Literature DB >> 35146430

Interinstitutional Portability of a Deep Learning Brain MRI Lesion Segmentation Algorithm.

Andreas M Rauschecker1, Tyler J Gleason1, Pierre Nedelec1, Michael Tran Duong1, David A Weiss1, Evan Calabrese1, John B Colby1, Leo P Sugrue1, Jeffrey D Rudie1, Christopher P Hess1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess how well a brain MRI lesion segmentation algorithm trained at one institution performed at another institution, and to assess the effect of multi-institutional training datasets for mitigating performance loss.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, a three-dimensional U-Net for brain MRI abnormality segmentation was trained on data from 293 patients from one institution (IN1) (median age, 54 years; 165 women; patients treated between 2008 and 2018) and tested on data from 51 patients from a second institution (IN2) (median age, 46 years; 27 women; patients treated between 2003 and 2019). The model was then trained on additional data from various sources: (a) 285 multi-institution brain tumor segmentations, (b) 198 IN2 brain tumor segmentations, and (c) 34 IN2 lesion segmentations from various brain pathologic conditions. All trained models were tested on IN1 and external IN2 test datasets, assessing segmentation performance using Dice coefficients.
RESULTS: The U-Net accurately segmented brain MRI lesions across various pathologic conditions. Performance was lower when tested at an external institution (median Dice score, 0.70 [IN2] vs 0.76 [IN1]). Addition of 483 training cases of a single pathologic condition, including from IN2, did not raise performance (median Dice score, 0.72; P = .10). Addition of IN2 training data with heterogeneous pathologic features, representing only 10% (34 of 329) of total training data, increased performance to baseline (Dice score, 0.77; P < .001). This final model produced total lesion volumes with a high correlation to the reference standard (Spearman r = 0.98).
CONCLUSION: For brain MRI lesion segmentation, adding a modest amount of relevant training data from an external institution to a previously trained model supported successful application of the model to this external institution.Keywords: Neural Networks, Brain/Brain Stem, Segmentation Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2021. 2021 by the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brain/Brain Stem; Neural Networks; Segmentation

Year:  2021        PMID: 35146430      PMCID: PMC8823451          DOI: 10.1148/ryai.2021200152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell        ISSN: 2638-6100


  17 in total

1.  External validity of randomised controlled trials: "to whom do the results of this trial apply?".

Authors:  Peter M Rothwell
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 Jan 1-7       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Multi-Institutional Deep Learning Modeling Without Sharing Patient Data: A Feasibility Study on Brain Tumor Segmentation.

Authors:  Micah J Sheller; G Anthony Reina; Brandon Edwards; Jason Martin; Spyridon Bakas
Journal:  Brainlesion       Date:  2019-01-26

3.  Understanding and Confronting Our Mistakes: The Epidemiology of Error in Radiology and Strategies for Error Reduction.

Authors:  Michael A Bruno; Eric A Walker; Hani H Abujudeh
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 5.333

4.  N4ITK: improved N3 bias correction.

Authors:  Nicholas J Tustison; Brian B Avants; Philip A Cook; Yuanjie Zheng; Alexander Egan; Paul A Yushkevich; James C Gee
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  A Multicenter, Scan-Rescan, Human and Machine Learning CMR Study to Test Generalizability and Precision in Imaging Biomarker Analysis.

Authors:  Anish Bhuva; Wenjia Bai; Clement Lau; Rhodri Davies; Yang Ye; Heeraj Bulluck; Elisa McAlindon; Veronica Culotta; Peter Swoboda; Gabriella Captur; Thomas Treibel; Joao Augusto; Kristopher Knott; Andreas Seraphim; Graham Cole; Steffen Petersen; Nicola Edwards; John Greenwood; Chiara Bucciarelli-Ducci; Alun Hughes; Daniel Rueckert; James Moon; Charlotte Manisty
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 7.792

Review 6.  Artificial intelligence in radiology.

Authors:  Ahmed Hosny; Chintan Parmar; John Quackenbush; Lawrence H Schwartz; Hugo J W L Aerts
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 60.716

7.  Ethics of Using and Sharing Clinical Imaging Data for Artificial Intelligence: A Proposed Framework.

Authors:  David B Larson; David C Magnus; Matthew P Lungren; Nigam H Shah; Curtis P Langlotz
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Variable generalization performance of a deep learning model to detect pneumonia in chest radiographs: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  John R Zech; Marcus A Badgeley; Manway Liu; Anthony B Costa; Joseph J Titano; Eric Karl Oermann
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 11.069

9.  Distributed deep learning networks among institutions for medical imaging.

Authors:  Ken Chang; Niranjan Balachandar; Carson Lam; Darvin Yi; James Brown; Andrew Beers; Bruce Rosen; Daniel L Rubin; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 7.942

View more
  3 in total

1.  Mitigating Bias in Radiology Machine Learning: 2. Model Development.

Authors:  Kuan Zhang; Bardia Khosravi; Sanaz Vahdati; Shahriar Faghani; Fred Nugen; Seyed Moein Rassoulinejad-Mousavi; Mana Moassefi; Jaidip Manikrao M Jagtap; Yashbir Singh; Pouria Rouzrokh; Bradley J Erickson
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2022-08-24

2.  An Integrated Analysis of Clinical, Genomic, and Imaging Features Reveals Predictors of Neurocognitive Outcomes in a Longitudinal Cohort of Pediatric Cancer Survivors, Enriched with CNS Tumors (Rad ART Pro).

Authors:  Cassie Kline; Schuyler Stoller; Lennox Byer; David Samuel; Janine M Lupo; Melanie A Morrison; Andreas M Rauschecker; Pierre Nedelec; Walter Faig; Dena B Dubal; Heather J Fullerton; Sabine Mueller
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 5.738

3.  Accurate auto-labeling of chest X-ray images based on quantitative similarity to an explainable AI model.

Authors:  Doyun Kim; Joowon Chung; Jongmun Choi; Marc D Succi; John Conklin; Maria Gabriela Figueiro Longo; Jeanne B Ackman; Brent P Little; Milena Petranovic; Mannudeep K Kalra; Michael H Lev; Synho Do
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 14.919

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.