| Literature DB >> 35125951 |
Wenhao Cheng1, Yumo Lu1, Renqiong Chen1, Hong Ren1, Wenlong Hu1.
Abstract
Currently, increasing attention has been paid to the association of the serofast status with natural killer (NK) cells. Remarkable diversity among the results of different studies has been observed. We conducted this meta-analysis to evaluate the variation of the proportion of NK cells in serofast patients compared with that of healthy controls and cured patients. Through the designed retrieval methods, 631 serofast patients, 562 healthy controls and 160 patients whose serology turned negative following treatment were derived from 16 publications for further analysis. The established items were used for the standard selection and quality assessment. The Stata software was used for meta-analysis. The final results indicated that serofast patients exhibited a dramatic decrease in the number of NK cells in the peripheral blood compared with that noted in healthy control subjects [standardized mean difference (SMD) = -0.63, 95% CI (-1.08, -0.17), p = 0.007]. The proportion of NK cells was significantly lower in serofast patients than that noted in cured patients [SMD = -0.25, 95% CI (-0.48, -0.02), p = 0.033] and no significant difference was noted in the proportion of NK cells between cured patients and healthy controls [SMD = -0.39, 95% CI (-0.93, 0.14), p = 0.148]. The present meta-analysis indicated that the proportion of NK cells in the peripheral blood was significantly lower in serofast patients compared with that of the healthy controls and cured patients, indicating that the reduction in the number of NK cells may be closely associated with the syphilis serofast status.Entities:
Keywords: meta-analysis; natural killer cells; serofast; syphilis
Year: 2021 PMID: 35125951 PMCID: PMC8808302 DOI: 10.5114/ceji.2021.111540
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cent Eur J Immunol ISSN: 1426-3912 Impact factor: 2.085
Main characteristics of the studies included in the meta-analysis
| Study | Year | Serofast patients | Healthy controls | Cured patients | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Mean | SD |
| Mean | SD |
| Mean | SD | ||
| Huang | 2018 | 103 | 8.10 | 0.80 | 103 | 8.70 | 0.80 | – | – | – |
| Xie | 2017 | 33 | 7.32 | 4.48 | 23 | 14.87 | 6.26 | – | – | – |
| Liang | 2016 | 60 | 21.58 | 6.11 | 60 | 14.18 | 4.55 | – | – | – |
| Liu | 2015 | 35 | 15.10 | 4.20 | 40 | 20.60 | 5.20 | 40 | 16.50 | 4.40 |
| Xiong | 2015 | 60 | 17.96 | 7.67 | 60 | 22.35 | 7.85 | – | – | – |
| Xu | 2014 | 40 | 8.20 | 0.70 | 40 | 8.60 | 0.60 | 50 | 8.50 | 0.70 |
| Xie | 2013 | 32 | 15.03 | 4.98 | 11 | 22.25 | 6.11 | – | – | – |
| Zhang | 2013 | 24 | 14.91 | 6.98 | 22 | 20.10 | 9.01 | – | – | – |
| Guan | 2013 | 54 | 18.39 | 7.93 | 32 | 22.84 | 8.47 | – | – | – |
| Ruan | 2012 | 32 | 14.91 | 6.98 | 30 | 20.10 | 9.01 | – | – | – |
| Lin | 2010 | 23 | 15.82 | 8.44 | 20 | 20.35 | 9.93 | 20 | 16.81 | 6.95 |
| Liu | 2010 | 25 | 10.41 | 7.21 | 20 | 25.67 | 7.76 | – | – | – |
| Li | 2009 | 20 | 13.00 | 6.00 | 18 | 16.00 | 6.00 | 20 | 13.00 | 8.00 |
| Huang | 2008 | 20 | 20.55 | 6.55 | 30 | 18.90 | 4.84 | 30 | 21.27 | 4.98 |
| Bao | 2006 | 38 | 0.06 | 0.02 | 23 | 0.13 | 0.04 | – | – | – |
| Yang | 2005 | 32 | 21.59 | 7.32 | 30 | 14.19 | 4.87 | – | – | – |
n – the number of study subjects
Fig. 1Forest plot of the proportion of NK cells in serofast patients and healthy controls
Fig. 2Forest plot of the proportion of NK cells in serofast patients and cured patients
Fig. 3Forest plot of the proportion of NK cells in cured patients and healthy controls
Summary of the meta-analysis on NK cells: serofast patients, healthy controls and cured patients
| Comparisons | No. of comparisons | Test of association | Test of heterogeneity | Publication bias | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMD | 95% CI | Model | ||||||
| Serofast patients vs. healthy controls | 16 | –0.63 | –1.08~–0.17 | 0.007 | R | 92.6 | 0.000 | 0.192 |
| Serofast patients vs. cured patients | 5 | –0.25 | –0.48~–0.02 | 0.033 | F | 0.0 | 0.779 | 0.806 |
| Cured patients vs. healthy controls | 5 | –0.39 | –0.93~0.14 | 0.148 | R | 80.6 | 0.000 | 0.806 |
R – random-effects model, F – fixed-effects model