| Literature DB >> 35141188 |
Xiaojing Lian1, Lili Zhang2, Yang Zhao3, Yuhua Li4, Xuemin Jing5, Xin Liu6, Jianing Han7, Jianhong Ma7, Yongyong Zhang8, Huimin Guo2, Xiaojie Huang9.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to explore the utilization of a mobile multifunctional workstation for COVID-19 sample collection.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; mobile multifunctional workstation; nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal specimen collection; satisfaction; specimen collection
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35141188 PMCID: PMC8818745 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.794359
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Public Health ISSN: 2296-2565
Comparison of the two groups of nurses with different work patterns.
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 36.50 (33.25–43.50) | 36.50 (31.00–43.00) | 0.780 | |
| Years of work | 16.00 (10.00–23.50) | 14.50 (10.00–24.00) | 0.952 | |
| Positional titles | 0.609 | |||
| Primary nurses | 16 | 10 | ||
| Supervisor and deputy chief nurse | 20 | 14 | ||
| Education degree junior college education | 0.832 | |||
| Bachelor degree or above | 7 | 6 | ||
| 26 | 18 | |||
| Comfort of working environment | 2.00 (1.00–3.75) | 5.00 (4.00–5.00) | <0.001 | |
| Self-perceived security | 4.00 (3.00–5.00) | 5.00 (4.00–5.00) | 0.034 | |
| The convenience of information system | 3.00 (3.00–4.00) | 4.00 (4.00–4.00) | 0.001 | |
| Operational process flexibility | 0.00 (0.00–1.00) | 3.00 (2.00–4.00) | 0.009 | |
| Pharyngeal acquisition visibility | 4.00 (3.00–4.00) | 4.00 (4.00–4.00) | 0.099 | |
| Effectiveness of communication | 3.00 (3.00–4.00) | 4.00 (4.00–5.00) | 0.001 |
Bivariate and multivariate analysis of comfort of working environment.
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| 18–29 | Ref. | 0.287 | 0.366(0.072,1.855) | 0.225 |
| 30–39 | 4.200 (0.698, 25.264) | 0.117 | ||
| ≥40 | 1.213 (0.404, 3.645) | 0.730 | ||
|
| ||||
| ≤ 10 | Ref. | 0.420 | 1.251 (0.305, 5.130) | 0.756 |
| 10–20 | 1.833 (0.472, 7.216) | 0.382 | ||
| ≥21 | 2.333 (0.655, 8.309) | 0.191 | ||
|
| ||||
| Primary nurses | Ref. | |||
| Supervisor and deputy chief nurse | 1.125 (0.405, 3.126) | 0.821 | ||
|
| ||||
| Junior college education | Ref. | |||
| Bachelor degree or above | 0.754 (0.220, 2.585) | 0.654 | ||
|
| ||||
| PPE | Ref. | |||
| Workstations | 15.000 (4.039, 55.708) | <0.001 | 17.297 (4.294, 69.673) | <0.001 |
Bivariate and multivariate analysis of the convenience of information system and effectiveness of communication.
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| ||||
| 18–29 | Ref. | 0.502 | Ref. | 0.449 |
| 30–39 | 0.846 (0.171, 4.198) | 0.838 | 1.500 (0.245, 9.179) | 0.661 |
| ≥40 | 1.786 (0.578, 5.522) | 0.314 | 0.339 (0.577, 0.187) | 0.339 |
|
| ||||
| ≤ 10 | Ref. | 0.561 | Ref. | 0.636 |
| 10–20 | 1.111 (0.294, 4.205) | 0.877 | 0.655 (0.160, 2.680) | 0.556 |
| ≥21 | 1.889 (0.530, 6.727) | 0.326 | 0.530 (0.143, 1.962) | 0.342 |
|
| ||||
| Primary nurses | Ref. | Ref. | ||
| Supervisor and deputy chief nurse | 0.893 (0.314, 2.537) | 0.832 | 1.792 (0.625, 5.142) | 0.278 |
|
| ||||
| Junior college education | Ref. | Ref. | ||
| Bachelor degree or above | 1.381 (0.400, 4.767) | 0.610 | 0.655 (0.176, 2.437) | 0.528 |
|
| ||||
| PPE | Ref. | Ref. | ||
| Workstations | 6.250 (1.775, 22.008) | 0.004 | 5.588 (1.590, 19.646) | 0.007 |
Comparison between two groups of people requiring nasopharyngeal swabs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | 2.940 | 0.086 | ||
| Male | 107 | 93 | ||
| Female | 43 | 57 | ||
| Age | 43.00 (31.50–52.00) | 41.00 (30.00–51.00) | −0.178 | 0.858 |
| Education degree | 3.50 (1.75–3.00) | 3.00 (2.00–3.00) | −0.682 | 0.495 |
| Self-perceived security | 2.00 (1.75–3.00) | 2.00 (2.00–3.00) | −1.965 | 0.049 |
| Waiting time | 3.50 (2.00–4.00) | 3.00 (2.25–4.00) | −0.063 | 0.950 |
| Overall satisfaction | 3.00 (2.00–3.00) | 3.00 (2.00–4.00) | −2.053 | 0.040 |