25.0) | 3 (6.4) |
| Self‐reported symptoms of pollen allergy (hay‐fever), | 10 (41.7) | 2 (4.3) |
| Self‐reported symptoms of atopic eczema, | 10 (41.7) | 3 (6.4) |
In the birch‐pollen‐allergic (n = 24) and non‐allergic (n = 47) subjects, the percentages of allergen‐specific IgE levels ≥0.35 kUA/l against the 13 other tested allergens are given. The total IgE levels ≥110 kUA/l in the two groups are also given.
House dust mite =Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus.
One or more positive (≥0.35 kUA/l) responses out of the 14 allergens included.
One or more positive (≥0.35 kUA/l) responses excluding house dust mite.
FIGURE 1Differentially expressed genes of PBMCs from birch‐allergic and non‐birch‐allergic subjects at baseline and six hours after Bet v 1 stimulation. (A) Study outline and graphical summary of the analysis pipeline. (B) Venn diagram representation to identify uniquely and shared DEGs between unstimulated non‐birch‐allergic (unstim‐NBA), unstimulated birch‐allergic (unstim‐BA), Bet v 1 non‐birch‐allergic (Bet v 1‐NBA) and Bet v 1 birch‐allergic (Bet v 1‐BA) conditions. (C) Significantly up‐ (green) and downregulated (red) genes between different conditions. (D) Fold change of shared genes between unstim‐BA vs. unstim‐NBA and Bet v 1‐BA vs. unstim‐BA. Red lines indicate changes from unique genes. (E) ClusterProfiler and ReactomePA was used to identify GO biological processes and (F) Reactome pathway enrichment of differently expressed genes
FIGURE 2Protein–Protein interaction (PPI) networks of differentially expressed genes. PPI networks were built employing the STRING online database (V11.5) and visualized using Cytoscape. (A) PPI of differentially expressed genes between baseline expression of non‐birch‐allergic (NBA) and birch‐allergic (BA) patients. Hub genes are highlighted in orange. (B) Differentially expressed genes of Bet v 1‐stimulated PBMCs of BA patients form 2 distinct networks (Network 1= turquoise, Network 2= cyan). The ARCHS4 Tissue database was used to associate networks with cell types. All PPI networks showed an PPI enrichment p‐value of p < 1 × 10−16
FIGURE 3Leukocyte composition in non‐allergic and allergic patients determined by leukocyte deconvolution algorithm and flow cytometry. (A) Relative cell numbers of flow cytometry experiments and estimated cell fractions of the Cibersort (CS) algorithm were compared to assess congruency among the two methods. (B) Furthermore, estimated cell fractions were correlated with measured relative cell fractions of CD4+, CD8+ and CD56+ cells via flow cytometry. Colour represents the correlation coefficient. Only positive correlations with a p‐value <.01 are shown. (C) Estimated cell fractions from transcriptome wide gene expression signatures using the Cibersort (CS) algorithm. (D) Significant leukocyte changes at baseline and after Bet v 1 stimulation in birch‐allergic patients and non‐allergic controls. *p<.05, **p<.01, ***p<.001, ****p<.0001
FIGURE 4Co‐expression networks of non‐birch‐allergic and birch‐allergic patients at baseline. (A) Co‐expression network modules were identified using WGCNA between unstimulated non‐birch‐allergic (unstim‐NBA) and unstimulated birch‐allergic (unstim‐BA) patients. Modules were linked to the estimated cell fractions determined by the Cibersort (CS) leukocyte deconvolution algorithm. Colour represents the correlation coefficient. Only correlations with a p‐value<.001 are shown. (B) Modules correlating with the phenotype were further analysed for pathway enrichment using ReactomePA. (C/D/E) Protein–Protein Interaction (PPI) networks of enriched modules were built with STRING database (V11.5) and visualized using Cytoscape. The CytoHubba plug‐in for Cytoscape was used to determine hub genes within each module, which are highlighted in orange. Networks were built with the top 200 genes with the highest module membership. Module names have been chosen according to involved genes, enriched pathways and hub genes. All PPI networks showed an enrichment value of p < 1 × 10−10
FIGURE 5Co‐expression networks of birch‐allergic patients at baseline and after Bet v 1 stimulation. (A) Co‐expression network modules were identified using WGCNA between unstimulated birch‐allergic (unstim‐BA) and Bet v 1‐stimulated BA (Bet v 1‐BA) patients. Modules were linked to the estimated cell fractions determined by the Cibersort (CS) leukocyte deconvolution. Colour represents the correlation coefficient. Only correlations with a p‐value<.001 are shown. (B) Modules correlating with the phenotype were further analysed for pathway enrichment using ReactomePA. (C/D) Protein–Protein Interaction (PPI) networks of enriched modules were built with STRING database (V11.5) and visualized using Cytoscape. The CytoHubba plug‐in for Cytoscape was used to determine hub genes within each module, which are highlighted in orange. Networks were built with the top 200 genes with the highest module membership. Module names have been chosen according to involved genes, enriched pathways and hub genes. All PPI networks showed an enrichment value of p < 1 × 10−12