Literature DB >> 35133494

Frequency and timing of emergency department visits and hospital admissions in stented patients following common stone procedures.

Rohail Rashid Kazi1, Molly Jung2, Timothy Kelly3, Yan Xiong2, Andrew Harris4.   

Abstract

Emergency department (ED) visits and hospital admissions (HA) following urologic procedures are a concern for payors, providers, and patients. We seek to quantify ED visits and HA after urologic stone procedures. This is a retrospective cohort study using claims data from the IBM MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplement database. Adults with a urologic stone diagnosis and no history of stone procedure in prior 12 months who underwent stone procedures with ureteral stent codes between 2012 and 2017 were included. All-cause vs genitourinary (GU)-related ED visits and HA were evaluated during 30, 60, 90, and 120-day periods following the index urologic stone procedure. 88,047 patients were included in the analytic cohort. For inpatients, rate of all-cause vs GU-related ED visits was 10% vs 9% at 30 days and 19% vs 15% at 120 days. For outpatients, rate of all-cause vs GU-related ED visits was 9% vs 8% at 30 days and 15% vs 12% at 120 days. A similar trend was found when examining HA. Younger patients (18-44 years old) had higher rates of all-cause ED visits following inpatient index stone procedure (13% vs 10% at 30 days, p ≤ 0.0001). Twenty percent of patients have an ED visit or HA up to 120 days after having a stone procedure with most returning with GU-related complaint. Younger patients had the greatest burden among the study cohort. Further studies need to determine causation of these unplanned visits to guide appropriate intervention.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy; Hospital readmission; Percutaneous nephrolithotomy; Ureteroscopy; Urolithiasis

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35133494     DOI: 10.1007/s00240-022-01313-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urolithiasis        ISSN: 2194-7228            Impact factor:   3.436


  19 in total

Review 1.  Metabolic risk-evaluation and prevention of recurrence in stone disease: does it make sense?

Authors:  Hans-Göran Tiselius
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Nationwide Readmission Rates Following Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Does Age Matter?

Authors:  Ashley W Johnston; Ruiyang Jiang; Muhammad H Alkazemi; Steven Wolf; Gina-Maria Pomann; Michael E Lipkin; Charles D Scales; Jonathan C Routh
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 2.942

3.  Charlson comorbidity score is associated with readmission to the index operative hospital after radical cystectomy and correlates with 90-day mortality risk.

Authors:  Coleman McFerrin; Syed Johar Raza; Allison May; Facundo Davaro; Sameer Siddiqui; Zachary Hamilton
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  Medical management of kidney stones: AUA guideline.

Authors:  Margaret S Pearle; David S Goldfarb; Dean G Assimos; Gary Curhan; Cynthia J Denu-Ciocca; Brian R Matlaga; Manoj Monga; Kristina L Penniston; Glenn M Preminger; Thomas M T Turk; James R White
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

6.  The impact of unplanned postprocedure visits in the management of patients with urinary stones.

Authors:  Charles D Scales; Christopher S Saigal; Janet M Hanley; Andrew W Dick; Claude M Setodji; Mark S Litwin
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2013-12-16       Impact factor: 3.982

7.  Prevalence of kidney stones in the United States.

Authors:  Charles D Scales; Alexandria C Smith; Janet M Hanley; Christopher S Saigal
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-03-31       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  Development and Validation of Models to Predict Pathological Outcomes of Radical Prostatectomy in Regional and National Cohorts.

Authors:  Erkin Ötleş; Brian T Denton; Bo Qu; Adharsh Murali; Selin Merdan; Gregory B Auffenberg; Spencer C Hiller; Brian R Lane; Arvin K George; Karandeep Singh
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2021-09-23       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Use of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey to calculate the impact of obesity and diabetes on cost and prevalence of urolithiasis in 2030.

Authors:  Jodi A Antonelli; Naim M Maalouf; Margaret S Pearle; Yair Lotan
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  Effect of Comorbidity On Unplanned Readmissions After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (From The Nationwide Readmission Database).

Authors:  Chun Shing Kwok; Sara C Martinez; Samir Pancholy; Waqar Ahmed; Khaled Al-Shaibi; Jessica Potts; Mohamed Mohamed; Evangelos Kontopantelis; Nick Curzen; Mamas A Mamas
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.