Literature DB >> 35136203

Testicular pain and youtube™: are uploaded videos a reliable source to get information?

Alberto Melchionna1, Claudia Collà Ruvolo2, Marco Capece1, Roberto La Rocca1, Giuseppe Celentano1, Gianluigi Califano1, Massimiliano Creta1, Luigi Napolitano1, Simone Morra1, Simone Cilio1, Carmine Turco1, Vincenzo Caputo1, Nicola Longo1, Vincenzo Mirone1, Ciro Imbimbo1.   

Abstract

Several previous studies on YouTube™ on urological field have already been published. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the quality information of YouTubeTM videos on testicular pain. Using Google Trends tool, the frequency of worldwide YouTubeTM and Google Search on testicular pain was examined from 2010 to 2020. The keywords "testicular pain", "testicular ache" and "scrotal pain" were used on the YouTube platform and the first 100 YouTubeTM videos were analyzed for each one. The Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT) for Audiovisual (A/V) Materials, the DISCERN score and Misinformation tool were used to assess video quality. According to YouTube™ Search the mean relative frequency search for "testicular pain" ranged from 10.5 to 30.0%. According to GoogleTM Search it ranged from 73.7 to 91.0%, Of all 300 videos, 117 were eligible for the analysis. The median number of views, thumbs-up and thumbs-down was respectively: 47060 (interquartile range [IQR] = 6297.0-144188.0), 289 (IQR = 40-912) and 19 (IQR = 4-53). Of all videos, 68.4% and 31.6% were produced respectively by Medical Doctors and Other. The median PEMAT Actionability and Understandability scores were 66.7% and 66.7%, respectively. The median DISCERN score ranged from 1 to 5, with an overall median score of 3, defined from question 16. The median misinformation score ranged from 2 to 5. In conclusion, an increased interest on testicular pain was recorded on both YouTubeTM and Google search during the last decade. However, according to the quality assessment tools used, YouTube™ users cannot get trustful and exhaustive information on testicular pain. Therefore, authors with/without medical background should improve the quality of information on YouTube™ videos.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35136203     DOI: 10.1038/s41443-022-00536-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Impot Res        ISSN: 0955-9930            Impact factor:   2.896


  14 in total

1.  YouTube as a source of information on kidney stone disease.

Authors:  Akshay Sood; Sasmit Sarangi; Ambarish Pandey; Karthik Murugiah
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2010-12-04       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Does YouTube include high-quality resources for training on laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy?

Authors:  Burak Arslan; Serkan Gönültaş; Ersin Gökmen; Oktay Özman; Özkan Onuk; Gökhan Yazıcı; Taha Göv; Enver Özdemir
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  Why adolescents delay with presentation to hospital with acute testicular pain: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Caroline MacDonald; Maria Burton; Robert Carachi; Stuart O'Toole
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 2.545

Review 4.  Scrotal pain: evaluation and management.

Authors:  Chirag G Gordhan; Hossein Sadeghi-Nejad
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2015-01-12

5.  YouTube as source of prostate cancer information.

Authors:  Peter L Steinberg; Shaun Wason; Joshua M Stern; Levi Deters; Brian Kowal; John Seigne
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Assessment of YouTube videos as a source of information on medication use in pregnancy.

Authors:  Craig Hansen; Julia D Interrante; Elizabeth C Ailes; Meghan T Frey; Cheryl S Broussard; Valerie J Godoshian; Courtney Lewis; Kara N D Polen; Amanda P Garcia; Suzanne M Gilboa
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 2.890

Review 7.  Chronic testicular pain: an overview.

Authors:  P Granitsiotis; D Kirk
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  YouTube as a Source of Information About Premature Ejaculation Treatment.

Authors:  Murat Gul; Mehmet Akif Diri
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2019-09-12       Impact factor: 3.802

9.  Why do men go to the doctor? Socio-demographic and lifestyle factors associated with healthcare utilisation among a cohort of Australian men.

Authors:  Marisa Schlichthorst; Lena A Sanci; Jane Pirkis; Matthew J Spittal; Jane S Hocking
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 10.  Chronic orchialgia: Review of treatments old and new.

Authors:  Bayo Tojuola; Jeffrey Layman; Ibrahim Kartal; Ahmet Gudelogul; Jamin Brahmbhatt; Sijo Parekattil
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar
View more
  2 in total

1.  Quality Assessment of YouTube Videos as an Information Source for Testicular Torsion.

Authors:  Gaochen Bai; Xi Pan; Tianxin Zhao; Xiong Chen; Guochang Liu; Wen Fu
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-05-18

2.  Analysis of quality information provided by "Dr. YouTubeTM" on Phimosis.

Authors:  Simone Cilio; Claudia Collà Ruvolo; Carmine Turco; Massimiliano Creta; Marco Capece; Roberto La Rocca; Giuseppe Celentano; Gianluigi Califano; Simone Morra; Alberto Melchionna; Francesco Mangiapia; Felice Crocetto; Paolo Verze; Alessandro Palmieri; Ciro Imbimbo; Vincenzo Mirone
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 2.896

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.