Literature DB >> 29569896

Electrolytic CO2 Reduction in a Flow Cell.

David M Weekes1, Danielle A Salvatore2, Angelica Reyes2, Aoxue Huang1, Curtis P Berlinguette1,2,3.   

Abstract

Electrocatalytic CO2 conversion at near ambient temperatures and pressures offers a potential means of converting waste greenhouse gases into fuels or commodity chemicals (e.g., CO, formic acid, methanol, ethylene, alkanes, and alcohols). This process is particularly compelling when driven by excess renewable electricity because the consequent production of solar fuels would lead to a closing of the carbon cycle. However, such a technology is not currently commercially available. While CO2 electrolysis in H-cells is widely used for screening electrocatalysts, these experiments generally do not effectively report on how CO2 electrocatalysts behave in flow reactors that are more relevant to a scalable CO2 electrolyzer system. Flow reactors also offer more control over reagent delivery, which includes enabling the use of a gaseous CO2 feed to the cathode of the cell. This setup provides a platform for generating much higher current densities ( J) by reducing the mass transport issues inherent to the H-cells. In this Account, we examine some of the systems-level strategies that have been applied in an effort to tailor flow reactor components to improve electrocatalytic reduction. Flow reactors that have been utilized in CO2 electrolysis schemes can be categorized into two primary architectures: Membrane-based flow cells and microfluidic reactors. Each invoke different dynamic mechanisms for the delivery of gaseous CO2 to electrocatalytic sites, and both have been demonstrated to achieve high current densities ( J > 200 mA cm-2) for CO2 reduction. One strategy common to both reactor architectures for improving J is the delivery of CO2 to the cathode in the gas phase rather than dissolved in a liquid electrolyte. This physical facet also presents a number of challenges that go beyond the nature of the electrocatalyst, and we scrutinize how the judicious selection and modification of certain components in microfluidic and/or membrane-based reactors can have a profound effect on electrocatalytic performance. In membrane-based flow cells, for example, the choice of either a cation exchange membrane (CEM), anion exchange membrane (AEM), or a bipolar membrane (BPM) affects the kinetics of ion transport pathways and the range of applicable electrolyte conditions. In microfluidic cells, extensive studies have been performed upon the properties of porous carbon gas diffusion layers, materials that are equally relevant to membrane reactors. A theme that is pervasive throughout our analyses is the challenges associated with precise and controlled water management in gas phase CO2 electrolyzers, and we highlight studies that demonstrate the importance of maintaining adequate flow cell hydration to achieve sustained electrolysis.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 29569896     DOI: 10.1021/acs.accounts.8b00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acc Chem Res        ISSN: 0001-4842            Impact factor:   22.384


  31 in total

Review 1.  Ionic liquid-based electrolytes for CO2 electroreduction and CO2 electroorganic transformation.

Authors:  Xingxing Tan; Xiaofu Sun; Buxing Han
Journal:  Natl Sci Rev       Date:  2021-02-06       Impact factor: 23.178

2.  High-temperature ionic logic gates composed of an ionic rectifying solid-electrolyte interface.

Authors:  Takashi Nakamura; Miri Honda; Yuta Kimura; Koji Amezawa
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 4.036

3.  CO2 Electrolysis via Surface-Engineering Electrografted Pyridines on Silver Catalysts.

Authors:  Maryam Abdinejad; Erdem Irtem; Amirhossein Farzi; Mark Sassenburg; Siddhartha Subramanian; Hugo-Pieter Iglesias van Montfort; Davide Ripepi; Mengran Li; Joost Middelkoop; Ali Seifitokaldani; Thomas Burdyny
Journal:  ACS Catal       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 13.700

4.  Poly(bis-arylimidazoliums) possessing high hydroxide ion exchange capacity and high alkaline stability.

Authors:  Jiantao Fan; Sapir Willdorf-Cohen; Eric M Schibli; Zoe Paula; Wei Li; Thomas J G Skalski; Ania Tersakian Sergeenko; Amelia Hohenadel; Barbara J Frisken; Emanuele Magliocca; William E Mustain; Charles E Diesendruck; Dario R Dekel; Steven Holdcroft
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Low-cost high-efficiency system for solar-driven conversion of CO2 to hydrocarbons.

Authors:  Tran Ngoc Huan; Daniel Alves Dalla Corte; Sarah Lamaison; Dilan Karapinar; Lukas Lutz; Nicolas Menguy; Martin Foldyna; Silver-Hamill Turren-Cruz; Anders Hagfeldt; Federico Bella; Marc Fontecave; Victor Mougel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Multilayer Electrolyzer Stack Converts Carbon Dioxide to Gas Products at High Pressure with High Efficiency.

Authors:  B Endrődi; E Kecsenovity; A Samu; F Darvas; R V Jones; V Török; A Danyi; C Janáky
Journal:  ACS Energy Lett       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 23.101

Review 7.  Solvents and Supporting Electrolytes in the Electrocatalytic Reduction of CO2.

Authors:  Maximilian König; Jan Vaes; Elias Klemm; Deepak Pant
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2019-07-16

8.  Dopant-tuned stabilization of intermediates promotes electrosynthesis of valuable C3 products.

Authors:  Tao-Tao Zhuang; Dae-Hyun Nam; Ziyun Wang; Hui-Hui Li; Christine M Gabardo; Yi Li; Zhi-Qin Liang; Jun Li; Xiao-Jing Liu; Bin Chen; Wan Ru Leow; Rui Wu; Xue Wang; Fengwang Li; Yanwei Lum; Joshua Wicks; Colin P O'Brien; Tao Peng; Alexander H Ip; Tsun-Kong Sham; Shu-Hong Yu; David Sinton; Edward H Sargent
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  A study on improving the current density performances of CO2 electrolysers.

Authors:  Yueyuan Gu; Jucai Wei; Xu Wu; Xiaoteng Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Efficient wettability-controlled electroreduction of CO2 to CO at Au/C interfaces.

Authors:  Run Shi; Jiahao Guo; Xuerui Zhang; Geoffrey I N Waterhouse; Zhaojun Han; Yunxuan Zhao; Lu Shang; Chao Zhou; Lei Jiang; Tierui Zhang
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.