Literature DB >> 35124806

The association of hospital research publications and clinical quality.

David M Shahian1,2,3, Dan McCloskey4, Xiu Liu1, Elizabeth Schneider4, David Cheng3,5, Elizabeth A Mort1,6,7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the quantity and impact of research publications among US acute care hospitals; to identify hospital characteristics associated with publication volumes; and to estimate the independent association of bibliometric indicators with Hospital Compare quality measures. DATA SOURCES: Hospital Compare; American Hospital Association Survey; Magnet Recognition Program; Science Citation Index Expanded. STUDY
DESIGN: In cross-sectional studies using a 40% random sample of US Medicare-participating hospitals, we estimated associations of hospital characteristics with publication volumes and associations of hospital-linked bibliometric indicators with 19 Hospital Compare quality metrics. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION
METHODS: Using standardized search strategies, we identified all publications attributed to authors from these institutions from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2016 and their subsequent citations through July 2020. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: Only 647 of 1604 study hospitals (40.3%) had ≥1 publication. Council of Teaching Hospitals and Health Systems (COTH) hospitals had significantly more publications (average 599 vs. 11 for non-COTH teaching and 0.6 for nonteaching hospitals), and their publications were cited more frequently (average 22.6/publication) than those from non-COTH teaching (18.2 citations) or nonteaching hospitals (12.8 citations). In multivariable regression, teaching intensity, hospital beds, New England or Pacific region, and not-for-profit or government ownership were significant predictors of higher publication volumes; the percentage of Medicaid admissions was inversely associated. In multivariable linear regression, hospital publications were associated with significantly lower risk-adjusted mortality rates for acute myocardial infarction (coefficient -0.52, p = 0.01), heart failure (coefficient -0.74, p = 0.004), pneumonia (coefficient -1.02, p = 0.001), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (coefficient -0.48, p = 0.005), and coronary artery bypass surgery (coefficient -0.73, p < 0.0001); higher overall Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) ratings (coefficient 2.37, p = 0.04); and greater patient willingness to recommend (coefficient 3.38, p = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: A minority of US hospitals published in the biomedical literature. Publication quantity and impact indicators are independently associated with lower risk-adjusted mortality and higher HCAHPS scores.
© 2022 Health Research and Educational Trust.

Entities:  

Keywords:  outcomes; publications; quality; research

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35124806      PMCID: PMC9108066          DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.13947

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.734


  43 in total

1.  Clinical research and healthcare outcomes.

Authors:  Dame Sally Davies
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 2.  How may clinical research improve healthcare outcomes?

Authors:  M K Krzyzanowska; R Kaplan; R Sullivan
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 32.976

3.  Measuring the surgical academic output of an institution: the "institutional" H-index.

Authors:  Kiran K Turaga; T Clark Gamblin
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2012-04-06       Impact factor: 2.891

4.  Tracking publication outcomes of National Institutes of Health grants.

Authors:  Benjamin G Druss; Steven C Marcus
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.965

5.  The history and meaning of the journal impact factor.

Authors:  Eugene Garfield
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 6.  How has healthcare research performance been assessed?: a systematic review.

Authors:  Vanash M Patel; Hutan Ashrafian; Kamran Ahmed; Sonal Arora; Sejal Jiwan; Jeremy K Nicholson; Ara Darzi; Thanos Athanasiou
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Advantages and challenges of working as a clinician in an academic department of medicine: academic clinicians' perspectives.

Authors:  Colleen Christmas; Samuel C Durso; Steven J Kravet; Scott M Wright
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2010-09

8.  The association of hospital research publications and clinical quality.

Authors:  David M Shahian; Dan McCloskey; Xiu Liu; Elizabeth Schneider; David Cheng; Elizabeth A Mort
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 3.734

Review 9.  Effects on patients of their healthcare practitioner's or institution's participation in clinical trials: a systematic review.

Authors:  Mike Clarke; Kirsty Loudon
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  Health research improves healthcare: now we have the evidence and the chance to help the WHO spread such benefits globally.

Authors:  Stephen R Hanney; Miguel A González-Block
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2015-03-03
View more
  1 in total

1.  The association of hospital research publications and clinical quality.

Authors:  David M Shahian; Dan McCloskey; Xiu Liu; Elizabeth Schneider; David Cheng; Elizabeth A Mort
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 3.734

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.