Literature DB >> 16221029

Structural equation modeling of paired-comparison and ranking data.

Albert Maydeu-Olivares1, Ulf Böckenholt.   

Abstract

L. L. Thurstone's (1927) model provides a powerful framework for modeling individual differences in choice behavior. An overview of Thurstonian models for comparative data is provided, including the classical Case V and Case III models as well as more general choice models with unrestricted and factor-analytic covariance structures. A flow chart summarizes the model selection process. The authors show how to embed these models within a more familiar structural equation modeling (SEM) framework. The different special cases of Thurstone's model can be estimated with a popular SEM statistical package, including factor analysis models for paired comparisons and rankings. Only minor modifications are needed to accommodate both types of data. As a result, complex models for comparative judgments can be both estimated and tested efficiently. Copyright 2005 APA, all rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16221029     DOI: 10.1037/1082-989X.10.3.285

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Methods        ISSN: 1082-989X


  9 in total

1.  A Hierarchical Model for Accuracy and Choice on Standardized Tests.

Authors:  Steven Andrew Culpepper; James Joseph Balamuta
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 2.500

2.  My strong, Black daughter: Racial/ethnic differences in the attributes mothers value for their daughters.

Authors:  Linda A Oshin; Stephanie Milan
Journal:  Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol       Date:  2018-12-03

3.  Item Response Models for Forced-Choice Questionnaires: A Common Framework.

Authors:  Anna Brown
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 2.500

4.  Detecting Heterogeneity of Intervention Effects in Comparative Judgments.

Authors:  Wolfgang Wiedermann; Ulrich Frick; Edgar C Merkle
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2021-03-09

5.  Remarkable properties for diagnostics and inference of ranking data modelling.

Authors:  Cristina Mollica; Luca Tardella
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 2.410

6.  Modeling ranking, time trade-off, and visual analog scale values for EQ-5D health states: a review and comparison of methods.

Authors:  Benjamin M Craig; Jan J V Busschbach; Joshua A Salomon
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Thurstonian-Based Analyses: Past, Present, and Future Utilities.

Authors:  Ulf Böckenholt
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2007-01-30       Impact factor: 2.500

8.  Why rate when you could compare? Using the "EloChoice" package to assess pairwise comparisons of perceived physical strength.

Authors:  Andrew P Clark; Kate L Howard; Andy T Woods; Ian S Penton-Voak; Christof Neumann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  On the Statistical and Practical Limitations of Thurstonian IRT Models.

Authors:  Paul-Christian Bürkner; Niklas Schulte; Heinz Holling
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 2.821

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.