| Literature DB >> 35142041 |
Dan Hui Huang1, Jing He1, Xiao Fang Su1, Ya Na Wen1, Shu Jia Zhang1, Lai Yu Liu1, Haijin Zhao1, Cui Pin Ye1, Jian Hua Wu2, Shaoxi Cai1, Hangming Dong1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Accumulating studies have suggested the airway microbiota in lung cancer patients is significantly different from that of healthy controls. However, little is known about the relationship between airway microbiota and important clinical parameters of lung cancer. In this study, we aimed to explore the association between sputum microbiota and lung cancer stage, lymph node metastasis, intrathoracic metastasis, and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutation.Entities:
Keywords: 16S rRNA sequencing; EGFR gene; airway microbiota; lung cancer; metastasis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35142041 PMCID: PMC8930493 DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.14340
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Thorac Cancer ISSN: 1759-7706 Impact factor: 3.500
FIGURE 1Study flow diagram of patient recruitment and exclusion
FIGURE 2Taxonomic composition of sputum microbiota of the patients in the early stage (ES) and advanced stage (AS) groups. (a) Sputum phyla of the patients in the ES and AS groups; (b) sputum genera of the patients in the ES and AS groups
FIGURE 3Difference of sputum microbiota between NSCLC patients in the early stage (ES) and advanced stage (AS) groups. (a) Chao 1 index; (b) Simpson index; (c) Shannon index among NSCLC patients in the ES and AS groups; (d) PCOA plot based on Bray‐Curtis distance of sputum genus among NSCLC patients in the ES and AS groups. *p < 0.05, p was calculated using the Mann–Whitney U test
FIGURE 4Differentially abundant taxonomy and predicted metabolic function of sputum microbiota between NSCLC patients in the early stage (ES) and advanced stage (AS) groups. (a) Differentially abundant taxonomy between patients in the ES and AS groups identified by LEfSe; (b) differentially abundant phyla Actinobacteria, Firmicutes between the ES and AS groups; (c) differentially abundant genera Actinobacillus, Actinomyces and Granulicatella between SCC_M1 and AD_M1; (d) differential predicted metabolic function based on the MetaCyc database between patients in the ES and AS groups. *p < 0.05, calculated using the Mann–Whitney U test
FIGURE 5Genera co‐occurrence network based on SparCC of patients in (a) the early stage (ES) group; (b) advanced stage (AS) groups. Only p‐value ≤ 0.05 and SparCC correlation scores ≥0.5 or ≤−0.5 were included for networks inference. The genus nodes are colored based on phylum level. The size of each node was determined by the relative abundance of each genus
FIGURE 6Differentially abundant taxonomy and predicted metabolic function of sputum microbiota between lung adenocarcinoma patients with and without EGFR mutation. (a) Differentially abundant taxonomy between EGFR‐ lung adenocarcinoma and EGFR+ lung adenocarcinoma identified by LEfSe; (b) differentially abundant taxonomy between EGFR‐ nonsmoker lung adenocarcinoma and EGFR+ nonsmoker lung adenocarcinoma identified by LEfSe; (c) differentially abundant phyla Bacteroidetes between EGFR‐ nonsmoker lung adenocarcinoma and EGFR+ nonsmoker lung adenocarcinoma; (d) differentially abundant genera Actinobacillus and Parvimonas between EGFR‐ nonsmoker lung adenocarcinoma and EGFR+ nonsmoker lung adenocarcinoma; (e) differential predicted metabolic function based on the MetaCyc database between EGFR‐ nonsmoker lung adenocarcinoma and EGFR+ nonsmoker lung adenocarcinoma. *p < 0.05, calculated using the Mann–Whitney test