Literature DB >> 35130367

Association of atrial fibrillation with infectivity and severe complications of COVID-19: A nationwide cohort study.

Jin Park1, Jae Il Shin2, Dong-Hyeok Kim3, Junbeom Park4, Jimin Jeon5, Jinkwon Kim5, Tae-Jin Song1.   

Abstract

Infection is associated with the occurrence, recurrence, and progression of atrial fibrillation (AF), and is also closely related to poor prognosis. However, studies of the relationship between infectivity and severe complications of coronavirus infectious disease-19  (COVID-19) with a history of AF are limited. To estimate infectivity and severity of complications in COVID-19 patients with a history of AF, this study was done. From the Korean nationwide COVID-19 dataset, 212 678 participants with at least one severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (COVID-19) test were included between January 1 and June 4, 2020. AF was defined according to at least two outpatient hospital visits or one admission with an ICD-10 code of "I48" before the COVID-19 test. To investigate the association of AF with infectivity and severe complications of COVID-19, 1:4 ratio propensity score matching (PSM) was performed. Severe complications of COVID-19 were defined as a composite outcome of mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit admission, and death within 2 months after COVID-19 diagnosis. Among 212 678 participants who underwent the COVID-19 test, there were 7713 COVID-19 positive patients. After PSM, COVID-19 PCR positivity did not show a significant difference according to the presence of AF (odds ratio [OR]: 0.79, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [0.60-1.04]). Of 7713 COVID-19 patients, 62 (0.8%) had a history of AF and severe complications occurred in 444 (5.7%) patients. After PSM, AF was associated with the development of severe complications (OR: 2.04, 95% CI: [1.10-3.79]) and mortality (OR: 2.09, 95% CI: [1.01-4.31]) of COVID-19. We found that AF was associated with an increased risk of severe complications in COVID-19 infected patients.
© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; atrial fibrillation; infectivity; intensive care unit; mechanical ventilation; mortality; prognosis

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35130367      PMCID: PMC9088370          DOI: 10.1002/jmv.27647

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Virol        ISSN: 0146-6615            Impact factor:   20.693


INTRODUCTION

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) is a positive sense, single‐stranded RNA coronavirus in genetic sequence, which is contagious to humans and is the cause of coronavirus infectious disease‐19 (COVID‐19). Most patients infected with COVID‐19 complain of asymptomatic or mild flu‐like symptoms, but respiratory insufficiency or hypoxemia is also accompanied in some cases. Additionally, a COVID‐19 infection may require mechanical ventilation treatment, hospitalization in an intensive care unit (ICU), or may lead to death. Therefore, it is essential to differentiate and treat patients likely to develop severe complications due to COVID‐19. Until recently, several studies have suggested factors, such as diabetes mellitus, heart failure, cancer, allergic diseases, and chronic kidney diseases that are associated with a poor prognosis after COVID‐19 infection. , , Infection is associated with the occurrence, recurrence, and progression of atrial fibrillation (AF), and is also closely related to poor prognosis. , Recently, a relationship between COVID‐19 infection and AF has been proposed, with the likelihood of AF being increased in COVID‐19 patients. In addition, there have been some meta‐analyses on the mortality in COVID‐19 patients with or without AF. , , However, most individual studies are retrospective, some meta‐analyses did not use the adjusted odds ratio, which could cause biased results. In addition, other important severe complications of COVID‐19 such as mechanical ventilation or ICU admission have rarely been investigated and statistical methods to reduce bias such as propensity score matching (PSM) have rarely been applied in previous studies. Therefore, the purpose of our study was to investigate the relationship of AF with infectivity and severe complications of COVID‐19, including mechanical ventilation, ICU admission, and mortality, in a nationwide population‐based COVID‐19 dataset.

METHODS

Study design and participants

This is a retrospective observational study using a nationwide COVID‐19 dataset from South Korea. South Korea has a public single‐payer health insurance system, the National Health Insurance Service (NHIS). The NHIS had a national health insurance claims database of hospital visits, diagnoses (recorded by International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems [ICD]‐10 codes), medical procedures, prescriptions, and mortality for the whole South Korean population. , In the face of the COVID‐19 pandemic, the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Centers and NHIS released a nationwide COVID‐19 dataset consisting of Koreans who underwent real‐time reverse transcription‐polymerase chain reaction (RT‐PCR) assays of nasal and pharyngeal swabs to COVID‐19 from January 1 to June 4, 2020 for academic research. The RT‐PCR assays followed World Health Organization guidelines and were validated by the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Centers. Due to its nature as a retrospective analysis based on a fully anonymized dataset, this study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of our institution (Seoul Hospital Ewha Woman's University College of Medicine 2020‐10‐021), and the requirement for informed consent was waived.

Atrial fibrillation

In this study, AF was defined by at least two outpatient hospital visits or one admission with the diagnostic code of “I48” before the COVID‐19 RT‐PCR test. The diagnostic accuracy of AF using this algorithm was 94.1% of the positive predictive value. ,

Study outcomes

The current study evaluated the risk of infectivity to COVID‐19 and prognosis after COVID‐19 infection by AF. In an analysis for COVID‐19 infectivity, the study outcome was the positivity in patients who underwent the COVID‐19 test. In an analysis for COVID‐19 prognosis, the study outcome was the development of severe complications in COVID‐19 patients. Severe complications of COVID‐19 were defined as a composite of mechanical ventilation, admission to the ICU, and mortality during the 2‐month period after COVID‐19 diagnosis. Mechanical ventilation was identified using claim codes of mechanical ventilation (M5850, M5857, M5858, and M5860). Admission to the ICU was defined using the related claims codes (AH110, AH150, AH180‐95 AH190‐5, AH210, AH250, AH280‐9, AH28A, AH290‐9, AH380‐9, AH38A, AH390‐9, AH501, AJ001–AJ011, AJ020‐1, AJ031, AJ100‐390, AJ2A0, AJ3A0, AJ500‐590, V5100, V5200, V5210‐20, V5500‐5520). Mortality and time of death data were provided by NHIS and were previously validated. ,

Covariates

We acquired demographic information regarding sex, age, and household income level (tertiles). In the nationwide COVID‐19 dataset, age is presented in 10‐year intervals to preserve privacy. Therefore, we divided age categories by the median value and dichotomized data based on a cutoff age of 60 years. The definition of comorbidities regarding hypertension, diabetes mellitus, stroke, heart failure, coronary artery disease, asthma, chronic kidney disease, and malignancy was described in Supporting Information Methods.

Statistical analysis

To investigate the association of AF with infectivity and severe complications of COVID‐19, 1:4 ratio PSM was performed with the Greedy nearest‐neighbor algorithm to compare samples with and without AF, to balance the baselines of both groups and to reduce potential confounding. To determine whether PSM was appropriate, standardized mean differences were used. If the standardized mean differences were less than 0.1, we considered PSM to be appropriate. Logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate infectivity and severe complications of COVID‐19 according to AF history in unmatched cohorts and cohorts balanced after PSM. The results are expressed as odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Secondary outcome analysis was performed for individual components of severe complications of COVID‐19 including mechanical ventilation, admission to ICU, and death. There are prior reports that smoking is an important risk factor for worse outcomes of COVID‐19. Therefore, we performed subgroup analysis with 3934 COVID‐19 infected patients whose smoking history (current smoking or not) was available from the national health screening check‐up program results (2015–2018). Of them, 1:4 ratio PSM was performed to match patients with AF and without AF, and current smoking was additionally included as a covariate in the PSM. Statistical analyses were executed using R software, version 3.3.3 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria), and SAS 9.4 version (SAS Inc.). Two‐sided p values less than 0.05 were considered significant.

RESULTS

COVID‐19 infectivity by AF

In the national COVID‐19 dataset, there were 212 678 individuals aged older than 20 years who underwent at least one SARS‐CoV‐2 test between January 1 and June 4, 2020 (Figure 1). Among 212 678 individuals, 208 958 individuals without AF, and 3720 (1.7%) individuals with AF were identified in the unmatched cohort (Table 1). There were 7713 with positivity for the COVID‐19 RT‐PCR test. Then, we applied 1:4 ratio PSM for 14 880 individuals without AF and 3720 individuals with AF, which were appropriately matched (Figure 1 and Table 1). After PSM, COVID‐19 PCR positivity did not show a significant difference according to AF history (OR: 0.79, 95% CI: (0.60–1.04), p = 0.087) (Table 2).
Figure 1

Study flow of a nationwide cohort study of COVID‐19 and atrial fibrillation between January 1 and June 4, 2020. Atrial fibrillation was identified by at least two outpatient hospital visits or one admission with International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision (ICD‐10) code of “I48” before COVID‐19 real‐time reverse transcription‐polymerase chain reaction (RT‐PCR) test

Table 1

Baseline characteristics of participants who underwent COVID‐19 test with and without atrial fibrillation before and after propensity score matching

VariableBefore propensity score matchingAfter propensity score matchingSMDa
Without AFWith AFWithout AFWith AF
N 208 958372014 8803720
Sex, male97 856 (46.83)2182 (58.66)8770 (58.94)2182 (58.66)0.006
Age, years0.006
<60141 001 (67.48)428 (11.51)1739 (11.69)428 (11.51)
≥6067 957 (32.52)3292 (88.49)13 141 (88.31)3292 (88.49)
Household income<0.001
T1, lowest70 979 (33.97)1254 (33.71)5007 (33.65)1254 (33.71)
T270 013 (33.51)940 (25.27)3779 (25.4)940 (25.27)
T3, highest67 966 (32.53)1526 (41.02)6094 (40.95)1526 (41.02)
Medical history
Hypertension62 230 (29.78)3345 (89.92)13 434 (90.28)3345 (89.92)0.012
Diabetes mellitus27 772 (13.29)1219 (32.77)4866 (32.70)1219 (32.77)0.001
Stroke10 853 (5.19)802 (21.56)3189 (21.43)802 (21.56)0.003
Heart failure18 075 (8.65)2439 (65.56)9736 (65.43)2439 (65.56)0.003
Coronary artery disease13 723 (6.57)931 (25.03)3822 (25.69)931 (25.03)0.015
Asthma14 022 (6.71)618 (16.61)2423 (16.28)618 (16.61)0.009
Chronic kidney disease18 431 (8.82)1098 (29.52)4351 (29.24)1098 (29.52)0.006
Malignancy29 553 (14.14)1055 (28.36)4218 (28.35)1055 (28.36)<0.001

Note: Data are presented as numbers with percentages.

Abbreviations: AF, atrial fibrillation; CI, confidence interval; SMD, standard mean difference; T, tertile.

A standardized difference in the matched cohort. All standardized mean difference values were less than 0.10 in the propensity score‐matched cohort.

Table 2

Proportion of COVID‐19 infection in participants who underwent COVID‐19 test with and without atrial fibrillation before and after propensity score matching

VariableBefore propensity score matchingAfter propensity score matching
Without AF (N = 208 958)With AF (N = 3720)OR [95% CI]Without AF (N = 14 880)With AF (N = 3720)OR [95% CI]
COVID‐19
Negative (−)201 307 (96.34)3658 (98.33)Ref14 566 (97.89)3658 (98.33)Ref
Positive (+)7651 (3.66)62 (1.67)0.45 [0.35–0.57]314 (2.11)62 (1.67)0.79 [0.60–1.04]

Note: Data are presented as numbers with percentages.

Abbreviations: AF, atrial fibrillation; CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.

Study flow of a nationwide cohort study of COVID‐19 and atrial fibrillation between January 1 and June 4, 2020. Atrial fibrillation was identified by at least two outpatient hospital visits or one admission with International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision (ICD‐10) code of “I48” before COVID‐19 real‐time reverse transcription‐polymerase chain reaction (RT‐PCR) test Baseline characteristics of participants who underwent COVID‐19 test with and without atrial fibrillation before and after propensity score matching Note: Data are presented as numbers with percentages. Abbreviations: AF, atrial fibrillation; CI, confidence interval; SMD, standard mean difference; T, tertile. A standardized difference in the matched cohort. All standardized mean difference values were less than 0.10 in the propensity score‐matched cohort. Proportion of COVID‐19 infection in participants who underwent COVID‐19 test with and without atrial fibrillation before and after propensity score matching Note: Data are presented as numbers with percentages. Abbreviations: AF, atrial fibrillation; CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.

COVID‐19 prognosis by AF

Among 7713 patients with COVID‐19, 62 (0.8%) had a history of AF in the unmatched cohort (Figure 1 and Table 3). During 2 months after the diagnosis of COVID‐19, the overall primary outcome occurred in 444 (5.7%) patients, including 171 (2.2%) cases of mechanical ventilation, 265 (3.4%) cases of ICU admission, and 224 (2.9%) cases of death (Table 4). In the unmatched cohort, severe complications of COVID‐19 were more frequently noted in individuals with AF (overall p < 0.001) (Table 4). We applied PSM for 248 individuals without AF and 62 individuals with AF who were appropriately matched (Figure 1 and Table 3). After PSM, history of AF was associated with severe complications of COVID‐19 (OR: 2.04, 95% CI: [1.10–3.79], p = 0.025) and mortality (OR: 2.09, 95% CI: (1.01–4.31), p = 0.048), while the frequency of mechanical ventilation and ICU admission did not differ according to AF history (Table 4).
Table 3

Baseline characteristics of COVID‐19 patients with and without atrial fibrillation before and after propensity score matching

VariableBefore propensity score matchingAfter propensity score matchingSMDa
Without AFWith AFWithout AFWith AF
N 76516224862
Sex, male3016 (39.42)32 (51.61)122 (49.19)32 (51.61)0.048
Age, years<0.001
<605486 (71.7)6 (9.68)24 (9.68)6 (9.68)
≥602165 (28.3)56 (90.32)224 (90.32)56 (90.32)
Household income0.013
T1, lowest3315 (43.33)32 (51.61)129 (52.02)32 (51.61)
T22192 (28.65)8 (12.90)33 (13.31)8 (12.90)
T3, highest2144 (28.02)22 (35.48)86 (34.68)22 (35.48)
Medical history
Hypertension1672 (21.85)56 (90.32)230 (92.74)56 (90.32)0.087
Diabetes mellitus752 (9.83)16 (25.81)71 (28.63)16 (25.81)0.063
Stroke285 (3.73)13 (20.97)43 (17.34)13 (20.97)0.092
Heart failure432 (5.65)37 (59.68)144 (58.06)37 (59.68)0.033
Coronary artery disease290 (3.79)19 (30.65)70 (28.23)19 (30.65)0.053
Asthma338 (4.42)6 (9.68)21 (8.47)6 (9.68)0.042
Chronic kidney disease421 (5.50)16 (25.81)75 (30.24)16 (25.81)0.099
Malignancy489 (6.39)8 (12.90)36 (14.52)8 (12.90)0.047

Note: Data are presented as numbers with percentages.

Abbreviations: AF, atrial fibrillation; CI, confidence interval; SMD, standard mean difference; T, tertile.

A standardized difference in the matched cohort. All standardized mean difference values were less than 0.10 in the propensity score‐matched cohort.

Table 4

Severe complication in COVID‐19 patients with and without atrial fibrillation before and after propensity score matching

OutcomesBefore propensity score matchingAfter propensity score matching
Without AF (N = 7651)With AF (N = 62)OR [95% CI] p valueWithout AF (N = 248)With AF (N = 62)OR [95% CI] p value
Severe complication in COVID‐19
Mechanical ventilation165 (2.16)6 (9.68)4.86 [2.07–11.44] <0.001 17 (6.85)6 (9.68)1.46 [0.55–3.86]0.450
Intensive care unit admission254 (3.32)11 (17.74)6.28 [3.24–12.20] <0.001 28 (11.29)11 (17.74)1.70 [0.79–3.63]0.174
Death211 (2.76)13 (20.97)9.36 [5.00–17.51] <0.001 28 (11.29)13 (20.97)2.09 [1.01–4.31] 0.048
Compose of outcome424 (5.54)20 (32.26)8.12 [4.72–13.95] <0.001 47 (18.95)20 (32.26)2.04 [1.10–3.79] 0.025

Note: Data are presented as numbers with percentages.

Abbreviations: AF, atrial fibrillation; CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.

Baseline characteristics of COVID‐19 patients with and without atrial fibrillation before and after propensity score matching Note: Data are presented as numbers with percentages. Abbreviations: AF, atrial fibrillation; CI, confidence interval; SMD, standard mean difference; T, tertile. A standardized difference in the matched cohort. All standardized mean difference values were less than 0.10 in the propensity score‐matched cohort. Severe complication in COVID‐19 patients with and without atrial fibrillation before and after propensity score matching Note: Data are presented as numbers with percentages. Abbreviations: AF, atrial fibrillation; CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.

Subgroup analysis for prognosis in COVID‐19 patients with available smoking history

We performed a subgroup analysis with COVID‐19 infected patients whose smoking history was available from the national health screening check‐up data because smoking history is an important issue in COVID‐19 prognosis. , Among 3934 COVID‐19 infected patients with available smoking history, 40 (1.0%) had a history of AF, and 299 (7.6%) were current smokers in the unmatched cohort (Figure S1 and Table S1). In the unmatched cohort, severe complications of COVID‐19 such as mechanical ventilation (15.0%), ICU admission (27.5%), and death (22.5%) were more frequent in individuals with AF (all p < 0.001) as shown in Table S2. After 1:4 PSM, 160 individuals without AF and 40 individuals with AF were matched and all covariates, including current smoking, were balanced appropriately (Table S1). In the matched cohort (Table S2), a history of AF was significantly associated with ICU admission (OR: 3.41, 95% CI: [1.44–8.11], p = 0.005) and compose of outcome (OR: 2.89, 95% CI: [1.37–6.10], p = 0.005) with COVID‐19 infection (Table 5).
Table 5

The results of previous meta‐analysis on outcome in COVID‐19 patients with and without atrial fibrillation

Author, year N OutcomeOR [95% CI] p valueProblems in the analysis
Yang, et al. (2021) 11 23Unfavorable outcome1.14 [1.03–1.26] 0.01 There is no definition of unfavorable outcome
Yang, et al. (2021) 11 23Death1.13 [1.02–1.25] <0.05
Romiti, et al. (2021) 9 14Mortality3.97 [2.76–5.71] <0.05 This is the result of meta‐analysis of univariate OR
Zuin, et al. (2021) 10 12Death in the short‐term period2.22 [1.47–3.36] <0.0001 This is the result of meta‐analysis of unadjusted OR

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; N, number of included study; OR, odds ratio.

The results of previous meta‐analysis on outcome in COVID‐19 patients with and without atrial fibrillation Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; N, number of included study; OR, odds ratio.

The results of the previous meta‐analyses on COVID‐19 prognosis by AF

There have been three meta‐analyses on COVID‐19 prognosis by AF. Yang et al. showed that AF was significantly associated with an increased risk of unfavorable outcomes among COVID‐19 patients (pooled effect size = 1.14, 95% CI: 1.03–1.26, p = 0.01; I 2  =  63.9%, random‐effects analysis). However, there was no definition of unfavorable outcome in this study. When they limited the outcome to death, there was a significant relation between AF and COVID‐19 mortality (pooled effect size = 1.13, 95% CI: 1.02–1.25). Romiti et al. analyzed the 14 studies reporting on all‐cause mortality among COVID‐19 patients and according to AF status, which showed there was a fourfold higher risk of death compared to patients without AF (OR: 3.97, 95% CI: 2.76–5.71), but the heterogeneity among studies was high (I 2 = 78%) and they used univariate ORs. Zuin et al. also demonstrated that preexisting AF was significantly associated with a higher risk of death in the short‐term period (OR: 2.22, 95% CI: 1.47–3.36, p < 0.0001), but similarly, they did not use adjusted ORs.

DISCUSSION

The key findings of this study based on a nationwide COVID‐19 database is that COVID‐19 patients with AF are more likely to suffer severe complications, particularly mortality by propensity score matching analysis. In our study, OR for the risk of death in COVID‐19 patients with AF was 9.36 but it was decreased to 2.09 after propensity score matching, which suggests that unadjusted OR for this outcome is highly biased. Similarly, some important outcomes such as mechanical ventilation and admission to ICU, were statistically significant before propensity score matching, but those became nonsignificant after propensity score matching. In addition, infectivity for COVID‐19 infection was not different according to a history of AF. During the pandemic period, the morbidity and mortality of COVID‐19 have continued to disrupt health systems around the world. This requires a concentration of medical resources for critically ill patients, and therefore, studies of risk factors that predict progression to severe COVID‐19 are being conducted. Cardiovascular diseases, including cardiac arrhythmia, are known risk factors for adverse outcomes and mortality in COVID‐19 infected patients. , A previous single‐center study showed that 7.2% of cardiac arrhythmias were documented during COVID‐19 hospitalization, detected a significant correlation between cardiac arrhythmia and disease severity, and identified risk factors for adverse outcomes including age, congestive heart failure, and troponin levels. AF is the most common type of sustained cardiac arrhythmia and is a well‐known risk factor for other cardio‐cerebral vascular diseases, as well as the most commonly identified arrhythmia in previous COVID‐19 studies. , A recent meta‐analysis of new‐onset AF in COVID‐19 patients showed that patients with AF were at a 2.4‐fold higher risk of all‐cause mortality than patients without AF. Our results were in line with these previous studies and suggested AF is a significant risk factor associated with poor prognosis in COVID‐19 infection. It is difficult to demonstrate how AF worsens outcomes of COVID‐19 using the findings presented here, but there is some evidence for a possible explanation (Figure 2). First, in the closely connected cardio‐respiratory system, COVID‐19 patients with respiratory failure may be at risk of increased cardiac injury. Cardiac dysfunctions such as cardiomyopathy, cardiac arrhythmias, and hemodynamic instability are known as acute COVID‐19 cardiovascular syndrome. SARS‐CoV‐2 can directly invade cardiomyocytes and pericytes through angiotensin‐converting enzyme‐2 and systemic inflammatory cytokines can also induce cardiac injury. Respiratory failure in patients with COVID‐19 may also increase the cardiac burden in patients with AF who have cardiac remodeling, one of the key pathophysiological mechanisms of AF. Although the underlying mechanisms are unclear, patients who experience sepsis and acute respiratory distress syndrome with AF are at higher risk of severe respiratory failure and mortality than patients with no history of AF. , Second, systematic inflammatory response followed by SARS‐CoV‐2 infection may worsen outcomes in patients with AF. Higher C‐reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin‐6 (IL‐6) levels in AF patients support the increase of inflammation burden in AF patients. The severity of inflammation during COVID‐19 is also associated with adverse clinical outcomes and mortality. Elevation of inflammation biomarkers including CRP, IL‐6, and lactate dehydrogenase can predict severe COVID‐19, and at the same time, early normalization of these markers has been observed in patients with better prognosis. , Third, thromboembolism (TE) is another potential mechanism since SARS‐Cov‐2 contagion can contribute to immunothrombosis. , As is well known, TE is one of the major cardiovascular complications in patients with COVID‐19, presumably due to the inflammatory response of SARS‐Cov‐2, with endothelial dysfunction observed in multiple organs and abnormal coagulation.  As AF is a risk factor for TE, TE may influence the poor prognosis of AF patients diagnosed with COVID‐19. In a previous study comparing seasonal influenza and COVID‐19, TE including pulmonary embolism was found to be significantly higher in COVID‐19 patients. It is difficult for us to provide a clear rationale or cause for these results.
Figure 2

Summary of possible mechanisms and results of our study

Summary of possible mechanisms and results of our study In our study, the infectivity of COVID‐19 did not differ according to the history of AF. In the general population, information on the infectivity or prevalence of AF in COVID‐19 infection is lacking. Italy's national health data showed that 24.5% of people who died from COVID‐19 had a history of AF before COVID‐19 infection. A small hospital‐based study reported that 75% of elderly COVID‐19 patients have AF. Various factors such as design, population, duration of follow‐up, ethnicity, and comorbidity of the study may have induced these discrepancies between our results and those of other researchers. Therefore, it is necessary to refer to studies involving a larger number of people or considering other races. Our study has limitations. First, the current study had a retrospective observational design based on an already existing health claims database, causal relationships could not be explored. Due to the limitation of claims data, there are uncovered covariates that could be confounding factors on the association between AF and COVID‐19, such as physical activity or body mass index. , Second, it is difficult to generalize our results because our dataset represents the Korean general population. Third, detailed information regarding severity, type, or characteristics of AF could not be acquired because our dataset did not include the information, including the electrocardiograms. Fourth, our dataset did not include the information of COVID‐19 related symptoms that could be related to prognosis or infectivity in the participants at the time of RT‐PCR testing. Therefore, we could not confirm the individuals in this cohort had COVID‐19 symptoms or not. Last, it is unknown the medication history of anticoagulation after COVID‐19 infection in patients with AF. We could not figure out the answer to how many AF patients are on or quitted anticoagulants during COVID‐19. There is a need for further research on the relationship between anticoagulation and the prognosis of COVID‐19 patients with AF. In conclusion, we demonstrated that a history of AF is associated with an increased risk of severe complications of COVID‐19. Patients with AF may have poor prognoses if infected with COVID‐19, therefore, careful management and monitoring of such patients is necessary.

CONFLICT OF INTERESTS

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Jinkwon Kim and Tae‐Jin Song: study design, manuscript writing, and review. Jin Park, Jae Il Shin, Jinkwon Kim, Tae‐Jin Song: study design, data collection, and manuscript writing. Dong‐Hyeok Kim, Junbeom Park, Jimin Jeon: data collection and statistical analysis. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

PEER REVIEW

The peer review history for this article is available at https://publons.com/publon/10.1002/jmv.27647 Supporting information. Click here for additional data file. Supporting information. Click here for additional data file. Supporting information. Click here for additional data file.
  39 in total

1.  Better oral hygiene is associated with lower risk of stroke.

Authors:  Yoonkyung Chang; Ho Geol Woo; Ji Sung Lee; Tae-Jin Song
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 6.993

2.  Clinical implication of an impaired fasting glucose and prehypertension related to new onset atrial fibrillation in a healthy Asian population without underlying disease: a nationwide cohort study in Korea.

Authors:  Sean S Lee; Kyoung Ae Kong; Daehoon Kim; Yeong-Min Lim; Pil-Sung Yang; Jeong-Eun Yi; Minsuk Kim; Kihwan Kwon; Wook Bum Pyun; Boyoung Joung; Junbeom Park
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 29.983

3.  Cohort profile: the National Health Insurance Service-National Health Screening Cohort (NHIS-HEALS) in Korea.

Authors:  Sang Cheol Seong; Yeon-Yong Kim; Sue K Park; Young Ho Khang; Hyeon Chang Kim; Jong Heon Park; Hee-Jin Kang; Cheol-Ho Do; Jong-Sun Song; Eun-Joo Lee; Seongjun Ha; Soon Ae Shin; Seung-Lyeal Jeong
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-09-24       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  C-reactive protein and clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19.

Authors:  Nathaniel R Smilowitz; Dennis Kunichoff; Michael Garshick; Binita Shah; Michael Pillinger; Judith S Hochman; Jeffrey S Berger
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 29.983

5.  Smoking is associated with worse outcomes of COVID-19 particularly among younger adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Roengrudee Patanavanich; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-08-16       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Associations of heart failure with susceptibility and severe complications of COVID-19: A nationwide cohort study.

Authors:  Hyung Jun Kim; Moo-Suk Park; Jae Il Shin; Jin Park; Dong-Hyeok Kim; Jimin Jeon; Jinkwon Kim; Tae-Jin Song
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 20.693

7.  Association of atrial fibrillation with infectivity and severe complications of COVID-19: A nationwide cohort study.

Authors:  Jin Park; Jae Il Shin; Dong-Hyeok Kim; Junbeom Park; Jimin Jeon; Jinkwon Kim; Tae-Jin Song
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 20.693

Review 8.  COVID-19 and cardiovascular disease: from basic mechanisms to clinical perspectives.

Authors:  Masataka Nishiga; Dao Wen Wang; Yaling Han; David B Lewis; Joseph C Wu
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 32.419

9.  Clinical characteristics of 113 deceased patients with coronavirus disease 2019: retrospective study.

Authors:  Tao Chen; Di Wu; Huilong Chen; Weiming Yan; Danlei Yang; Guang Chen; Ke Ma; Dong Xu; Haijing Yu; Hongwu Wang; Tao Wang; Wei Guo; Jia Chen; Chen Ding; Xiaoping Zhang; Jiaquan Huang; Meifang Han; Shusheng Li; Xiaoping Luo; Jianping Zhao; Qin Ning
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2020-03-26

10.  Vascular neutrophilic inflammation and immunothrombosis distinguish severe COVID-19 from influenza pneumonia.

Authors:  Leo Nicolai; Alexander Leunig; Sophia Brambs; Rainer Kaiser; Markus Joppich; Marie-Louise Hoffknecht; Christoph Gold; Anouk Engel; Vivien Polewka; Maximilian Muenchhoff; Johannes C Hellmuth; Adrian Ruhle; Stephan Ledderose; Tobias Weinberger; Heiko Schulz; Clemens Scherer; Martina Rudelius; Michael Zoller; Oliver T Keppler; Bernhard Zwißler; Michael von Bergwelt-Baildon; Stefan Kääb; Ralf Zimmer; Roman D Bülow; Saskia von Stillfried; Peter Boor; Steffen Massberg; Kami Pekayvaz; Konstantin Stark
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2020-12-20       Impact factor: 16.036

View more
  3 in total

1.  Association of Cerebral Venous Thrombosis with mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines: A Disproportionality Analysis of the World Health Organization Pharmacovigilance Database.

Authors:  Jin Park; Moo-Seok Park; Hyung Jun Kim; Tae-Jin Song
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-18

2.  Association of atrial fibrillation with infectivity and severe complications of COVID-19: A nationwide cohort study.

Authors:  Jin Park; Jae Il Shin; Dong-Hyeok Kim; Junbeom Park; Jimin Jeon; Jinkwon Kim; Tae-Jin Song
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 20.693

3.  Associations of Guillain-Barré syndrome with coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination: Disproportionality analysis using the World Health Organization pharmacovigilance database.

Authors:  Jee-Eun Kim; Jin Park; Young Gi Min; Yoon-Ho Hong; Tae-Jin Song
Journal:  J Peripher Nerv Syst       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 5.188

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.