| Literature DB >> 35146127 |
Mengni Shen1, Elizabeth O'Donnell1, Gabriela Leon1, Ana Kisovar1, Pedro Melo2, Krina Zondervan1, Ingrid Granne1, Jennifer Southcombe1.
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION: What are the similarities and differences in endometrial B cells in the normal human endometrium and benign reproductive pathologies? SUMMARY ANSWER: Endometrial B cells typically constitute <5% of total endometrial CD45+ lymphocytes, and no more than 2% of total cells in the normal endometrium, and while their relative abundance and phenotypes vary in benign gynaecological conditions, current evidence is inconsistent. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: B cells are vitally important in the mucosal immune environment and have been extensively characterized in secondary lymphoid organs and tertiary lymphoid structures (TLSs), with the associated microenvironment germinal centre. However, in the endometrium, B cells are largely overlooked, despite the crucial link between autoimmunity and reproductive pathologies and the fact that B cells are present in normal endometrium and benign female reproductive pathologies, scattered or in the form of lymphoid aggregates (LAs). A comprehensive summary of current data investigating B cells will facilitate our understanding of endometrial B cells in the endometrial mucosal immune environment. STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION: This systematic review retrieved relevant studies from four databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science Core Collection and CINAHL) from database inception until November 2021. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTINGEntities:
Keywords: B cells; endometriosis; endometrium; female infertility; immunology; infertility; recurrent miscarriage
Year: 2021 PMID: 35146127 PMCID: PMC8825379 DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoab043
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hum Reprod Open ISSN: 2399-3529
Figure 1.PRISMA flow diagram of study selection.
Studies examining B cells in the normal endometrium.
| Citation | Study type | Participant information | Menstrual cycle phase of the samples obtained | Hormone treatment | Experimental method | Marker for B cell (subset) | Key findings | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | Number | Characteristics | |||||||
|
| Cross-sectional | 42–57 | 7 | Without malignant and inflammatory conditions, HIV IgG seronegative and no clinical symptoms of sexually transmitted infections during the 3 months prior to endometrial sample collection | – | None were on hormonal contraceptives | Mass spectrometry | heavy chains of IgG, IgM, IgJ, IgHA1, IgHA2 and light chain of Igκ | Various immunoglobulins (heavy chains of IgG, IgM, IgJ, IgA1, IgA2 and light chain of Igκ) were present in human endometrium. |
| IHC | IgA | IgA was mainly located at or adjacent to the columnar endometrium epithelium. | |||||||
|
| Cross-sectional | 20–40 | 24 | Had one or more successful pregnancies and a regular menstrual pattern, without endometrial pathology, pelvic endometriosis or anatomic abnormalities of the uterus, no coitus for over 48 h before the endometrial sample collection | Luteal phase | No steroid hormone treatment 3 months before biopsy collection | IHC | CD22 | B cells represent 2–3% of total CD45+ leucocytes, were detected in stroma as well as lymphoid aggregates. |
|
| Cross-sectional | Mean age 42–43 | 39 | Without malignant condition or endometrial pathology, no evidence of infection or inflammation | Follicular phase and luteal phase | – | Flow cytometry | CD19 | Significantly lower B-cell percentage in endometrium (3%) compared with PBMCs (18%). |
|
| Cross-sectional | 31–42 | 6 | With regular menstrual cycles, BMI between 23 and 32 kg/m2, and absence of uterine pathology on transvaginal ultrasound examination | Mid-luteal phase (LH + 8) and late-luteal phase (LH + 10) | None | Single-cell RNA-seq | – | Naïve B cells, with no more than 2% of total endometrial cell population, were detected in human endometrium. |
IHC, immunohistochemistry; PBMC, peripheral blood mononuclear cell.
Figure 2.Illustration of lymphoid aggregates in human endometrium. (A) The uterine lining, including the stratum functionalis and basalis (the endometrium), and the underlying myometrium. (B) A close-up of the lower functionalis and the basalis layers of the endometrium. The lymphoid aggregates are composed of a B-cell core, surrounded by a circle of T cells and a halo of macrophages. Natural killer cells are scattered throughout the stroma.
Studies examining endometrial B cells in patients with infertility, RIF and RPL.
| Citation | Study type | Control group | Reproductive pathologies group | Age (years) | Menstrual cycle phase of the samples obtained | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control characteristics | Number of participants | Participants’ selection | Number of participants | |||||
|
| Case–control | Successful pregnancy after IVF treatment for solely male factor infertility | 15 | A history of two consecutive first-trimester miscarriages, with subsequent IVF treatment outcome | Successful pregnancy | 11 | Mean age, 30–32 | Mid-luteal phase (day 5–8 after LH surge) |
| Pregnancy loss (RPL) | 6 | |||||||
|
| Case–control | Healthy fertile women | 15 | A history of 3 or more unexplained, consecutive, first trimester spontaneous miscarriages with the same partner | Primary RPL | 11 | 22–40 | Luteal phase |
| Secondary RPL | 9 | |||||||
|
| Case–control | Two or more normal pregnancies | 9 | At least three consecutive miscarriages (RPL) | 22 | 20–41 | Mid-luteal phase | |
|
| Case–control | – | 10 | 17 Women had 3 or more idiopathic early miscarriages, and 8 women had 2 early miscarriages (RPL) | 25 | 21–41 | Luteal phase | |
|
| Case–control | Women without a history of RPL, infertility (inability to conceive for more than 1 year) | 26 | Two or more pregnancy losses (unexplained RPL) | 50 | Mean age: 33.3 (controls), 35.2 (RPL) | – | |
|
| Case–control | Proven fertile women | 22 | Consecutive negative pregnancy tests following transfer of three or more morphologically good embryos and/or blastocysts (RIF) | Non-endometritis patientsa | 23 | Mean age, 37 | Follicular phase |
| Endometritis patientsa | 28 | |||||||
|
| Cross-sectional | – | – | Infertile patients who received IVF-embryo transfer treatment with an average of 3 years infertility | 716 | <45 | Mid-luteal phase | |
|
| Case–control | One or more successful pregnancies in the past | 18 | Endometriosis patientsb who are unable to conceive alter at least 12 months of unprotected intercourse (infertility) | 18 | 22–41 | Early, mid and late luteal phase | |
|
| Case–control | One or more successful pregnancies | 24 | A history of involuntary infertility of >2 years (unexplained infertility) | 24 | 24–43 | Luteal phase | |
|
| Cross-sectional | – | – | Patients with 2–4 years of infertility and failed with IVF fresh cycle in which at least 2 high-quality embryos were transferred | 78 | 20–38 | Mid-luteal phase | |
|
| Cross-sectional | – | – | Failure to achieve a clinical pregnancy after two good-quality embryo transfers in fresh or frozen cycles (RIF) | 47 | Mean age, 36 | Follicular phase (3–5 days after menstruation) | |
| Two or more consecutive pregnancy losses or three or more alternate pregnancy losses (<20 weeks of gestational ages) (RPL) | 38 | |||||||
|
| Case–control | At least one live birth within the previous 2 years | 40 | Loss of three or more consecutive pregnancies before 24 weeks of gestation (RPL) | 93 | 20–40 | Mid-luteal phase | |
| Fail to achieve clinical pregnancy after transfer of at least four good-quality embryos in three or more transfer cycles (RIF) | 39 | |||||||
| Infertility | 48 | |||||||
RIF, recurrent implantation failure; RPL, recurrent pregnancy loss.
aAs detailed in Table IV, endometritis was diagnosed when there were unusual plasmacyte infiltrates within the endometrial stromal compartment (Kitaya ).
bAs detailed in Table II, endometriosis was diagnosed laparoscopically, according to the rASRM criteria (The American Fertility Society, 1985; Klentzeris ).
cCD138 staining was performed as a diagnostic criterion for chronic endometritis.
Studies examining endometrial B cells in patients with endometritis.
| Citation | Study type | Control group | Endometritis group | Age (years) | Menstrual cycle phase of the samples obtained | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control characteristics | Number of participants | Endometritis diagnosis | Number of participants | |||||
|
| Case–control | No sign of plasma cells by CD138 staining in endometrial samples | 54 | CD138+ punctate staining in endometrial samples | 22 | Premenopausal | Mid-luteal phase | |
|
| Case–controla | – | – | Surgical diagnosis | 30 out of 92 | 16–46 | – | |
| HPS staining and morphological plasma cell identification | in endometrial samples | 38 out of 92 | ||||||
| H&E staining and morphological plasma cell identification | 72 out of 92 | |||||||
| CD138 and HPS staining to find plasma cells | 76 out of 92 | |||||||
|
| Case–controlb | – | – | 1 or more plasma cells per 10 per 10 high power fields | in endometrial samples, identified by CD138 | 12 out of 220 | 20–40 | Mid-luteal phase |
| 1.95 or more plasma cells per 10 per 10 high power fields | 36 out of 220 | |||||||
| 1 or more plasma cells per whole section | 95 out of 220 | |||||||
| 2.95 or more plasma cells per whole section | 42 out of 220 | |||||||
| 5.15 or more plasma cells per 0.1 mmb | 20 out of 220 | |||||||
|
| Case–controlc | – | – | Hysteroscopic examination based on the demonstration of micro-polyps, polypoid endometrium, stromal oedema and focal or diffuse hyperaemia | 238 out of 480 | Mean age, 33 | Follicular phase | |
| 1–5 plasma cells per high-power field or discrete clusters of <20 plasma cells endometrial samples identified by CD138 | 206 out of 480 | |||||||
|
| Cross-sectional | – | – | 1 or more plasma cell identified per 10 high power fields in endometrial samples, identified by CD138 | 322 out of 1189 | Mean age, 33 | Follicular phase | |
| Endometrium with one or more hysteroscopic features, hyperaemia, micro-polyps, and/or interstitial oedema | 454 out of 1189 | |||||||
|
| Cross-sectional | – | – | More than 5 plasma cells per 20 high-power fields in endometrial samples identified by CD138 | RPL patientsd | 14 out of 38 | Mean age, 36 | Follicular phase (3 to 5 days after menstruation) |
| RIF patientsd | 11 out of 47 | |||||||
| Hysteroscopy examination, direct observation of mucosal oedema, focal or diffuse endometrial hyperaemia, and the presence of micropolyps (<1 mm) | RPL patientsd | 12 out of 38 | ||||||
| RIF patientsd | 10 out of 47 | |||||||
|
| Cross-sectional | – | – | 1 or more plasma cells in endometrial samples, identified by MUM1, CD138, and H&E | 55 out of 87 | Median age, 36 | Variable | |
| 1 or more plasma cells in endometrial samples, identified by MUM1 and H&E | 118 out of 224 | |||||||
|
| Case–control | Histologically normal, no evidence of any endometrial pathology | 22 | Based on the presence of endometrial stromal plasma cells and/or neutrophils, inflammation was graded as: | Mild | 25 | Variable | Variable |
| Moderate | 32 | |||||||
| Severe | 22 | |||||||
|
| Case–control | No CE, proven fertile women | 22 | RIF patientse with unusual plasmacyte infiltrates within the endometrial stromal compartment (histopathologic diagnosis) | 28 | Mean age, 37 | Follicular phase | |
| No CE, consecutive negative pregnancy tests following transfer of 3 or more morphologically good embryos | 23 | |||||||
HPS, haematoxylin phloxine saffron stain; H&E, haematoxylin and eosin; MUM1, multiple myeloma oncogene 1.
A case–control study on C. trachomatis and abnormal uterine bleeding. In total 92 cases, C. trachomatis was detected in 44 cases, abnormal uterine bleeding was diagnosed in 65 cases (as detailed in Table V), uterine fibroids and ovarian cysts were noted in 27 cases (Toth ).
A case–control study on infertility, RIF and RPL patients (as detailed in Table III), in total 220 cases, 40 were controls, 93 were RPL patients, 39 were RIF patients and 48 were infertile patients (Liu ).
A case–control study on endometrial polyps (as detailed in Table V), in total 480 cases, 50% of all participants had endometrial polyps (Cicinelli ).
In total, 38 RPL patients and 47 RIF patients were included. As detailed in Table III, RPL was diagnosed when participants had 2 or more consecutive pregnancy losses or three or more alternate pregnancy losses (<20 weeks of gestational ages), RIF was diagnosed when participants failed to achieve a clinical pregnancy after two good-quality embryo transfers in fresh or frozen cycles (Zargar ).
As detailed in Table III, RIF was diagnosed when participants had consecutive negative pregnancy tests following transfer of three or more morphologically good embryos and/or blastocysts (Kitaya ).
Studies examining endometrial B cells in controls and patients with endometriosis.
Number of participants
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
| |||||||
|
| Case–control | Regular but heavy menstrual cycles and no evidence of pelvic disease | 10 | Laparoscopically diagnosed, diagnosis and classification of endometriosis was based on the revised criteria of the American Fertility Society ( | 8 | Premenopausal | Variable |
|
| Case–control | Healthy women with previously documented fertility and no relevant gynaecological history | 15 | Laparoscopically diagnosed | 20 | 21–40 | – |
|
| Case–control | No endometriosis, 1 or more successful pregnancies in the past, with regular menstrual cycles | 18 | Infertile womena who had laparoscopically diagnosed endometriosis. Diagnosis and classification of endometriosis was based on the revised criteria of the American Fertility Society ( | 18 | 22–41 | Early-, mid- and late-luteal phase |
|
| Case–control | Laparoscopically proven tubal factor infertility resulting from prior pelvic inflammatory disease. No signs of endometrial inflammation | 110 | Laparoscopically diagnosed, diagnosis and classification of endometriosis was based on the revised criteria of the American Fertility Society ( | 143 | Mean age, 30 | Variable |
|
| Cross-sectional | – | – | Diagnosis and classification of endometriosis was based on rASRM ( | 55 | 18–44 | Variable, mostly (87%) in the follicular phase |
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
| |||||||
|
| None | IHC | CD22 | B cells were detected in stroma as well as lymphoid aggregates. Similar B-cell count in control and endometriosis group (on average 4–5 CD22+ cells per 989 µm2) | |||
|
| None within last 3 months | Flow cytometry | CD20 (HLA-DR, CD5) | Significantly higher ( | |||
|
| None when sample was collected | IHC | CD22 | B cells were detected in stroma as well as lymphoid aggregates. Similar B-cell count in control and endometriosis group (3–4% of total CD45+ cells) | |||
|
| – | IHC | CD22 | B cells were exclusively detected in lymphoid aggregates. Similar B-cell count in control and endometriosis group (20 CD22+ cells per mm2) | |||
|
| – | IHC | CD138 | CD138+ plasma cell count per 20 high-power field ranging from 0 to 13, and the cell count was positively correlated with the endometriosis rASRM stage (r = 0.302, | |||
rASRM, revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine.
As detailed in Table III, infertility is diagnosed when participants were unable to conceive after at least 12 months of unprotected intercourse (Klentzeris ).
Studies examining endometrial B cells in controls and patients diagnosed with abnormal uterine bleeding, endometrial polyps and uterine fibroids.
| Citation | Study type | Control group | Pathological group | Age (years) | Menstrual cycle phase of the samples obtained | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control characteristics | Number of participants | Pathology and patients’ characteristic (if stated) | Number of participants | ||||||
|
| Case–control | Without abnormal uterine bleeding diagnosis | 27 | Abnormal uterine bleeding | 65 | 16–46 | – | ||
|
| Case–control | Normal endometrium without evidence of endometrial polyps at hysteroscopyb | 240 | Endometrial polyps, diagnosed at hysteroscopy and histology, identified as localized overgrowths of endometrial mucosa | 240c | Mean age, 33 | Follicular phase | ||
|
| Case–control | Normal endometrium without uterine fibroids | With benign ovarian tumours | 20 | Uterine fibroids, classified into three categories according to the location within the uterine wall: | Submucosal, causing cavity distortions | 24 | 37–45 | Variable |
| With uterine prolapse | 4 | Intramural, with <50% extension outside the myometrium without any cavity distortions | 25 | ||||||
| Subserosal, with 50% or more extension outside the myometrium without cavity distortions | 13 | ||||||||
aIn total 92 cases, C. trachomatis was detected in 44 cases, uterine fibroids and ovarian cysts were noted in 27 cases. Additionally, CE was diagnosed by H&E, HPS and/or CD138 staining, as detailed in Table IV (Toth ).
bIn total 240 cases, 136 women had a submucous/intramural uterine myoma. Additionally, CE was diagnosed by hysteroscopic examination or CD138 staining, as detailed in Table IV (Cicinelli ).
cAbout 240 endometrial polyps’ samples from the same group of patients were also collected and analysed (Cicinelli ).
Comparison of the bona fide definition of tertiary lymphoid structures with evidence from human endometrial lymphoid aggregates.
|
| Evidence from endometrial lymphoid aggregates | References |
|---|---|---|
| Ectopic and organized lymphoid tissue, contains distinct T- and B-cell zones | Yes |
|
| PNAd+ high endothelial venules present surrounding, for extravasation of CD26L+ immune cells | Addressins of the PNAd family have not been examined for endometrial LAs; however, other adhesion molecules including ICAM-1, VCAM-1 and E-selectin have been reported. Lymphoid aggregates with CD20+ B cell have been detected in the surroundings of MECA-79+ high endothelial venules. |
|
| Evidence of B-cell class switching and GC reactions in B-cell follicles | GC B cells (FAS+ IgD− BCL6+) have been identified in human endometrium, but the functional activity has not been studied. |
|
| LAMP+ mature dendritic cells present in T-cell zone | LAMP+ dendritic cells have been reported in the endometrium; however, they have not been explicitly examined in LAs. Dendritic reticulum cells (DRC) have been noted in the LAs, with staining conducted using anti-DRC1 antibody. |
|
| Expression of major set of chemokines involved in SLO organization | Chemokine expression has not been studied. | – |
DRC1, dendritic reticulum cells; GC, germinal centre; ICAM-1, intracellular adhesion molecule; LAMP, lysosome associated membrane protein; LAMP, lysosome-associated membrane protein; MECA-79, high endothelial venule marker monoclonal antibody; PNAd, peripheral node addressin; VCAM-1, vascular cell adhesion molecule.