Literature DB >> 35132613

Remarkable properties for diagnostics and inference of ranking data modelling.

Cristina Mollica1, Luca Tardella1.   

Abstract

The Plackett-Luce model (PL) for ranked data assumes the forward order of the ranking process. This hypothesis postulates that the ranking process of the items is carried out by sequentially assigning the positions from the top (most liked) to the bottom (least liked) alternative. This assumption has been recently relaxed with the Extended Plackett-Luce model (EPL) through the introduction of the discrete reference order parameter, describing the rank attribution path. By starting from two formal properties of the EPL, the former related to the inverse ordering of the item probabilities at the first and last stage of the ranking process and the latter well-known as independence of irrelevant alternatives (or Luce's choice axiom), we derive novel diagnostic tools for testing the appropriateness of the EPL assumption as the actual sampling distribution of the observed rankings. These diagnostic tools can help uncovering possible idiosyncratic paths in the sequential choice process. Besides contributing to fill the gap of goodness-of-fit methods for the family of multistage models, we also show how one of the two statistics can be conveniently exploited to construct a heuristic method, that surrogates the maximum likelihood approach for inferring the underlying reference order parameter. The relative performance of the proposals, compared with more conventional approaches, is illustrated by means of extensive simulation studies.
© 2022 The Authors. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Psychological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Luce's choice axiom; Plackett-Luce model; Ranking data; bootstrap; goodness-of-fit assessment; heuristic methods

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35132613      PMCID: PMC9305251          DOI: 10.1111/bmsp.12260

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol        ISSN: 0007-1102            Impact factor:   2.410


  9 in total

1.  Testing Thurstonian Case V ranking models using posterior predictive checks.

Authors:  R C Tsai; G Yao
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.380

2.  Ensuring Positiveness of the Scaled Difference Chi-square Test Statistic.

Authors:  Albert Satorra; Peter M Bentler
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.500

3.  Item Response Modeling of Paired Comparison and Ranking Data.

Authors:  Alberto Maydeu-Olivares; Anna Brown
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  Structural equation modeling of paired-comparison and ranking data.

Authors:  Albert Maydeu-Olivares; Ulf Böckenholt
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2005-09

5.  Remarks on the method of paired comparisons: II. The effect of an aberrant standard deviation when equal standard deviations and equal correlations are assumed.

Authors:  F MOSTELLER
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  1951-06       Impact factor: 2.500

6.  Science, statistics, and paired comparisons.

Authors:  R A Bradley
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Posterior calibration of posterior predictive p values.

Authors:  Geert H van Kollenburg; Joris Mulder; Jeroen K Vermunt
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2017-06

8.  Bayesian Plackett-Luce Mixture Models for Partially Ranked Data.

Authors:  Cristina Mollica; Luca Tardella
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 2.500

9.  Epitope profiling via mixture modeling of ranked data.

Authors:  Cristina Mollica; Luca Tardella
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 2.373

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.