Literature DB >> 10335643

A solution to diffraction biases in sonoelasticity: the acoustic impulse technique.

S Catheline1, F Wu, M Fink.   

Abstract

Several methods have been proposed to estimate the viscoelastic properties of soft biological tissues using forced low-frequency vibrations (10-500 Hz). Those methods are based on the measurement of phase velocity of the shear waves (approximately 5 m/s). It is shown in this article that the measurements of velocity as well as attenuation are subjected to biases. These biases are related to reflected waves created at boundaries, to the nonnegligible size of the piston source which causes diffraction effects and to the influence of a low-frequency compressional wave. Indeed, a theoretical analysis of the field radiated by a point source explains how mechanical vibrations of a piston generate a shear wave with a longitudinal component and how this component can interfere with a low-frequency compressional wave. However, by using a low-frequency transient excitation, these biases can be avoided. Then the precise numerical values of elasticity and viscosity can be deduced. Experiments in phantoms and beef muscles are shown. Moreover, a relative hardness imaging of a phantom composed of two media with different elasticities is presented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10335643     DOI: 10.1121/1.426907

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  35 in total

Review 1.  Elastography: modality-specific approaches, clinical applications, and research horizons.

Authors:  Yufei Li; Jess G Snedeker
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  AN OVERVIEW OF ELASTOGRAPHY - AN EMERGING BRANCH OF MEDICAL IMAGING.

Authors:  Armen Sarvazyan; Timothy J Hall; Matthew W Urban; Mostafa Fatemi; Salavat R Aglyamov; Brian S Garra
Journal:  Curr Med Imaging Rev       Date:  2011-11

3.  Congruence of imaging estimators and mechanical measurements of viscoelastic properties of soft tissues.

Authors:  Man Zhang; Benjamin Castaneda; Zhe Wu; Priya Nigwekar; Jean V Joseph; Deborah J Rubens; Kevin J Parker
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2007-07-02       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Surface response of a fractional order viscoelastic halfspace to surface and subsurface sources.

Authors:  F Can Meral; Thomas J Royston; Richard L Magin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Real-time sonoelastography of hepatic thermal lesions in a swine model.

Authors:  Man Zhang; Benjamin Castaneda; Jared Christensen; Wael E Saad; Kevin Bylund; Kenneth Hoyt; John G Strang; Deborah J Rubens; Kevin J Parker
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Diffraction-biased shear wave fields generated with longitudinal magnetic resonance elastography drivers.

Authors:  Meng Yin; Olivier Rouvière; Kevin J Glaser; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 2.546

7.  Rayleigh-Lamb wave propagation on a fractional order viscoelastic plate.

Authors:  F Can Meral; Thomas J Royston; Richard L Magin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Probe Oscillation Shear Wave Elastography: Initial In Vivo Results in Liver.

Authors:  Daniel C Mellema; Pengfei Song; Randall R Kinnick; Joshua D Trzasko; Matthew W Urban; James F Greenleaf; Armando Manduca; Shigao Chen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 10.048

9.  Single tracking location methods suppress speckle noise in shear wave velocity estimation.

Authors:  Etana C Elegbe; Stephen A McAleavey
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.578

10.  Measurement of viscoelastic properties of in vivo swine myocardium using lamb wave dispersion ultrasound vibrometry (LDUV).

Authors:  Matthew W Urban; Cristina Pislaru; Ivan Z Nenadic; Randall R Kinnick; James F Greenleaf
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 10.048

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.