Jeremy B Ducharme1, Zachary J McKenna2, Ann L Gibson2, Christine M Mermier2. 1. Department of Health, Exercise and Sports Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA. jducharme@unm.edu. 2. Department of Health, Exercise and Sports Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Evaluate the efficacy of a regression method for identifying a VO2 plateau to confirm the attainment of VO2max compared to a verification trial in middle-aged and older adults. METHODS: Eleven men and ten women (age 61.0 ± 8.1, VO2max 21.8-50.3 ml/kg/min, n = 21) completed an individualized ramp graded exercise test (GXT) on the cycle ergometer, and one hour later, a verification trial at 105% of their maximal work rate (WR) achieved during the GXT. A plateau in VO2 was used to confirm VO2max was attained. VO2 plateau was identified using the difference between the highest VO2 between the two trials and a linear regression analysis of the VO2-WR relationship during the GXT. McNemar's test of marginal homogeneity was used to detect differences in the proportion of paired data of individuals' attainment of VO2max criteria. RESULTS: Of the 21 participants, 15 (71.4%) met the verification criterion while 6 (28.6%) did not, compared to the regression method where 16 (76.2%) achieved the regression criterion while 5 (23.8%) did not. McNemar's test revealed no significant difference between participants' ability to achieve the regression and verification criteria (p = 0.999). CONCLUSION: The regression method is an effective strategy for confirming VO2max was attained with middle-aged and older adults on a cycle ergometer. This time-efficient regression method is comparable with the verification criterion but does not require a second maximal test, which may be advantageous for those where the verification trial may not be practical.
PURPOSE: Evaluate the efficacy of a regression method for identifying a VO2 plateau to confirm the attainment of VO2max compared to a verification trial in middle-aged and older adults. METHODS: Eleven men and ten women (age 61.0 ± 8.1, VO2max 21.8-50.3 ml/kg/min, n = 21) completed an individualized ramp graded exercise test (GXT) on the cycle ergometer, and one hour later, a verification trial at 105% of their maximal work rate (WR) achieved during the GXT. A plateau in VO2 was used to confirm VO2max was attained. VO2 plateau was identified using the difference between the highest VO2 between the two trials and a linear regression analysis of the VO2-WR relationship during the GXT. McNemar's test of marginal homogeneity was used to detect differences in the proportion of paired data of individuals' attainment of VO2max criteria. RESULTS: Of the 21 participants, 15 (71.4%) met the verification criterion while 6 (28.6%) did not, compared to the regression method where 16 (76.2%) achieved the regression criterion while 5 (23.8%) did not. McNemar's test revealed no significant difference between participants' ability to achieve the regression and verification criteria (p = 0.999). CONCLUSION: The regression method is an effective strategy for confirming VO2max was attained with middle-aged and older adults on a cycle ergometer. This time-efficient regression method is comparable with the verification criterion but does not require a second maximal test, which may be advantageous for those where the verification trial may not be practical.
Authors: Scott E Crouter; Amanda Antczak; Jonathan R Hudak; Diane M DellaValle; Jere D Haas Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2006-08-03 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Lance C Dalleck; Todd A Astorino; Rachel M Erickson; Caitlin M McCarthy; Alyssa A Beadell; Brigette H Botten Journal: Res Sports Med Date: 2012-04 Impact factor: 4.674