| Literature DB >> 35143493 |
Rahmat Dapari1, Mohd Hafizuddin Mahfot1, Ahmad Iqmer Nashriq Mohd Nazan1, Mohd Rohaizat Hassan2, Nazri Che Dom3, Syed Sharizman Syed Abdul Rahim4.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The issue of decriminalization of medical marijuana has gained public attention globally due to the decisions of various governments in developed and developing countries who have decriminalized marijuana for medical purposes. The action was the result of the change in perception towards medical marijuana use, which is now believed to be safe, acceptable, and should be decriminalized. Due to the progress of modernization and the wide access to information, the change in perception towards medical marijuana seems to be inevitable and might have already permeated among the public in Malaysia. However, at the moment there is no baseline data to determine any of this claim.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35143493 PMCID: PMC8830660 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262819
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Number of drug and substance abusers and addicts according to state in Malaysia and estimated total population in 2019.
| STATE | NUMBER OF DRUG AND SUBSTANCE ABUSERS AND ADDICTS | % | ESTIMATED TOTAL POPULATION (’000) | RATIO OF DRUG AND SUBSTANCE ABUSER AND ADDICTS PER ESTIMATED TOTAL POPULATION | NUMBER OF DRUG AND SUBSTANCE ABUSERS AND ADDICTS PER 100,000 POPULATION |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Johor | 16,124 | 11.34 | 3,764.30 | 0.43 | 428 |
| Kedah | 11,629 | 8.18 | 2,180.60 | 0.53 | 533 |
| Kelantan | 16,341 | 11.49 | 1,885.70 | 0.87 | 867 |
| Melaka | 4,968 | 3.49 | 930.7 | 0.53 | 534 |
| Negeri Sembilan | 7,934 | 5.58 | 1,130.30 | 0.7 | 702 |
| Pahang | 13,616 | 9.58 | 1,674.60 | 0.81 | 813 |
| Pulau Pinang | 8,987 | 6.32 | 1,774.60 | 0.51 | 506 |
| Perak | 9,335 | 6.56 | 2,512.10 | 0.37 | 372 |
| Perlis | 2,064 | 1.45 | 254.4 | 0.81 | 811 |
| Selangor | 13,722 | 9.65 | 6,528.40 | 0.21 | 210 |
| Terengganu | 11,409 | 8.02 | 1,245.70 | 0.92 | 916 |
| Sabah* | 10,886 | 7.66 | 4,002.70 | 0.27 | 272 |
| Sarawak | 6,774 | 4.76 | 2,812.80 | 0.24 | 241 |
| WP Kuala Lumpur** | 8,410 | 5.91 | 1,884.50 | 0.45 | 446 |
| Total | 142,199 | 100 | 32,581.40 | 0.44 | 436 |
Reliability test results of questionnaire items (N = 9).
| Instrument | Mean | Std. Deviation | Cronbach’s Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ever drank | 1.3667 | .49013 | .677 |
| Given up drinking | 1.9667 | .88992 | .763 |
| Current substance use | 1.9667 | .18257 | .705 |
| Given up substance | 2.9333 | .25371 | .711 |
| Exposure to MMJ content | 1.2333 | .43018 | .702 |
| Perceived risk of MMJ | 1.2667 | .44978 | .643 |
| Perceived risk of harm | 1.3000 | .46609 | .637 |
| Perceived approval of use | 1.3000 | .46609 | .653 |
| Acceptance | 1.2333 | .43018 | .655 |
Descriptive statistics of the respondents based on sociodemographic, socioeconomic, and lifestyle factors, and perception with acceptance towards decriminalization of medical marijuana.
| Variable | M | SD |
|---|---|---|
| Age (year) | 36.3 | 10.85 |
| Daily online media engagement (hours) | 4.97 | 3.6 |
|
|
| |
| Gender | ||
| Male | 352 | 76.2 |
| Female | 110 | 23.8 |
| Ethnicity | ||
| Malay | 381 | 82.5 |
| Chinese | 39 | 8.4 |
| Indian | 20 | 4.3 |
| Others | 22 | 4.8 |
| Level of education | ||
| Primary school | 3 | 0.6 |
| Secondary school | 100 | 21.6 |
| STPM/Matriculation/Diploma | 146 | 31.6 |
| First degree (Bachelor) | 168 | 36.4 |
| Second/Third degree (Master/PhD) | 45 | 9.7 |
| Employment status | ||
| Government servant | 69 | 14.9 |
| Private company | 190 | 41.1 |
| Self-employed | 136 | 29.4 |
| Student | 21 | 4.5 |
| Unemployed | 46 | 10 |
| Household Monthly income | ||
| B40 | 205 | 44.4 |
| M40 | 165 | 35.7 |
| T20 | 92 | 19.9 |
| Smoking | ||
| Ever smoked | ||
| Yes | 317 | 68.6 |
| No | 145 | 31.4 |
| Current cigarette smoke | ||
| Yes | 207 | 44.8 |
| No | 255 | 55.2 |
| Given up smoking | ||
| Yes | 117 | 25.3 |
| No | 200 | 43.3 |
| Never smoke | 145 | 31.4 |
| Alcohol | ||
| Ever drank | ||
| Yes | 178 | 38.5 |
| No | 284 | 61.5 |
| Current alcohol drinker | ||
| Yes | 40 | 8.7 |
| No | 422 | 91.3 |
| Given up alcohol | ||
| Yes | 112 | 24.2 |
| No | 66 | 14.3 |
| Never drank | 284 | 61.5 |
| Substance Use | ||
| Ever used | ||
| Yes | 222 | 48.1 |
| No | 240 | 51.9 |
| Current substance use | ||
| Yes | 122 | 26.4 |
| No | 340 | 73.6 |
| Given up substance | ||
| Yes | 75 | 16.2 |
| No | 147 | 31.8 |
| Never used drugs | 240 | 51.9 |
| Online media | ||
| Online media user | ||
| Yes | 456 | 98.7 |
| No | 6 | 1.3 |
| Exposure to marijuana-related content | ||
| Yes | 340 | 73.6 |
| No | 122 | 26.4 |
| Perceived risk associated with medical marijuana | ||
| Low risk | 285 | 61.7 |
| High risk | 177 | 38.3 |
| Perceived risk of harm of medical marijuana use | ||
| Low risk | 292 | 63.2 |
| High risk | 170 | 36.8 |
| Perceived approval of use of medical marijuana average score | ||
| High approval | 269 | 58.2 |
| Low approval | 193 | 41.8 |
| Acceptance towards decriminalization of medical marijuana | ||
| Accept | 299 | 64.7 |
| Reject | 163 | 35.3 |
Note: N = Number M = Mean, SD = Standard deviation.
Associations between acceptance towards decriminalization of medical marijuana and sociodemographic, socioeconomic, and lifestyle factors, and perception of medical marijuana use.
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
| 462 | 35 (10.6) | 38.67 (10.8) | -3.521 |
| -5.726, -1.624 | |
|
| 462 | 5.4 (3.8) | 4.18 (2.99) | 3.797 |
| 0.590, 1.857 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 7.766 | 1 |
| ||||
| Male | 352 (76.2) | 240 (68.2) | 112 (31.8) | 1.269, 1.367 | |||
| Female | 110 (23.8) | 59 (53.6) | 51 (46.4) | 1.369, 1.559 | |||
|
| 11.015 | 3 |
| ||||
| Malay | 381 (82.5) | 257 (67.5) | 124 (32.5) | 1.278, 1.372 | |||
| Chinese | 39 (8.4) | 21 (53.8) | 18 (46.2) | 1.298, 1.625 | |||
| Indian | 20 (4.3) | 7 (35.0) | 13 (65.0) | 1.421, 1.879 | |||
| Others | 22 (4.8) | 14 (63.6) | 8 (36.4) | 1.145, 1.581 | |||
|
| 13.113 | 4 |
| ||||
| Primary school | 3 (0.6) | 1 (33.3) | 2 (66.7) | 0.232, 3.100 | |||
| Secondary school | 100 (21.6) | 51 (51) | 49 (49) | 1.390, 1.590 | |||
| STPM/Matriculation/Diploma | 146 (31.6) | 97 (66.4) | 49 (51.5) | 1.258, 1.413 | |||
| First degree (Bachelor) | 168 (36.4) | 120 (71.4) | 48 (28.6) | 1.217, 1.355 | |||
| Second/Third degree (Master/PhD) | 45 (9.7) | 30 (66.7) | 15 (33.3) | 1.190, 1.477 | |||
|
| 18.638 | 4 |
| ||||
| Government servant | 69 (14.9) | 44 (63.8) | 25 (36.2) | 1.246, 1.479 | |||
| Private company | 190 (41.1) | 136 (71.6) | 54 (28.4) | 1.219, 1.349 | |||
| Self-employed | 136 (29.4) | 85 (62.5) | 51 (37.5) | 1.292, 1.457 | |||
| Student | 21 (4.5) | 16 (76.2) | 5 (23.8) | 1.039, 1.437 | |||
| Unemployed | 46 (10) | 18 (39.1) | 28 (60.9) | 1.462, 1.755 | |||
|
| .434 | 2 | 0.805 | ||||
| Less than RM4849 | 205 (44.4) | 136 (66.3) | 69 (33.7) | 1.271, 1.402 | |||
| RM4850-RM10959 | 165 (35.7) | 105 (63.6) | 60 (36.4) | 1.289, 1.438 | |||
| More than RM10960 | 92 (19.9) | 58 (59.5) | 34 (37.5) | 1.269, 1.470 | |||
|
| |||||||
| Ever smoked | 12.486 | 1 |
| ||||
| Yes | 317 (68.6) | 222 (70.0) | 95 (30.0) | 1.249, 1.350 | |||
| No | 145 (31,4) | 77 (53.1) | 68 (46.9) | 1.387, 1.551 | |||
| Current cigarette smoker | 3.127 | 1 | 0.077 | ||||
| Yes | 207 (44.8) | 143 (69.1) | 64 (30.9) | 1.246, 1.373 | |||
| No | 255 (55.2) | 156 (61.2) | 99 (38.8) | 1.328, 1.449 | |||
| Given up smoking | 12.709 | 2 |
| ||||
| Yes | 117 (25.3) | 80 (68.4) | 37 (31.6) | 1.231, 1.402 | |||
| No | 200 (43.3) | 142 (71.0) | 58 (29.0) | 1.227, 1.353 | |||
| Never smoke | 145 (31.4) | 77 (53.1) | 68 (46.9) | 1.387, 1.551 | |||
|
| |||||||
| Ever drank | 3.845 | 1 | 0.05 | ||||
| Yes | 178 (38.5) | 125 (70.2) | 53 (29.8) | 1.229, 1.367 | |||
| No | 284 (61.5) | 174 (61.3) | 110 (38.7) | 1.330, 1.444 | |||
| Current alcohol drinker | 1.161 | 1 | 0.281 | ||||
| Yes | 40 (8.7) | 29 (72.5) | 11 (27.5) | 1.130, 1.419 | |||
| No | 422 (91.3) | 270 (64.0) | 152 (36.0) | 1.314, 1.406 | |||
| Given up alcohol | 3.857 | 2 | 0.145 | ||||
| Yes | 112 (24.2) | 79 (70.5) | 33 (29.5) | 1.208, 1.380 | |||
| No | 66 (14.3) | 46 (69.7) | 20 (30.3) | 1.189, 1.417 | |||
| Never drank | 284 (61.5) | 174 (61.3) | 110 (38.7) | 1.330, 1.444 | |||
|
| |||||||
| Ever used | 10.120 | 1 |
| ||||
| Yes | 222 (48.1) | 160 (72.1) | 62 (27.9) | 1.219, 1.338 | |||
| No | 240 (51.9) | 139 (57.9) | 101 (42.1) | 1358, 1.484 | |||
| Current substance use | 47.007 | 1 |
| ||||
| Yes | 122 (26.4) | 110 (90.2) | 12 (9.8) | 1.045, 1.152 | |||
| No | 340 (73.6) | 189 (55.6) | 151 (44.4) | 1.391, 1.497 | |||
| Given up substance | 64.101 | 2 |
| ||||
| Yes | 75 (16.2) | 57 (76.0) | 18 (24.0) | 1.141, 1.339 | |||
| No | 147 (31.8) | 127 (86.4) | 20 (13.6) | 1.080, 1.192 | |||
| Never used substance | 240 (51.9) | 115 (47.9) | 125 (52.1) | 1.457, 1.585 | |||
|
| |||||||
| Online media user | 0.100 | 1 | 0.920 | ||||
| Yes | 456 (98.7) | 295 (64.7) | 161 (35.3) | 1.309, 1.397 | |||
| No | 6 (1.3) | 4 (664.7) | 2 (33.3) | 0.791, 1.875 | |||
|
| 46.745 | 1 |
| ||||
| Yes | 340 (73.6) | 251 (73,8) | 89 (26.2) | 1.215, 1.309 | |||
| No | 122 (26.4) | 48 (39.3) | 74 (60.7) | 1.518, 1,695 | |||
|
| 211.129 | 1 |
| ||||
| Low risk | 285 (61.7) | 257 (90.2) | 28 (9.8) | 1.064, 1.133 | |||
| High risk | 177 (38.3) | 42 (23.7) | 135 (76.3) | 1.699, 1.826 | |||
|
| 199.848 | 1 |
| ||||
| Low risk | 292 | 259 (88.7) | 33 (11.3) | 1.077, 1.150 | |||
| High risk | 170 | 40 (23.5) | 130 (76.5) | 1.700, 1.829 | |||
|
| 218.676 | 1 |
| ||||
| High approval | 269 (58.2) | 249 (92.6) | 20 (7.4) | 1.043, 1.110 | |||
| Low approval | 193 (41.8) | 50 (25.9) | 143 (74.1) | 1.679, 1.803 | |||
Note: p-value < 0.05 is significant.
Multiple logistic regression analysis predicting acceptance towards decriminalization of medical marijuana in Malaysia.
| Variable | B | SE | Wald | p-value | aOR | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ever used substance | 0.696 | 0.317 | 4.819 | 0.028 | 2.005 | 1.077–3.732 |
| Current substance use | 0.817 | 0.416 | 3.854 | 0.050 | 2.264 | 1.001–5.118 |
| Perceived risk of medical marijuana | 1.743 | 0.359 | 23.568 | 0.000 | 5.716 | 1.702–7.114 |
| Perceived risk of harm of medical marijuana | 1.247 | 0.365 | 11.682 | 0.001 | 3.480 | 3.534–13.955 |
| Perceived approval of use | 1.949 | 0.350 | 30.952 | 0.000 | 7.023 | 1.077–3.732 |
| Constant | -2.444 | 0.309 | 62.672 | 0.000 | .087 |
Note: p-value < 0.05 is significant.
Hosmer and Lemeshow test, X2 (6) = 6.795, p = 0.340, Cox and Snell R2 = 0.494.
Nagelkerke R2 = 0.679.