Literature DB >> 3512426

Rapid killing of actinomycin D-treated tumour cells by mononuclear phagocytes: reactivity in mouse strains with defective classical tumour cytotoxicity.

F Collota, L Bersani, N Polentarutti, A Mantovani.   

Abstract

In confirmation of previous data, macrophages from C3H/HeJ, C57BL/10ScCR and A/J mice, exposed in vivo to BCG or in vitro to lymphokines, had little tumoricidal activity, as assessed in a 48-hr [3H]thymidine release assay against TU5 tumour cells, compared to macrophages from C3H/HeN, C57BL/6 and (BALB/c X DBA/2)F1 mice. Macrophages from these mouse strains were examined for their capacity to kill actinomycin D-pretreated WEHI 164 sarcoma cells in a 6-hr 51chromium release assay (drug-dependent cellular cytotoxicity, DDCC). Peptone-elicited macrophages from C3H/HeN, C57BL/6, (BALB/c X DBA/2)F1, C57BL/10ScCR and A/J mice had high DDCC activity, whereas C3H/HeJ macrophages expressed little cytotoxicity against actinomycin D-pretreated WEHI 164 cells. In vivo exposure to BCG or inactivated streptococci caused a modest augmentation of the DDCC effector function of C3H/HeJ macrophages, but levels of reactivity remained 20-fold less than those of similarly treated normal mice. Thus, C57BL/10ScCR and A/J macrophages have defective classical direct cytotoxicity but mediate DDCC efficiently, whereas C3H/HeJ macrophages are defective in both effector functions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3512426      PMCID: PMC1453950     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Immunology        ISSN: 0019-2805            Impact factor:   7.397


  17 in total

1.  Macrophage activation for tumor cytotoxicity: tumoricidal activity by macrophages from C3H/HeJ mice requires at least two activation stimuli.

Authors:  L P Ruco; M S Meltzer
Journal:  Cell Immunol       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 4.868

2.  Defective tumoricidal capacity of macrophages from A/J mice. II. Comparison of the macrophage cytotoxic defect of A/J mice with that of lipid A-unresponsive C3H/HeJ mice.

Authors:  D Boraschi; M S Meltzer
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1979-04       Impact factor: 5.422

Review 3.  Do macrophages destroy nascent tumors?

Authors:  D O Adams; R Snyderman
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Genetic defect in responsiveness to the B cell mitogen lipopolysaccharide.

Authors:  A Coutinho; L Forni; F Melchers; T Watanabe
Journal:  Eur J Immunol       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 5.532

5.  Genetic control of leucocyte responses to endotoxin.

Authors:  B M Sultzer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1968-09-21       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 6.  The cell biology of macrophage activation.

Authors:  D O Adams; T A Hamilton
Journal:  Annu Rev Immunol       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 28.527

7.  Macrophage activation for tumor cytotoxicity: control of macrophage tumoricidal capacity by the LPS gene.

Authors:  L P Ruco; M S Meltzer; D L Rosenstreich
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 5.422

8.  Defective tumoricidal capacity of macrophages from C3H/HeJ mice.

Authors:  L P Ruco; M S Meltzer
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 5.422

9.  Defective tumoricidal capacity of macrophages from A/J mice. I. Characterization of the macrophage cytotoxic defect after in vivo and in vitro activation stimuli.

Authors:  D Boraschi; M S Meltzer
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1979-04       Impact factor: 5.422

10.  Defective tumoricidal capacity of macrophages from P/J mice: characterization of the macrophage cytotoxic defect after in vivo and in vitro activation stimuli.

Authors:  D Boraschi; M S Meltzer
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 5.422

View more
  1 in total

1.  Involvement of tumour necrosis factor in monocyte-mediated rapid killing of actinomycin D-pretreated WEHI 164 sarcoma cells.

Authors:  L Bersani; F Colotta; A Mantovani
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 7.397

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.