Iman Naseri1, Morteza Ziaee1, Zach N Nilsson2, Danielle R Lustig2, Mostafa Yourdkhani1,3. 1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, United States. 2. Department of Chemistry, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, United States. 3. School of Advanced Materials Discovery, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, United States.
Abstract
Nanostructured heaters based on laser-induced graphene (LIG) are promising for heat generation and temperature control in a variety of applications due to their high efficiency as well as a fast, facile, and highly scalable fabrication process. While recent studies have shown that LIG can be written on a wide range of precursors, the reports on LIG-based heaters are mainly limited to polyimide film substrates. Here, we develop and characterize nanostructured heaters by direct writing of laser-induced graphene on nonuniform and structurally porous aramid woven fabric. The synthesis and writing of graphene on aramid fabric is conducted using a 10.6 μm CO2 laser. The quality of laser-induced graphene and electrical properties of the heater fabric is tuned by controlling the lasing process parameters. Produced heaters exhibit good electrothermal efficiency with steady-state temperatures up to 170 °C when subjected to an input power density of 1.5 W cm-2. In addition, the permeable texture of LIG-aramid fabric heaters allows for easy impregnation with thermosetting resins. We demonstrate the encapsulation of fabric heaters with two different types of thermosetting resins to develop both flexible and stiff composites. A flexible heater is produced by the impregnation of LIG-aramid fabric by silicone rubber. While the flexible composite heater exhibits inferior electrothermal performance compared to neat LIG-aramid fabric, it shows consistent electrothermal performance under various electrical and mechanical loading conditions. A multifunctional fiber-reinforced composite panel with integrated de-icing functionality is also manufactured using one ply of LIG-aramid fabric heater as part of the composite layup. The results of de-icing experiments show excellent de-icing capability, where a 5 mm thick piece of ice is completely melted away within 2 min using an input power of 12.8 W.
Nanostructured heaters based on laser-induced graphene (LIG) are promising for heat generation and temperature control in a variety of applications due to their high efficiency as well as a fast, facile, and highly scalable fabrication process. While recent studies have shown that LIG can be written on a wide range of precursors, the reports on LIG-based heaters are mainly limited to polyimide film substrates. Here, we develop and characterize nanostructured heaters by direct writing of laser-induced graphene on nonuniform and structurally porous aramid woven fabric. The synthesis and writing of graphene on aramid fabric is conducted using a 10.6 μm CO2 laser. The quality of laser-induced graphene and electrical properties of the heater fabric is tuned by controlling the lasing process parameters. Produced heaters exhibit good electrothermal efficiency with steady-state temperatures up to 170 °C when subjected to an input power density of 1.5 W cm-2. In addition, the permeable texture of LIG-aramid fabric heaters allows for easy impregnation with thermosetting resins. We demonstrate the encapsulation of fabric heaters with two different types of thermosetting resins to develop both flexible and stiff composites. A flexible heater is produced by the impregnation of LIG-aramid fabric by silicone rubber. While the flexible composite heater exhibits inferior electrothermal performance compared to neat LIG-aramid fabric, it shows consistent electrothermal performance under various electrical and mechanical loading conditions. A multifunctional fiber-reinforced composite panel with integrated de-icing functionality is also manufactured using one ply of LIG-aramid fabric heater as part of the composite layup. The results of de-icing experiments show excellent de-icing capability, where a 5 mm thick piece of ice is completely melted away within 2 min using an input power of 12.8 W.
Resistive heating has
been widely used as a heat generation solution
in a wide variety of applications, such as de-icing of aircraft structures,
composite curing, water heating, and electric home appliances, due
to the high heat generation efficiency and simplicity of use.[1−4] Metal alloys (e.g., Kanthal and Nichrome) have been traditionally
used as resistive elements due to their low electrical resistance
and high thermomechanical stability. However, such electrothermal
materials suffer from high density and rigidity, making their use
in emerging technologies (e.g., flexible heaters, wearable and portable
devices) impractical.[5,6] The growing demand for Joule heating
materials with unique properties, such as superior electrothermal
performance, high degree of deformability, and low density, motivates
the development of new materials and processes.[7] For example, in the composite industry, the use of flexible
heaters can allow for energy-efficient, out-of-oven manufacturing
or in-the-field repair of composite parts with complex geometries.Conductive nanomaterials are promising alternatives for fabricating
highly deformable and efficient resistive heaters.[8] Fabrication of a resistive heater based on nanomaterials
requires forming a continuous network of conductive nanoparticles
to enable the flow of electrons and generating heat based on the electrothermal
effect. A wide range of nanomaterials, such as silver nanowires,[9] copper nanowires,[10] graphene,[11] carbon nanotubes,[12] and MXene,[13] have
been previously used for creating resistive heaters by generating
conductive paths for the flow of electrons in various material systems.
While nanomaterial-based resistive heaters offer great potential for
fabricating highly efficient and multifunctional heaters, their widespread
adoption on a commercial scale faces two major challenges. Production
of such heaters typically involves multiple processing steps, including
deposition and drying, which are undesirable from an economic point
of view. In addition, scalability and large-scale utilization of such
heaters are rather challenging and costly, making their use mainly
limited to laboratory-scale research or specific applications.[14]Laser-induced graphene (LIG) is a three-dimensional
(3D) porous
form of graphene that is synthesized by a rapid, facile, and scalable
process and that exhibits excellent electrical and thermal conductivity,
large surface area, mechanical robustness, and thermochemical stability.[15−17] The synthesis process of LIG involves lasing an appropriate precursor
material with a CO2, UV, or visible-light laser source.
Upon irradiation of the precursor material with a laser beam, the
surface temperature locally increases via photothermal or photochemical
effect, leading to direct conversion of the surface polymer layer
into porous 3D graphene structures.[18] Several
precursors, including polyimide, polyether sulfone, phenolic, and
even wood, have been successfully converted into LIG in a single-step
process.[19] Unlike conventional approaches
for the synthesis of graphene and other nanomaterials, LIG synthesis
process is highly scalable and inexpensive, is performed rapidly at
ambient conditions, and allows for direct and concurrent patterning
without any sophisticated masking or processing methods.[20] As a result, LIG has been used as an alternative
to conventional conductive nanomaterials in a variety of applications
such as sensing,[21] Joule heating,[22] water treatment,[23] actuators,[24] and energy storage devices.[25]Resistive heaters based on LIG have been
previously developed by
directly writing graphene on polyimide films, where steady-state temperatures
of more than 200 °C have been obtained under an input power of
1.4 W.[26] Such flexible heaters exhibit
consistent performance after 10,000 bending cycles and are stable
in high temperatures up to 225 °C. Additionally, the heaters
offer better uniformity of temperature distribution compared to commercial
counterparts while being less expensive. Large resistive heaters (20
× 20 cm2) based on LIG have also been fabricated using
porous polyimide sheets as precursor materials instead of polyimide
films.[27] The tailorable synthesis process
of LIG has been exploited for creating heaters with multiple heating
zones in one single step by changing the processing parameters during
the lasing process.[27] Produced heaters
were then used as an external heater for the out-of-oven curing of
fiber-reinforced polymer composites, where an ∼85% reduction
in manufacturing energy was obtained compared to the conventional
oven curing approach. In another work, composites with an integrated
de-icing system based on LIG heaters were fabricated by combining
extrusion-printing of polyamic acid solution on a cured composite
laminate, followed by high-temperature imidization and laser-induced
graphene synthesis process.[28] Although
the creation of LIG patterns on composites involved multiple processing
steps, the resulting composites showed a good de-icing performance.Development of LIG-based resistive heaters has been mainly limited
to solid films of polyimide as the substrate material due to the ease
of processing. Use of solid substrates, however, often results in
shape distortion,[27] especially as the size
of the lased region increases, and prevents easy encapsulation with
other polymer resins or solutions in applications where integrated
or sandwiched heaters are required. Porous substrates with the discontinuous
distribution of polymer precursors, such as polymer fabrics or veils,
allow for the easy infusion of polymer resins or solutions and minimize
the shape distortion but provide a nonuniform, textured surface for
LIG synthesis. This report describes the development of resistive
heaters based on LIG–aramid woven fabrics as an alternative
to polyimide film precursors. Aramid fabrics are less expensive substrate
materials compared to polyimide films, provide a porous architecture
for the easy infusion of solutions and resins, and are commonly used
as fiber reinforcements in polymer composites. As a result, the LIG–aramid
fabric heaters developed in the present study are compatible with
most composite processing techniques and can readily be used to impart
multifunctional properties to composite materials and structures.Resistive heating of LIG-modified fabrics requires creation of
a uniform and continuous network of LIG on the textured and nonuniform
fabric architecture for the even distribution of electric current
and heat generation throughout the fabric. In comparison with solid
polymer films, the spacing between individual fibers within a tow
or interyarn spacing can affect the continuity of the LIG network
and spatial uniformity of heat generation. While LIG-modified aramid
fabrics have been previously developed for protective clothing and
composites with enhanced interlaminar mechanical properties and damage
detection capability,[29−31] the use of LIG in those applications does not necessarily
require integrity, continuity, and uniformity of the LIG layer within
the entire plane of the fabric. To the best of our knowledge, resistive
heating of LIG network synthesized on nonuniform, architected substrates
(such as fabrics) has not been studied before.The aim of the
present work is therefore to investigate the electrothermal
performance of resistive heaters based on LIG–aramid fabric
and understand the role of various processing parameters on the quality
and performance of resulting heaters. The effect of input laser power
on the quality of LIG–aramid is studied by characterizing the
morphology and chemical composition of the produced LIG. Detailed
experiments are carried out to determine the relationship between
lasing process parameters (i.e., input laser power, scan rate, and
pulse per inch, PPI) and electrical properties as well as the Joule
heating performance of LIG–aramid fabric heaters. Fabric heaters
are then used to create flexible and stiff composites using two different
types of polymer resins and to demonstrate the easy integration of
fabric-based heaters in polymer matrices for developing multifunctional
polymer composites. Highly flexible LIG heaters are prepared by the
impregnation of LIG–aramid fabrics with a polydimethylsiloxane
silicone rubber. While the addition of silicone rubber might adversely
affect the electrothermal efficiency of heaters, it enhances their
durability and reliability, which is ideal for use in applications
where flexible and robust heaters are required. In addition, an aramid
composite panel containing a top layer of LIG–aramid is fabricated
and the de-icing performance of the resulting multifunctional composite
is demonstrated. Owing to the facile and scalable synthesis and writing
of LIG along with the easy impregnation of the substrate aramid fabric
with polymeric materials, the heaters developed in this study can
be used in a wide variety of applications where flexible or integrated
heaters are required.
Experimental Section
Preparation of LIG–Aramid Fabrics and
Composites
Woven aramid (Kevlar) fabric (plain weave, thickness
= 230 μm, areal weight = 140 gsm, fiber linear mass density
= 0.127 g m–1) was purchased from ACP Composites
and used as received. LIG was synthesized on aramid fabric using a
10.6 μm CO2 laser (ILS 12.15 platform, 75 W, Universal
Laser Systems) in a raster mode. Various processing parameters including
laser power, scan rate, and pulse per inch were used to tailor and
study the quality and properties of the resulting LIG. For the preparation
of flexible composite heaters, one layer of LIG-patterned fabric (25
× 40 mm2) was impregnated with a polydimethylsiloxane
silicone rubber (SYLGARD 184, Dow Corning) by the drop-casting method
and cured in an oven at 70 °C for 8 h. The resin used in the
drop-casting technique was prepared by manually mixing 1 g of the
hardener with 10 g of the silicone resin for 5 min. For the preparation
of the composite panel with an integrated de-icing surface layer,
eight plies of aramid fabric including one top layer of LIG–aramid
were impregnated with a thermoset resin using the hand-layup technique,
vacuum-bagged, and cured in an oven at 70 °C for 12 h. The resin
system used for the manufacture of the composite panel was based on
dicyclopentadiene (DCPD) and prepared according to the procedure developed
by Robertson et al.[32] Briefly, dicyclopentadiene
(Sigma-Aldrich, CAS Number: 77-73-6) was first mixed with 5-ethylidene-2-norbornene
(Sigma-Aldrich, CAS Number: 16219-75-3) at a 95:5 weight ratio to
depress its melting point. Then, 6 g of this resin solution was mixed
with another solution consisting of 3.85 mg of second-generation Grubb’s
catalyst (Sigma-Aldrich, CAS Number: 246047-72-3) and 1.2 μL
of tributyl phosphite (TCI America, CAS Number: 102-85-2) dissolved
in 500 μL of phenylcyclohexane (Sigma-Aldrich, CAS Number: 827-52-1).
Structural Characterization of LIG
The
morphology of pristine aramid fabric and LIG was imaged using
a JEOL JSM-5800 field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM)
at an accelerating voltage of 1 kV. The as-produced LIG sample was
imaged without any surface coating step due to the intrinsic electrical
conductivity of the LIG layer, whereas the surface of the pristine
aramid sample was sputter-coated with a 10 nm thick layer of gold.
Raman spectra were collected using a Horiba THz Raman system (26 mW,
532 nm) focused through a 10× microscope objective (Olympus)
mounted on an Olympus IX73 inverted microscope. A Horiba iHR550 spectrometer
was used to disperse the Raman signal on a Horiba Synapse back-illuminated
CCD camera for detection. Electrical measurements were conducted using
a DM285 FLIR multimeter. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was
performed using a Physical Electronics 5800 series Multi-Technique
ESCA system with a monochromatic Al Kα (hν
= 1486.6 eV) source operated at 350.0 W. An electron flood gun was
used for charge neutralization. High-resolution scans were collected
with a pass energy of 23.5 eV and an interval of 0.1 eV/step. The
instrument pressure was 5 × 10–8 torr or lower
during data acquisition.
Characterization of Electrothermal
Performance
Electrothermal performance of resistive heaters
was evaluated using
specimens with a 15 × 15 mm2 effective heating area
prepared under various processing conditions. A nickel-filled conductive
paste (Pyro-Duct 598 A, Aremco) was used to attach copper electrodes
to both ends of heaters. Various voltages were supplied to heaters
using a direct current (DC) power supply (9206, B&K Precision).
The temperature at the center of heaters was measured using a T-type
thermocouple and recorded by a LabView program. A FLIR T540 infrared
thermal camera was also used to measure the temperature distribution
and stability of heaters under static and cyclic electrical loading
conditions.
Results and Discussion
Synthesis of LIG on Aramid Fabric
The manufacturing
process of LIG–aramid fabric heaters is
schematically shown in Figure a. Upon irradiation of aramid fabric with a CO2 laser beam, the material is converted into porous graphene via a
photothermal process. Unlike conventional nanomaterial-based Joule
heating methods, which require handling and deposition of nanomaterials
in multiple processing steps, the synthesis and writing of graphene
on aramid fabric is conducted in one simple step. In addition, highly
customized and geometrically complex patterns of LIG can readily be
written on aramid fabric without the need for using any masks (Figure b).
Figure 1
Writing laser-induced
graphene (LIG) on aramid fabric. (a) Schematic
representation of the lasing process. (b) Example of an LIG pattern
created on aramid fabric.
Writing laser-induced
graphene (LIG) on aramid fabric. (a) Schematic
representation of the lasing process. (b) Example of an LIG pattern
created on aramid fabric.The microstructure, composition, and morphology of LIG–aramid
were studied using Raman spectroscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy
(XPS), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), respectively. Raman
spectra of aramid fabric before and after laser treatment are shown
in Figure a. The characteristic
peaks of aramid at 1509, 1566, 1606, and 1640 cm–1 disappeared after laser scribing, and three new bands formed at
1337, 1565, and 2667 cm–1. These new bands are representative
of the D-band, G-band, and 2D-band of the graphitic structure, respectively.[33] Specifically, the D-band is related to defects,
bent sp2 bonds, and vacancies, while the G-band is the
first-order Raman band of all sp2-hybridized carbons. The
relative intensities of these three peaks are a measure of the quality
of graphene. The intensity ratio of D-band to G-band (ID/IG) is a measure of the
defect level in the graphitic structure, whereas the intensity ratio
of 2D-band to G-band (I2D/IG) is related to the number of graphene layers stacked
in the c-axis. Raman spectrum of a high-quality graphene
typically exhibits a low D/G-band ratio and high 2D/G-band ratio.[34] Although the quality of graphene produced on
an aramid precursor is not as good as those synthesized on a polyimide
precursor, as also previously reported for LIG–aramid,[30] the resulting LIG is still conductive enough
to exhibit substantial Joule heating capability.
Figure 2
Characterization of the
microstructure and composition of LIG–aramid.
(a) Raman spectra of aramid fabric before and after laser treatment
under an input laser power of 4.5 W, a PPI of 800, and a scan rate
of 90 mm s–1. (b) Effect of laser input power on
the Raman spectra of LIG. (c, d) Variation of D/G and 2D/G peak intensity
ratios as a function of input laser power, respectively. (e) XPS general
survey before and after laser treatment (input laser power = 9 W,
PPI = 800, and scan rate = 90 mm s–1). Upon the
laser treatment, the ratio of N 1s to C 1s peak intensities in aramid
decreases from 0.238 to 0.226 and the ratio of O 1s to C 1s peak intensities
decreases from 0.433 to 0.391. (f) High-resolution XPS carbon (C 1s)
spectra before and after laser ablation, indicating the removal of
the peak around 288 eV and changing the symmetry of the main peak
after the lasing treatment.
Characterization of the
microstructure and composition of LIG–aramid.
(a) Raman spectra of aramid fabric before and after laser treatment
under an input laser power of 4.5 W, a PPI of 800, and a scan rate
of 90 mm s–1. (b) Effect of laser input power on
the Raman spectra of LIG. (c, d) Variation of D/G and 2D/G peak intensity
ratios as a function of input laser power, respectively. (e) XPS general
survey before and after laser treatment (input laser power = 9 W,
PPI = 800, and scan rate = 90 mm s–1). Upon the
laser treatment, the ratio of N 1s to C 1s peak intensities in aramid
decreases from 0.238 to 0.226 and the ratio of O 1s to C 1s peak intensities
decreases from 0.433 to 0.391. (f) High-resolution XPS carbon (C 1s)
spectra before and after laser ablation, indicating the removal of
the peak around 288 eV and changing the symmetry of the main peak
after the lasing treatment.The effect of laser input power on the quality of the resulting
LIG is shown in Figure b–d. An increase in the input laser power first decreases
the defect levels but then results in increased defect quantity (Figure c). This observation
can be attributed to the temperature increase during the lasing process,
which is directly affected by the input laser power. When the input
laser power is low, the graphitization temperature is not high enough
for achieving a high degree of crystallinity in the graphitic structure,
resulting in high defect levels. As the input laser power increases,
the conversion of precursor into graphitic structures occurs at higher
temperatures, leading to higher levels of order. However, thermal
oxidation at high input power caused by excessively high temperatures
results in the formation of high amounts of defects in the graphitic
structure. In addition to the influence on the level of defect, the
input laser power also affects the number of layers in the LIG. The
values of I2D/IG ratios reveal that multilayer graphene is formed during the lasing
process (Figure d).The surface compositions of untreated and treated fabrics were
characterized by XPS measurements (Figure e,f). The survey spectra of the neat aramid
fabric show three peaks at 289, 400, and 550 eV, which are indicators
of carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen elements, respectively (Figure e). A comparison of the survey
spectra before and after laser scribing reveals a slight reduction
in the atomic percentages of nitrogen and oxygen elements. This reduction
in concentrations of oxygen and nitrogen elements is also confirmed
by the high-resolution carbon spectra of LIG (Figure f). In addition, the asymmetric peak of the
LIG–aramid fabric at low binding energies is another evidence
for the formation of graphitic structures (Figure f).[35]The
morphological changes of aramid fabric after laser treatment
were determined using SEM imaging. While untreated aramid fibers exhibit
a very smooth surface (Figure a), the treated fibers show a relatively rough and porous
surface structure (Figure b,c). The higher-magnification micrograph in Figure c shows the sheet-like porous
structure of the scribed fibers, caused by the release of gaseous
products during the lasing process due to the photothermal breakage
of chemical bonds, such as C–N and C=O.[36]
Figure 3
Morphological characterization of aramid fabric before and after
laser treatment using SEM imaging (input power = 9 W, PPI = 800, and
scan rate = 90 mm s–1). (a) Pristine aramid fabric.
(b, c) LIG–aramid fabric at two magnifications.
Morphological characterization of aramid fabric before and after
laser treatment using SEM imaging (input power = 9 W, PPI = 800, and
scan rate = 90 mm s–1). (a) Pristine aramid fabric.
(b, c) LIG–aramid fabric at two magnifications.
Electrothermal Characterization of LIG–Aramid
Fabric
Developing efficient resistive heaters based on LIG–aramid
requires a thorough understanding of the effect of processing parameters
on the electrothermal performance of modified fabrics. Three key processing
parameters, which can directly affect the quality and performance
of heaters, are input laser power, laser scan rate, and pulse per
inch (PPI). The effects of these three lasing process parameters on
the electrical and electrothermal performance of LIG–aramid
heaters are shown in Figure . As the laser power increases from 4.1 to 6.1 W, the electrical
resistance of modified fabrics decreases from 422 to 42 Ω (Figure a). Further increase
in the laser power results in a steady drop in the electrical resistance
such that a resistance of 19 Ω is achieved at an
input laser power of 8.9 W. Incomplete conversion of aramid precursor
to graphene along with the relatively low quality of graphene is responsible
for the relatively high electrical resistance of LIGs at low input
laser powers. With an increase in the laser power, a thicker layer
of aramid is converted into graphene and the defect level in the graphitic
structure is decreased, leading to a lower measured resistance.
Figure 4
Effect of lasing
processing parameters on electrical properties
and time-dependent electrothermal performance of LIG–aramid
fabrics. (a, b) Electrical resistance and electrothermal response
of LIG samples prepared by various input laser powers at a fixed scan
rate of 90 mm s–1 and a PPI of 800, respectively.
(c, d) Electrical resistance and electrothermal response of LIG samples
prepared by various scan rates at a fixed input laser power of 6.1
W and a PPI of 800, respectively. (e, f) Electrical resistance and
electrothermal response of LIG samples prepared by various PPI values
at a fixed laser input power of 6.1 W and a scan rate of 90 mm s–1.
Effect of lasing
processing parameters on electrical properties
and time-dependent electrothermal performance of LIG–aramid
fabrics. (a, b) Electrical resistance and electrothermal response
of LIG samples prepared by various input laser powers at a fixed scan
rate of 90 mm s–1 and a PPI of 800, respectively.
(c, d) Electrical resistance and electrothermal response of LIG samples
prepared by various scan rates at a fixed input laser power of 6.1
W and a PPI of 800, respectively. (e, f) Electrical resistance and
electrothermal response of LIG samples prepared by various PPI values
at a fixed laser input power of 6.1 W and a scan rate of 90 mm s–1.The electrothermal performance
of nanostructured heaters produced
by various input laser powers was determined by applying a constant
voltage of 10 V across specimens and measuring their time-dependent
temperature profiles (Figure b). As the driving voltage is applied, the temperature of
resistive heaters rapidly increases until a steady-state temperature
is reached. Additionally, higher steady-state temperatures are observed
for heaters produced by higher input laser powers, indicating the
significance of graphene quality and electrical conductivity on the
electrothermal performance of LIG-based heaters. This improvement
in electrothermal performance can be explained by the inverse relationship
between the generated heat (Q) and heater resistance
(R) for a given input voltage[37]As the resistance of heaters
decreases, more
electric current can pass through the heater when subjected to a constant
input voltage, leading to a higher frequency of collision between
electrons and increased heat generation as a result of energy loss.Scan rate is another processing parameter that is used to control
the speed of laser beam movement across the specimen. A series of
heaters were prepared under a fixed input power of 6.1 W, a PPI of
800, and various scan rates to understand the effect of scan rate
on the performance of heaters (Figure c,d). As shown in Figure c, heater resistance increases with an increase
in the scan rate, where a low electrical resistance of 16 Ω
is measured for a scan rate of 50 mm s–1. The electrothermal
performance of heaters improves at lower lasing speeds, where steady-state
temperatures of up to 200 °C can be obtained using a lasing speed
of 50 mm s–1 (Figure d). According to these results, heaters produced at
low input powers and low scan rates exhibit similar performance to
those produced at high input powers and high scan rates although the
latter processing condition is more desirable from the productivity
point of view.The effect of PPI on the quality and performance
of LIG–aramid
fabric heaters is shown in Figure e,f. PPI is a processing parameter that is used to
control the number of laser pulses per linear inch of engraving. Fabric
heaters were prepared under various PPIs while fixing the input power
to 6.1 W and the scan rate to 90 mm s–1. The electrical
resistance of LIG–aramid decreases from 56 to 42 Ω as
PPI varies from 400 to 800 (Figure e). Considering the nonuniform, textured architecture
of the aramid fabric, an increase in the PPI allows for lasing a higher
number of points along the lasing direction and improving the continuity
and uniformity of the produced graphene network on the uneven substrate.
This observation, however, is in contrast to the results of LIG synthesis
on uniform polyimide films, where an increase in PPI results in reduced
energy density delivered by each pulse, leading to an increase in
the average resistance of the LIG.[38] The
reduction in electrical resistance observed in Figure e is associated with a 15 °C increase
in the steady-state temperature of heaters during the electrothermal
tests under an input voltage of 10 V (Figure f).We performed additional experiments
to understand the electrothermal
response of heaters to various applied voltages. For these experiments,
the temperature profile of a heater produced under an input laser
power of 8.9 W, a PPI of 800, and a scan rate of 90 mm s–1 was determined by varying the value of voltage applied across the
heater (Figure a).
The steady-state temperature of the heater increased quadratically
as a function of the applied voltage (Figure b), verifying that the response of the resistive
heater follows Joule’s law. The consumed power density for
reaching a temperature of 170 °C from room temperature is 1.5
W cm–2 (Figure c), which is equivalent to a heating performance of
100 °C cm2 W–1. While this heating
performance is slightly lower than that of LIG heaters produced using
PI films as a precursor (131 °C cm2 W–1),[26] it is sufficiently high to meet the
heating requirements of a wide range of applications.
Figure 5
Electrothermal performance
of LIG–aramid fabric heaters
under various input voltages. (a) Temperature profile of an LIG–aramid
heater (input power = 8.9 W, PPI = 800, and scan rate = 90 mm s–1) in response to an increasing input voltage load.
(b) Steady-state temperature of the heater in panel (a) as a function
of input voltage. (c) Relationship between the steady-state temperature
of the heater in panel (a) and power density. (d, e) Digital and thermal
infrared images of a large LIG–aramid heater (effective heating
area = 35 cm2), respectively. (f) Temperature distribution
along the midlines of the sample shown in panels (d, e). The midline
directions are parallel and transverse to the lasing direction.
Electrothermal performance
of LIG–aramid fabric heaters
under various input voltages. (a) Temperature profile of an LIG–aramid
heater (input power = 8.9 W, PPI = 800, and scan rate = 90 mm s–1) in response to an increasing input voltage load.
(b) Steady-state temperature of the heater in panel (a) as a function
of input voltage. (c) Relationship between the steady-state temperature
of the heater in panel (a) and power density. (d, e) Digital and thermal
infrared images of a large LIG–aramid heater (effective heating
area = 35 cm2), respectively. (f) Temperature distribution
along the midlines of the sample shown in panels (d, e). The midline
directions are parallel and transverse to the lasing direction.A larger heater (effective heating area = 35 cm2) was
also produced under the same processing condition (i.e., input power
= 8.9 W, scan rate = 90 mm s–1, and PPI = 800) to
demonstrate the scalability of the manufacturing process and resistive
heating performance of produced heaters (Figure d). The thermal infrared image of the heater
shows an even distribution of temperature (average temperature = 170
°C) with a 10 °C variation throughout the heater in response
to a power density of 1.3 W cm–2 (Figure e). In addition, similar temperature
profiles were measured along the two midlines of the sample (Figure f); however, a more
uniform temperature distribution was observed along the lasing direction
compared to that along the transverse direction. This directional
difference in temperature distribution is attributed to the more controlled
and uniform creation of graphene along the lasing direction compared
to that along the transverse direction.
Silicone-Encapsulated
LIG–Aramid Fabric
While LIG-modified films and fabrics
exhibit excellent electrothermal
performance, they are prone to mechanical damage during handling and
service due to the brittle structure of LIG layers.[26] Loss of the conductive LIG layers can consequently result
in increased resistance and degradation of the performance of LIG
heaters. We improve the mechanical robustness of LIG–aramid
fabrics by encapsulating them with silicone rubber and protecting
the LIG structure against mechanical damages and scratches. Although
silicone rubber is an intrinsically insulating polymer, we observed
no significant change in the electrical resistance of LIG after encapsulation
with silicone. We hypothesize that the resistance of LIG does not
vary when encapsulated by silicone due to two competing effects. The
presence of the electrically insulating rubber is typically expected
to increase the overall resistance of the LIG structure after filling
the porous spacing within graphene layers. However, deformation of
the LIG structure due to cure shrinkage of silicone can lead to compaction
of the LIG network and therefore a reduction in resistance. As a result,
no significant change in the resistance of LIG-modified fabric was
observed upon the encapsulation process. However, the electrothermal
performance of the LIG fabric remarkably decreased upon encapsulation
by silicone rubber (Figure a). For example, the steady-state temperature of the composite
heater is ∼100 °C under an applied voltage of 10 V, whereas
the equilibrium temperature of the unencapsulated fabric heater is
∼170 °C under the same condition (Figure b). The difference in the equilibrium temperature
(Teq) of encapsulated and unencapsulated
heaters can be explained by the following equation[39]where the first
term represents
the amount of heat generated by the Joule heating effect, m is the mass of the heater, Cp is the heat capacity of the heater, Qloss is the amount of heat dissipated via any mechanisms, and T0 is the ambient temperature. Since the resistance
of the heater remains unchanged after adding silicone rubber, the
amount of heat generated via the Joule heating effect remains constant.
However, the thermal mass of the heater increases when adding silicone
encapsulant, resulting in a reduced equilibrium temperature of the
composite heater. In addition, the presence of silicone rubber can
facilitate heat dissipation to substrate via conduction heat transfer.
As a result, the higher thermal mass of the composite heater and the
increased heat loss to the surrounding are responsible for the observed
inferior performance of the composite heater compared with those of
as-prepared LIG–aramid fabric heaters. Similarly, the composite
heater requires higher input electric power for reaching a given steady-state
temperature compared to the LIG–aramid fabric without silicone
rubber (Figure c).
Figure 6
Electrothermal
response of a flexible silicone-encapsulated LIG–aramid
fabric. (a) Temperature profile of the encapsulated heater in response
to an increasing input voltage load. (b, c) Steady-state temperature
of both encapsulated and unencapsulated heaters as a function of applied
voltage and power density, respectively.
Electrothermal
response of a flexible silicone-encapsulated LIG–aramid
fabric. (a) Temperature profile of the encapsulated heater in response
to an increasing input voltage load. (b, c) Steady-state temperature
of both encapsulated and unencapsulated heaters as a function of applied
voltage and power density, respectively.The electrothermal stability of composite heaters was determined
using both electrical static and cyclic loads to evaluate the time-dependent
and dynamic response of heaters to applied power (Figure ). For static electrothermal
tests, a constant voltage of 10 V was applied on the heater while
monitoring its average temperature over time (Figure a). In dynamic electrothermal tests, the
applied voltage was intermittently varied between 0 and 10 V during
30 s time intervals (Figure b). The steady-state temperature of the composite resistive
heater did not significantly change even after 1 h of continuously
applying electric power. Similarly, the results of the cyclic electrothermal
stability test reveal that the performance of the heater is consistent
under electrical cyclic loading conditions, further verifying the
reliability and reproducibility of produced composite heaters. In
addition, the encapsulated LIG heater could preserve its heat generation
capability when deformed from the original flat shape to a bent geometry
(Figure c,d). However,
a small difference (∼5 °C) between steady-state temperatures
of deformed and undeformed heaters was observed, which is due to a
slight increase in the resistance of the heater under bending deformation.
Figure 7
Electrothermal
performance of the silicone-encapsulated LIG–aramid
fabric under various electrical and mechanical loading conditions.
(a) Long-term stability test at a constant input voltage of 10 V.
(b) Cyclic stability test by varying the applied voltage between 0
and 10 V within 30 s time intervals. (c) Digital image of the bent
encapsulated LIG–aramid fabric. (d) Time-dependent temperature
profile of the heater in bent (radius of curvature of ∼7 mm)
and flat configurations.
Electrothermal
performance of the silicone-encapsulated LIG–aramid
fabric under various electrical and mechanical loading conditions.
(a) Long-term stability test at a constant input voltage of 10 V.
(b) Cyclic stability test by varying the applied voltage between 0
and 10 V within 30 s time intervals. (c) Digital image of the bent
encapsulated LIG–aramid fabric. (d) Time-dependent temperature
profile of the heater in bent (radius of curvature of ∼7 mm)
and flat configurations.
Aramid
Composite Laminate with Integrated
De-Icing Functionality
The fabric structure of the aramid
precursor used for the synthesis of LIG in this study is ideal for
the easy integration of LIG-based heaters into fiber-reinforced polymer
composites and imparting multifunctional properties such as de-icing
to the composite materials. The integrated fabric heater can eliminate
the need for parasitic heavy metallic resistive heaters traditionally
used for de-icing of composite structures while contributing to the
mechanical reinforcement of the host composite. We manufactured an
aramid composite laminate with a thermoset matrix to demonstrate the
de-icing capability of composites with an integrated fabric heater.
Composite layup was prepared by placing one ply of LIG–aramid
fabric on top of seven pristine aramid fabric plies. The electrothermal
response of the fiber-reinforced composite laminate is shown in Figure a,b. The average
temperature of the laminate quickly increases to ∼70 °C
within 80 s in response to an applied voltage of 15 V, which is high
enough to quickly melt the surface ice layers. The de-icing capability
of the composite laminate is further demonstrated by placing a 20
× 20 × 5 mm3 piece of ice on the laminate and
applying the same voltage (i.e., 15 V) across the laminate. As shown
in Figure c, the ice
layer completely melts away within 2 min after applying the input
voltage, indicating the excellent de-icing performance of the manufactured
composite laminate with an integrated LIG–aramid fabric.
Figure 8
Manufacturing
a multifunctional aramid-thermoset composite laminate
with an integrated ply of LIG–aramid fabric. (a) The average
temperature profile of the cured composite when subjected to an input
voltage of 15 V. (b) Thermal infrared image of the composite laminate
at t = 80 s. (c) Demonstration of the de-icing functionality
of the resulting composite laminate. A 20 × 20 × 5 mm3 piece of ice is completely melted away within 2 min after
applying an input voltage of 15 V across the laminate.
Manufacturing
a multifunctional aramid-thermoset composite laminate
with an integrated ply of LIG–aramid fabric. (a) The average
temperature profile of the cured composite when subjected to an input
voltage of 15 V. (b) Thermal infrared image of the composite laminate
at t = 80 s. (c) Demonstration of the de-icing functionality
of the resulting composite laminate. A 20 × 20 × 5 mm3 piece of ice is completely melted away within 2 min after
applying an input voltage of 15 V across the laminate.
Conclusions
We have demonstrated that
a textured, woven aramid fabric can be
successfully used as an inexpensive precursor for fabricating LIG-based
resistive heaters with a high electrothermal efficiency. The quality
and performance of fabric heaters were directly affected by the key
processing parameters, namely, input laser power, scan rate, and pulse
per inch of engraving. The electrothermal response of produced LIG
heaters followed Joule’s law, where a linear correlation was
obtained between the steady-state temperature of heaters and the square
of the input voltage. The fabric structure of LIG heaters allowed
for facile impregnation with polymer resins for the development of
integrated heaters and multifunctional composites. Two types of thermosetting
resins were used to fabricate flexible and stiff composites using
LIG–aramid fabric for various applications. Highly flexible
and stable heaters were prepared by the impregnation of LIG-modified
aramid fabric with silicone rubber, while a multifunctional fiber-reinforced
composite laminate with de-icing functionality was manufactured using
dicyclopentadiene resin system. The LIG–aramid fabric heaters
developed in this study can be used in a wide variety of applications
including out-of-oven curing of composites, in-the-field repair of
polymeric and composite structures, wearable and portable devices,
and de-icing/anti-icing of various structures.
Authors: Tuo Wang; Yonghao Zheng; Abdul-Rahman O Raji; Yilun Li; William K A Sikkema; James M Tour Journal: ACS Appl Mater Interfaces Date: 2016-05-26 Impact factor: 9.229
Authors: Andrea Lamberti; Francesco Perrucci; Matteo Caprioli; Mara Serrapede; Marco Fontana; Stefano Bianco; Sergio Ferrero; Elena Tresso Journal: Nanotechnology Date: 2017-03-10 Impact factor: 3.874
Authors: Jacob L Beckham; John Tianci Li; Michael G Stanford; Weiyin Chen; Emily A McHugh; Paul A Advincula; Kevin M Wyss; Yieu Chyan; Walker L Boldman; Philip D Rack; James M Tour Journal: ACS Nano Date: 2021-04-26 Impact factor: 15.881
Authors: Bohdan Kulyk; Beatriz F R Silva; Alexandre F Carvalho; Sara Silvestre; António J S Fernandes; Rodrigo Martins; Elvira Fortunato; Florinda M Costa Journal: ACS Appl Mater Interfaces Date: 2021-02-23 Impact factor: 9.229