| Literature DB >> 35127670 |
Qiudi Shen1, Yansong Qi2, Yangzhi Kong1, Huricha Bao2, Yifan Wang2, Alideertu Dong1, Haixia Wu1, Yongsheng Xu2.
Abstract
Treating bone defects coupled with pathogen infections poses a formidable challenge to clinical medicine. Thus, there is an urgent need to develop orthopedic implants that provide excellent antibacterial and osteogenic properties. Of the various types, copper-based biomaterials capable of both regenerating bone and fighting infections are an effective therapeutic strategy for bone tissue engineering and therefore have attracted significant research interest. This review examines the advantages of copper-based biomaterials for biological functions and introduces these materials' antibacterial mechanisms. We summarize current knowledge about the application of copper-based biomaterials with antimicrobial and osteogenic properties in the prevention and treatment of bone infection and discuss their potential uses in the field of orthopedics. By examining both broad and in-depth research, this review functions as a practical guide to developing copper-based biomaterials and offers directions for possible future work.Entities:
Keywords: antibacterial; biomaterials; bone tissue engineering; copper; osteogenic
Year: 2022 PMID: 35127670 PMCID: PMC8811349 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.795425
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Bioeng Biotechnol ISSN: 2296-4185
FIGURE 1A schematic image of one hypothesis about the antibacterial mechanism of Cu2+. Reprinted with permission from ref. (Liu et al., 2016) (Copyright 2016; Nature Publishing Group).
FIGURE 2(A) Optical images and SEM images of the scaffolds were obtained. (B) Microct evaluation of skull defects and unfilled bone regeneration in rats implanted with BG-3Cu and BG stents 8 weeks after implantation. (C) Transmitted light images of stained sections of rat skull defects implanted with BG-3Cu and BG scaffolds and unfilled defects 8 weeks after implantation. Reprinted with permission from ref. (Wang et al., 2014). (Copyright 2014; The Royal Society of Chemistry).
FIGURE 3(A) Synthesis and potential biomedical applications of copper alginate microspheres. (B) Development of a novel injectable hydrogel and its osteogenic application. (C) Schematic diagram of surgical construction of CTP-SA and GTR. (D) In vivo function of CTP-SA in GTR surgery. Panel (A) reprinted with permission from ref. (Madzovska-Malagurski et al., 2016) (Copyright 2016; IOP Publishing Ltd.). Panel (B) reprinted with permission from ref. (Bassett et al., 2014) (Copyright 2019; Elsevier). Panel (C) and panel (D) reprinted with permission from ref. (Xu et al., 2020) (Copyright 2020; American Chemical Society).
Representative examples of copper-based antibacterial biomaterials.
| Copper-based biomaterials | Component | Type of Cu | Result | Application | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antibacterial scaffolds | Bioactive glass (BG) | Cu2+ | Release of ibuprofen and antibacterial | Infection of regenerated bone |
|
| Cu2+ | Good bioactivity in bone marrow tissue | Bone scaffold |
| ||
| Cu |
| Bone regeneration |
| ||
| Polycaprolactone (PCL) | Cu2+ |
| Bone tissue engineering |
| |
| Cu | Have a positive effect on fibroblast cell | Bone tissue engineering |
| ||
| CuO |
| Antibacterial wound dressing |
| ||
| Collagen scaffold (CS) | Cu2+ | Antibacterial and enhancing bone healing | Infection osteomyelitis |
| |
| Borate | CuO | Stimulate angiogenesis and regenerate bone | Healing bone defects |
| |
| Ethylene-vinyl acetate (EVA) | CuNPs |
| Antibacterial |
| |
| Antibacterial hydrogels | Alginate | Cu2+ |
| Antimicrobial wound dressings and tissue engineering scaffolds |
|
| Cu2+ | Good bioactivity | Bone tissue engineering alternatives |
| ||
| TiO2@PDA | Cu2O | Antibacterial and osteogenic | Periodontitis |
| |
| Antibacterial bone cements | Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) | Cu |
| Antibiofilm and bone tissue engineering |
|
| Cu2+ |