Literature DB >> 35140862

Factors Associated with Femoral Neck Shortening After Closed or Open Reduction and Screw Fixation.

Abdulkadir Polat1, Abdulhamit Misir1, Mehmet Ozbey Buyukkuscu1, Seckin Basilgan1, Hakan Basar1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the incidence of femoral neck shortening (FNS) after the treatment of displaced and non-displaced femoral neck fractures with closed or open reduction internal fixation, and determine the independent factors associated with this condition.
METHOD: The study included 81 patients who underwent internal fixation by closed or open reduction with multiple screws between 2013 and 2018 due to femoral neck fracture (FNF) and were followed up for at least 1 year. Patients were divided into two groups as with and without FNS. The patient, fracture, and surgical parameters compared between the two groups, and the factors affecting development of FNS were investigated.
RESULTS: Internal fixation was applied by closed reduction in 56 patients (69.1%) and open in 25 (30.9%). FNS was detected in 41 patients (50.6%), with the mean shortening 6.3 ± 6.4 mm. Fracture union achieved in 72 patients (89%). The mean time to fracture union was 4.3 ± 2.3 months.No statistically significant relationship found between FNS and the parameters of gender, age, smoking, reduction type, number, type and orientation of screws, Singh index, and Garden fix index (p > 0.05).However, there was significant difference between two groups regarding energy of the fracture, fragmentation, coronal angulation, Garden type, and fixation with medial buttress plate (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: FNS is an expected condition in FNF fixed by screws. Patients with high-energy traumas and advanced Garden types are more likely to have FNS. The use of medial plate may be effective in preventing FNS. © Indian Orthopaedics Association 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Femoral neck fracture; Malunion; Medial buttress plate; Shortening

Year:  2021        PMID: 35140862      PMCID: PMC8789974          DOI: 10.1007/s43465-021-00484-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Orthop        ISSN: 0019-5413            Impact factor:   1.033


  27 in total

1.  Can bone quality be predicted accurately by Singh index in patients with rheumatoid arthritis?

Authors:  Cemal Bes; Melih Güven; Budak Akman; Evren Fehmi Atay; Emrah Ceviz; Mehmet Soy
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 2.980

2.  Femoral Neck Shortening After Hip Fracture Fixation Is Associated With Inferior Hip Function: Results From the FAITH Trial.

Authors:  Jessica Felton; Gerard P Slobogean; Sarah S Jackson; Gregory J Della Rocca; Susan Liew; Robert Haverlag; Kyle J Jeray; Sheila A Sprague; Nathan N OʼHara; Marc Swiontkowski; Mohit Bhandari
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.512

3.  Fixation of femoral neck fractures using divergent versus parallel cannulated screws.

Authors:  Ioannis D Papanastassiou; Andreas F Mavrogenis; Zinon T Kokkalis; Konstantinos Nikolopoulos; Konstantinos Skourtas; Panayiotis J Papagelopoulos
Journal:  J Long Term Eff Med Implants       Date:  2011

Review 4.  Tips and tricks for ORIF of displaced femoral neck fractures in the young adult patient.

Authors:  Stephen C Stacey; Christopher H Renninger; David Hak; Cyril Mauffrey
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-03-10

5.  Femoral neck shortening in adult patients under the age of 55 years is associated with worse functional outcomes: Analysis of the prospective multi-center study of hip fracture outcomes in China (SHOC).

Authors:  Gerard P Slobogean; David J Stockton; Bing-Fang Zeng; Dong Wang; Baotong Ma; Andrew N Pollak
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 2.586

6.  Incidence, Magnitude, and Predictors of Shortening in Young Femoral Neck Fractures.

Authors:  David J Stockton; Kelly A Lefaivre; Daniel E Deakin; Georg Osterhoff; Andrew Yamada; Henry M Broekhuyse; Peter J OʼBrien; Gerard P Slobogean
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.512

7.  Does screw configuration affect subtrochanteric fracture after femoral neck fixation?

Authors:  Jerome W Oakey; Michael D Stover; Hobie D Summers; Mark Sartori; Robert M Havey; Avinash G Patwardhan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Femoral neck shortening after fracture fixation with multiple cancellous screws: incidence and effect on function.

Authors:  Michael Zlowodzki; Olufemi Ayeni; Olufemi Ayieni; Brad A Petrisor; Mohit Bhandari
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2008-01

9.  Risk Factors for Neck Shortening in Patients with Valgus Impacted Femoral Neck Fractures Treated with Three Parallel Screws: Is Bone Density an Affecting Factor?

Authors:  Yerl-Bo Sung; Eui-Yub Jung; Kyung-Il Kim; Soo-Yeon Kim
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2017-12-01

10.  Risk factors for osteoporosis are common in young and middle-aged patients with femoral neck fractures regardless of trauma mechanism.

Authors:  Amer N Al-Ani; Gustaf Neander; Bodil Samuelsson; Richard Blomfeldt; Wilhelmina Ekström; Margareta Hedström
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 3.717

View more
  2 in total

1.  Femoral neck system versus cannulated screws for fixation of femoral neck fracture in young adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yao Lu; Zhilong Huang; Yibo Xu; Qiang Huang; Cheng Ren; Ming Li; Zhong Li; Liang Sun; Hanzhong Xue; Kun Zhang; Qian Wang; Teng Ma
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 3.940

2.  The efficacy of dynamic compression locking system vs. dynamic hip screw in the treatment of femoral neck fractures: a comparative study.

Authors:  Jian-Zhong Chang; Ya-Ping Xiao; Ling Li; Ming-Jian Bei
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 2.562

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.