Literature DB >> 35139868

Loss of Drosophila Coq8 results in impaired survival, locomotor deficits and photoreceptor degeneration.

Angelia J Hura1, Hannah R Hawley1, Wei Jun Tan1, Rebecca J Penny1, Jessie C Jacobsen2, Helen L Fitzsimons3.   

Abstract

Coenzyme Q8A encodes the homologue of yeast coq8, an ATPase that is required for the biosynthesis of Coenzyme Q10, an essential component of the electron transport chain. Mutations in COQ8A in humans result in CoQ10 deficiency, the clinical features of which include early-onset cerebellar ataxia, seizures and intellectual disability. The rapid advancement of massively parallel sequencing has resulted in the identification of more than 40 new mutations in COQ8A and functional studies are required to confirm causality and to further research into determining the specific mechanisms through which the mutations result in loss of function. To that end, a Drosophila model of Coq8 deficiency was developed and characterized to determine its appropriateness as a model system to further explore the role of Coq8 in the brain, and for functional characterisation of Coq8 mutations. Pan-neuronal RNAi knockdown of Coq8 was largely lethal, with female escapers displaying severe locomotor deficits. Knockdown of Coq8 in the eye resulted in degeneration of photoreceptors, progressive necrosis and increased generation of reactive oxygen species. Reintroduction of wild-type Coq8 restored normal function, however expression of human wild-type COQ8A exacerbated the eye phenotype, suggesting it was acting as a dominant-negative. This model is therefore informative for investigating the function of Drosophila Coq8, however human COQ8A mutations cannot be assessed as hCOQ8A does not rescue Coq8 deficiency.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brain; COQ8A; Coenzyme Q10; Drosophila; Mitochondria; Neurodegeneration; Neurodevelopment; Neuron; Photoreceptor; coq8

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35139868      PMCID: PMC8827264          DOI: 10.1186/s13041-022-00900-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Brain        ISSN: 1756-6606            Impact factor:   4.041


Main text

Coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10, ubiquinone) is an essential component of the electron transport chain that shuffles electrons from complex I and complex II to complex III for mitochondrial respiration. Biosynthesis of CoQ10 in humans is orchestrated by a number of enzymes that are highly conserved across the animal kingdom [1]. One such enzyme is Coenzyme Q8A (ADCK3, CABC1), an atypical kinase of the UbiB protein kinase-like family, which localizes to the inner mitochondrial matrix [2] where it is activated by lipid precursors [3]. Its specific role in CoQ10 biosynthesis has not been fully elucidated, however it exhibits ATPase activity and is thought to couple hydrolysis of ATP to extraction of lipids into the aqueous matrix [3]. COQ8A also associates with other COQ biosynthetic proteins (COQ3-9), forming Complex Q [2, 4], and the presence of COQ8A is integral to its stability, as knockout of COQ8A in the mouse reduces the expression of all other COQ proteins in the complex in multiple tissues including the cerebellum and skeletal muscle [4]. Mutations in COQ8A in humans result in CoQ10 deficiency (OMIM: 612,016), the clinical features of which include early-onset cerebellar ataxia, seizures and intellectual disability [5-8]. The rapid advancement of massively parallel sequencing methodologies has resulted in the identification of more than 40 mutations in COQ8A [6-15] [16-22] and functional studies are required to confirm causality and to determine the specific mechanisms through which the mutations impact function. To that end, we developed and characterized a Drosophila model of Coq8 deficiency to further explore the role of Coq8 in the brain, and to assess the impact of loss of function Coq8 mutations. Drosophila Coq8 (CG32649) is orthologous to human COQ8A, sharing 53% identity/70% similarity in the C-terminal two-thirds of the protein (NCBI BLAST, accession NP_572836.1 vs NP_064632.2), which contains conserved sequence motifs that are central to the function of human COQ8A [3, 4] [23]. We first investigated the importance of Coq8 to neuronal function in Drosophila via RNAi knockdown with the UAS/GAL4 system [24]. Pan-neuronal knockdown was lethal when flies were raised at 25 °C, however, when raised at 18 °C (at which temperature GAL4 is less active and thus there is reduced RNAi) some female flies survived (Fig. 1A), allowing characterization of the impact of Coq8 depletion on neuronal phenotypes. The female survivors displayed reduced movement with a tendency to accumulate at the bottom of the vial, therefore their locomotor function was assessed with the negative geotaxis assay [25]. Female flies displayed a profound climbing deficit, with only 3% climbing over 5 cm in comparison to 70% of controls which express GAL4 but do not carry the RNAi construct (Fig. 1B).
Fig. 1

A Survival of male and female flies following knockdown of Coq8 with elav-GAL4, which drives expression of Coq8 RNAi in all neurons. In all graphs, black bars indicate females and grey bars indicates males. elav/ + indicates elav-GAL4 crossed to the wild-type w control. Flies were raised at 18 °C. The number of live male and female progeny were counted. Error bars indicate the standard error of three separate experiments. Female (t-test t(4) = 3.585, *p = 0.0231); Male (t-test t(4) = 16.2, ***p < 0.0001). B Flies were generated as described in A. The proportion of female flies (30/vial) to climb above 5 cm in 10 s was counted. Nine vials of flies were counted per genotype. (t-test t(16) = 23.465, ***p < 0.0001). The schematic indicates the average climbing index of the Coq8 RNAi (CI = 0.03) and control (CI = 0.7) females. C Frontal confocal projections of whole brains processed for immunohistochemistry with anti-Bruchpilot (n = 6 brains/group). Scale bar = 100 μm. D GMR-GAL4 males were crossed to UAS-Coq8 RNAi or w females and the eyes of F1 progeny were analysed by light and scanning electron microscopy. Scale bar = 200 μm (top), 50 μm (bottom). E Nile red staining on dissected retinas. Scale bar 10 μm. F Dihydroethidium staining on dissected retinas. Scale bar = 10 μm. The fluorescence intensity was quantified (n = 3/group) Female (t-test t(5) = 44.68, ***p < 0.0001); Male (t-test t(5) = 3.3153, *p = 0.0211). G Flies were generated as described in E. Eyes were imaged by light microscopy at the indicated number of days post-eclosion. Scale bar = 200 μm. H The area of necrosis in each eye was quantified (n ≥ 8 eyes/group). (Female: ANOVA F(3,31) = 28.7 p < 0.0001; post-hoc Tukey’s test. Male: ANOVA F(3,32) = 27.12 p < 0.0001; post-hoc Tukey’s test, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05). I Co-expression of mitoGFP and Myc-tagged Drosophila Coq8 with motor neuron driver D42-GAL4. Scale bar = 20 μm. J. elav-GAL4 females were crossed to males of the indicated genotypes and the number of surviving adult male F1 progeny were counted (ANOVA F(4,10) = 51.95 p < 0.0001; post-hoc Tukey’s test, **p < 0.01). K The climbing ability of surviving females was assessed (ANOVA F(4,40) = 137.46 p < 0.0001; post-hoc Tukey’s test, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05). L GMR-GAL4 females were crossed to flies of the indicated genotypes and eyes were imaged by light microscopy 14 days post-eclosion. Co-expression of WT Coq8 rescued the necrosis resulting from Coq8 knockdown but I295P and L520* did not. M Quantification of necrosis in L (n ≥ 9 eyes/group) (Female: ANOVA F(4,43) = 7.73 p < 0.0001; post-hoc Tukey’s test. Male: ANOVA F(4,43) = 10.4 p < 0.0001; post-hoc Tukey’s test, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05). N Co-expression of mitoGFP and human COQ8A with motor neuron driver D42-GAL4 detected with anti-COQ8A. Scale bar = 12 μm. O elav-GAL4 females were crossed to males of the indicated genotypes and the number of surviving adult male F1 progeny were counted (ANOVA F(3,8) = 133.22 p < 0.0001; post-hoc Tukey’s test, **p < 0.01). P The climbing ability of surviving females was assessed (ANOVA F(3,28) = 108.46 p < 0.0001; post-hoc Tukey’s test, **p < 0.01). Q Eyes of the indicated genotypes were imaged by light microscopy at 14 days post-eclosion. Scale bar = 200 μm. R Necrosis was quantified in the eyes of the indicated genotypes (n =  ≥ 9 eyes/group) (Female: ANOVA F(3,34) = 34.9 p < 0.0001; post-hoc Tukey’s test. Male: ANOVA F(3,34) = 77.4 p < 0.0001; post-hoc Tukey’s test, **p < 0.01)

A Survival of male and female flies following knockdown of Coq8 with elav-GAL4, which drives expression of Coq8 RNAi in all neurons. In all graphs, black bars indicate females and grey bars indicates males. elav/ + indicates elav-GAL4 crossed to the wild-type w control. Flies were raised at 18 °C. The number of live male and female progeny were counted. Error bars indicate the standard error of three separate experiments. Female (t-test t(4) = 3.585, *p = 0.0231); Male (t-test t(4) = 16.2, ***p < 0.0001). B Flies were generated as described in A. The proportion of female flies (30/vial) to climb above 5 cm in 10 s was counted. Nine vials of flies were counted per genotype. (t-test t(16) = 23.465, ***p < 0.0001). The schematic indicates the average climbing index of the Coq8 RNAi (CI = 0.03) and control (CI = 0.7) females. C Frontal confocal projections of whole brains processed for immunohistochemistry with anti-Bruchpilot (n = 6 brains/group). Scale bar = 100 μm. D GMR-GAL4 males were crossed to UAS-Coq8 RNAi or w females and the eyes of F1 progeny were analysed by light and scanning electron microscopy. Scale bar = 200 μm (top), 50 μm (bottom). E Nile red staining on dissected retinas. Scale bar 10 μm. F Dihydroethidium staining on dissected retinas. Scale bar = 10 μm. The fluorescence intensity was quantified (n = 3/group) Female (t-test t(5) = 44.68, ***p < 0.0001); Male (t-test t(5) = 3.3153, *p = 0.0211). G Flies were generated as described in E. Eyes were imaged by light microscopy at the indicated number of days post-eclosion. Scale bar = 200 μm. H The area of necrosis in each eye was quantified (n ≥ 8 eyes/group). (Female: ANOVA F(3,31) = 28.7 p < 0.0001; post-hoc Tukey’s test. Male: ANOVA F(3,32) = 27.12 p < 0.0001; post-hoc Tukey’s test, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05). I Co-expression of mitoGFP and Myc-tagged Drosophila Coq8 with motor neuron driver D42-GAL4. Scale bar = 20 μm. J. elav-GAL4 females were crossed to males of the indicated genotypes and the number of surviving adult male F1 progeny were counted (ANOVA F(4,10) = 51.95 p < 0.0001; post-hoc Tukey’s test, **p < 0.01). K The climbing ability of surviving females was assessed (ANOVA F(4,40) = 137.46 p < 0.0001; post-hoc Tukey’s test, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05). L GMR-GAL4 females were crossed to flies of the indicated genotypes and eyes were imaged by light microscopy 14 days post-eclosion. Co-expression of WT Coq8 rescued the necrosis resulting from Coq8 knockdown but I295P and L520* did not. M Quantification of necrosis in L (n ≥ 9 eyes/group) (Female: ANOVA F(4,43) = 7.73 p < 0.0001; post-hoc Tukey’s test. Male: ANOVA F(4,43) = 10.4 p < 0.0001; post-hoc Tukey’s test, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05). N Co-expression of mitoGFP and human COQ8A with motor neuron driver D42-GAL4 detected with anti-COQ8A. Scale bar = 12 μm. O elav-GAL4 females were crossed to males of the indicated genotypes and the number of surviving adult male F1 progeny were counted (ANOVA F(3,8) = 133.22 p < 0.0001; post-hoc Tukey’s test, **p < 0.01). P The climbing ability of surviving females was assessed (ANOVA F(3,28) = 108.46 p < 0.0001; post-hoc Tukey’s test, **p < 0.01). Q Eyes of the indicated genotypes were imaged by light microscopy at 14 days post-eclosion. Scale bar = 200 μm. R Necrosis was quantified in the eyes of the indicated genotypes (n =  ≥ 9 eyes/group) (Female: ANOVA F(3,34) = 34.9 p < 0.0001; post-hoc Tukey’s test. Male: ANOVA F(3,34) = 77.4 p < 0.0001; post-hoc Tukey’s test, **p < 0.01) We next sought to examine whether the behavioral changes were associated with changes in brain morphology and function. The gross architecture of the brain was assessed via immunohistochemistry with anti-Bruchpilot, which labels the synaptic neuropil and allows visualization of the ultrastructure of the brain [26]. No gross morphological deficits were observed (Fig. 1C) and examination of individual sections did not indicate increased vacuolation. We next examined the impact of Coq8 depletion on photoreceptor development and integrity and observed a profound impairment in ommatidial patterning, with detachment of ommatidia and misaligned bristles (Fig. 1D). Each ommatidium develops with a characteristic asymmetric trapezoid arrangement of photoreceptors as visualized by Nile Red, which stains lipids in the rhabdomeres [27] (Fig. 1E top). When Coq8 was reduced, this regular arrangement was disrupted (Fig. 1E bottom). As COQ8A mutations have been associated with oxidative stress [2], dihydroethidium staining [28] was performed on retina, which showed an increase in reactive oxygen species (Fig. 1F). Necrotic patches were also evident on the surface of the eye (Fig. 1G) and a progressive increase in necrosis was observed, with area of the necrotic tissue increasing in size 111-fold in males and 490-fold in females from day 3 to 42 (Fig. 1H,  p < 0.0001). Expression of Myc-tagged wild-type Coq8 in neurons resulted in robust expression in the adult brain and appropriate localization to mitochondria as indicated by colocalization with mito-GFP [29] (Fig. 1I). Co-expression of Coq8 rescued the male lethality resulting from Coq8 knockdown (Fig. 1J), as well as the climbing deficits (Fig. 1K) and necrosis (Fig. 1L, M), confirming the specificity of the RNAi. Two mutants of Coq8 (I295P and L520*) were generated that were based on corresponding human mutations (p.Leu277Pro and c.1506 + 1G > A) that we previously identified in a sibling pair [7]. Unlike the complementation observed on reintroduction of WT Coq8, neither mutant rescued the lethality (Fig. 1J), the climbing deficits (Fig. 1K) or impaired eye development (Fig. 1M). Immunohistochemical analyses revealed that expression of I295P was reduced and L520* expression was not detected (Additional file 3). We next examined whether human wild-type COQ8A could rescue Coq8 knockdown. The hCOQ8A cDNA was expressed and localized appropriately to mitochondria (Fig. 1N). However, it was unable to rescue male lethality (Fig. 1O), climbing deficits (Fig. 1P) or necrosis (Fig. 1Q, R), in fact expression of hCOQ8A in a wild-type background impaired survival and climbing. Moreover, hCOQ8A also appeared to act as a dominant-negative in the eye, resulting in a more severe phenotype than Coq8 knockdown alone, with smaller eyes displaying a complete loss of ommatidial integrity and pigmentation, resulting in a glossy phenotype (Fig. 1Q), which has been previously observed in mutants for mitochondrial function [30]. Coq8 functions as a dimer, thus it is possible that hCOQ8A interferes with Coq8 function, the impact of which is exacerbated when Coq8 is already depleted. Taken together, these data show that Coq8 is essential for survival in Drosophila, and is required for normal locomotor function and survival of photoreceptors. This model of Coq8 deficiency can be used for investigating the function of Drosophila Coq8. The lack of rescue by hCOQ8A suggests that Drosophila Coq8 has additional functions to hCOQ8A and warrants further investigation. Additional file 1. Materials and Methods. Additional file 2. References 16 to 30. Additional file 3: Figure S1. Expression of Myc-tagged WT Coq8, Coq8 I295P and Coq8 L520* in the Drosophila brain. Anti-Myc (green) detects the Myc-tagged proteins, and anti-Bruchpilot detects the neuropil marker nc82 (magenta). All genotypes were generated by crossing elav-GAL4 females to males carrying each indicated UAS-Coq8 transgene and to the w control (elav-GAL4/ +). Representative images of frontal confocal projections of whole brains (n = 6/group) are shown. Robust expression of WT Coq8 was observed across the brain, with localization to the cytoplasm of neurons as seen in the magnified image in the inset. Expression of I295P was much reduced, and L520* was not detected, with staining at a similar level to the control. Scale bar = 100 μm.
  15 in total

1.  ADCK3 mutations with epilepsy, stroke-like episodes and ataxia: a POLG mimic?

Authors:  O Hikmat; C Tzoulis; P M Knappskog; S Johansson; H Boman; P Sztromwasser; E Lien; E Brodtkorb; D Ghezzi; L A Bindoff
Journal:  Eur J Neurol       Date:  2016-04-23       Impact factor: 6.089

2.  Exome sequencing found a novel homozygous deletion in ADCK3 gene involved in autosomal recessive spinocerebellar ataxia.

Authors:  Mohammadreza Hajjari; Maryam Tahmasebi-Birgani; Javad Mohammadi-Asl; Habib Nasiri; Abolghasem Kollaee; Mandana Mahmoodi; Hossein Ansari
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2019-05-10       Impact factor: 3.688

3.  Cerebellar Ataxia and Coenzyme Q Deficiency through Loss of Unorthodox Kinase Activity.

Authors:  Jonathan A Stefely; Floriana Licitra; Leila Laredj; Andrew G Reidenbach; Zachary A Kemmerer; Anais Grangeray; Tiphaine Jaeg-Ehret; Catherine E Minogue; Arne Ulbrich; Paul D Hutchins; Emily M Wilkerson; Zheng Ruan; Deniz Aydin; Alexander S Hebert; Xiao Guo; Elyse C Freiberger; Laurence Reutenauer; Adam Jochem; Maya Chergova; Isabel E Johnson; Danielle C Lohman; Matthew J P Rush; Nicholas W Kwiecien; Pankaj K Singh; Anna I Schlagowski; Brendan J Floyd; Ulrika Forsman; Pavel J Sindelar; Michael S Westphall; Fabien Pierrel; Joffrey Zoll; Matteo Dal Peraro; Natarajan Kannan; Craig A Bingman; Joshua J Coon; Philippe Isope; Hélène Puccio; David J Pagliarini
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 17.970

4.  Adult-onset cerebellar ataxia due to mutations in CABC1/ADCK3.

Authors:  Rita Horvath; Birgit Czermin; Sweena Gulati; Stephanie Demuth; Gunnar Houge; Angela Pyle; Christine Dineiger; Emma L Blakely; Adam Hassani; Charlotte Foley; Michael Brodhun; Karin Storm; Janbernd Kirschner; Grainne S Gorman; Hanns Lochmüller; Elke Holinski-Feder; Robert W Taylor; Patrick F Chinnery
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2011-10-29       Impact factor: 10.154

5.  Nonsense mutations in CABC1/ADCK3 cause progressive cerebellar ataxia and atrophy.

Authors:  Mike Gerards; Bianca van den Bosch; Chantal Calis; Kees Schoonderwoerd; Klaartje van Engelen; Marina Tijssen; René de Coo; Anneke van der Kooi; Hubert Smeets
Journal:  Mitochondrion       Date:  2010-05-23       Impact factor: 4.160

6.  Heterozygous Mutations in the ADCK3 Gene in Siblings with Cerebellar Atrophy and Extreme Phenotypic Variability.

Authors:  Lubov Blumkin; Esther Leshinsky-Silver; Ayelet Zerem; Keren Yosovich; Tally Lerman-Sagie; Dorit Lev
Journal:  JIMD Rep       Date:  2013-09-19

7.  Compound Heterozygous Inheritance of Mutations in Coenzyme Q8A Results in Autosomal Recessive Cerebellar Ataxia and Coenzyme Q10 Deficiency in a Female Sib-Pair.

Authors:  Jessie C Jacobsen; Whitney Whitford; Brendan Swan; Juliet Taylor; Donald R Love; Rosamund Hill; Sarah Molyneux; Peter M George; Richard Mackay; Stephen P Robertson; Russell G Snell; Klaus Lehnert
Journal:  JIMD Rep       Date:  2017-11-21

8.  Conserved Lipid and Small-Molecule Modulation of COQ8 Reveals Regulation of the Ancient Kinase-like UbiB Family.

Authors:  Andrew G Reidenbach; Zachary A Kemmerer; Deniz Aydin; Adam Jochem; Molly T McDevitt; Paul D Hutchins; Jaime L Stark; Jonathan A Stefely; Thiru Reddy; Alex S Hebert; Emily M Wilkerson; Isabel E Johnson; Craig A Bingman; John L Markley; Joshua J Coon; Matteo Dal Peraro; David J Pagliarini
Journal:  Cell Chem Biol       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 8.116

9.  Genetic spectrum and clinical features in a cohort of Chinese patients with autosomal recessive cerebellar ataxias.

Authors:  Hao-Ling Cheng; Ya-Ru Shao; Yi Dong; Hai-Lin Dong; Lu Yang; Yin Ma; Ying Shen; Zhi-Ying Wu
Journal:  Transl Neurodegener       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 8.014

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.