Ivany Romero-Sanchez1,2, Ilian Pihlajamaa3,4, Natasa Adžić3, Laura E Castellano2, Emmanuel Stiakakis5, Christos N Likos3, Marco Laurati1. 1. Dipartimento di Chimica & CSGI, Università di Firenze, 50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Italy. 2. División de Ciencias e Ingenierías, Universidad de Guanajuato, 37150 León, Mexico. 3. Faculty of Physics, University of Vienna, Bolzmanngasse 5, A-1090 Vienna, Austria. 4. Eindhoven University of Technology, Department of Applied Physics, Soft Matter and Biological Physics, Postbus 513, NL-5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands. 5. Biomacromolecular Systems and Processes, Institute of Biological Information Processing (IBI-4), 4 Forschungszentrum Jülich, D-52425 Jülich, Germany.
Abstract
We investigate the effects of crowding on the conformations and assembly of confined, highly charged, and thick polyelectrolyte brushes in the osmotic regime. Particle tracking experiments on increasingly dense suspensions of colloids coated with ultralong double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) fragments reveal nonmonotonic particle shrinking, aggregation, and re-entrant ordering. Theory and simulations show that aggregation and re-entrant ordering arise from the combined effect of shrinking, which is induced by the osmotic pressure exerted by the counterions absorbed in neighbor brushes and of a short-range attractive interaction competing with electrostatic repulsion. An unconventional mechanism gives origin to the short-range attraction: blunt-end interactions between stretched dsDNA fragments of neighboring brushes, which become sufficiently intense for dense and packed brushes. The attraction can be tuned by inducing free-end backfolding through the addition of monovalent salt. Our results show that base stacking is a mode parallel to hybridization to steer colloidal assembly in which attractions can be fine-tuned through salinity and, potentially, grafting density and temperature.
We investigate the effects of crowding on the conformations and assembly of confined, highly charged, and thick polyelectrolyte brushes in the osmotic regime. Particle tracking experiments on increasingly dense suspensions of colloids coated with ultralong double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) fragments reveal nonmonotonic particle shrinking, aggregation, and re-entrant ordering. Theory and simulations show that aggregation and re-entrant ordering arise from the combined effect of shrinking, which is induced by the osmotic pressure exerted by the counterions absorbed in neighbor brushes and of a short-range attractive interaction competing with electrostatic repulsion. An unconventional mechanism gives origin to the short-range attraction: blunt-end interactions between stretched dsDNA fragments of neighboring brushes, which become sufficiently intense for dense and packed brushes. The attraction can be tuned by inducing free-end backfolding through the addition of monovalent salt. Our results show that base stacking is a mode parallel to hybridization to steer colloidal assembly in which attractions can be fine-tuned through salinity and, potentially, grafting density and temperature.
Entities:
Keywords:
blunt-ends; colloids; dna; order transitions; polyelectrolytes
Polyelectrolyte
brushes, which
consist of charged polymer chains grafted to a planar or curved surface,
have found key applications due to their unique properties.[1,2] Among their applications are the ability to prevent protein absorption,
called an antibiofouling effect[3,4] and exploited in biomedical
applications and tissue engineering.[5] Conversely,
at low ionic strength the opposite effect is observed, i.e., strong
protein absorption.[6] The two effects can
be combined to obtain a protein delivery mechanism.[7] In addition, spherical polyelectrolyte brushes (SPBs) can
be used as nanoreactors for the synthesis of metallic nanoparticles
with strong catalytic activity.[8] Polyelectrolyte
brushes also present an exceptionally low mutual friction,[9,10] which arises from the huge osmotic pressure generated by counterions
absorbed within the brush in low ionic strength environments and can
be controlled through the addition of multivalent ions.[11,12] The ultralow friction of polyelectrolyte brushes is essential in
biolubrication, for example, for the correct operation of synovial
joints[13] and the production of coatings
for medical implants.[14] In the context
of polyelectrolyte-mediated lubrication effects, the interactions
between contacting brushes and the resulting polymer conformations
play a fundamental role: compression or interpenetration can change
friction by orders of magnitude.[11] Such
interactions and conformations are decisively influenced by the packing
of brushes, in particular, in crowded conditions, an aspect which
is especially relevant in biological systems. These deformations under
crowding, which constitute one of the main issues of the present work,
have not been fully explored to date.DNA is a highly charged
polyelectrolyte whose properties have been
used to develop nanotechnologies such as electrochemical sensors,[15] field-effect transistors,[16] and smart surfaces.[17] Being
highly customizable with molecular precision, DNA is thus the ideal
building block for the systematic investigation of polyelectrolyte
brush interactions in crowded systems. In addition, the specificity
of DNA interactions can be exploited to precisely control assembly.
Complex DNA structures can be assembled through Watson–Crick
base pairing of sticky ends,[18] the programmable
folding of long single strands (DNA Origami and “brick”
assembly),[19] or supramolecular interactions,[20] including blunt-end base stacking.[21−23] DNA can be also used to direct the assembly of colloidal micro-
and nanoparticles, which can confer to materials desired optical,
electrical, or mechanical properties.[24,25] For colloidal
systems, base-pairing interactions between sticky ends have been the
main tool used to construct the desired structural arrangements.[26,27] Blunt-end interactions, while scarcely considered,[28] provide a parallel route to colloidal assembly that exploits
base stacking instead of base-pairing. The effective interaction between
a collection of blunt-end of dsDNA fragments grafted onto two facing
colloidal particles can be fine-tuned through ionic strength and ion
type and, potentially, grafting density and temperature.In
this work, we demonstrate that the combination of strong osmotic
forces from the neighboring SPBs and the blunt-end DNA attractions
leads to unconventional re-entrant ordering phenomena and to the emergence
of stringlike patterns in concentrated DNA-brush solutions. To this
end, we combined microscopy experiments, theory, and simulations to
systematically investigate the interactions and correlations between
thick, densely packed SPBs in quasi-2D confinement. In these experiments,
the structural organization and the dynamics of thick spherical dsDNA
brushes grafted onto latex beads were determined. Two main effects
of the brush–brush interactions were found: a progressive reduction
of the interparticle effective interaction range (distance of closest
approach) with increasing packing and a complex, unusual aggregation
behavior, with a re-entrant ordering as a function of packing fraction.
By developing a detailed microscopic model of the effective interactions,
which incorporates electrostatic, entropic, and osmotic free energy
contributions, as well as the concentration-dependent blunt-end attractions,
we determined the conformations of single and contacting SPBs. Moreover,
we established that the decrease of the interparticle distance is
associated with a size reduction that origins from the pressure exerted
on a brush by the absorbed, noncondensed counterions of neighbor brushes.
This mechanism significantly differs from that of charged microgels,
in which the free counterions surrounding the particles are controlling
the deswelling behavior.[29,30] The size reduction
is accompanied by a very limited particle interdigitation. The experimentally
observed aggregation phenomena were reproduced in simulations of particles
interacting with a short-range attraction in addition to the mild,
long-range repulsion associated with electrostatics. The origin of
the attractive interaction, which is atypical for polyelectrolyte
brushes, could be attributed to base stacking interactions. These
become significant in the osmotic regime where dsDNA fragments are
stretched, and the blunt-ends of neighbor brushes face each other
at a short distance. These blunt-end interactions could be tuned by
acting on chain conformations through the addition of monovalent salt.
Results
and Discussion
Experiments: Effect of Packing on the Brush
Size
We
present in this section the evolution of the conformation and interactions
of increasingly packed SPBs extracted from the analysis of the radial
distribution function g(r) of quasi-2D
dispersions of dsDNA-coated polystyrene (PS) particles. A sketch illustrating
the quasi-2D confinement is shown in Figure A: particle
dispersions are contained in a channel formed by a
microscope slide and a
glass coverslip, separated by 10 μm using spacers. The
radial distribution function g(r) = N(r)/(2πnrΔr), with N(r) being
the number of
particles in a thin shell of thickness Δr at
distance r from a selected particle and n = ⟨N/A⟩ the average particle number surface-density, was
determined from particle coordinates extracted from bright-field microscopy
experiments. This contrast technique was chosen to avoid possible
damages of the DNA fragments due to prolonged exposure to intense
laser irradiation in fluorescence-based techniques using labeled DNA.[31] In addition, fluorescent labeling of the dsDNA
chain ends can alter their interactions.[32] In bright field contrast only the PS cores are visible. Dense dsDNA
brushes were formed by grafting f ≈ 105 dsDNA fragments of length equal to 10 kilobase-pairs (kbp)
on PS particles with radius RPS = 0.49
μm. In what follows, we will also employ the term functionality to denote the number f of grafted dsDNA fragments.
As shown in previous work,[33,34] in water solution without
any added salt the dsDNA chains assume a fully stretched configuration
resulting in a brush thickness equal to the contour length LC = 3.4 μm, corresponding to a brush-core
size ratio LC/RPS ≈ 6.9, i.e., a starlike architecture.[35]Figure A shows an exemplary portion of an image of a dispersion, with indication
of the overall size of the particles. Details of the synthesis, the
preparation of dispersions, and the quasi-2D confinement of the system
are reported in the Methods. The g(r) functions of systems with increasing packing
fraction η = nπσ02/4, shown in Figure B, evidence significant structural
variations, indicated by changes in the number of the observed peaks,
their height, and their position. Note that η is calculated
using the particle diameter in dilute solution σ0 = RPS + LC and thus reflects the increase in particle number density without
accounting for the particle shrinking discussed later. A clear nonmonotonic
variation of the height of the first peak with increasing η
is evident and will be discussed later together with variations of
the local order parameter. Here, we focus instead on the variations
of the position of the first peak of the g(r), rp, indicated by the dashed
lines in Figure B,
which represents the shortest interparticle distance. For monodisperse
hard spheres, this quantity presents a minimum value equal to the
particle diameter when particles are in contact.
Figure 1
Experimental setup and
analysis of the radial distribution function.
(A) (Top) Sketch of the experimental setup showing dsDNA-coated particles
confined between two microscope coverslips separated by 10 μm
spacers. The relative sizes of the core (RPS) and brush (LC) are represented in the
zoomed image on the left side of the sketch, where for clarity a single
dsDNA fragment is shown. The coverslips were coated with a hydrophobic
material to avoid particles sticking to the glass. (Bottom) Exemplary
portion of a bright field microscopy image of a dispersion of dsDNA-coated
colloids with packing fraction η = 0.14. The PS cores are visible.
The overall size of the particles is indicated by the red circle.
(B) Radial distribution functions g(r) of dispersions with different packing fractions η, as indicated.
In each panel curves with larger packing fractions have been shifted
vertically by 1 with respect to the previous curve for clarity. Dashed
lines indicate the position of the first peak for each curve. In the
top panel, the expected positions of the peaks and the corresponding
values of the ratios r/r1 for a 2D hexagonal lattice are reported,
with r and r1 the positions of peak i and 1, respectively.
(C) Position of the first peak of g(r) in units of the particle diameter in dilute conditions, as a function
of packing fraction. Symbols: experiments, solid line: theory. Red
arrows highlight the nonmonotonic behavior of the experimental data.
The progressive size reduction as a function of packing fraction is
represented in the cartoon.
Experimental setup and
analysis of the radial distribution function.
(A) (Top) Sketch of the experimental setup showing dsDNA-coated particles
confined between two microscope coverslips separated by 10 μm
spacers. The relative sizes of the core (RPS) and brush (LC) are represented in the
zoomed image on the left side of the sketch, where for clarity a single
dsDNA fragment is shown. The coverslips were coated with a hydrophobic
material to avoid particles sticking to the glass. (Bottom) Exemplary
portion of a bright field microscopy image of a dispersion of dsDNA-coated
colloids with packing fraction η = 0.14. The PS cores are visible.
The overall size of the particles is indicated by the red circle.
(B) Radial distribution functions g(r) of dispersions with different packing fractions η, as indicated.
In each panel curves with larger packing fractions have been shifted
vertically by 1 with respect to the previous curve for clarity. Dashed
lines indicate the position of the first peak for each curve. In the
top panel, the expected positions of the peaks and the corresponding
values of the ratios r/r1 for a 2D hexagonal lattice are reported,
with r and r1 the positions of peak i and 1, respectively.
(C) Position of the first peak of g(r) in units of the particle diameter in dilute conditions, as a function
of packing fraction. Symbols: experiments, solid line: theory. Red
arrows highlight the nonmonotonic behavior of the experimental data.
The progressive size reduction as a function of packing fraction is
represented in the cartoon.For dense dispersions of soft particles, rp can be smaller than the particle diameter measured in dilute
solution due to particle interpenetration, compression (shrinking),
or deformation (and combinations of them). It can be therefore used
to measure morphological changes of the particles with increasing
crowding. Starting from rp ≈ 1.05σ0 for η = 0.14, when the packing
fraction is increased the interparticle distance decreases monotonically
until η = 0.40, for which rp ≈
0.88σ0. Interestingly, for η = 0.56 the position
moves back to a slightly larger value, indicating a re-entrant behavior.
For η = 0.68, the value of rp decreases
again. Note that for this sample also the position of the second peak
shifts to significantly smaller values compared to the previous sample,
indicating a sudden compaction of the particle neighborhood. The minimum
value of rp is registered for η
= 0.73, while for η = 0.87 it increases slightly and significantly
more for η = 1.20. For this value of η, the system crystallizes
into a 2D hexagonal lattice, as demonstrated by the position of the
peaks of the g(r) (Figure B). The trend of rp as a function of η is reported separately in Figure C. The nonmonotonic
trend discussed in detail above can be observed for packing fractions
η around 0.7, even if not particularly pronounced. Overall,
the values of rp lie between 1.05σ0 and 0.7σ0. The fact that rp values are, for the majority of samples, smaller than
the particle diameter and decreasing with increasing η indicates
that the dsDNA brushes were shrinking, interpenetrating, and/or mechanically
deforming. Interpenetration could be excluded in this case according
to experimental evidence provided in previous work[33] through confocal fluorescence microscopy images of packed,
free-end labeled brushes. The absence of interpenetration was attributed
to the large osmotic pressure generated by the absorbed counterions.
In the next section, we present a theoretical model that confirms
this speculation and explains the physical origin of the observed
decrease of rp in terms of particle shrinking
which results from the osmotic pressure generated by absorbed, noncondensed
counterions. We will also show in the last section that the particle
dynamics even at large packing fractions never fully stop. This finding
further supports shrinking as the origin of the reduction of rp: if an increasingly large number of particles
would be able to pack through deformation, particle movements should
be strongly suppressed. This finding marks a clear difference with
the results of previous work[33] in which
particle deformation was observed at high packings: the distinct response
can be attributed to the significantly different conditions of the
experiments in the two studies. In this work, the packing fraction
of the whole macroscopic sample was progressively increased, while
in the work of Zhang et al. only a fraction of particles of a dilute
suspension was concentrated in a limited portion of space using magnetic
forces. Shrinking, deformation, and interpenetration due to crowding
have been intensively studied in microgel suspensions.[30,36−42] For neutral microgels three regimes were recognized: A first regime,
below space filling, where no significant shrinking, interpenetration,
or deformation are observed; a second, above space filling, in which
particle deformation and interpenetration occur; a third at even larger
packing fractions in which deformation and interpenetration saturate
and particles shrink (deswell).[39,41] Instead, for ionic
microgels shrinking was found to be the main mechanism acting above
space filling.[42] Note that the behavior
of the system investigated here is clearly different from the two
cases just discussed: a significant shrinking is observed well before
space filling and interpenetration is negligible also at large packing
fractions.
Theory: Modeling the dsDNA Brush Configurations
as a Function
of Packing
The primary dependence of the interaction diameter
σ of SPBs on their packing fraction η is a monotonic decrease,
represented, roughly, by the solid line in Figure C. Since the SPBs are complex macromolecular
aggregates, their conformations and interactions depend crucially
on a diverse variety of physical parameters, bringing forward their
hybrid polymer/colloid character. An understanding of the effective
interactions between SPBs requires analysis of their conformations,
which result from a minimization of a suitable free energy F, as we elaborate below.We build a cell model of
a SPB of which the geometry is schematically illustrated in Figure A. The brush consists
of a hard core having a radius RPS, surrounded
by a brush of thickness L, which consists of f PE chains comprising N monomers each.
Correspondingly, for each chain there are N monovalent
counterions, which are contained in a Wigner-Seitz cell with radius RW, related to the overall packing fraction η
by the requirement that a single SPB is contained within the volume
of one cell. Since the experiment has shown that the size of SPBs
can be highly density dependent, we explicitly differentiate between
the density dependent brush size R = RPS + L, and the brush size in unperturbed dilute conditions R0 = σ0/2 = RPS + LC, where LC stands for the brush height at infinite dilution. We
assume that the SPB is dissolved in a solvent with electric permittivity
ε at temperature T. Because of the high bare
charge of the DNA fragments, many of the counterions will be condensed
along them, the number of which, N1, can
be approximated with the Manning parameter ξ, which we define
as the ratio of the Bjerrum length, λB = e2/4πεkBT, and the distance b between each
charge, giving ξ = λB/b, with kB being Boltzmann’s constant. Using this
parameter, we estimate that the number of condensed counterions is , where Qbare = −efN is the total bare charge
of a brush.[43] With this estimation we presume
that the counterions
condense in such a way that there remains only one net charge per
Bjerrum length. Here, we neglect the effect other nearby chains exert
because their electrostatic interactions are screened by the counterions
in the brush. The remaining fN – N1 counterions are subdivided into two populations N2 and N3, representing
those that are free to move within the brush and those that are free
outside of the brush. In order to find the number of free counterions
within the brush (N2) and outside of the
brush (N3), as well as the brush thickness L, we set up a variational free energy F(N3,L) and minimize
it to find the equilibrium values of N3 and L. The remaining population is now easily calculated
with the charge-neutrality condition N1 + N2 + N3 = Nf. We explicitly minimize for the brush thickness L as well to qualitatively capture the significant decrease
of the location of the first peak of the radial distribution function g(r) that was found in the experimental
system as shown in Figure C.
Figure 2
Theoretical and simulation models, fraction of noncondensed counterions.
(A) Schematic model of a SPB of total radius R = RPS + L, enclosed in a spherical
Wigner-Seitz cell of radius RW. N1, N2, and N3 are the numbers of condensed, noncondensed,
and free counterions, respectively. (B) Snapshot of coarse-grained
MD simulation of miniature SPB (N = 40, RPS = 10 nm), which presents the same grafting density
as the experimental system. (C, D) Fraction of counterions N3/Nf that escape the SPB, where f is the functionality and N is the chain
length. This fraction as a function of functionality f (C) and as a function of Wigner-Seitz radius R scaled with the radius R of a chain monomer (D). For more information
on the simulations of the miniature brushes, see the Supporting Information.
Theoretical and simulation models, fraction of noncondensed counterions.
(A) Schematic model of a SPB of total radius R = RPS + L, enclosed in a spherical
Wigner-Seitz cell of radius RW. N1, N2, and N3 are the numbers of condensed, noncondensed,
and free counterions, respectively. (B) Snapshot of coarse-grained
MD simulation of miniature SPB (N = 40, RPS = 10 nm), which presents the same grafting density
as the experimental system. (C, D) Fraction of counterions N3/Nf that escape the SPB, where f is the functionality and N is the chain
length. This fraction as a function of functionality f (C) and as a function of Wigner-Seitz radius R scaled with the radius R of a chain monomer (D). For more information
on the simulations of the miniature brushes, see the Supporting Information.In this free energy F, we include six contributions
and express F asWe present more information and explicit calculations
in the Supporting Information, limiting
ourselves to a more concise description in what follows.The
first contribution (UH) approximates
the electrostatic energy modeling the Coulombic interactions between
all the charged PE-monomers and counterions. We use a Hartree type
expressionwhere
ρ(r) is the expectation
value of the total charge density resulting from the sum of the counterion
charges and the charges on the PE chains and where the integrations
run over the entire Wigner–Seitz cell. Theory, simulation,
and experiments agree that the chains of isolated, dense PE brushes
in a salt-free environment are completely stretched, meaning that
the charged monomer density falls of as r–2 inside the brush.[33,44,45] Because counterions are inclined to neutralize the charged monomers,
we assume that the distribution of counterions within the brush also
has this functional form. Furthermore, we model the free counterions
outside the brush as homogeneously dispersed. The charge density resulting
from the sum of the counterion and the monomer density is now given
byin
which the prefactors ensure charge neutrality.The second term
(Fel) in the free energy
models the entropic elasticity of the PE chains, which adds a penalty
for a highly stretched chain configuration[45]Here, b is the equilibrium
length of the bonds between chain monomers.The third (FFl) is a Flory self-avoidance
term that models the excluded-volume interactions between the chain
monomers. We choose to set the excluded volume equal to the volume
of a monomer with radius Rm and obtain[44]The form of this contribution to the free
energy is strictly only applicable if the radius of the central colloid
is much smaller than the total brush radius R ≪ R. Similarly,
we implicitly assume that the chain monomer density within the brush
is homogeneous, meaning that the PE chains can fully explore the volume
of the brush and are not attached to the central colloid. However,
because we are mainly interested in predicting the way in which the
brush size L changes with a change in the relevant
parameters, we expect that these simplifications do not disqualify
our findings.The next two terms model the entropic free energy S2 of the noncondensed counterions within the
brush and
that of the free counterions outside the brush, S3. We leave out the entropy of the condensed counterions
as it will drop out in the minimization since the number of these
counterions is kept constant. However, we do take into account that
the presence of the PE chains limits the available free volume to
the counterions in the brush. Defining the local number densities n(r), i ∈ {2,3}, and the counterion diameter d, we can estimate the entropic contributions to the free energy within which we omit the usual characteristic
length-scale term as it will yield a constant contribution to the
free energy.[45]The final contribution
(Fp) to the
free energy takes into account the effects of the surrounding SPBs
in a concentrated solution on the size of any given SPB. Following
the arguments put forward for the related case of star polymers,[46] we introduce Fp as
the free energy cost of insertion of a SPB of radius R in a concentrated solution of the same. Such an insertion results
into the expulsion of the remaining SPBs from a region of size R and the associated free energy cost can be estimated as
the product between the volume taken up by the SPB, R3, and the osmotic pressure Π(RW) of the remaining solution at packing fraction η,
parametrized through the Wigner–Seitz radius RW. This osmotic pressure, in turn, is dominated by the
trapped counterions[46] and is estimated
by the product of the number of entropically active counterions N2 in each brush, the thermal energy kBT, and the number density
of the brushes ∝ RW–3. Summarizing, we obtainand
can only be considered in the limit that N2 ≫ N3, which
we justify later in this section.The role of the various terms
is antagonistic: some of them favor
large SPB sizes whereas others would favor the shrinking of the same;
thus, their competition leads to a value that minimizes the total
free energy. The sum of these contributions is numerically minimized
with respect to L and N3. In Figure C,D,
we show for miniature brushes (N = 40, R = 10 nm) the effect of varying the
functionality f and the SPB density on the osmotic
power of the brushes, i.e., on the fraction of counterions the brush
absorbs. The name miniature is used to indicate that the simulated
brushes are a scaled version of the experimental system presenting
the same grafting density (but smaller fragment length, see Figure B). We validate the
results of this procedure with coarse-grained molecular dynamics simulations
of these small brushes (see the Supporting Information), finding excellent quantitative agreement between the theoretical
cell model and simulations for the fraction of the nonabsorbed counterions
(Figure C,D). We show
that as the functionality increases, a decreasing fraction of counterions
manages to escape the brush (Figure C). This is due to the increased relative influence
of the electrostatic energy.Since the functionality f, i.e., the number of
grafted dsDNA fragments of an experimental brush, is rather large
(f ∼ 105), we expect these to be
highly osmotic, releasing very few counterions. Indeed, using the
geometric parameters of the large experimental brushes, our cell model
predicts that the fraction of released counterions is of the order
of 10–5, indicating that virtually all available
counterions are being absorbed. On the other hand, we see that an
increase in the cell size RW, related
to the volume fraction by η = R03/RW3, tends to
decrease the osmotic power of the brushes. This is to be expected,
of course, since an increase in the available volume for each brush
increases the entropy of released counterions.Applying the
model to brushes with the same geometry as that from
the experiments results in a concentration-dependent size given by
the solid line in Figure C, which describes very well the progressive reduction of
the position of the first peak of the experimental g(r). For the large experimental brushes, we find
that especially the contribution Fp has
a very significant influence on the density dependence of the brush
size. Even though the model captures well the experimentally observed
density-driven shrinkage of the brushes, it does not manage to accurately
predict the absolute size of the experimental brushes, underestimating
it by roughly 40%. On the other hand, such deviations are not unusual
in scaling-type theories that seek to establish general trends and
regimes and do not aim at detailed quantitative accuracy. We remark
that an experimental verification of the theoretically predicted particle
shrinking presented in this work, which is also related to previous
contributions,[45] was not presented to date.Even though the SPBs shrink as the local colloid density increases,
at constant density the effective interactions between two such particles
can be expected to be very strongly repulsive as they start overlapping.
In particular, Jusufi et al. showed that the effective interactions
between colloidal particles similar to SPBs scale linearly with the
number of absorbed counterions.[45] To confirm
that these findings extend to our system as well, we perform a similar
analysis for miniature SPBs of which we present the results in the Supporting Information. Since the number of absorbed
counterions in the experimental brushes must be of the order of Nf ≈ 109, we conclude that even small
brush overlaps are penalized with energies orders of magnitude higher
than those available for thermal fluctuations. In short, our model
prohibits highly osmotic SPBs from (significantly) interdigitating,
in agreement with experimental findings in previous work.[33]
Experiments: Aggregation and Re-entrant Ordering
While
the theory developed in the previous section identifies the physical
origin of the progressive size reduction of the brushes, the experimental
data show an additional, nonmonotonic trend of the position of the
first peak, with significant deviations from the theoretical predictions
in the interval 0.7 < η < 0.8. This discrepancy suggests
that the monotonic size reduction predicted by theory as an effect
of the osmotic pressure of the absorbed, noncondensed counterions
is not sufficient to capture the entire experimental phenomenology,
at least when only repulsive interactions between the brushes are
considered. To better understand the physical origin of the nonmonotonic
experimental trend, we report in Figure the packing fraction dependence of two additional
structural parameters, the height of the first peak of the g(r), gp, and
the average 6-fold order parameter, ⟨Ψ6⟩
= ⟨1/N∑Ψ6⟩, with N the total number
of particles in one image of the sample, where Ψ6 = 1/N∑e is the 6-fold order parameter of particle i with ϑ the relative orientation
angle between particles i and j and Nb the number of neighbors of particle i. The brackets ⟨ ⟩ indicate an average over
all images of the sample.
Figure 3
Structural parameters to investigate the degree
of ordering. (Bottom)
Height of the first peak of the g(r), gp(squares), and average 6-fold order
parameter ⟨Ψ6⟩ (circles) as a function
of packing fraction η. Inset: Average number of neighbors per
particle, ⟨Nb⟩, as a function
of packing fraction η, same x-axis as the main
plot. (Top) Images corresponding to exemplary renderings were obtained
from coordinates for the samples indicated by the arrows. Particles
are colored according to their individual value of Ψ6 (see scale-bar). In the snapshots of samples with η = 0.40
and 0.68 selected particles have been represented with an artificially
larger size to highlight the presence of chainlike structures.
Structural parameters to investigate the degree
of ordering. (Bottom)
Height of the first peak of the g(r), gp(squares), and average 6-fold order
parameter ⟨Ψ6⟩ (circles) as a function
of packing fraction η. Inset: Average number of neighbors per
particle, ⟨Nb⟩, as a function
of packing fraction η, same x-axis as the main
plot. (Top) Images corresponding to exemplary renderings were obtained
from coordinates for the samples indicated by the arrows. Particles
are colored according to their individual value of Ψ6 (see scale-bar). In the snapshots of samples with η = 0.40
and 0.68 selected particles have been represented with an artificially
larger size to highlight the presence of chainlike structures.Two particles were considered neighbors when the
distance between
their particle centers was smaller than the diameter plus half the
distance between the first maximum and the first minimum of the g(r). Both g and ⟨Ψ6⟩ show a similar
trend which, on top of a progressive increase as a function of η,
presents a nonmonotonic behavior and the presence of two local maxima.
One is observed for η ≈ 0.40 and the second for η
≈ 0.68. These peaks indicate for the corresponding samples
the presence of structures with a larger degree of local order and
are visualized in the representative renderings of the samples shown
in Figure , which
were obtained using particle coordinates from particle-tracking (representative
renderings of all samples can be found in the Supporting Information, Figure S1). For the sample with η
≈ 0.40 one can see that chainlike structures are present with
a simultaneous emergence of density inhomogeneities (crowded regions
and voids), indicating the presence of attractions in the effective
brush–brush interaction potential. These attractions, however,
are neither broad nor deep enough to bring about macroscopic phase
separation (liquid–gas) in the SPB solution, leading rather
to the formation of finite-size clusters only. The linear geometry
of the structures is also confirmed by the average number of neighbors
for each particle which is ⟨Nb⟩
≈ 2 (Figure , inset). The length of the chains presents a broad distribution,
and also isolated particles are present. For the sample with η
≈ 0.68, the aforementioned features persist, albeit with suppressed
density inhomogeneities with respect to η ≈ 0.40, and
the average number of neighbors increases to ⟨Nb⟩ ≈ 3 (Figure , inset). The degree of local order within
the aggregates is pronounced, as confirmed by the value of the average
6-fold order parameter, ⟨Ψ6⟩ ≈
0.54. Interestingly, for η > 0.68 gp and ⟨Ψ6⟩ (and also ⟨N⟩ to a minor extent)
decrease first and then increase again, indicating a re-entrant order–disorder
transition. The trends of ⟨Ψ6⟩ and gp (and ⟨N⟩) are all consistent with the trend of rp, which is also nonmonotonic and presents a
minimum value for a comparable value of η = 0.73. The minimum
of rp indicates the strongest size reduction,
which is followed by an increase for larger values of η, indicating
reswelling. We speculate then that the sudden disordering indicated
by the structural parameters ⟨Ψ6⟩, gp, and ⟨Nb⟩, i.e., the reduction observed for η > 0.68, can
be
associated with the size reduction, and the successive increase of
order (increase of the parameters) with the reswelling.We already
commented on the fact that the size reduction registered
for these samples deviates from the monotonic trend predicted by assuming
purely repulsive interactions, and we additionally noted that pronounced
aggregation is observed for these packing fractions. This leads us
to conclude that the pronounced particle shrinking responsible for
the reentrant transition might be associated with the strong local
packing induced by aggregation. These aggregation phenomena can be
explained if an attractive interaction between the brushes is present.
We will demonstrate that introducing a model short-range attraction
between particles/brushes the experimental re-entrant ordering can
be qualitatively reproduced; the origin of this attraction can be
attributed to blunt DNA ends, and its effect can be suppressed by
salinity. Note, finally, that the formation of a hexagonal lattice
for the highest packing fraction η = 1.20 is confirmed by the
large value of ⟨Ψ6⟩ ≈ 0.8.
Experiments: Testing the Origin of the Short-Range Attraction
by Acting on DNA Conformation
The experimental observation
of finite-size clusters and density inhomogeneities discussed in the
previous section indicates the presence of a short-range attraction
of moderate intensity between the dsDNA brushes. We speculate that
DNA blunt-end base stacking is the origin of this effective attractive
interaction. Our interpretation is based on the following arguments:
Previous experiments[33] and findings in
this work indicate the absence of significant interdigitation at large
packing fractions and a stretched configuration of the dsDNA fragments
within the brushes in the absence of added salt. We can therefore
foresee that when two neighbor brushes are in contact and the DNA
fragments are stretched, a large number of blunt ends on the two sides
will face each other and will be separated by a short distance. Recent
experimental and theoretical work on the assembly of DNA nanostructures[21−23,47,48] showed that when a large number of complementary DNA blunt ends
lie at sufficiently small distance from each other, stacking assembly
is observed. We propose that this mechanism could be at the origin
of the attractive interactions between compressed and densely packed
DNA brushes. It was found that the attractive interaction per base
contact amounts to a few kBT.[22] Upon the SPBs approaching contact,
blunt-end-pairs are exposed to such an attraction while at the same
time experiencing a weak electrostatic repulsion from the other brush,
which is of the order of a few kBT itself.[46] The resulting effective
interaction between two SPBs could be thus estimated to be of the
order of the thermal energy. A fundamental assumption of our hypothesis
is the stretched configuration of dsDNA fragments due to the presence
of a large fraction of counterions absorbed within the brush in the
absence of salt. To test our hypothesis, we performed a similar analysis
of the structural evolution of the dsDNA brushes adding 25 mM of NaCl
to the dispersions. We report in Figure A exemplary images of samples with comparable
particle number density for the system in deionized water and with
addition of 25 mM NaCl. For the sample in deionized water, which corresponds
to η ≈ 0.68, in selected regions like the one reported
in Figure A (left)
one observes a pronounced heterogeneous structure with aggregates
and local ordering within the aggregates. For the sample with 25 mM
NaCl we did not find instead heterogeneous regions and the structure
is generally homogeneous (Figure A, right). This suggests an important change of the
effective interactions in the sample with 25 mM salt. This pronounced
difference is confirmed by the comparison of the trend of gp as a function of η for the two systems
(Figure B): No peaks
are visible for the system with added salt (the corresponding g(r) are reported in the Supporting Information, Figure S2).
Figure 4
Changes in the dsDNA
configuration lead to the disappearance of
reentrant ordering. (A) Images of samples with η ≈ 0.68
for systems without any added salt (left) and with 25 mM NaCl (right).
(B) Height of the first peak of the g(r), gp, as a function of packing fraction
η for the system without any added salt (same data as in Figure ) and for the system
with 25 mM salt content, as indicated. Inset: Corresponding peak position rp as a function of η, same range as in
the main plot. At the top of the figure, we show a schematic representation
of the changes in the configuration of a few exemplary dsDNA fragments
for the system with and without added salt.
Changes in the dsDNA
configuration lead to the disappearance of
reentrant ordering. (A) Images of samples with η ≈ 0.68
for systems without any added salt (left) and with 25 mM NaCl (right).
(B) Height of the first peak of the g(r), gp, as a function of packing fraction
η for the system without any added salt (same data as in Figure ) and for the system
with 25 mM salt content, as indicated. Inset: Corresponding peak position rp as a function of η, same range as in
the main plot. At the top of the figure, we show a schematic representation
of the changes in the configuration of a few exemplary dsDNA fragments
for the system with and without added salt.Additionally, also the position of the first peak decreases in
this case smoothly, different from the case without added salt (Figure B, inset). We speculate
that while addition of monovalent salt should increase the strength
of blunt-end interactions,[22,47] at the same time it
strongly affects the spatial configuration of the dsDNA fragments:
Previous work in ref (33) showed that a significant backfolding (sketch in Figure ) of the ends of the fragments
occurs. This implies that the probability that blunt ends from neighbor
brushes face each other drastically reduces and, thus, the effective
attraction between brushes decreases. This finding supports the interpretation
that the unconventional origin of the effective attraction between
brushes is blunt-end interactions.
Simulations: Aggregation
and Re-entrant Ordering in a System
with Competing Short-Range Attraction and Midrange Repulsion
Based on the experimental evidence on the presence of additional,
short-range attractions originated by blunt-end interactions, we postulated
an effective repulsive potential that includes additional such attractions
and confirm that it brings about the experimentally observed features.
In particular, we performed Monte Carlo simulations of colloidal particles
in two dimensions, interacting with the following generic pair interaction:The first term is the Lennard-Jones 100–200
potential, modeling a strong repulsion of hard-core-like spheres of
diameter σ, followed by a short-range attraction.The
justification for such strong repulsion which prohibits particles
from interdigitation is found in the work of Jusufi et al., who showed
that the effective interactions between colloidal particles similar
to SPBs scale linearly with the number of absorbed counterions.[45] Since the number of the absorbed counterions
in the experimental brushes must be of the order of Nf ≈ 109, we conclude that even small brush overlaps
are penalized with energies that are orders of magnitude larger than
thermal fluctuations. Note that for the described conditions the interaction
can be conveniently modeled by any steeply diverging potential. This
assumption is corroborated by the experimental findings of ref (33) where it was shown that
dsDNA-coated colloids densely packed on a 2D lattice are resilient
to mutual interpenetration of their charged coronas. Moreover, the
Lennard-Jones term in eq features an attractive well with a range corresponding to a fraction
of σ. This short-ranged attraction is used to model interactions
between dsDNA fragments when particles approach each other to close
proximity, caused by the blunt DNA-end, as discussed in the previous
section. The second term in eq is of a repulsive Yukawa form that models a weak residual
electrostatic repulsion between the almost fully neutralized SPBs.The potential of eq has been used to investigate aggregation phenomena in 3D colloidal
systems, showing that the competition between short-range attraction
and midrange repulsion drives the formation of aggregates. Similar
interactions have been also used to study the phase behavior of 2D
colloidal systems.[49] The choice of the
potential parameters, V1, V2, and λ, determines the morphology of the aggregates.[50,51] In the simulations based on the potential of eq , the experimentally observed size reduction
of the particles was included by using the values of the experimental
particle diameter as a function of the packing fraction η in Figure C. Potentials with
different sets of V1, V2, and λ values were generated. The potential generating
the g(r) that shows reasonable,
semiquantitative agreement with experiments was chosen as the most
representative of the interactions in the experimental system.The pair potential is reported in Figure A and was obtained for V1/(kBT) = 1.43; V2/(kBT) =
0.28; λ/σ0 = 1.5. Although we have not attempted
a microscopic derivation for the values of the parameters used, it
is possible to offer plausibility arguments for the resulting values
on the basis of physical argumentation. The parameter V1/(kBT) sets
the scale of the attraction, which, as suggested in the previous section,
is caused by end-to-end stacking of the dsDNA blunt ends and is expected
to be of the order of the thermal energy. The obtained value of 1.43kBT is in very good agreement
with this expectation and supports our interpretation about the origin
of the attractive interaction. On the other hand, the value of the
parameter V2 is set by the overall SPB
charge, which is very low for osmotic brushes and thus a small value
results. Finally, the screening length λ is set by the radius
of the Wigner–Seitz cell, which is somewhat larger than the
brush size in the concentrations under consideration.
Figure 5
MC simulations of a system
with competing attractive and repulsive
interactions confirm reentrant ordering. (A) Interaction potential
with parameters: V1/kBT = 1.43; V2/kBT = 0.28; λ/σ0 = 1.5, and variable σ as indicated in the legend. (B)
Simulated g(r) for various packing fractions, where the color code
matches the scheme in (A). (C) Trend of the height of the first peak
(black symbols) and the order parameter (red symbols) as a function
of packing fraction. (D) Corresponding simulation snapshots.
MC simulations of a system
with competing attractive and repulsive
interactions confirm reentrant ordering. (A) Interaction potential
with parameters: V1/kBT = 1.43; V2/kBT = 0.28; λ/σ0 = 1.5, and variable σ as indicated in the legend. (B)
Simulated g(r) for various packing fractions, where the color code
matches the scheme in (A). (C) Trend of the height of the first peak
(black symbols) and the order parameter (red symbols) as a function
of packing fraction. (D) Corresponding simulation snapshots.The obtained particle configurations were used
to determine the
corresponding g(r) which are presented
in Figure B for the
investigated values of η. A nonmonotonic behavior of the height
of the first peak, gp, for packing fractions
in the range 0.7 < η < 0.8, Figure B, is observed, in qualitative agreement
with the experimental findings. The re-entrance is also reflected
in the nonmonotonicity of the 6-fold order parameter ⟨Ψ6⟩, Figure C. Finally, the snapshots of the simulated systems (Figure D) show the presence
of chainlike structures and aggregates comparable to those found in
experiments. The simulations thus confirm that attractions, which
induce aggregation, are a key ingredient to explain the re-entrant
ordering phenomenon. Therefore, we conclude that re-entrant ordering
is determined by two mechanisms: The formation of aggregates and size
reduction due to deswelling. At larger packing fractions, particles
get more ordered and progressively shrink; at the same time, attraction
induces formation of aggregates. When the aggregates become locally
denser than the average packing fraction, a pronounced shrinking occurs,
which leads to a sudden disordering. Aggregates are disrupted and
the local packing decreases, allowing the particles to rearrange configurations
and partially reswell. Further increasing the packing fraction, the
order increases again until crystallization occurs. It is interesting
to note that a nonmonotonic variation of g at packing fractions in the range 0.7 < η
< 0.9 can also be found in Monte Carlo simulations in which a monotonic
decrease of particle size similar to that predicted by theory is assumed,
even though the agreement with experiments is poorer (results not
shown). This suggests that there is a critical packing fraction, which
depends on the degree of deswelling, at which a restructuring into
a more disordered structure is needed to be able to pack additional
particles. We remark also that the re-entrant behavior is only found
in a very narrow range of potential parameters. Finally, the re-entrant
behavior observed for the investigated family of interaction potentials
is in qualitative agreement with previous work on 2D colloidal dispersions
with competing interactions.[52,53]
Experiments: Dynamics as
a Function of Packing Fraction
The structural variations
observed with increasing packing fraction,
and in particular the aggregation phenomena assigned to the interactions
between dsDNA fragments of contacting brushes, should also affect
the dynamical behavior of suspensions. In particular, the presence
of particle aggregates should induce a slowdown of the average single-particle
dynamics. To test our expectations, we determined the mean-squared
displacement (MSD) of samples with different packing fractions, ⟨Δr2(Δt)⟩
= ⟨(r(Δt + t0) – r(t0))2⟩ where r is the position of particle i, Δt is the delay time, t0 is the time during
the particle trajectory, and ⟨⟩ indicates an average over all
times t0 and all particles i. We show the resulting MSD for several packing fractions in Figure A. All trajectories
were corrected for the possible presence of drift due to stage instabilities:
despite this correction, the apparent superdiffusive behavior at very
short times might be the result of residual drift contributions.
Figure 6
(A) Experimental
mean squared displacements for samples with different
packing fractions. Average mean squared displacement ⟨Δr2(Δt)⟩
of dispersions of dsDNA-coated colloids with different packing fraction
η, as indicated. Inset: Effective diffusion coefficient Deff extracted from the mean squared displacements
as a function of η for the samples in the main panel and for
the system with 25 mM NaCl, as indicated. (B) Schematic diagram illustrating
the morphological and structural evolution of samples as a function
of increasing η, highlighting the combined effect of particle
shrinking (red curve, representing the schematic evolution of the
particle size) and blunt-end induced attractive interactions in determining
the state diagram (sketches at the bottom) and in particular aggregation
and re-entrant ordering of the structure (blue curve, representing
the evolution of the structural parameters).
(A) Experimental
mean squared displacements for samples with different
packing fractions. Average mean squared displacement ⟨Δr2(Δt)⟩
of dispersions of dsDNA-coated colloids with different packing fraction
η, as indicated. Inset: Effective diffusion coefficient Deff extracted from the mean squared displacements
as a function of η for the samples in the main panel and for
the system with 25 mM NaCl, as indicated. (B) Schematic diagram illustrating
the morphological and structural evolution of samples as a function
of increasing η, highlighting the combined effect of particle
shrinking (red curve, representing the schematic evolution of the
particle size) and blunt-end induced attractive interactions in determining
the state diagram (sketches at the bottom) and in particular aggregation
and re-entrant ordering of the structure (blue curve, representing
the evolution of the structural parameters).Samples with η ≤ 0.56 show approximately diffusive
dynamics at long times, as indicated by the almost linear dependence
of the MSD on t. Aggregation in the form of chainlike
structures observed for η = 0.40 leads to a significant slowdown
of the dynamics and smaller values of the MSD, while a slightly larger
MSD is obtained for η = 0.56. This corresponds to the transition
to a more uniform spatial distribution of particles with less aggregates.
Similarly, a considerably smaller MSD is observed at η = 0.68
and 0.73: in particular, the MSDs become subdiffusive, in agreement
with the formation of a large number of aggregates in which particle
movements are suppressed. The MSD presents a larger value and a time
dependence approaching that expected for diffusion for η = 0.87,
while a significantly smaller and subdiffusive MSD is obtained for
η = 1.20. For the latter, the presence of a large number of
crystalline regions is at the origin of the slow dynamics. The inset
of Figure A reports
an effective diffusion coefficient calculated as Deff = Δr2(Δt ≈ 55s)/4Δt, which summarizes the behavior illustrated above for the MSD, and
which confirms the correspondence between the structural variations
and the evolution of the dynamics. The MSDs of samples with 25 mM
NaCl are reported in Figure S3. Similar
to what was discussed for the g(r), also the dynamics of the system with salt show a smoother slowdown
with increasing η, as shown in the inset of Figure A. The data of Figure A also confirm what was anticipated
when discussing the possibility of brush shrinking and/or deformation
with increasing packing fraction: For all samples, except the crystalline
state for η = 1.20, the MSD shows a diffusive or moderately
subdiffusive behavior, indicating that dynamical arrest is not occurring
even at large packing fractions. This supports the scenario of progressive
shrinking of the brushes rather than deformation.
Conclusions
We report unconventional effects of packing on the morphology and
interactions of thick, dense spherical dsDNA brushes in planar confinement.
These are schematically summarized in Figure B. Combining experiments and theory we showed
that the large number of free (entropically active) counterions absorbed
within a dense brush in the osmotic regime produces a huge entropic
pressure which leads to the progressive shrinking of neighbor brushes
with increasing packing fraction. Interestingly, shrinking occurs
without significant interdigitation of the brushes and starts well
below space filling. Moreover, the absence of dynamical arrest, even
for large packing fractions, suggests that shrinking prevents jamming
and significant particle deformation. These findings mark a pronounced
difference with the behavior of uncharged hairy colloids, where interdigitation
is especially relevant,[54] but also of neutral
and charged microgel particles, in which deswelling occurs above space
filling or even at larger packings.[55] As
demonstrated in previous experimental and theoretical studies on planar
polyelectrolyte brushes, a small degree of interdigitation plays a
fundamental role in maintaining the lubrication between contacting
brushes under high loads. SPBs find application as lubrication additives
in biological environments:[56,57] Our study, indicating
shrinking in the absence of interdigitation of SPBs with increasing
packing, suggests that low friction is expected between highly crowded
brushes, a condition which is relevant for the applications mentioned
above, in which SPBs dispersions are typically strongly confined.
The lubrication between brushes is also supported by the dynamics
of the system, which do not fully arrest even for highly crowded conditions.The isotropic repulsive interactions derived in the theory for
generic polyelectrolyte brushes do not entirely explain the structural
evolution of the increasingly packed spherical dsDNA brushes. Aggregation
phenomena in the form of chainlike structures and nonmonotonic shrinking
are observed experimentally and were reproduced in simulations by
considering an additional short-range attractive interaction, in competition
with electrostatic repulsion. We explained the origin of this attraction
in terms of base stacking forces between blunt ends of dsDNA fragments,
which become particularly important when osmotic brushes are densely
packed. In these conditions a large number of blunt ends from neighboring
brushes lie at short distance and can attract each other, leading
to an effective additional short-range attraction between the particles
that drives assembly. This effective attraction induced by blunt-end
interactions can be tuned by addition of salt, as demonstrated here,
and potentially by temperature, grafting density and the type of free-end
modification of the DNA brushes.[58] Colloidal
assembly exploiting DNA hybridization of single-stranded DNA or sticky
ends has been largely investigated during the last years,[26] mainly for assembling crystals[59,60] but also nonequilibrium gels.[61] However,
it was found that assembling structures with a higher degree of complexity
than those also obtained with more conventional colloids, and with
a programmable approach similar to that used in DNA nanotechnology,
is an extremely demanding task. As mentioned in the introduction,
blunt-end base stacking has been shown to be especially powerful in
DNA nanotechnology in combination with shape design[62,63] but is almost unexploited in colloidal assembly. We can foresee
that engineering the DNA blunt-ends through careful design of the
PCR primers and control over their spatial distribution can allow
the orthogonal programming of the directionality and strength of the
interactions between dsDNA grafted colloids. The experimental realization
of such patchy spherical DNA-based brushes will provide the basis
for the development of innovative self-assembly platforms that combine
directionality and sequence complementarity of DNA fragments. This
may be used to guide the organization of colloidal materials with
unique plasmonic[64,65] and photonic properties,[66] thanks also to the possibility of easily changing
the material and shape of the colloidal core,[67,68] and thus the responsiveness to external fields.
Methods
Synthesis of DNA Star Polyelectrolyte Colloids
and Dispersions’
Preparation
The procedure to obtain DNA star polyelectrolyte
colloids was described in detail before.[33] Here, the main steps of the procedure are recalled. They can be
summarized as follows: (i) synthesis of 10 kbp double-stranded DNA
through the amplification of end-biotinylated fragments using the
polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and (ii) grafting of DNA chains to
the streptavidin functionalized surface of polystyrene beads (RPS = 0.49 μm). In step (i) we amplified
the end-biotinylated dsDNA fragments using a λ-DNA template
(New England Biolabs) and a DNA polymerase enzyme contained in the
Go Taq Long PCR Master Mix (Promega) and following the detailed PCR
protocols accompanied by this product. End-functionalization of the
dsDNA strands was achieved by the PCR using commercially synthesized
and HPLC purified forward and reverse primers, modified at their 5′-ends
(IDT). More specifically, for the aforementioned linear dsDNA fragments
the forward primer was 5′-biotinylated, including an extended
15-atom spacer TEG (tetra-ethylene-glycol) in order to reduce steric
hindrance and therefore increase the binding efficiency of the long
dsDNA to the streptavidin coated PS beads (Bangs Laboratories). The
reverse primers were unmodified. Grafting was obtained using a binding
buffer (Dynabeads Kilobase binder Kit, Invitrogen). Biotin end-modified
dsDNA fragments were mixed in a picomole range with the PS bead suspension
in appropriate amounts to obtain a final volume of about 35 μL
and incubated at room temperature under gentle rotation for 12 h in
order to avoid sedimentation. The unreacted dsDNA fragments were removed
using sequential washes with Milli-Q water. This can be easily achieved
by centrifuging the suspension and by carefully pipetting off the
supernatant and by finally resuspending the DNA coated beads to 40
μL Milli-Q water. This procedure was repeated three times. The
number of attached dsDNA chains per bead (functionality f) was quantified, knowing the number of the beads (value that can
be determined by the concentration of the stock bead solution) and
the number of DNA chains in the reaction vial before the cleaning
procedure. The DNA concentration was determined by measuring the absorbance
at 260 nm employing a microvolume spectrometer (MicroDrop, ThermoScientific).
Grafted particles were then dispersed in deionized water or a saline
buffer solution containing 2.5 × 10–2 M of
NaCl. Dispersions with different particle concentrations were obtained
by diluting a sediment obtained by centrifugation. The average area
packing fraction η of the confined dispersions was determined
through the analysis of sample images by particle tracking. For each
dispersion the results of the analysis of 1000 images were averaged.
Microscopy Experiments
Quasi-2D samples were obtained
by confining the dispersions between a microscope slide and a #1 coverslip:
The distance between slide and coverslip was controlled by means of
a PET-based double-sided tape with thickness h =
10 μm (No. 5601, Nitto). Glass surfaces were made hydrophobic
by cleaning with Rain X solution (ITW Krafft) to avoid particle sticking
to the glass. After depositing a 1.2 μL droplet of sample onto
the microscope slide, the coverslip was uniformly pressed against
the slide until the desired separation was reached and then successively
glued on the sides using epoxy resin. Microscopy experiments were
performed on a Nikon Ti–S inverted microscope using a Nikon
50x LWD objective (N.A. 0.9). For each sample, about 50 series of
1000 images of 1280 × 1024 pixels were acquired at different
locations in the sample using a 2.2Mp Pixelink M2 camera at a frame
rate of 15fps. Particle coordinates were extracted from images using
the Mosaic Suite for Fiji[69] while particle
trajectories were determined using TrackMate.[70] Dedrifting procedures available in TrackMate were applied to sample
trajectories before calculating the MSDs. In order to avoid sample
degradation, experiments were run shortly after sample loading.
Monte Carlo Simulations
Monte Carlo (MC) simulations
employing the standard Metropolis algorithm were performed for soft
discs in two dimensions interacting with the pair potential of eq , cut off at a distance rc = 3.5σ, at constant temperature. The
parameters of the potential determining the strength of the short-ranged
attraction and the long-ranged repulsion as well as its range are
reported in Figure . The particles are contained in a box of dimensions L = L = 20σ0. The number of particles is N = {196, 289, 342, 380, 441, 600} in the systems with packing
fraction η = {0.40, 0.57, 0.68, 0.73, 0.87, 1.17}, respectively.
Data were gathered for simulation runs of 105 MC steps
for packing fractions η = 0.40 and 0.57; 106 MC steps
for η = 0.68, 0.73, and 0.87; and 2 × 106 MC
steps for the system with η = 1.17. Equilibration is achieved
after 20–50% of the given MC runs. The steric interaction diameter
σ as a function of packing fraction is reported in the legend
of Figure A.
Authors: Jean-Yves Tinevez; Nick Perry; Johannes Schindelin; Genevieve M Hoopes; Gregory D Reynolds; Emmanuel Laplantine; Sebastian Y Bednarek; Spencer L Shorte; Kevin W Eliceiri Journal: Methods Date: 2016-10-03 Impact factor: 3.608