Literature DB >> 35122450

Addressing concomitant gradient phase errors in time-interleaved chemical shift-encoded MRI fat fraction and R2 * mapping with a pass-specific phase fitting method.

Nathan T Roberts1,2, Diego Hernando1,2,3,4, Nikolaos Panagiotopoulos1, Scott B Reeder1,3,4,5,6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Concomitant gradients induce phase errors that increase quadratically with distance from isocenter. This work proposes a complex-based fitting method that addresses concomitant gradient phase errors in chemical shift encoded (CSE) MRI estimation of proton density fat fraction (PDFF) and R2 * through joint estimation of pass-specific phase terms. This method is applicable to time-interleaved multi-echo gradient-echo acquisitions (i.e., multi-pass acquisitions) and does not require prior knowledge of gradient waveforms typically needed to address concomitant gradient phase errors. THEORY AND METHODS: A CSE-MRI spoiled gradient echo signal model, with pass-specific phase terms, is introduced for non-linear least squares estimation of PDFF and R2 * in the presence of concomitant gradient phase errors. Cramér-Rao lower bound analysis was used to determine noise performance tradeoffs of the proposed fitting method, which was then validated in both phantom and in vivo experiments.
RESULTS: The proposed fitting method removed PDFF and R2 * estimation errors up to 12% and 10 s-1 , respectively, at ±12 cm off isocenter (S/I) in a water phantom. In healthy volunteers, PDFF and R2 * bias was reduced by ~10% (12 cm off-isocenter) and ~30 s-1 (16 cm off-isocenter), respectively. An evaluation in 29 clinical liver datasets demonstrated reduced PDFF bias and variability (8.4% improvement in the coefficient of variation), even with the imaging volume centered at isocenter.
CONCLUSION: Concomitant gradient induced phase errors in multi-pass CSE-MRI acquisitions can result in PDFF and R2 * estimation biases away from isocenter. The proposed fitting method enables accurate PDFF and R2 * quantification in the presence of concomitant gradient phase errors without knowledge of imaging gradient waveforms.
© 2022 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PDFF estimation; R2* estimation; chemical shift encoded MRI; concomitant gradients; iron quantification

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35122450      PMCID: PMC8957492          DOI: 10.1002/mrm.29175

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  35 in total

1.  Comparison of reconstruction accuracy and efficiency among autocalibrating data-driven parallel imaging methods.

Authors:  Anja C S Brau; Philip J Beatty; Stefan Skare; Roland Bammer
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Investigations of the origin of phase differences seen with ultrashort TE imaging of short T2 meniscal tissue.

Authors:  Michael Carl; Jing-Tzyh Alan Chiang
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Concomitant gradient terms in phase contrast MR: analysis and correction.

Authors:  M A Bernstein; X J Zhou; J A Polzin; K F King; A Ganin; N J Pelc; G H Glover
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Phase and amplitude correction for multi-echo water-fat separation with bipolar acquisitions.

Authors:  Huanzhou Yu; Ann Shimakawa; Charles A McKenzie; Wenmiao Lu; Scott B Reeder; R Scott Hinks; Jean H Brittain
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Chemical shift-based water/fat separation: a comparison of signal models.

Authors:  Diego Hernando; Zhi-Pei Liang; Peter Kellman
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  T1 -corrected quantitative chemical shift-encoded MRI.

Authors:  Xiaoke Wang; Timothy J Colgan; Louis A Hinshaw; Nathan T Roberts; Leah C Henze Bancroft; Gavin Hamilton; Diego Hernando; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Constraining the initial phase in water-fat separation.

Authors:  Mark Bydder; Takeshi Yokoo; Huanzhou Yu; Michael Carl; Scott B Reeder; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-12-14       Impact factor: 2.546

8.  Combination of complex-based and magnitude-based multiecho water-fat separation for accurate quantification of fat-fraction.

Authors:  Huanzhou Yu; Ann Shimakawa; Catherine D G Hines; Charles A McKenzie; Gavin Hamilton; Claude B Sirlin; Jean H Brittain; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Multiecho water-fat separation and simultaneous R2* estimation with multifrequency fat spectrum modeling.

Authors:  Huanzhou Yu; Ann Shimakawa; Charles A McKenzie; Ethan Brodsky; Jean H Brittain; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  The effects of concomitant gradients on chemical shift encoded MRI.

Authors:  Timothy J Colgan; Diego Hernando; Samir D Sharma; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 4.668

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.