| Literature DB >> 35140298 |
Muhammad Talib Kalhoro1, Hong Zhang2, Ghulam Mujtaba Kalhoro1, Fukai Wang1, Tianhong Chen1, Yahya Faqir1, Farhan Nabi1.
Abstract
Recently, plant essential oils (EOs) have attracted special attention in plant disease control and food preservation. Since ancient times, essential oils extracted from plants have exhibited many biological characteristics, especially antimicrobial properties. Recent studies have described the potentials of EOs and derivatives to inhibit the growth and reproduction of microorganisms, mainly in response of overwhelming concerns of consumers about food safety. In the context of returning to nature, with the advancement of science and technology and improved living standards, people have begun to seek solutions for food hygiene without chemical additives. Therefore, biological pesticides and plant-oriented chemicals have received special attention from scientists because they are environmentally friendly and nonhazardous, sustainable, and effective alternatives against many noxious phytopathogens. Present study is intended to appraise the fungicidal properties of ginger EOs to combat leaf blight disease of taro, which threatens global taro production. Farmers often hinge on extremely toxic synthetic fungicides to manage diseases, but the residual effects and resistance of chemicals are unavoidable. The microwave-assisted hydrodistillation method was used for ginger EOs extraction and an FTIR (ATR) spectrometer was used to evaluate their chemical composition and citral was identified as most abundant compound (89.05%) in oil. The pathogen isolated from lesions of diseased taro plants was identified as Phytophthora colocasiae and used as test fungus in the present study. Ginger EO was evaluated in-vitro for antifungal properties against mycelium growth, sporangium production, zoospore germination, leaf, and corm necrosis inhibition. Repeated experiments have shown that the concentration of ginger essential oil (1250 ppm) proved to be the lowest dose to obtain 100% inhibition of fungal growth and spore germination, sporangia formation and leaf necrosis assessment. These results are derived from this fungal species and a hypothesis that involves further research on other plant pathogens to demonstrate the overall potency of essential oils. This study references the easy, economic, and environmental management and control of plant diseases using essential oils and byproducts.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35140298 PMCID: PMC8828847 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-06321-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure. 1FTIR spectra of ginger essential oil.
Mycelium, zoospores, and sporangium inhibition of P. colocasiae by ginger EO.
| EO concentration (ppm) | Radius colony (mm) | Inhibition %* | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mycelium | Zoospore | Sporangium | ||
| 0.00 | 45.00 ± 0.0a | 0.00 ± 0.00e | 0.00 ± 0.00d | 0.00 ± 0.00d |
| 156 | 28.00 ± 1.63b | 37.77 ± 1.81d | 59.42 ± 0.91c | 77.06 ± 0.68c |
| 312 | 10.75 ± 1.73c | 76.11 ± 1.89c | 82.49 ± 0.68b | 83.20 ± 0.51b |
| 625 | 5.50 ± 1.08d | 87.77 ± 1.20b | 100.00 ± 0.00a | 100.00 ± 0.00a |
| 1250 | 0.00 ± 0.00e | 100.00 ± 0.00a | 100.00 ± 0.00a | 100.00 ± 0.00a |
| 2500 | 0.00 ± 0.00e | 100.00 ± 0.00a | 100.00 ± 0.00a | 100.00 ± 0.00a |
| 5000 | 0.00 ± 0.00e | 100.00 ± 0.00a | 100.00 ± 0.00a | 100.00 ± 0.00a |
| Metalaxyl | 0.00 ± 0.00e | 100.00 ± 0.00a | 100.00 ± 0.00a | 100.00 ± 0.00a |
Values indicate means of four replications, and means followed by different subscripts in the same column indicate significantly different based on the LSD (P < 0.05).
*Inhibition percentage compared with negative and positive control.
Inhibition effects of ginger EO on leaf blight and sporulation of, P colocasiae.
| Essential oil | Latency time | Leaf blight symptoms | Sporangia production | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Concentrations (ppm) | Hour | Diameter (mm) | Inhibition* % | 103 Sporangia/mL | Inhibition* % |
| 0.00 | 16.50 ± 0.79a | 0.00 ± 0.00e | 95.00 ± 1.29a | 0.00 ± 0.00e | |
| 156 | 8.92 ± 0.52b | 45.90 ± 3.19d | 38.25 ± 1.49b | 59.73 ± 1.57d | |
| 312 | 5.85 ± 0.28c | 64.54 ± 1.72c | 24.50 ± 1.19c | 74.21 ± 1.25c | |
| 625 | 3.00 ± 0.27d | 81.81 ± 1.69b | 12.75 ± 0.85d | 86.57 ± 0.89b | |
| 1250 | = | 0.00 ± 0.00e | 100 ± 0.00a | 0.00 ± 0.00e | 100 ± 0.00a |
| 2500 | = | 0.00 ± 0.00e | 100 ± 0.00a | 0.00 ± 0.00e | 100 ± 0.00a |
| 5000 | = | 0.00 ± 0.00e | 100 ± 0.00a | 0.00 ± 0.00e | 100 ± 0.00a |
| Metalaxyl | = | 0.00 ± 0.00e | 100 ± 0.00a | 0.00 ± 0.00e | 100 ± 0.00a |
Significant values are in bold.
Values indicate means of four replications, and dissimilar letters in the same column indicate significant differences based on the LSD test (P < 0.05).
*Inhibition percentage compared with the control without ginger EO = Indicates no symptoms.
Figure 2Inhibition effects of ginger EO on taro corms inoculated with P. colocasiae. Values are the means of four replicates, and dissimilar letters indicate significantly different based on the LSD test.
Figure 3Microwave-assisted hydrodistillation equipment design.
Figure 4Typical Symptoms of taro leaf blight and fungal Morphology of Phytophthora colocasiae. (A) Leaf blight lesions showing silvery rings of sporangia, (B) Symptoms on leaf petioles, (C) Cross-section of corm showing decaying symptoms, (D) Typical symptoms, lesion showing plant sap exudates, (E) Colony morphology of P colocasiae, (F) Sporangia with mycelium and zoospores, (G) sporangia releasing zoospores, (H) Zoospores magnified under compound microscope.