Literature DB >> 16462455

Does screw configuration affect subtrochanteric fracture after femoral neck fixation?

Jerome W Oakey1, Michael D Stover, Hobie D Summers, Mark Sartori, Robert M Havey, Avinash G Patwardhan.   

Abstract

A subtrochanteric femur fracture after cannulated screw fixation of a femoral neck fracture is a devastating complication. We hypothesized that an apex-distal screw orientation would tolerate higher loads to subtrochanteric fracture. Human cadaveric femora were instrumented with three cannulated screws in either an apex-distal or an apex-proximal configuration. Specimens were loaded along the mechanical axis to failure creating a subtrochanteric femur fracture. Ultimate load to failure and the effect of bone density on load to failure were compared between groups. There was a greater load to failure in the apex-distal group compared with the apex-proximal group. The mean force to fracture in the apex-distal group (11,330 N; standard deviation = 3151 N) was greater than the mean force to fracture in the apex-proximal group (7795 N; standard deviation = 3194 N). Previous investigations have shown improved femoral neck fixation with an apex-distal configuration, but none has examined the relationship between screw orientation and subtrochanteric fractures. Our observations support the use of an apex-distal configuration for cannulated screw fixation of femoral neck fractures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16462455     DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000188557.65387.fc

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  19 in total

1.  Contemporary management of femoral neck fractures: the young and the old.

Authors:  David A Forsh; Tania A Ferguson
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2012-09

Review 2.  [Percutaneous screw osteosynthesis of femoral neck fractures in the elderly. Subtrochanteric fractures as severe complications].

Authors:  H Jansen; S P Frey; R H Meffert
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  Radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of osteoid osteoma: results and complications.

Authors:  Jeffrey Earhart; David Wellman; James Donaldson; Julie Chesterton; Erik King; Joseph A Janicki
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2013-02-14

4.  A guide to improving the care of patients with fragility fractures.

Authors:  Susan V Bukata; Benedict F Digiovanni; Susan M Friedman; Harry Hoyen; Amy Kates; Stephen L Kates; Simon C Mears; Daniel A Mendelson; Fernando H Serna; Frederick E Sieber; Wakenda K Tyler
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2011-01

5.  Scaphoid Proximal Pole Fracture Following Headless Screw Fixation.

Authors:  Schneider K Rancy; Jonathan A Zelken; Joseph D Lipman; Scott W Wolfe
Journal:  J Wrist Surg       Date:  2015-11-21

Review 6.  Tips and tricks for ORIF of displaced femoral neck fractures in the young adult patient.

Authors:  Stephen C Stacey; Christopher H Renninger; David Hak; Cyril Mauffrey
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-03-10

7.  Is there an increased risk for subtrochanteric stress fracture with the Femoral Neck System versus multiple cannulated screws fixation?

Authors:  Megan R Hsu; Henry T Shu; Kitchai Luksameearunothai; Adam Margalit; Andrew T Yu; Erik A Hasenboehler; Babar Shafiq
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2022-02-16

8.  Femoral Iatrogenic Subtrochanteric Fatigue Fracture Risk is not Increased by Placing Drill Holes Below the Level of the Lesser Trochanter.

Authors:  Andrew G Tsai; Timothy J Ashworth; Randall Marcus; Ozan Akkus
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2017

9.  A Guide to Improving the Care of Patients with Fragility Fractures, Edition 2.

Authors:  Simon C Mears; Stephen L Kates
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2015-06

10.  Analysis on risk factors for neck shortening after internal fixation for Pauwels II femoral neck fracture in young patients.

Authors:  Fulong Zhao; Lijuan Guo; Xuefei Wang; Yakui Zhang
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 2.175

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.