| Literature DB >> 35145110 |
Sung-Fu Hung1,2, Aoni Xu1, Xue Wang1, Fengwang Li1, Shao-Hui Hsu3, Yuhang Li1, Joshua Wicks1, Eduardo González Cervantes1, Armin Sedighian Rasouli1, Yuguang C Li1, Mingchuan Luo1, Dae-Hyun Nam1, Ning Wang1, Tao Peng1, Yu Yan1, Geonhui Lee1, Edward H Sargent4.
Abstract
Nitrogen-doped graphene-supported single atoms convert CO2 to CO, but fail to provide further hydrogenation to methane - a finding attributable to the weak adsorption of CO intermediates. To regulate the adsorption energy, here we investigate the metal-supported single atoms to enable CO2 hydrogenation. We find a copper-supported iron-single-atom catalyst producing a high-rate methane. Density functional theory calculations and in-situ Raman spectroscopy show that the iron atoms attract surrounding intermediates and carry out hydrogenation to generate methane. The catalyst is realized by assembling iron phthalocyanine on the copper surface, followed by in-situ formation of single iron atoms during electrocatalysis, identified using operando X-ray absorption spectroscopy. The copper-supported iron-single-atom catalyst exhibits a CO2-to-methane Faradaic efficiency of 64% and a partial current density of 128 mA cm-2, while the nitrogen-doped graphene-supported one produces only CO. The activity is 32 times higher than a pristine copper under the same conditions of electrolyte and bias.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35145110 PMCID: PMC8831533 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-28456-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Fig. 1Calculations and catalytic activities for single-atom-anchored copper.
a Comparison of adsorption energy and hydrogenation of *CO on various single-atom catalytic sites. b Catalytic methane activities of pristine Cu vs. various single-atom-anchored copper catalysts for CO2 reduction reaction. c Effect of iron domain sizes in the copper surface on the adsorption energies of *H and *CO. d Catalytic activities of various iron-dispersed copper materials, including nanoparticle, cluster, and single-atom forms. The error bars represent 1 s.d. on the basis of three independent samples.
Fig. 2Mechanism study for the copper-supported single-atom iron catalyst.
a Density of states of pristine Cu and Cu-FeSA. b Adsorption energy of *CO for pristine Cu and Cu-FeSA. c Deconvolution of d orbitals of single-atom iron in Cu-FeSA. d Schematic illustration of *CO transition: the arrow heads mean the transition pathway while the cross marks suggest immobile *CO adsorption sites. e C-C coupling energy for pristine Cu vs. Cu-FeSA. f Hydrogenation energy of the intermediates for methane production on the iron sites in Cu-FeSA. g Energy diagram for methane evolution in Cu-FeSA. The r.d.s. (rate determining step) is the hydrogenation of *CO intermediates on the iron sites.
Fig. 3Materials characterization and in-situ investigation of iron-phthalocyanine-modified and iron-single-atom-anchored copper.
a X-ray diffraction. The inset illustrates the bonding between Cu surface and iron phthalocyanine using 3-mercaptopropionic acid. b Extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) of Fe K-edge for the Cu-FePc GDE. c In-situ EXAFS and (d) in-situ XANES of Fe K-edge for identifying Cu-FeSA during CO2RR. e Atomic resolution transmission electron microscope images and atomic elemental mapping using EELS. Dashed circles indicate the single-atom iron. f In-situ Raman spectroscopy for pristine Cu and Cu-FeSA. The intensity scale is 4000 c.p.s. in the spectrum.
Fig. 4Catalytic performance of Cu-FeSA.
a Comparison of reaction products for pristine Cu and Cu-FeSA. Error bars represent 1 standard deviation on the basis of three independent samples. b Faradaic efficiency and partial current density to methane vs. applied potential. c Stability of methane production. d In-situ X-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES) of Fe K-edge for long-term investigation over 12 h. The error bars represent 1 s.d. on the basis of three independent samples.