The pandemic situation of novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a global threat on our current planet, with its rapid spread and high mortality rate. Sarcoidosis patients are at high risk to COVID-19 severity for having lung injuries as well as treating with immunosuppressive agents. So, physicians are in dilemma whether they should use immunosuppressive agents or not for the patients with sarcoidosis history and COVID-19 infection. Therefore, common factors should be identified to provide effective treatment. For determining the common genes between COVID-19 and sarcoidosis, GSE164805 and GSE18781 were retrieved from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. Common upregulated genes were identified by using R language to investigate their involved pathways and gene ontologies (GO). With the aid of the STRING Cytoscape plugin tool, protein-protein interactions (PPIs) network was constructed. From the PPIs network, Hub genes and essential modules were detected by using Cytohubba, and MCODE respectively. For hub genes, TFs, TFs-miRNA, and drug, interaction networks were built through the NetworkAnalyst web platform. A total of 34 common upregulated genes were identified and among them, five hub genes, including TET2, MUC5AC, VDR, NFE2L2, and BCL6 were determined. In addition, a cluster having VDR and NFE2L2 was detected from the PPIs network. Moreover, 32 transcription factors and 9 miRNA were recognized for hub genes. Furthermore, vitamin D and some of its analogous compounds were obtained from the drug interaction network. In conclusion, hub genes identified in this study might have potential roles in modulating COVID-19 infection and sarcoidosis. However, further studies are required to corroborate this study.
The pandemic situation of novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a global threat on our current planet, with its rapid spread and high mortality rate. Sarcoidosis patients are at high risk to COVID-19 severity for having lung injuries as well as treating with immunosuppressive agents. So, physicians are in dilemma whether they should use immunosuppressive agents or not for the patients with sarcoidosis history and COVID-19 infection. Therefore, common factors should be identified to provide effective treatment. For determining the common genes between COVID-19 and sarcoidosis, GSE164805 and GSE18781 were retrieved from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. Common upregulated genes were identified by using R language to investigate their involved pathways and gene ontologies (GO). With the aid of the STRING Cytoscape plugin tool, protein-protein interactions (PPIs) network was constructed. From the PPIs network, Hub genes and essential modules were detected by using Cytohubba, and MCODE respectively. For hub genes, TFs, TFs-miRNA, and drug, interaction networks were built through the NetworkAnalyst web platform. A total of 34 common upregulated genes were identified and among them, five hub genes, including TET2, MUC5AC, VDR, NFE2L2, and BCL6 were determined. In addition, a cluster having VDR and NFE2L2 was detected from the PPIs network. Moreover, 32 transcription factors and 9 miRNA were recognized for hub genes. Furthermore, vitamin D and some of its analogous compounds were obtained from the drug interaction network. In conclusion, hub genes identified in this study might have potential roles in modulating COVID-19 infection and sarcoidosis. However, further studies are required to corroborate this study.
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a rapidly spreading infectious disease that is caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). COVID-19 first reported a cluster of causing pneumonia in Wuhan, Hubei Province on December 31, 2019 and subsequently declared as a pandemic on March 11, 2020 [1]. Pandemics are extensive outbreaks of infectious diseases that pose a serious challenge to medical systems owing to the complexity of estimating the number and severity of cases, the lack of immediate vaccinations, and inadequate antiviral stockpiles to meet demand [2]. According to WHO, until January 13, 2022, the number of confirmed cases in the world were 312,173,462 including 5,501,000 deaths [3]. WHO also identified highly infected countries including the USA, India, Brazil, UK, France, Russian Federation, Turkey, Italy, Germany, Spain, Argentina, and Iran [3]. Although some vaccines are available in the world, the pandemic will be under control if they are given to enough people [4]. To gain global control of COVID-19, however, approved vaccines yet to achieve some goals: need to be manufactured at high volume, provide affordable price, distribute globally so that they are available where needed, and should be widely implemented in local communities [5]. Therefore, it is suggested to wear the mask, maintain social distance, wash hands frequently, and take extra precaution to pulmonary diseased people to control the severity of COVID-19 pandemic situation.Sarcoidosis is an inflammatory disease characterized by granuloma formation that can affect multiple organs but dominate the lungs. The etiology of sarcoidosis is still yet to demystify. However, sarcoidosis is thought to be caused by a combination of genetic, host immunologic, and environmental factors [6]. The initial cause of granulomatous inflammation is thought to involve the innate immune response where phagocytic cells express pattern recognition receptors such as Toll-like receptors (TLRs) in an attempt to engulf poorly soluble or insoluble material [7]. Even though many people undergo disease remission within the first few years, over 30–50% develop a chronic active disease that requires medication to prevent organ failure and fibrosis [6]. It was reported, in 2010, that the peak age for sarcoidosis in women was 50–69 years old, and for men, it was 40–59 years old [8].Patients having pulmonary sarcoidosis impose a higher risk for severe illness related to COVID-19 [9,10]. According to Baughman et al. study, in case of sarcoidosis patients, the overall rate of COVID-19 was 2.23% or 22,308 cases per million from April to July 2020 and the rate of hospitalization was 15.8% who required ICU care [10]. Another cohort study reported that the rate of COVID-19 in sarcoidosis patients was 2.1% from March to April 2020 [11]. For several reasons sarcoidosis patients may have severe conditions and death from COVID-19: Involving lungs as a prominent target in sarcoidosis, immunological dysfunction, and dysregulation, providing immunosuppressive medications as primary treatment and having significant relation of sarcoidosis with hypertension, diabetes, and obesity, since they have been identified as independent risk factors for COVID-19 [12]. Studies reported that patients with COVID-19 infection are more likely to be harmed by corticosteroids treatment [13,14]. For all of these reasons, physicians are in predicament to offer effective treatment to patients with COVID-19 infection with sarcoidosis [15]. Therefore, common genetic aspects should be identified to ensure high outcomes in these conditions. This study was designed to find out common genes between COVID-19 and sarcoidosis by utilizing publicly available peripheral blood cells microarray datasets. Initially, upregulated genes were identified, and subsequently GO ontology, PPIs network, hub genes, TFs network, TFs-miRNA network, and drugs network were analyzed.
Methods
Acquisition of datasets
Gene expression profiles of microarray data for COVID-19 (GSE164805) and sarcoidosis (GSE18781) were obtained from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gds). Both datasets are dedicated to peripheral blood cells. GPL26963 (Agilent-085982 Arraystar human lncRNA V5 microarray) platform was used for the GSE164805 dataset where samples were got from five severe COVID-19 patients, five mild COVID-19 patients, and five healthy people. On the contrary, for the GSE18781 dataset, GPL570 (Affymetrix Human Genome U133 plus 2.0 Array) platform was adopted where samples were collected from twelve sarcoidosis patients and twelve control subjects.
Identification of common upregulated genes
For identifying common differentially expressed genes (DEGs) from both datasets, GEO2R (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/geo2r/) was applied. GEO2R is used to identify DEGs, using GEOquery and limma R packages from the Bioconductor project, having compared two or more groups of samples [16]. In order to control the false discovery rate, Benjamini-Hochberg was conducted [17]. Common DEGs from both datasets were downloaded from GEO2R as table format and subsequently imported in RStudio for further analysis. Datasets were filtered by setting adjusted p-value<0.01 and Log2-fold change < −1. A Venn diagram was constructed by using Bioinformatics and Evolutionary Genomics (http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/Venn/) web tool followed by getting common upregulated genes.
Enrichment analysis of common upregulated genes
Gene set enrichment analysis process is used to evaluate collective behaviors of genes in terms of health and diseases [18]. Gene ontologies (GO) and associated pathways of common upregulated genes were retrieved through Enrichr (https://maayanlab.cloud/Enrichr/). Enrichr is a web-based enrichment analysis platform that is simple to use and provides various collective functions of gene lists [19,20]. For pathways analysis, KEGG, BioPlanet, Reactome, and MSigDB databases were selected.
Network analysis
Networks analysis is an essential part of system biology to understand the molecular and cellular interaction of proteins [21]. In addition, insightful knowledge can be gained about gene sets from network-based studying without studying individual genes [22]. For constructing the network, STRING protein quarry Cytoscape plugin tool was adopted. Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes (STRING) (https://string-db.org/) is utilized to provide information about direct (physical) and indirect (functional) associations of protein-protein interaction that covers information more than 2000 organisms [23]. Upregulated genes were inserted in the search box where the confidence score was set up at 0.400. After retrieving the relevant network, it was visualized and modified by Cytoscape [24] and other associated plugin tools.
Hub genes identification and module analysis
Network has a lot of nodes and edges, among them, those nodes that have higher interconnection are considered hub genes. Having a higher degree of interconnection, hub genes tend to be essential for maintaining biological processes. From our PPI networks, hub genes were determined by using cytoHubba, which is a Cytoscape plugin software. CytoHubba is a user-friendly tool for exploring key nodes in biological networks by providing 11 topological analysis methods [25]. Degree topological method was applied for current research since it works based on the number of interactions for each gene in the PPIs network. Molecular Complex Detection (MCODE), another Cytoscape plugin tool, was exploited to detect highly interconnected portions in the PPIs network. MCODE makes visualization manageable by extracting the dense regions around a protein of interest [26].
Transcriptional factor regulatory network of hub genes
In mammalian development and adult tissue homeostasis, transcription factors (TFs) networks are a central determinant of cell fate decisions, and they are often corrupted in disease [27]. TFs gene interaction network for hub genes was constructed by NetworkAnalyst (https://www.networkanalyst.ca/NetworkAnalyst/uploads/ListUploadView.xhtml). NetworkAnalyst is a comprehensive web platform that provides a visual network for gene expression analysis [28,29]. TFs gene interaction network was retrieved from JASPAR (http://jaspar.genereg.net/) which is included in NetworkAnalyst platform.
TFs-miRNA regulatory network analysis
TFs can activate or repress transcription at a pre-transcriptional level [30], while microRNAs can control gene expression at the post-transcriptional stage [31]. TFs-miRNA regulatory network, for hub genes, was built by RegNetwork [32] repository through NetworkAnalyst platform. The network was filtered at 1° cutoff value. Finally, the network was downloaded from the NetworkAnalyst and visualized in Cytoscape software.
Protein drug interaction network
Lastly, the drug interaction network, for our hub genes, was constructed to know the potential drugs for both COVID-19 and sarcoidosis diseases. The network was made based on DrugBank (https://go.drugbank.com/) database [33] through the NetworkAnalyst web platform. The network file was downloaded from NetworkAnalyst and visualized by using Cytoscape.
Results
Identification of common upregulated genes between COVID-19 and sarcoidosis
Selected datasets (GSE164805 and GSE18781) were analyzed to sort out common upregulated genes in between COVID-19 and sarcoidosis patients. 34 common upregulated genes were obtained from GSE164805 and GSE18781 datasets. These common upregulated genes were included as SCARF1, GNAS, ASS1, KLHL6, KIAA1109, VCAN, TBC1D22B, ACTR2, ST3GAL2, KDM4A, TCF7L2, TET2, CSAD, ASAP1, NXPH3, SDCCAG8, SEZ6L2, MALAT1, SLC11A2, NFE2L2, CEACAM1, SMCHD1, BCL6, TMEM80, C7orf50, PRR14L, SAMD9L, VDR, NECTIN2, GTDC1, MUC5AC, GTPBP2, XK, and KATNBL1. The Venn diagram in Fig. 1 indicates the comparison of common upregulated genes.
Fig. 1
A Venn diagram of commonly differentially expressed upregulated genes. Common 34 upregulated genes were identified from 2320 upregulated genes of COVID-19 infection and 227 upregulated genes of sarcoidosis.
A Venn diagram of commonly differentially expressed upregulated genes. Common 34 upregulated genes were identified from 2320 upregulated genes of COVID-19 infection and 227 upregulated genes of sarcoidosis.GO and associated pathways of upregulated genes were analyzed by the Enrichr web platform. Significant (p < 0.05) ontologies were listed in Table 1 from three GO subsections (biological process, molecular function, and cellular component). This table indicates, the biological process was enriched with cellular response to laminar fluid shear stress, regulation of natural killer cells, and so on. Moreover, transmembrane transporter activity, beta-galactoside (CMP) alpha-2,3-sialyltransferase activity, and so forth were prominent in molecular function. Furthermore, for cellular components, zonula adherens, t-cell receptor complex were putative components. On the other hand, pathways related to inflammatory response were predominantly found from pathway databases. Significant (p < 0.05) pathways from different pathways databases are described in Table 2. Finally, depending on the combined score, a collection of GO terms and associated pathways were depicted in Fig. 2. The combined score is defined by Enrichr based on p-values and z-score.
Table 1
Gene ontologies, their corresponding p-values and common upregulated genes.
Category
GO ID
GO terms
p-value
Genes
GO Biological process 2018
GO:0071499
Cellular response to laminar fluid shear stress.
0.00005859
ASS1, NFE2L2
GO:0002858
Regulation of natural killer cell mediated cytotoxicity directed against tumor cell target.
0.0001252
CEACAM1,NECTIN2
GO:0030856
Regulation of epithelial cell differentiation.
0.0004219
CEACAM1, KIAA1109
GO:0002889
Regulation of immunoglobulin mediated immune response.
Top pathways for common upregulated genes from KEGG, BioPlanet, Reactome and MSigDB databases.
Category
Pathways
p-value
Genes
KEGG 2019 Human
Taurine and hypotaurine metabolism.
0.01855
CSAD
Endocrine and other factor-regulated calcium reabsorption.
0.003013
VDR, GNAS
Mineral absorption.
0.003395
VDR, SLC11A2
Arginine biosynthesis.
0.03512
ASS1
Adherens junction.
0.006655
TCF7L2, NECTIN2
Mucin type O-glycan biosynthesis
0.05142
ST3GAL2
Melanogenesis
0.01275
TCF7L2,GNAS
Parathyroid hormone synthesis, secretion and action
0.01398
VDR,GNAS
BioPlanet 2019
Influenza factor interactions with host
0.01016
XK
Degradation of cysteine and homocysteine
0.01352
CSAD
Vitamin D biosynthesis
0.01352
VDR
Termination of O-glycan biosynthesis
0.0008886
ST3GAL2,MUC5AC
Rapid glucocorticoid receptor pathway
0.01520
GNAS
Urea cycle
0.01520
ASS1
Ganglio sphingolipid metabolism
0.01687
ST3GAL2
Taurine and hypotaurine metabolism
0.01687
CSAD
Dermatan sulfate biosynthesis
0.01687
VCAN
Attenuation of GPCR signaling
0.0185
GNAS
Reactome 2016
Fibronectin matrix formation
0.01016
CEACAM1
Scavenging by Class F Receptors
0.01016
SCARF1
Binding of TCF/LEF:CTNNB1 to target gene promoters.
0.01184
TCF7L2
Defective CHST3 causes SEDCJD
0.01184
VCAN
Defective CHSY1 causes TPBS
0.01184
VCAN
Defective CHST14 causes EDS, musculocontractural type
0.01184
VCAN
Termination of O-glycan biosynthesis
0.0008886
ST3GAL2,MUC5AC
Degradation of cysteine and homocysteine
0.01520
CSAD
Urea cycle
0.01687
ASS1
Dermatan sulfate biosynthesis
0.01855
VCAN
MSigDB Hallmark 2020
TNF-alpha Signaling via NF-Kb
0.04528
BCL6,NFE2L2
Apical Junction
0.04528
VCAN, NECTIN2
Inflammatory Response
0.04528
SLC11A2,SCARF1
Heme Metabolism
0.04528
XK,SLC11A2
Fig. 2
Gene ontologies (Biological process, Molecular function and Cellular component) and pathways (KEGG, BioPlanet, Reactome and MSigDB) for common upregulated genes based on combined score.
Gene ontologies, their corresponding p-values and common upregulated genes.Top pathways for common upregulated genes from KEGG, BioPlanet, Reactome and MSigDB databases.Gene ontologies (Biological process, Molecular function and Cellular component) and pathways (KEGG, BioPlanet, Reactome and MSigDB) for common upregulated genes based on combined score.The corresponding network was retrieved through the STRING protein quarry plugin tool in Cytoscape software. This network was stored, further to identify hub genes and subsequently for suggesting common drug molecules for both COVID-19 and sarcoidosis. Getting the common synergistic genetic factors and suggesting therapeutic targets for COVID-19 and sarcoidosis were the primary purposes of this study. The network consisted of 32 nodes and 102 edges (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3
Protein-protein interactions (PPIs) network for common upregulated genes from COVID-19 and sarcoidosis. The light green color nodes indicate common upregulated genes. Network consists of 32 nodes and 102 edges. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)
Protein-protein interactions (PPIs) network for common upregulated genes from COVID-19 and sarcoidosis. The light green color nodes indicate common upregulated genes. Network consists of 32 nodes and 102 edges. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)For sorting out the highly interconnected genes in the PPIs network, CytoHubba was utilized. Hub genes were determined by applying the Degree algorithm method. Five genes including TET2, MUC5AC, VDR, NFE2L2, and BCL6 were identified as hub genes (Fig. 4). On the other hand, a highly clustered region of PPIs networks was obtained by using MCODE. In this clustering network two hub genes, VDR and NFE2L2 were obtained (Fig. 5).
Fig. 4
Identification of hub genes from PPIs network for common upregulated genes. Five hub genes were detected based on their degree value. Light green color nodes (TET2, MUC5AC, BCL6, NFE2L2 and VDR) indicate common hub genes. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)
Fig. 5
Cluster analysis network extracted from PPIs network. This network represents highly interconnected network in PPIs network. From five hub genes NFE2L2 and VDR obtained in cluster network. Two hub genes highlighted in red color. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)
Identification of hub genes from PPIs network for common upregulated genes. Five hub genes were detected based on their degree value. Light green color nodes (TET2, MUC5AC, BCL6, NFE2L2 and VDR) indicate common hub genes. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)Cluster analysis network extracted from PPIs network. This network represents highly interconnected network in PPIs network. From five hub genes NFE2L2 and VDR obtained in cluster network. Two hub genes highlighted in red color. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)For hub genes, TFs regulatory network was constructed through the NetworkAnalyst platform having 48 interactions, 32 TFs, and 4 hub genes. BCL6 was found to be regulated by 17 TFs, TET2 was regulated by 13 TFs, NFE2L2 was regulated by 12 TFs and VDR was regulated by 6 TFs. Nine TFs were detected in the TF regulatory network with a connectivity degree of ≥2. Fig. 6 depicts TF regulatory network.
Fig. 6
TF-interaction network for common hub genes. Red color nodes denote hub gene and other nodes represent TF genes. This network contains 32 TFs and four hub genes. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)
TF-interaction network for common hub genes. Red color nodes denote hub gene and other nodes represent TF genes. This network contains 32 TFs and four hub genes. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)TFs-miRNA regulatory Network provides information about miRNAs and TFs interaction with the hub genes. TF-miRNA coregulatory network was studied by NetworkAnalyst that had 39 nodes and 61 edges. Among 39 nodes, 4 for hub genes, 9 for miRNA, and 26 for TFs. Furthermore, all miRNAs were found to have 2° connectivity except has-miR-544. Fig. 7 illustrates TFs-miRNA regulatory network.
Fig. 7
Network indicates TF-miRNA coregulatory network for common hub genes. This network embodied with 39 nodes and 61 edges where 4 noes for hub genes, 9 nodes for miRNA and 26 nodes for TFs. Magenta color denotes hub genes; Maroon color denotes miRNA Cyan color denotes TFs. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)
Network indicates TF-miRNA coregulatory network for common hub genes. This network embodied with 39 nodes and 61 edges where 4 noes for hub genes, 9 nodes for miRNA and 26 nodes for TFs. Magenta color denotes hub genes; Maroon color denotes miRNA Cyan color denotes TFs. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)Protein drug interaction networks provide essential insight for providing proper treatment to the patients. Protein drug interaction network collected from DrugBank where VDR dominantly connected to 14 different kinds of drug. This network indicates, vitamin D and some of its analogous compounds might play crucial roles in modulating both COVID-19 and sarcoidosis conditions. The drug network is presented in Fig. 8.
Fig. 8
Drugs protein interaction network.
Drugs protein interaction network.
Discussion
The COVID-19 pandemic is a concern for all clinicians, who are taking care of sarcoidosis patients; many of them require immunosuppressive drugs, which can put them at risk for severe and opportunistic infections as compared to the general population [34]. Therefore, common molecular signatures should be identified so that effective treatment can be provided. This research aids in the description of Bioinformatics approaches for the analysis of peripheral blood cells response during COVID-1 infection and sarcoidosis. Two datasets, GSE164805 and GSE18781, were chosen from GEO to identify common upregulated genes between COVID-19 and sarcoidosis. After obtaining 34 common upregulated genes, the study was continued with the analysis of GO, pathways, PPIs, TF-gene interactions network, TF-miRNA coregulatory network, and drug network.Common upregulated genes were used to know GO and their associated pathways. GO and pathways were retrieved by using Enrichr based on their p-value. For biological processes, laminar fluid shear stress, natural killer cell-mediated cytotoxicity, epithelial cell differentiation, immunoglobulin mediated immune response, and arginine biosynthetic process were top prominent. Fluid shear stress has significant effects on endothelial biology, inflammatory response, thrombotic and fibrinolytic homeostasis [35]. NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity has a great impact on the severity of COPD that also has responsibility for self-promoting emphysema [36]. Besides, manganese ion transporter activity, iron transporter activity, beta-galactoside (CMP) alpha-2,3-sialyltransferase activity, bile acid-binding, and histone demethylase activity were the most GO terms in terms of molecular function. It is demonstrated that a high iron level in the body is associated with many infectious diseases and inflammatory responses, as exemplified by malaria, viral infection, and neurodegeneration [37]. Furthermore, top GO terms regarding the cellular component are zonula adherents, beta-catenin-TCF complex, T cell receptor complex, mitotic spindle pole, and replication fork.Similarly, upregulated genes were also used to get insights into associated pathways. Prominent pathways from the KEGG database were included taurine and hypotaurine metabolism, endocrine and other factor-regulated calcium reabsorption, mineral absorption, arginine biosynthesis, and adherens’ junction. In humans, taurine and taurine derivatives are considered possible medicines against infectious and chronic inflammatory diseases [38]. Moreover, results from BioPlanet showed influenza factor interactions with host, degradation of cysteine and homocysteine, vitamin D biosynthesis, termination of O-glycan biosynthesis, and rapid glucocorticoid receptor pathway. Furthermore, Reactome provided most interacted pathways were fibronectin matrix formation, scavenging by Class F receptors, binding of TCF/LEF: CTNNB1 to target gene promoters, defective CHST3 causes SEDCJD, and defective CHSY1 causes TPBS.PPIs network was constructed and visualized with the aid of STRING and Cytoscape tools. Five hub genes, including MUC5AC, BCL6, TET2, NFE2L2, and VDR were detected from the PPIs network. MUC5AC, BCL6, NFE2L2, and VDR have been documented as having an association with the pathogenesis of lung diseases [[39], [40], [41], [42]]. In module analysis, VDR and NFE2l2 were clustered together which was performed to suggest more effective drug compounds.Hub genes were considered to construct a TFs gene interaction network through the NetworkAnalyst web platform. This network consisted of 36 nodes and 48 edges. Among hub genes, BCL6 had high interaction with 17° value in the TFs genes network. On the other hand, among transcription factor genes GATA2 gene was revealed as a prominent transcription factor having 4° value. GATA2 deficiency has disclosed the association with pulmonary alveolar proteinosis and fibrosis [43].Gene expression is an intricate process regulated by TFs and miRNAs. TFs and miRNAs can be useful as biomarkers in complex diseases. Identification of miRNAs in sarcoidosis is a great strategy for better understanding the disease's pathogenesis and identifying potential biomarkers [44]. For hub genes, TFs-miRNA coregulatory network was built through NetworkAnalyst tools where the network was filtered at 2° value. As a result, a network containing 39 nodes and 61 edges was gained. Among network interaction, BCL6 had a higher degree of interaction value of 27. On the other side, all miRNA contained 2° value except hsa-miR-544 having 1° value. Finally, drug interaction network was also retrieved through NetworkAnalyst. The drug interaction network provided 14 potential interactors with the VDR gene.From cluster and drug networks, this study hypothesized that vitamin D and its analogous compound may have a significant role in regulating COVID-19 and sarcoidosis conditions. Several studies documented that vitamin D deficiency is associated with lung diseases and predispose to respiratory infection by virus and bacteria [[45], [46], [47], [48], [49]]. A systemic review study reported, vitamin D can evaluate the risk of infection, seriousness, and mortality from COVID-19 as well as also suggest public to maintain an appropriate level of vitamin D to cope with the pandemic [50]. Likely, hypovitaminosis D tends to be linked to increased sarcoidosis disease activity, and thus can be considered a risk factor for sarcoidosis disease activity [51,52]. However, the exact mechanism of how vitamin D modulate immune and inflammation response in COVID-19 and sarcoidosis conditions is still unknown. Therefore, the more wet-lab research study is demanded to use vitamin D as a supplement in COVID-19 and sarcoidosis.Even though rigorous bioinformatics analysis was executed, some flaws remain. First, our study is limited to the number of data, where just two datasets were selected. Second, our data is limited to peripheral blood cells. Augmenting the number and types of data might increase the accuracy of our analyzed results. Third, this study cannot explain how upregulation of five hub genes can play role in COVID-19 and sarcoidosis.
Conclusion
So far there has been no other study on COVID-19 and sarcoidosis in the sense of peripheral blood cells transcriptomic analysis. In this circumstance, this study concludes that five hub genes, including, BCL6, MUC5AC, TET2, NFE2L2, and VDR might have synergistic effects and could be used as a therapeutic target on COVID-19 patients with sarcoidosis history. Since COVID-19 is a recent discovery infection and sarcoidosis etiology is not fully understood, therefore, more wet laboratory-based studies are necessary to validate the findings of this study.
Funding
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Author contributions
Md. Roman Mogal and Md. Asaduzzaman Sikder planned and designed the research. Md. Roman Mogal and Md. Rashel Mahmod conducted bioinformatics analyses. Sagarika Adhikary Sompa and Asadullah Junayed interpreted the results and performed statistical analysis. Md. Roman Mogal wrote the manuscript. Md. Asaduzzaman Sikder and Md. Zainul Abedin thoroughly edited and revised the manuscript. Md. Asaduzzaman Sikder supervised the whole research. All authors read and approved the manuscript.
Declaration of competing interest
Authors declared no competing interest among them.
Authors: Bibo Zhu; Ruixuan Zhang; Chaofan Li; Li Jiang; Min Xiang; Zhenqing Ye; Hirohito Kita; Ari M Melnick; Alexander L Dent; Jie Sun Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2019-05-28 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Damian Szklarczyk; Andrea Franceschini; Stefan Wyder; Kristoffer Forslund; Davide Heller; Jaime Huerta-Cepas; Milan Simonovic; Alexander Roth; Alberto Santos; Kalliopi P Tsafou; Michael Kuhn; Peer Bork; Lars J Jensen; Christian von Mering Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2014-10-28 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Nadera J Sweiss; Peter Korsten; Huzaefah J Syed; Aamer Syed; Robert P Baughman; Arthur M F Yee; Daniel A Culver; Teresa Sosenko; Arata Azuma; Francesco Bonella; Ulrich Costabel; Wonder P Drake; Marjolein Drent; Elyse E Lower; Dominique Israel-Biet; Remy L M Mostard; Hilario Nunes; Paola Rottoli; Paolo Spagnolo; Athol U Wells; Wim A Wuyts; Marc A Judson Journal: Chest Date: 2020-04-29 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Edward Y Chen; Christopher M Tan; Yan Kou; Qiaonan Duan; Zichen Wang; Gabriela Vaz Meirelles; Neil R Clark; Avi Ma'ayan Journal: BMC Bioinformatics Date: 2013-04-15 Impact factor: 3.169