| Literature DB >> 35145421 |
Feng Li1, Zhen-Ya Wang1, Zhi-Jie Zhang1, Su-Hong Shen1, Jia-Yi Guo1, Yan-Xing Guo1, Yi-Ran Feng2, Lin Zhang2, Yong-Bing Wen1, Yun-Fei Zhang1, Yi-Ming Fan1, Meng-Meng Fan1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Some patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA) show pain, stiffness and limited flexion and extension at the back of the knee, leading to dysfunction and affecting life. This may be related to changes in the biomechanical properties of skeletal muscles. Shear wave elastography (SWE) can detect these changes by measuring muscle shear modulus. AIMS: To investigate hamstring muscle shear modulus of healthy people and patients was studied using SWE method, and the correlation analysis between the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score of patients' subjective feeling and shear modulus of objective quantification was conducted.Entities:
Keywords: elasticity imaging techniques; hamstring; osteoarthritis; shear modulus; ultrasonography
Year: 2022 PMID: 35145421 PMCID: PMC8822153 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2021.752455
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Physiol ISSN: 1664-042X Impact factor: 4.566
Patients’ demographic findings.
| Observation ( | Control ( | |||
| Age (years) | 56.87 ± 8.41 | 56.15 ± 8.94 | 0.693 | |
| Gender | Male | 22 (44%) | 18 (36%) | 0.414 |
| Female | 28 (56%) | 32 (64%) | ||
| BMI (kg/m2) | 24.60 ± 3.67 | 23.6 ± 3.43 | 0.872 |
BMI, body mass index. Data are expressed as frequency (percentage) or mean ± standard deviation.
Intra- and interoperator reliabilities for assessing the three hamstrings stiffness.
| SM | SL | BFL | |||||||
| Mean ± SD | SEM | MDC | Mean ± SD | SEM | MDC | Mean ± SD | SEM | MDC | |
| Operator A in test 1 | 12.91 ± 2.78 | 0.62 | 1.72 | 12.83 ± 2.76 | 0.62 | 1.72 | 11.27 ± 3.21 | 0.62 | 2.0 |
| Operator A in test 2 | 12.37 ± 2.82 | 0.63 | 1.75 | 12.45 ± 2.23 | 0.50 | 1.39 | 11.56 ± 3.84 | 0.86 | 2.38 |
| Operator B | 12.32 ± 2.42 | 0.54 | 1.50 | 12.85 ± 2.64 | 0.59 | 1.64 | 11.51 ± 3.38 | 0.76 | 2.11 |
| ICC | 0.84 (0.43–0.94) | 0.85 (0.45–0.94) | 0.94 (0.73–0.98) | ||||||
| ICC | 0.97 (0.86–0.99) | 0.98 (0.88–0.99) | 0.98 (0.89–0.99) | ||||||
ICC, intraclass correlation coefficient; CI, confidence interval; SEM (kPa), standard error of measurement of kPa; MDC (kPa), minimal detectable change; SD (kPa), standard deviation of kPa; kPa, kilo Pascal.
Shear modulus (kPa) of the three hamstring in two groups.
| SM | ST | BFL | |
| Observation ( | 15.23 ± 7.23 | 15.94 ± 5.40 | 14.21 ± 6.55 |
| Control ( | 10.95 ± 2.41 | 11.25 ± 2.23 | 9.98 ± 2.81 |
| 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Correlation between the three hamstring shear modulus and WOMAC score in the observation group.
| SM | ST | BFL | ||
| Pain |
| 0.477 | 0.519 | 0.631 |
|
| 0.001 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
| Stiffness |
| 0.437 | 0.461 | 0.539 |
|
| 0.002 | 0.001 | 0.000 | |
| Physical function |
| 0.605 | 0.543 | 0.605 |
|
| 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
FIGURE 1The one on the left is listed as a healthy person, and the SM, ST, and BFL are listed from top to bottom. The one on the right is a patient, and the SM, ST, and BFL are listed from top to bottom.
FIGURE 2Correlation between the three hamstring shear modulus and WOMAC score in the observation group.