Literature DB >> 35139210

Mass spectrometry-based technologies for probing the 3D world of plant proteins.

Matthew R Blackburn1, Benjamin B Minkoff1, Michael R Sussman1.   

Abstract

Over the past two decades, mass spectrometric (MS)-based proteomics technologies have facilitated the study of signaling pathways throughout biology. Nowhere is this needed more than in plants, where an evolutionary history of genome duplications has resulted in large gene families involved in posttranslational modifications and regulatory pathways. For example, at least 5% of the Arabidopsis thaliana genome (ca. 1,200 genes) encodes protein kinases and protein phosphatases that regulate nearly all aspects of plant growth and development. MS-based technologies that quantify covalent changes in the side-chain of amino acids are critically important, but they only address one piece of the puzzle. A more crucially important mechanistic question is how noncovalent interactions-which are more difficult to study-dynamically regulate the proteome's 3D structure. The advent of improvements in protein 3D technologies such as cryo-electron microscopy, nuclear magnetic resonance, and X-ray crystallography has allowed considerable progress to be made at this level, but these methods are typically limited to analyzing proteins, which can be expressed and purified in milligram quantities. Newly emerging MS-based technologies have recently been developed for studying the 3D structure of proteins. Importantly, these methods do not require protein samples to be purified and require smaller amounts of sample, opening the wider proteome for structural analysis in complex mixtures, crude lysates, and even in intact cells. These MS-based methods include covalent labeling, crosslinking, thermal proteome profiling, and limited proteolysis, all of which can be leveraged by established MS workflows, as well as newly emerging methods capable of analyzing intact macromolecules and the complexes they form. In this review, we discuss these recent innovations in MS-based "structural" proteomics to provide readers with an understanding of the opportunities they offer and the remaining challenges for understanding the molecular underpinnings of plant structure and function. © American Society of Plant Biologists 2022. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35139210      PMCID: PMC9070838          DOI: 10.1093/plphys/kiac039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Physiol        ISSN: 0032-0889            Impact factor:   8.005


  38 in total

1.  A general method for site-specific incorporation of unnatural amino acids into proteins.

Authors:  C J Noren; S J Anthony-Cahill; M C Griffith; P G Schultz
Journal:  Science       Date:  1989-04-14       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Through a glass darkly: glimpses into the future of mass spectrometry.

Authors:  R Graham Cooks; Thomas Mueller
Journal:  Mass Spectrom (Tokyo)       Date:  2013-04-15

3.  High-fidelity mass analysis unveils heterogeneity in intact ribosomal particles.

Authors:  Michiel van de Waterbeemd; Kyle L Fort; Dmitriy Boll; Maria Reinhardt-Szyba; Andrew Routh; Alexander Makarov; Albert J R Heck
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 28.547

4.  Points of significance: Comparing samples—part I.

Authors:  Martin Krzywinski; Naomi Altman
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 28.547

5.  Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-12-14       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 6.  Mass Spectrometry-Based Protein Footprinting for Higher-Order Structure Analysis: Fundamentals and Applications.

Authors:  Xiaoran Roger Liu; Mengru Mira Zhang; Michael L Gross
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 7.  Protein folding and surface interaction phase diagrams in vitro and in cells.

Authors:  Martin Gruebele
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2021-03-27       Impact factor: 4.124

8.  Dynamic 3D proteomes reveal protein functional alterations at high resolution in situ.

Authors:  Valentina Cappelletti; Thomas Hauser; Ilaria Piazza; Monika Pepelnjak; Liliana Malinovska; Tobias Fuhrer; Yaozong Li; Christian Dörig; Paul Boersema; Ludovic Gillet; Jan Grossbach; Aurelien Dugourd; Julio Saez-Rodriguez; Andreas Beyer; Nicola Zamboni; Amedeo Caflisch; Natalie de Souza; Paola Picotti
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2020-12-23       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  How many human proteoforms are there?

Authors:  Ruedi Aebersold; Jeffrey N Agar; I Jonathan Amster; Mark S Baker; Carolyn R Bertozzi; Emily S Boja; Catherine E Costello; Benjamin F Cravatt; Catherine Fenselau; Benjamin A Garcia; Ying Ge; Jeremy Gunawardena; Ronald C Hendrickson; Paul J Hergenrother; Christian G Huber; Alexander R Ivanov; Ole N Jensen; Michael C Jewett; Neil L Kelleher; Laura L Kiessling; Nevan J Krogan; Martin R Larsen; Joseph A Loo; Rachel R Ogorzalek Loo; Emma Lundberg; Michael J MacCoss; Parag Mallick; Vamsi K Mootha; Milan Mrksich; Tom W Muir; Steven M Patrie; James J Pesavento; Sharon J Pitteri; Henry Rodriguez; Alan Saghatelian; Wendy Sandoval; Hartmut Schlüter; Salvatore Sechi; Sarah A Slavoff; Lloyd M Smith; Michael P Snyder; Paul M Thomas; Mathias Uhlén; Jennifer E Van Eyk; Marc Vidal; David R Walt; Forest M White; Evan R Williams; Therese Wohlschlager; Vicki H Wysocki; Nathan A Yates; Nicolas L Young; Bing Zhang
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 15.040

10.  Plasma-Generated OH Radical Production for Analyzing Three-Dimensional Structure in Protein Therapeutics.

Authors:  Benjamin B Minkoff; Joshua M Blatz; Faraz A Choudhury; Daniel Benjamin; J Leon Shohet; Michael R Sussman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.