Siddharth M Patel1, Jacob C Jentzer2, Carlos L Alviar3, Vivian M Baird-Zars1, Gregory W Barsness2, David D Berg1, Erin A Bohula1, Lori B Daniels4, Andrew P DeFilippis5, Ellen C Keeley6, Michael C Kontos7, Patrick R Lawler8, P Elliott Miller9, Jeong-Gun Park1, Robert O Roswell10, Michael A Solomon11, Sean van Diepen12,13, Jason N Katz14, David A Morrow1. 1. Levine Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, TIMI Study Group, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 60 Fenwood Rd, Suite 7022, Boston, MA 02115, USA. 2. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. 3. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA. 4. Sulpizio Cardiovascular Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA. 5. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA. 6. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. 7. Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA. 8. Peter Munk Cardiac Centre at Toronto General Hospital, Division of Cardiology and Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 9. Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA. 10. Lenox Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, NY, USA. 11. Critical Care Medicine Department, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center and Cardiovascular Branch, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. 12. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada. 13. Division of Cardiology, Department of Critical Care, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada. 14. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Abstract
AIMS: Contemporary cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) outcomes remain highly heterogeneous. As such, a risk-stratification tool using readily available lab data at time of CICU admission may help inform clinical decision-making. METHODS AND RESULTS: The primary derivation cohort included 4352 consecutive CICU admissions across 25 tertiary care CICUs included in the Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network (CCCTN) Registry. Candidate lab indicators were assessed using multivariable logistic regression. An integer risk score incorporating the top independent lab indicators associated with in-hospital mortality was developed. External validation was performed in a separate CICU cohort of 9716 patients from the Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN, USA). On multivariable analysis, lower pH [odds ratio (OR) 1.96, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.72-2.24], higher lactate (OR 1.40, 95% CI 1.22-1.62), lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.10-1.45), and lower platelets (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.05-1.32) were the top four independent lab indicators associated with higher in-hospital mortality. Incorporated into the CCCTN Lab-Based Risk Score, these four lab indicators identified a 20-fold gradient in mortality risk with very good discrimination (C-index 0.82, 95% CI 0.80-0.84) in the derivation cohort. Validation of the risk score in a separate cohort of 3888 patients from the Registry demonstrated good performance (C-index of 0.82; 95% CI 0.80-0.84). Performance remained consistent in the external validation cohort (C-index 0.79, 95% CI 0.77-0.80). Calibration was very good in both validation cohorts (r = 0.99). CONCLUSION: A simple integer risk score utilizing readily available lab indicators at time of CICU admission may accurately stratify in-hospital mortality risk. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
AIMS: Contemporary cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) outcomes remain highly heterogeneous. As such, a risk-stratification tool using readily available lab data at time of CICU admission may help inform clinical decision-making. METHODS AND RESULTS: The primary derivation cohort included 4352 consecutive CICU admissions across 25 tertiary care CICUs included in the Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network (CCCTN) Registry. Candidate lab indicators were assessed using multivariable logistic regression. An integer risk score incorporating the top independent lab indicators associated with in-hospital mortality was developed. External validation was performed in a separate CICU cohort of 9716 patients from the Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN, USA). On multivariable analysis, lower pH [odds ratio (OR) 1.96, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.72-2.24], higher lactate (OR 1.40, 95% CI 1.22-1.62), lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.10-1.45), and lower platelets (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.05-1.32) were the top four independent lab indicators associated with higher in-hospital mortality. Incorporated into the CCCTN Lab-Based Risk Score, these four lab indicators identified a 20-fold gradient in mortality risk with very good discrimination (C-index 0.82, 95% CI 0.80-0.84) in the derivation cohort. Validation of the risk score in a separate cohort of 3888 patients from the Registry demonstrated good performance (C-index of 0.82; 95% CI 0.80-0.84). Performance remained consistent in the external validation cohort (C-index 0.79, 95% CI 0.77-0.80). Calibration was very good in both validation cohorts (r = 0.99). CONCLUSION: A simple integer risk score utilizing readily available lab indicators at time of CICU admission may accurately stratify in-hospital mortality risk. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
Authors: David A Morrow; James C Fang; Dan J Fintel; Christopher B Granger; Jason N Katz; Frederick G Kushner; Jeffrey T Kuvin; Jose Lopez-Sendon; Dorothea McAreavey; Brahmajee Nallamothu; Robert Lee Page; Joseph E Parrillo; Pamela N Peterson; Chris Winkelman Journal: Circulation Date: 2012-08-14 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: J L Vincent; R Moreno; J Takala; S Willatts; A De Mendonça; H Bruining; C K Reinhart; P M Suter; L G Thijs Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 1996-07 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Courtney E Bennett; R Scott Wright; Jacob Jentzer; Ognjen Gajic; Dennis H Murphree; Joseph G Murphy; Sunil V Mankad; Brandon M Wiley; Malcolm R Bell; Gregory W Barsness Journal: J Crit Care Date: 2018-12-24 Impact factor: 3.425
Authors: Shashank S Sinha; Michael W Sjoding; Devraj Sukul; Hallie C Prescott; Theodore J Iwashyna; Hitinder S Gurm; Colin R Cooke; Brahmajee K Nallamothu Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2017-08
Authors: Erin A Bohula; Jason N Katz; Sean van Diepen; Carlos L Alviar; Vivian M Baird-Zars; Jeong-Gun Park; Christopher F Barnett; Gurjaspreet Bhattal; Gregory W Barsness; James A Burke; Paul C Cremer; Jennifer Cruz; Lori B Daniels; Andrew DeFilippis; Christopher B Granger; Steven Hollenberg; James M Horowitz; Norma Keller; Michael C Kontos; Patrick R Lawler; Venu Menon; Thomas S Metkus; Jason Ng; Ryan Orgel; Christopher B Overgaard; Nicholas Phreaner; Robert O Roswell; Steven P Schulman; R Jeffrey Snell; Michael A Solomon; Bradley Ternus; Wayne Tymchak; Fnu Vikram; David A Morrow Journal: JAMA Cardiol Date: 2019-09-01 Impact factor: 14.676
Authors: Jacob C Jentzer; Sean van Diepen; Dennis H Murphree; Abdalla S Ismail; Mark T Keegan; David A Morrow; Gregory W Barsness; Nandan S Anavekar Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2020-02-28 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Jacob C Jentzer; Courtney Bennett; Brandon M Wiley; Dennis H Murphree; Mark T Keegan; Ognjen Gajic; R Scott Wright; Gregory W Barsness Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2018-03-10 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Jacob C Jentzer; Nandan S Anavekar; Courtney Bennett; Dennis H Murphree; Mark T Keegan; Brandon Wiley; David A Morrow; Joseph G Murphy; Malcolm R Bell; Gregory W Barsness Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2019-08-29 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Ryan A Watson; Erin A Bohula; Thomas C Gilliland; Pablo A Sanchez; David D Berg; David A Morrow Journal: Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care Date: 2018-07-23