| Literature DB >> 35142370 |
Yujiao Wu1, Heqi Gao1, Yuxi Wang1, Ziting Peng1, Zhiqiang Guo2, Yongxuan Ma3, Ruifen Zhang4, Mingwei Zhang4, Qian Wu5, Juan Xiao1, Qiuping Zhong1.
Abstract
Total phenolic content (TPC), phenolic profiles, and antioxidant activity of free and bound extracts of Sargassum polycystum, obtained by different extraction solvents and hydrolysis methods, were investigated. Aqueous acetone afforded the highest free TPC and antioxidant ability, followed by aqueous ethanol and aqueous methanol. Twelve free phenolic compounds were identified by ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS), including two hydroxycinnamic acids, seven flavonoids, one stilbene, and two phlorotannins. Three to nine different free phenolic compounds were extracted by these solvents with different compositions, including nine by 70% acetone and eight by 70% methanol, 70% ethanol, and 50% ethanol. The highest total content of free phenolic compounds determined by high-performance liquid chromatography-diode array detection was obtained from 70% ethanol. Alkaline hydrolysis afforded higher bound TPC (274.27 mg GAE/100 g DW) and antioxidant ability than acid hydrolysis. Five bound phenolic compounds were characterized by UHPLC-MS and five were released from alkaline hydrolysis, whereas two were released from acid hydrolysis. Total content of bound phenolic compounds released by alkaline hydrolysis was 14.68-fold higher than that by acid hydrolysis. The free and bound TPC, phenolic profiles, and antioxidant activities depended on the extraction solvent used. These results indicate that S. polycystum is a potentially useful antioxidant source and contribute to the development of seaweed-based functional foods. PRACTICAL APPLICATION: Phenolics are usually divided into free and bound forms based on their extractability and interaction with cell wall components. The nutritional effects of bound phenolics in algae have long been neglected. These topics contribute to the development of seaweed-based functional foods.Entities:
Keywords: Sargassum polycystum; antioxidant ability; bound phenolic; free phenolic; seaweed
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35142370 PMCID: PMC9304242 DOI: 10.1111/1750-3841.16051
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Food Sci ISSN: 0022-1147 Impact factor: 3.693
Effects of different extraction solvents on the total phenolic content (TPC) and total flavonoid content (TFC) of free phenolic fraction from S. polycystum
| Solvents | TPC (mg GAE/100 g DW) | TFC (mg CE/100 g DW) |
|---|---|---|
| Methanol | 27.29 ± 3.04b | 107.43 ± 0.84cd |
| 70% Methanol | 40.63 ± 3.25c | 126.45 ± 6.46e |
| 50% Methanol | 43.99 ± 6.13c | 50.04 ± 3.79a |
| Ethanol | 19.46 ± 3.04a | 103.00 ± 3.86bc |
| 70% Ethanol | 68.88 ± 5.55d | 128.21 ± 2.29e |
| 50% Ethanol | 84.52 ± 8.69e | 98.79 ± 5.10b |
| Acetone | 25.26 ± 0.77b | 113.46 ± 1.25d |
| 70% Acetone | 91.54 ± 2.03e | 171.55 ± 5.43f |
| 50% Acetone | 90.55 ± 5.99e | 174.25 ± 1.54f |
| Ethyl acetate | 18.39 ± 1.52a | 125.03 ± 8.73e |
Each value was expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). Values with different letters within columns are significantly different (p < 0.05). Abbreviation: DW, dry weight.
Identification of free phenolic compositions in S. polycystum by ultra‐high‐performance liquid chromatography‐mass spectrometry (UHPLC‐MS)
| Peak |
| Tentative assignment | Model | Parents ions | Fragment ions | References | Polyphenols subclass |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 241,322 | Chlorogenic acid1 | – | 353.2 | 191.0,179.2 | Ivanescu et al., | Hydroxycinnamic acid |
| 2 | 243,315 | Cryptochlorogenic acid1 | – | 353.2 | 191.0, 179.2 | Shakya & Navarre, | Hydroxycinnamic acid |
| 3 | 276 | Baicalein1 |
| 271.0 | 122.9 | Li et al., | Flavone |
| 4 | 270,335 | Acacetin1 |
| 285.0 | 153.0 | Kim et al., | Flavone |
| 5 | 267,345 | Diosmetin1 |
| 301.0 | 153.0, 111.0, 255.0, 257.0 | Chen et al., | Flavone |
| 6 | 272,330 | Hinokiflavone1 | – | 537.0 | 417.0, 284.0 | Shan et al., | Flavone |
| 7 | 283,327 | Hesperidin1 | – | 609.0 | 301.0 | Mattonai et al., | Flavanone |
| 8 | 255,355 | Rutin1 | – | 609.0 | 301.1, 270.9,178.7 | Mattonai et al., | Flavonol |
| 9 | 257,356 | Quercitrin1 |
| 447.0 | 301.0, 179.0, 151.0 | Ivanescu et al., | Flavonol |
| 10 | 280, 306 | Trans‐resveratrol 1 |
| 229.0 | 135.0,107.1 | Lambert et al., | Stilbene |
| 11 | 280 | Diphlorethol/difucol | – | 249.0 | 231.0, 207.0, 163.0, 113.0 | Corona et al., | Phlorotannin |
| 12 | 280 | Eckol | + | 373.0 | 357.0, 319.0, 248.0, 231.0, 142.0 | Hipólito & Gerardo, | Phlorotannin |
| 13 | 262,346 | Unknown | – | 791.41 | 765.41, 575.0, 531.3, 461.5, 313.12, 277.2 | Flavonoid | |
| 14 | 274,310 | Unknown | – | 765.38 | 697.3, 644.7, 591.0, 413.2, 301.1 | Flavonoid |
Note: After the ultra‐high‐performance liquid chromatography‐mass spectrometry (UHPLC‐MS) analysis of all compounds present in the extracts and a comparison with the published mass spectrometry (MS) data, peaks 1–12 can be preliminarily deduced, then 1peaks 1–10 were further recognized by comparison with related commercial standards using UHPLC‐MS.
Contents of free phenolic compounds extracted by different extraction solvents determined by high‐performance liquid chromatography‐diode array detection (HPLC‐DAD)
| Content of free phenolic compounds (µg/g DW) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phenolics | Methanol | 70% Methanol | 50% Methanol | Ethanol | 70% Ethanol | 50% Ethanol | Acetone | 70% Acetone | 50% Acetone | Ethyl acetate |
| Chlorogenic acid | nd | 3.30 ± 0.29b | nd | 2.66 ± 0.24a | nd | nd | 2.37 ± 0.05a | 3.15 ± 0.25b | nd | nd |
| Cryptochlorogenic acid | nd | 2.73 ± 0.24a | 3.31 ± 0.20b | nd | 5.35 ± 0.39c | 4.92 ± 0.35c | nd | 6.51 ± 0.36d | 5.3 ± 0.31c | nd |
| Total phenolic acids | nd | 6.03 ± 0.26d | 3.31 ± 0.20b | 2.66 ± 0.24a | 5.35 ± 0.39c | 4.92 ± 0.35c | 2.37 ± 0.05a | 9.66 ± 0.35e | 5.3 ± 0.31c | nd |
| Baicalein | nd | nd | 13.63 ± 0.70a | nd | 17.18 ± 0.42bc | 13.48 ± 0.61a | 17.12 ± 0.24c | 16.46 ± 0.17b | 13.45 ± 0.21a | nd |
| Acacetin | nd | 2.86 ± 0.15c | 3.43 ± 0.24d | nd | 1.87 ± 0.14a | 2.46 ± 0.32bc | 27.31 ± 1.48e | 1.73 ± 0.17a | 2.42 ± 0.13b | nd |
| Diosmetin | nd | nd | nd | nd | 45.05 ± 0.97a | 48.05 ± 0.98b | nd | nd | nd | nd |
| Hinokiflavone | 25.57 ± 1.00d | 41.20 ± 1.24 g | 52.44 ± 2.05h | 22.07 ± 1.12c | 38.89 ± 1.19f | 22.59 ± 1.09c | 14.12 ± 0.48a | 37.85 ± 2.60f | 17.84 ± 1.03b | 28.37 ± 0.95e |
| Hesperidin | nd | 39.40 ± 3.57a | 39.28 ± 4.90a | nd | nd | nd | nd | nd | nd | nd |
| Rutin | 0.28 ± 0.03a | nd | nd | 0.51 ± 0.09b | nd | nd | nd | nd | nd | nd |
| Quercitrin | 0.10 ± 0.03a | 0.30 ± 0.06b | 0.56 ± 0.06c | nd | 3.31 ± 0.28e | 2.26 ± 0.29d | 0.15 ± 0.02a | 0.31 ± 0.03b | nd | nd |
| Total flavonoids | 25.95 ± 0.96b | 83.76 ± 2.76f | 109.34 ± 3.67h | 22.58 ± 0.98a | 106.3 ± 1.01h | 88.84 ± 0.89 g | 58.70 ± 1.34e | 56.35 ± 2.35e | 33.71 ± 0.87d | 28.37 ± 0.95c |
| Trans‐resveratrol | nd | nd | nd | nd | nd | nd | nd | 44.11±0.44b | 33.96±0.23a | nd |
| Diphlorethol/difucol1 | 5.01 ± 0.14e | 3.01 ± 0.21c | 0.87 ± 0.10a | 11.53 ± 0.25h | 10.98 ± 0.34h | 6.48 ± 0.13f | 8.01 ± 0.35 g | 4.21 ± 0.20d | 2.12 ± 0.21b | 8.52 ± 0.32 g |
| Eckol1 | 0.50 ± 0.04c | 0.34 ± 0.03b | nd | 0.74 ± 0.02e | 0.64 ± 0.04d | 0.34 ± 0.03b | 0.45 ± 0.04c | 0.30 ± 0.03b | 0.14 ± 0.02a | 0.54 ± 0.06 cd |
| Total phlorotannins | 5.51 ± 0.10e | 3.35 ± 0.19c | 0.87 ± 0.10a | 12.27 ± 0.33h | 11.62 ± 0.43h | 6.82 ± 0.12f | 8.46 ± 0.32 g | 4.51 ± 0.19d | 2.26 ± 0.20b | 9.06 ± 0.30 g |
| Number of phenolics | 5 | 8 | 7 | 5 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 9 | 7 | 3 |
| Total phenolics | 31.46 ± 1.05a | 93.14 ± 4.27e | 113.52 ± 3.78 g | 37.30 ± 0.87b | 125.10 ± 0.98h | 100.02 ± 0.97f | 69.53 ± 1.34c | 114.23 ± 2.5 g | 75.02 ± 0.99d | 37.40 ± 0.85b |
Note: After being identified, 1diphlorethol/difucol and eckol were quantified by HPLC‐DAD with the standard curve of phloroglucinol. The others were quantified by high‐performance liquid chromatography‐diode array detection (HPLC‐DAD) with their own standard curves. The contents were expressed as means ± SD (n = 3). Values not sharing a common letter within the same row are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Abbreviations: DW, dry weight; nd, not detected.
Antioxidant activity of free phenolic fraction from S. polycystum obtained by different extraction solvents
| Antioxidant activity | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| FRAP | |||
| Solvents | (mM Fe(II)E/g DW) | ABTS (mM TE/g DW) | ORAC (µM TE/g DW) |
| Methanol | 1.37 ± 0.13c | 1.02 ± 0.21c | 8.88 ± 0.41c |
| 70% Methanol | 2.30 ± 0.07d | 1.79 ± 0.31d | 8.93 ± 0.39c |
| 50% Methanol | 3.10 ± 0.02e | 2.04 ± 0.15de | 12.56 ± 0.29d |
| Ethanol | 0.82 ± 0.11b | 0.94 ± 0.14bc | 6.87 ± 0.37b |
| 70% Ethanol | 5.15 ± 0.03f | 2.09 ± 0.09e | 13.81 ± 0.29e |
| 50% Ethanol | 6.18 ± 0.11 g | 2.26 ± 0.12e | 21.71 ± 0.27 g |
| Acetone | 2.38 ± 0.09d | 0.46 ± 0.09a | 5.30 ± 0.05a |
| 70% Acetone | 6.79 ± 0.02h | 2.55 ± 0.15f | 20.15 ± 0.25f |
| 50% Acetone | 5.08 ± 0.18f | 2.15 ± 0.11e | 23.23 ± 0.33h |
| Ethyl acetate | 0.29 ± 0.02a | 0.67 ± 0.13ab | 5.50 ± 0.22a |
Note: Values not sharing a common letter within the same column are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Abbreviations: ABTS, 2,2′‐azino‐bis(3‐ethylbenzthiazoline)−6‐sulfonic acid; FRAP, ferric‐reducing antioxidant power; ORAC, oxygen radical absorbance capacity.
Correlation coefficients (r) between total flavonoid content (TFC), total phenolic content (TPC), and antioxidant activity (ferric‐reducing antioxidant power [FRAP], 2,2′‐azino‐bis(3‐ethylbenzthiazoline)−6‐sulfonic acid [ABTS], and oxygen radical absorbance capacity [ORAC]) of free phenolic fraction of S. polycystum obtained by different extraction solvents
| TFC | TPC | FRAP | ABTS | ORAC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TFC | 1 | ||||
| TPC | 0.659 | 1 | |||
| FRAP | 0.454 | 0.956 | 1 | ||
| ABTS | 0.287 | 0.886 | 0.863 | 1 | |
| ORAC | 0.506 | 0.970 | 0.896 | 0.865 | 1 |
Correlation is significant at p ≤ 0.05 level.
Correlation is significant at p ≤ 0.01 level.
Effect of different hydrolysis methods on the total phenolic content (TPC) and total flavonoid content (TFC) and antioxidant activity of bound phenolic fraction of S. polycystum
| Alkaline hydrolysis | Acid hydrolysis | |
|---|---|---|
| TPC (mg GAE/100 g DW) | 274.27 ± 6.71b | 63.73 ± 1.51a |
| TFC (mg CE/100 g DW) | 310.71 ± 3.86b | 144.98 ± 2.84a |
| FRAP (mM Fe(Ⅱ)E/g DW) | 7.58 ± 0.10b | 1.71 ± 0.15a |
| ABTS (mM TE/g DW) | 3.82 ± 0.19b | 3.27 ± 0.14a |
| ORAC (µM TE/g DW) | 94.39 ± 0.19b | 8.79 ± 0.30a |
Note: Values not sharing a common letter within the same row are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Abbreviations: ABTS, 2′‐azino‐bis(3‐ethylbenzthiazoline)−6‐sulfonic acid; FRAP, ferric‐reducing antioxidant power; ORAC, oxygen radical absorbance capacity.
Identification and quantification of bound phenolic compounds in S. polycystum
| Content (µg/g DW)3 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peak |
| Tentative assignment | Model | Parents ions | Fragment ions | Reference | Polyphenols subclass | Alkaline hydrolysis | Acid hydrolysis |
| 1 | 271 | Gallic acid1 | – | 168.9 | 125.0, 97.0 | Mattonai et al., | Hydroxybenzoic acid | 9.59 ± 1.69b | 1.51 ± 0.11a |
| 2 | 230,321 | Coutaric acid2 | – | 295.1 | 119.1, 149.1, 163.1 | Monica et al., | Hydroxycinnamic acid | 176.11 ± 9.84b | 18.20 ± 1.12a |
| 3 | 276 | Baicalein1 | + | 271.0 | 122.9 | Li et al., | Flavone | 20.99 ± 1.28 | nd |
| 4 | 267,345 | Diosmetin1 | + | 301.0 | 153.0, 111.0, 255.0, 257.0 | Chen et al., | Flavone | 81.25 ± 3.52 | nd |
| 5 | 267,339 | Apigenin1 | + | 271.0 | 227.0, 151.0 | Ivanescu et al., | Flavone | 16.04 ± 0.44 | nd |
| 6 | 242, 315 | Unknown | – | 609.0 | 565.0, 493.0, 299.0, 283.0 | Flavonoid | |||
| 7 | 252,326 | Unknown | – | 595.0 | 551.0, 421.0, 397.0, 325.0, 293.0 | Flavonoid | |||
| 8 | 280 | Unknown | – | 679.0 | 623.0, 578.0, 430.0, 340.0 | Phlorotannin/procyanidin | |||
| 9 | 280 | Unknown | – | 940.85 | 793.9, 686.8, 487.7,368.6, 249.4 | Phlorotannin | |||
Note: After the UHPLC‐MS analysis of all compounds exist in the extracts and a comparison with the published MS data, peaks 1–5 can be preliminarily deduced, then 1peaks were further recognized by comparison with related commercial standards using UHPLC‐MS. 2Peak 2 was not further assigned by UHPLC‐MS analysis of its commercial standard due to the lack of the commercial standard. 3Coutaric acid was quantified with standard curve of gallic acid using HPLC‐DAD. The other peaks were quantified by HPLC‐DAD with their own standard curves.
Values not sharing a common letter within the same row are significantly different (p < 0.05). Abbreviations: DW, dry weight; nd, not detected.