| Literature DB >> 35140906 |
Muhammad Umar1, Zulqurnain Sabir1, Muhammad Asif Zahoor Raja2, K S Al-Basyouni3, S R Mahmoud4, Yolanda Guerrero Sánchez5.
Abstract
This study is associated to solve the nonlinear SIR dengue fever system using a computational methodology by operating the neural networks based on the designed Morlet wavelet (MWNNs), global scheme as genetic algorithm (GA), and rapid local search scheme as interior-point algorithm (IPA), i.e., GA-IPA. The optimization of fitness function based on MWNNs is performed for solving the nonlinear SIR dengue fever system. This MWNNs-based fitness function is accessible using the differential system and initial conditions of the nonlinear SIR dengue fever system. The designed procedures based on the MWNN-GA-IPA are applied to solve the nonlinear SIR dengue fever system to check the exactness, precision, constancy, and efficiency. The achieved numerical form of the nonlinear SIR dengue fever system via MWNN-GA-IPA was compared with the Runge-Kutta numerical results that verify the significance of MWNN-GA-IPA. Moreover, statistical reflections through different measures for the nonlinear SIR dengue fever system endorse the precision and convergence of the computational MWNN-GA-IPA.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35140906 PMCID: PMC8820869 DOI: 10.1155/2022/9981355
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Healthc Eng ISSN: 2040-2295 Impact factor: 2.682
Figure 1Structure of the present approach to solve the nonlinear SIR dengue fever system.
Optimization performance taking the MWNN-GA-IPA for the nonlinear SIR dengue fever system.
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| (i) |
| Move to |
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Figure 2Best weight vector set and result comparison for each class of nonlinear SIR dengue fever system. (a) Best weights of X(τ) for 10 neurons. (b) Best weights of Y(τ) for 10 neurons. (c) Best weights of Z(τ) for 10 neurons. (d) Comparison for X(τ) class. (e) Comparison for Y(τ) class. (f) Comparison for Z(T) class.
Figure 3AE values for each class of the nonlinear SIR dengue fever system. (a) AE for X(τ) class. (b) AE for Y(τ) class. (c) AE for Z(τ) class.
Figure 4Performance of the E-VAF, M.A.D, and T.I.C operators for solving each class of the nonlinear SIR dengue fever system. (a) Performance for each class of the nonlinear SIR system.
Figure 5Convergence of T.I.C plots along with the histogram using MWNN-GA-IPA to solve each class of the nonlinear SIR dengue fever system. (a) T.I.C for each class of the nonlinear SIR system. (b) Histogram for X(τ) class. (c) Histogram for Y(τ) class. (d) Histogram for Z(τ) class.
Figure 6Convergence of M.A.D and E-VAF plots along with the histogram using MWNN-GA-IPA to solve each class of the nonlinear SIR dengue fever system. (a) Histogram for X(τ) class. (b) Histogram for Y(τ) class. (c) Histogram for Z(τ) class. (d) E-VAF for each class of the nonlinear SIR system. (e) Histogram for X(τ) class. (f) Histogram for Y(τ) class. (g) Histogram for Z(τ) class.
Statistical presentations of the nonlinear SIR dengue fever system for the category X(τ).
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Min | Max | Median | S.I range | S.T.D | |
| 0 | 4.0423220 | 9.9990000 | 2.2132198 | 3.3825540 | 2.9955460 |
| 0.1 | 1.8562196 | 9.9800585 | 2.2575664 | 9.2252690 | 3.1917267 |
| 0.2 | 1.1989577 | 9.9570595 | 2.8147596 | 7.3089931 | 3.1842462 |
| 0.3 | 3.2594992 | 9.9360942 | 3.6204945 | 5.6263588 | 3.1769837 |
| 0.4 | 9.7767938 | 9.9151010 | 5.4797252 | 5.1357097 | 3.1697503 |
| 0.5 | 3.2511304 | 9.8940563 | 8.1700536 | 7.3575618 | 3.1625439 |
| 0.6 | 2.8132523 | 9.8729376 | 1.1797241 | 1.1757718 | 3.1554735 |
| 0.7 | 6.9767773 | 9.8517226 | 1.5987828 | 9.1401060 | 3.1478449 |
| 0.8 | 6.3270889 | 9.8303897 | 2.0912004 | 1.0215585 | 3.1411641 |
| 0.9 | 4.5794286 | 9.8089357 | 2.5581289 | 9.6963771 | 3.1339004 |
| 1 | 3.0336439 | 9.7981727 | 3.1364852 | 1.1245408 | 3.1271044 |
Statistical presentations of the nonlinear SIR dengue fever system for the category Y(τ).
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Min | Max | Median | S.I range | S.T.D | |
| 0 | 4.7826156 | 1.2441636 | 5.3999940 | 2.1685104 | 1.9190429 |
| 0.1 | 2.2617648 | 3.1953335 | 5.3868377 | 2.2227911 | 6.0207993 |
| 0.2 | 2.4551957 | 5.1214677 | 5.3800062 | 2.9618951 | 1.3159469 |
| 0.3 | 2.1066905 | 7.0066945 | 5.3756084 | 2.1655938 | 2.0394513 |
| 0.4 | 1.7704587 | 8.9185145 | 5.3809794 | 1.9832062 | 2.7655709 |
| 0.5 | 1.7527548 | 1.0862314 | 5.3919348 | 1.6099165 | 3.4944298 |
| 0.6 | 1.5351687 | 1.2834137 | 5.4066226 | 1.7106495 | 4.2264704 |
| 0.7 | 4.2598412 | 1.4831228 | 5.4286714 | 2.3156731 | 4.9614134 |
| 0.8 | 1.2432002 | 1.6851840 | 5.4585539 | 3.3573941 | 5.6986905 |
| 0.9 | 1.2880654 | 1.8894845 | 5.4928063 | 3.3031846 | 6.4404297 |
| 1 | 9.7394166 | 2.0992829 | 5.5344362 | 2.9146189 | 7.1876800 |
Statistical presentations of the nonlinear SIR dengue fever system for the category Z(τ).
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Min | Max | Median | S.I range | S.T.D | |
| 0 | 2.7359906 | 6.0293074 | 2.1020438 | 1.4892650 | 1.6947015 |
| 0.1 | 1.2779827 | 6.0606789 | 1.7227698 | 2.9467734 | 1.8379946 |
| 0.2 | 9.8289161 | 6.0932383 | 3.4063897 | 4.1260050 | 1.8423547 |
| 0.3 | 7.8962744 | 6.1220946 | 5.0622682 | 2.7004041 | 1.8477633 |
| 0.4 | 2.8442743 | 6.1487380 | 6.6956094 | 1.7144321 | 1.8548676 |
| 0.5 | 4.3296911 | 6.1745495 | 8.3558913 | 2.8627209 | 1.8637956 |
| 0.6 | 6.4428148 | 6.2007841 | 1.0025700 | 3.3723574 | 1.8746689 |
| 0.7 | 7.8570024 | 6.2285742 | 1.1721379 | 3.3496552 | 1.8875847 |
| 0.8 | 8.0198804 | 6.2589332 | 1.3406477 | 3.9024126 | 1.9025869 |
| 0.9 | 4.5991286 | 6.2927739 | 1.5084468 | 2.3165808 | 1.9198331 |
| 1 | 4.4797926 | 6.3311235 | 1.6779808 | 4.5753017 | 1.9389410 |
Global presentations for each category of the nonlinear SIR dengue fever system.
| Category | [G-M.A.D] | [G-T.I.C] | [G-E.VAF] | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | S.I range | Mean | S.I range | Mean | S.I range | |
|
| 1.14673 | 7.46457 | 1.09132 | 5.61892 | 2.30930 | 1.16918 |
|
| 5.42141 | 1.85278 | 3.86220 | 1.58454 | 6.26006 | 4.76894 |
|
| 8.40963 | 2.85409 | 7.05895 | 2.03526 | 6.46250 | 1.58215 |