| Literature DB >> 35127340 |
Junqi Wang1,2,3, Jingjing Huang2,4, Qiming Fu2,4, Enting Gao2,4, Jianping Chen2,5.
Abstract
Gymnasiums, fitness rooms and alike places offer exercise services to citizens, which play positive roles in promoting health and enhancing human immunity. Due to the high metabolic rates during exercises, supplying sufficient ventilation in these places is essential and extremely important especially given the risk of infectious respiratory diseases like COVID-19. Traditional ventilation control methods rely on a single CO2 sensor (often placed at return air duct), which is often difficult to reflect the human metabolic rates accurately, and thus can hardly control the infection risk instantly. Thus, to ensure a safe and healthy environment in places with high metabolism, a real-time metabolism-based ventilation control method is proposed. A computer vision algorithm is developed to monitor human activities (regarding human motion amplitude and speed) and an artificial neural network is established for metabolic prediction. Case studies show that the proposed metabolism-based ventilation control method can reduce the infection probability down to 4.3-6.3% while saving 13% of energy in comparison with the strategy of fixed-fresh-air ventilation. In the development of healthy and sustainable society, gymnasiums and alike exercise places are essential and the proposed ventilation control method is a promising solution to decrease the risk of COVID-19 while preserving features of energy saving and carbon emission reduction.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; Healthy society; Metabolic rate; Ventilation control
Year: 2022 PMID: 35127340 PMCID: PMC8799456 DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2022.103719
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sustain Cities Soc ISSN: 2210-6707 Impact factor: 7.587
Fig. 1The metabolism-based ventilation control
Fig. 2Framework diagram: (a) metabolic rate prediction (model development) (b)ventilation control and assessment
Fig. 3(a) original image; (b) output image of background subtraction
Fig. 4Physical distance correction process
Heart rate and oxygen consumption at different activity level (Astrand and Rodahl, 1977)
| Level of Activity | Heart rate (Beat per Minute) | Oxygen consumption ( |
|---|---|---|
| Light work | <90 | <8 |
| Moderate work | 90∼110 | 8∼16 |
| Heavy work | 110∼130 | 16∼24 |
| Very heavy work | 130∼150 | 24∼32 |
| Extremely heavy work | 150∼170 | >32 |
Fig. 5(a) experimental scenario (b) heart rate monitoring bracelet (c) camera
Fig. 6Flow diagram of experiment
Basic information of subjects
| Occupant | Gender | Age (years old) | Height(cm) | Weight(kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | Male | 23 | 170 | 68 |
| B | Male | 23 | 176 | 69 |
Fig. 7The control schematic and experimental scenes
Fig. 8Plots of motion amplitude under different motion types
Fig. 9Regression of correcting distance
Fig. 10Occupants’ metabolic rates in different states: measured and predicted values
Fig. 11Infection probabilities and ventilation rates of three ventilation strategies
Performance evaluation of three ventilation strategies
| Ventilation strategy | Energy consumption (Wh) | Carbon emission(kg) | Energy saving rate | Infection probability |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed fresh air | 127 | 0.132 | / | 4.3% |
| Occupant-number-based ventilation | 43 | 0.102 | 66% | 12.4% |
| Metabolism-based ventilation | 111 | 0.122 | 13% | 5.0% |