Theresa W Guilbert1, Jocelyn M Biagini2, Rachelle R Ramsey3, Kristina Keidel4, Kristi Curtsinger4, John W Kroner4, Sandy R Durrani5, Mariana Stevens4, Valentina Pilipenko6, Lisa J Martin7, Carolyn M Kercsmar1, Kevin Hommel3, Gurjit K Khurana Hershey8. 1. Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio; Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio. 2. Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio; Division of Asthma Research, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio. 3. Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio; Division of Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio. 4. Division of Asthma Research, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio. 5. Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio; Division of Allergy and Immunology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio. 6. Division of Human Genetics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio. 7. Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio; Division of Human Genetics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio. 8. Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio; Division of Asthma Research, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio. Electronic address: Gurjit.Hershey@cchmc.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Asthma is heterogeneous, contributing to difficulty in disease management. OBJECTIVE: To develop a biomarker-informed treatment model for difficult-to-treat (DTT) asthma and conduct a pilot feasibility study. METHODS: School-aged children (n = 21) with DTT asthma were enrolled and completed 3 medical visits (V1-V3). V2 and V3 were completed approximately 3.5 months and 12 months after V1, respectively. At V1, guideline care and adherence interventions were initiated, and blood samples were collected for asthma biomarker assessment. A personalized treatment algorithm was developed based on biomarkers (treatment by endotype) and was implemented at V2. Asthma outcomes were compared from V1 to V2 (guideline-based care) to V2 to V3 (guideline + biomarker-informed care). RESULTS: Overall retention was 86%. There was an even distribution of participants with allergy, without allergy, and with mixed allergies. The participants received an average of 5.9 interventions (range, 3-9). The allergic phenotype was characterized by increased CDHR3 risk genotype and high transepidermal water loss. High serum interleukin-6 level was most notable in the mixed allergic subgroup. The nonallergic phenotype was characterized by vitamin D deficiency and poor steroid treatment responsiveness. The personalized treatment plans were associated with decreased emergency department visits (median, 1 vs 0; P = .04) and increased asthma control test scores (median, 22.5 vs 23.0; P = .01). CONCLUSION: The biomarker-based treatment algorithm triggered interventions on top of guideline care in all children with DTT asthma studied, supporting the need for this type of multipronged approach. Our findings identify the minimal biomarker set that is informative, reveal that this treatment-by-endotype intervention is feasible and may be superior to guideline care alone, and provide a strong foundation for a definitive trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04179461.
BACKGROUND: Asthma is heterogeneous, contributing to difficulty in disease management. OBJECTIVE: To develop a biomarker-informed treatment model for difficult-to-treat (DTT) asthma and conduct a pilot feasibility study. METHODS: School-aged children (n = 21) with DTT asthma were enrolled and completed 3 medical visits (V1-V3). V2 and V3 were completed approximately 3.5 months and 12 months after V1, respectively. At V1, guideline care and adherence interventions were initiated, and blood samples were collected for asthma biomarker assessment. A personalized treatment algorithm was developed based on biomarkers (treatment by endotype) and was implemented at V2. Asthma outcomes were compared from V1 to V2 (guideline-based care) to V2 to V3 (guideline + biomarker-informed care). RESULTS: Overall retention was 86%. There was an even distribution of participants with allergy, without allergy, and with mixed allergies. The participants received an average of 5.9 interventions (range, 3-9). The allergic phenotype was characterized by increased CDHR3 risk genotype and high transepidermal water loss. High serum interleukin-6 level was most notable in the mixed allergic subgroup. The nonallergic phenotype was characterized by vitamin D deficiency and poor steroid treatment responsiveness. The personalized treatment plans were associated with decreased emergency department visits (median, 1 vs 0; P = .04) and increased asthma control test scores (median, 22.5 vs 23.0; P = .01). CONCLUSION: The biomarker-based treatment algorithm triggered interventions on top of guideline care in all children with DTT asthma studied, supporting the need for this type of multipronged approach. Our findings identify the minimal biomarker set that is informative, reveal that this treatment-by-endotype intervention is feasible and may be superior to guideline care alone, and provide a strong foundation for a definitive trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04179461.
Authors: Prescott G Woodruff; Barmak Modrek; David F Choy; Guiquan Jia; Alexander R Abbas; Almut Ellwanger; Laura L Koth; Joseph R Arron; John V Fahy Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2009-05-29 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Lara J Akinbami; Jeanne E Moorman; Cathy Bailey; Hatice S Zahran; Michele King; Carol A Johnson; Xiang Liu Journal: NCHS Data Brief Date: 2012-05
Authors: Edward M Zoratti; Rebecca Z Krouse; Denise C Babineau; Jacqueline A Pongracic; George T O'Connor; Robert A Wood; Gurjit K Khurana Hershey; Carolyn M Kercsmar; Rebecca S Gruchalla; Meyer Kattan; Stephen J Teach; Steven M Sigelman; Peter J Gergen; Alkis Togias; Cynthia M Visness; William W Busse; Andrew H Liu Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2016-10 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: Michael C Peters; Kelly Wong McGrath; Gregory A Hawkins; Annette T Hastie; Bruce D Levy; Elliot Israel; Brenda R Phillips; David T Mauger; Suzy A Comhair; Serpil C Erzurum; Mats W Johansson; Nizar N Jarjour; Andrea M Coverstone; Mario Castro; Fernando Holguin; Sally E Wenzel; Prescott G Woodruff; Eugene R Bleecker; John V Fahy Journal: Lancet Respir Med Date: 2016-06-06 Impact factor: 30.700
Authors: Elena Goleva; Daniel A Searing; Leisa P Jackson; Brittany N Richers; Donald Y M Leung Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2012-02-11 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: Judie A Howrylak; Anne L Fuhlbrigge; Robert C Strunk; Robert S Zeiger; Scott T Weiss; Benjamin A Raby Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 10.793