Literature DB >> 35120192

Effect of dietary protein levels on the growth, enzyme activity, and immunological status of Culter mongolicus fingerlings.

Jing Qian1,2, Lingjun Xiao1,2, Kai Feng1,2, Wei Li1,3, Chuansong Liao1,3, Tanglin Zhang1,2,3, Jiashou Liu1,2,3.   

Abstract

A 65-day growth trial was conducted to investigate the dietary protein requirements for Culter mongolicus fingerlings. Isolipidic and isoenergetic diets were formulated with five dietary protein levels (32%, 37%, 42%, 47%, and 52%). Each diet was assigned to triplicate groups of 70 C. mongolicus fingerlings (0.99±0.08 g). The results indicated that weight gain and specific growth rate (SGR) increased with increasing dietary protein levels up to 47%. The activities of intestinal trypsin and lipase were the lowest in the 32% protein and 52% protein groups, while amylase activity reduced markedly in the 47% protein group. These results suggest that different dietary protein levels may cause different transformations of nutrients. The activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and lysozyme were not affected by varying dietary protein levels, except for those in the 32% protein group. In contrast, the content of malondialdehyde (MDA) increased with increasing dietary protein levels and reaching a maximum in the 52% protein group, suggesting that MDA accumulation depends on the protein concentration and the potential oxidative stress. Taken together, based on the broken-line analysis of SGR, we recommended the optimum dietary protein for C. mongolicus fingerlings to be 48.97%~49.31%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35120192      PMCID: PMC8815975          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263507

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Deficiencies or excesses of the main dietary components have profound effects on the growth and survival of fish [1]. Protein accounts for 65%~75% of fish dry-weight, and protein deposition in fish appears to be the main determinant of weight gain [2]. It plays a key role in many biological functions, including structural, enzymatic, transport, immune, and cell signaling [3]. Protein is broken down into smaller molecules in the gastrointestinal tract, which secrete fluids, electrolytes, and digestive enzymes that allow the absorption and utilization of free amino acids [4]. Dietary protein deficiency results in retarded growth and poor health [5-8]. On the other hand, excessive dietary protein can promote ammonia excretion and increase utilization of energy for amino acid catabolism, leading to water pollution and retarded growth [9, 10]. Therefore, the optimum dietary protein level is a key factor for fish to reach optimum growth at a low energy cost. The dietary protein requirements depend on fish species, and the optimum protein levels differ at different growth stages and/or body sizes [2, 11, 12]. Many studies have focused on the juvenile and broodstock stages, which are better adapted to pellets than that at the younger stages [6, 13–21]. In fact, during larval rearing, a powder-formulated diet could be added as a nutritional supplement as live prey, such as cladocera and copepods, because of the decreasing of live prey amount in pond. As larvae grow, the ingredients and particle sizes of the formulated diet can be adjusted according to the nutritional requirements and size of the fish oral gape, which is a common way to achieve weaning on artificial diets. For most fish species, their developments are far from perfect during the earlier period of domestication, and therefore the protein level of the formulated diet during this period is important for fish somatic growth and development [22, 23]. Digestive enzymes are important for nutrient digestion. Higher enzyme activity in the digestive tract enhances the digestive capability and growth performance of the host. It is widely accepted that the level of fish digestive enzyme activity is a useful comparative indicator of food utilization, digestive capacity, and growth performance of the host [24, 25]. Many factors such as the stage of life, diet, feeding management, and the sampling time after feeding affect the activity of digestive enzymes [26]. Changes in diet composition can modulate enzymatic activities and nutrient absorption capacity, leading to improve feed use and assure growth performance [27]. Immunological status is an important health indicator of an organism. Lysozyme is an important hydrolytic enzyme of the non-specific immune system, and it can disrupt b-(1, 4) glycosidic bonds between the N-acetylmuramic acid and N-acetylglucosamine in the peptidoglycan of bacterial cell walls [28]. As a humoral element in the innate immune system, lysozyme levels can be elevated in response to the immunostimulants, vaccines, and probiotics [29-32]. Superoxide dismutase (SOD) is an important enzyme in the cellular antioxidant enzymatic system, and it can remove the internal reactive oxygen species (ROS), that are generated during the immune response and metabolic process, prevent the occurrence of fatty acid oxidation, decrease the toxic effects of ROS, and consequently protect organisms from oxidative damage [33-35]. Malondialdehyde (MDA) is an indicator of endogenous oxidative damage and a final product of lipid peroxidation [36, 37]. Culter mongolicus is widely distributed in freshwater bodies including lakes, rivers, and reservoirs of East Asia [38] and is one of important commercially carnivorous species in China due to the increasing production [39]. However, its population has declined gradually in recent decades, due to water pollution, habitat destruction, and overfishing [40, 41]. This species has been stocked into natural waters such as the Yangtze River basin to conduct bio-manipulation [42-47]. Stock enhancement programs have been launched by China’s Ministry of Agriculture since the early 2000s to rehabilitate this valuable fishery resource [48]. Hatchery-reared fingerlings were released annually to build the recruitment stock. In addition, larger size fingerlings would improve the recapture rate [49]. Based on earlier research, artificial propagation of C. mongolicus was successful [50]. However, the survival rate of fingerlings was lower than 45% due to the shortage of suitable food for their small oral gape. Therefore, it is crucial to develop diets with optimum protein levels to improve the survival rate and enhance the health of C. mongolicus during fingerling stage. To this end, the present study aimed to evaluate the effect of varying dietary protein levels on the growth and the survival rate of C. mongolicus fingerlings in artificial cultivation. In addition, we measured the activities of intestinal digestive enzymes and non-specific immunological indices in the plasma to evaluate the physiological effects of different dietary protein levels.

Materials and methods

Ethic statement

C. Mongolicus is not an endangered or protected species. All experimental animal care protocols were approved by the ethics committee of the Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences. And all experimental methods were performed following the guidelines for the care and use of experimental animals of China (GB/T35892 2018) [51].

Experimental diets

Five isolipidic (mean lipid percentage of 7.26%) and isoenergetic (mean 18.25 kJ/kg) experimental diets containing 32%, 37%, 42%, 47%, and 52% crude protein levels (dry basis) were formulated. The formulation and chemical composition of the diets are presented in Table 1. White fishmeal was used as an animal protein source, soybean meal, rapeseed meal, and flour were used as plant protein sources, and fish oil and soybean oil (1:1, w/w) as lipid sources. Corn starch and cellulose were added to the diets to modulate the total energy. All ingredients were passed through a 375μm sieve before mixture. Diets were prepared in a laboratory extruder (SLP-45, Fishery Mechanical Facility Research Institute, Shanghai, China) to form 1.5-mm pellets. The pellets were oven-dried at 75°C and stored at −4°C until use.
Table 1

Formulation and chemical composition of the experimental diets (% in dry matter basis).

IngredientsDietary protein levels (%)
3237424752
White fishmeala27.134.341.448.655.7
Soybean meal1313131313
Rapeseed meal1313131313
Flour88888
Fish oilb1.981.621.270.940.6
Soybean oil1.981.621.270.940.6
Corn starch27.4420.95146.80
Cellulose00.010.561.221.6
Vitamin premixc0.390.390.390.390.39
Mineral premixd55555
Carboxymethyl cellulose22222
Choline chloride0.110.110.110.110.11
Chemical composition (% in dry matter)
Crude protein32.0237.0442.0047.0351.98
Crude lipid7.277.257.247.277.28
Gross energy (kJ g-1)e18.1818.2718.2618.2518.28

a Pollock fishmeal from American Seafood Company, Seattle, Washington, USA.

b Anchovy oil from Peru purchased from Coland Feed Co. Ltd., Wuhan, Hubei, China.

c Vitamin premix (mg kg−1 diet): thiamin, 20; riboflavin, 20; pyridoxine, 20; cyanocobalamine, 0.020; folic acid, 5; calcium pantothenate, 50; inositol, 100; niacin, 100; biotin, 0.1; starch, 645.2; ascorbic acid, 100; vitamin A, 110; vitamin D, 20; vitamin E, 50; and vitamin K, 10.

d Mineral premix (mg kg−1 diet): NaCl, 500; MgSO4·7H2O, 8155.6; NaH2PO4·2H2O,12500.0; KH2PO4, 16,000.0; CaHPO4·H2O, 7650.6; FeSO4·7H2O, 2286.2; C6H10CaO6·5H2O,1750.0; ZnSO4·7H2O, 178.0; MnSO4·H2O, 61.4; CuSO4·5H2O, 15.5; CoSO4·7H2O, 34.5; KI, 114.8; and corn starch, 753.7.

e Gross energy obtained through calorimetry.

a Pollock fishmeal from American Seafood Company, Seattle, Washington, USA. b Anchovy oil from Peru purchased from Coland Feed Co. Ltd., Wuhan, Hubei, China. c Vitamin premix (mg kg−1 diet): thiamin, 20; riboflavin, 20; pyridoxine, 20; cyanocobalamine, 0.020; folic acid, 5; calcium pantothenate, 50; inositol, 100; niacin, 100; biotin, 0.1; starch, 645.2; ascorbic acid, 100; vitamin A, 110; vitamin D, 20; vitamin E, 50; and vitamin K, 10. d Mineral premix (mg kg−1 diet): NaCl, 500; MgSO4·7H2O, 8155.6; NaH2PO4·2H2O,12500.0; KH2PO4, 16,000.0; CaHPO4·H2O, 7650.6; FeSO4·7H2O, 2286.2; C6H10CaO6·5H2O,1750.0; ZnSO4·7H2O, 178.0; MnSO4·H2O, 61.4; CuSO4·5H2O, 15.5; CoSO4·7H2O, 34.5; KI, 114.8; and corn starch, 753.7. e Gross energy obtained through calorimetry.

Experimental fish and feeding trial

Culter mongolicus fingerlings were obtained from the Niushan Lake Fish Farm (Wuhan, Hubei, China) and transported to the laboratory of the Institute of Hydrobiology, the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Wuhan, Hubei, China). Prior to the experiment, all fish were acclimated to the laboratory rearing system. Similar sized fish (mean initial total length 55.08±1.49 mm; mean initial weight 0.99±0.08 g) were randomly distributed into 15 cylindrical tanks (diameter 60 cm, water depth 60 cm). Each diet was assigned to triplicate tanks at a density of 70 fish per tank. Fish were hand-fed their prescribed diets to apparent satiation twice a day at 09:00 and 16:00. At the beginning of the experiment, the granular feeds were milled and rolled into balls with water to prevail upon fish to ingest formula feeds, and then pellets were added gradually. All fish were fed with the pellets feeds initiatively after 15 days. The uneaten feeds and feces were removed an hour after feeding. A third of the water was replaced at 19:00 daily. A photoperiod of 12 h light:12 h dark cycle was maintained (lighting-up time was 8:30~20:30). During the experiment, the averaged water temperature was 25.0°C, with a dissolved oxygen (DO) level >5.0 mg/L, pH 7~7.5, ammonia-N < 0.5 mg/L, and residual chlorine < 0.05 mg/L. The trial lasted for 65 days.

Sample collection

At the end of the feeding experiment, all fish were starved for 24 h before sampling. Total body length, weight and mortality of fish in each tank were recorded to calculate the specific growth rate of total length (SGRTL) and body weight (SGRBW), and the survival (SR). Blood samples were collected from the caudal veins (sixty specimens per tank) using heparinized syringes. After centrifugation (3500 rpm, 15 min, 4°C) (centrifuge 5417R, Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany), plasma was separated and stored at −20°C until analysis of lysozyme, superoxide dismutase (SOD), and malondialdehyde (MDA) concentrations. After blood sampling, the intestine was dissected on ice, and the intestinal samples were frozen immediately in liquid nitrogen and stored at−80°C until analysis of trypsin, lipase, and amylase activities.

Growth parameters

Chemical analysis of feeds

The chemical composition of the experimental diets was analyzed using the following standard methods. The samples were dried to a constant weight at 105°C for 24 h to determine the dry matter content. Crude protein content was determined by the Kjeldahl method using a Kjeltec system (Kjeltec-8400, FOSS). Crude lipids were measured by Soxhlet extraction using a Soxhlet extractor (Soxtec-2055, FOSS). Crude ash content was determined by incineration in a muffle furnace at 550°C for 12 h. Gross energy was determined using an automatic oxygen bomb calorimeter (Parr Isoperibol Calorimeter 6200, Moline, Illinois, USA).

Analysis of immunological parameters

Plasma malondialdehyde (MDA) levels and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activities were measured according to the instructions of the commercial assay kits (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China). Lysozyme activity was measured as described by Parry and Ellis [52, 53], based on the lysis of Micrococcus lysodeikticus (Sigma Chemical C) with some modifications. Twenty microliters of plasma was mixed with 250 μl M. lysodeikticus suspension (0.3 mg/mL in 0.05 M PBS, pH 6.2). The mixture reacted at 25°C for 0.5 min and 4.5 min, and then the optical density (O.D.) was measured at 0.5 min and 4.5 min respectively at 490 nm (Photometer 5010, BM Co. Germany). One unit of enzyme activity was defined as the amount of enzyme causing a decrease in absorbance of 0.001 and the activity was expressed as U/min/mL plasma.

Quantification of digestive enzymes

Intestinal trypsin, lipase, and amylase were extracted, and their activities were measured according to the instructions of the commercial assay kits (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China). According to the kits instructions, frozen intestinal samples were homogenized in a specific solvent at a propotion of 1:9, followed by centrifugation (2500 g, 10 min, 4°C) to obtain supernatants for testing trypsin activities; frozen intestinal samples homogenized in ice-cold 0.68% saltwater at a proportion of 1:4, followed by centrifugation (2500 g, 10 min, 4°C) to obtain supernatants for testing lipase activities; and frozen intestinal samples homogenized in ice-cold 0.68% saltwater at a proportion of 1:9, followed by centrifugation (2500 g, 10 min, 4°C) to obtain supernatants for testing amylase activities.

Statistical analysis

All data were subjected to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using SPSS 22.0 (SPSS, IL, USA), after checking for the normality and homogeneity, followed by Duncan’s multiple comparison analysis to conduct pairwise comparisons. The optimum dietary protein requirement based on the total length and weight-specific growth rate was estimated using broken-line regression analysis (y = L − U × (R − x), y means specific growth rate, x means protein content) [17, 54] in Excel 2016. The data were expressed as mean ± SE (standard error).

Results

Growth performance

There was no mortality in C. mongolicus fingerlings during the feeding trial. The body weight and total length increased with the increasing dietary protein and then significantly decreased at 57% dietary protein. Similarly, SGRTL and SGRBW increased significantly (p < 0.05) when dietary protein levels increased from 32% to 47% and then a decreasing trend was observed in the 52% protein group. Based on broken-line regression analysis of SGRTL and SGRBW against dietary protein levels, the optimum dietary protein levels for maximal growth of the fish were 49.31% and 48.97% (Fig 1).
Fig 1

Relationship between varying dietary protein levels and specific growth rate of Culter mongolicus.

Digestive enzyme activities

The intestinal digestive enzyme activities in intestine of fish are shown in Fig 2. The activities of intestinal trypsin in fish fed on 37%, 42%, and 47% protein diets were not significantly different (p > 0.05), but were significantly higher than those of fish fed on 32% and 52% protein diets (p < 0.05). The intestinal lipase activities were significantly lower in the 32% and 52% protein groups than in the other three groups (p < 0.05), while no significant difference was observed among those three groups. The intestinal amylase activity in the 47% protein group was the lowest among the test groups (p < 0.05), and no significant difference was observed among the other four groups.
Fig 2

Specific activities of three digestive enzymes in the intestine of Culter mongolicus fed with varying dietary protein levels.

Data presented are mean ± SE, different letters on the top of bars mean significantly different (p < 0.05).

Specific activities of three digestive enzymes in the intestine of Culter mongolicus fed with varying dietary protein levels.

Data presented are mean ± SE, different letters on the top of bars mean significantly different (p < 0.05).

Immunological parameters

The results of immunological parameters in plasma are shown in Fig 3. The lysozyme activity of fish that were fed the 32% protein diet was significantly higher than that in the other groups (p < 0.05), and there was no significant difference among the other groups. MDA content increased with the increasing dietary protein levels (p < 0.05). SOD activity did not show any significant difference among the experimental groups (p > 0.05).
Fig 3

The three non-specific immune parameters in plasma of Culter mongolicus fed with varying dietary protein levels.

Data presented are mean ± SE, different letters on the top of same shape bars means significantly different (p < 0.05).

The three non-specific immune parameters in plasma of Culter mongolicus fed with varying dietary protein levels.

Data presented are mean ± SE, different letters on the top of same shape bars means significantly different (p < 0.05).

Discussion

The results of this study showed that the 100% survival of C. mongolicus fingerlings, indicating an adaptation to a wide range of dietary protein levels. These findings are similar to these of previous studies on Brazilian sardine [8], Rhamdia quelen [13], Nibea diacanthus juveniles [17], Dabry’s sturgeon juveniles [54], bluegill sunfish juveniles [55], and juvenile marbled spinefoot rabbit fish [56]. These results suggest that dietary protein levels may not be a determinant factor of the mortality. The growth of C. mongolicus was profoundly affected by the different dietary protein levels. The values of SGRTL and SGRBW revealed high dietary protein requirements for the growth of C. mongolicus. However, excessive protein content may have no further benefits for individual growth and may even induce growth retardation due to the higher energy cost of extra protein metabolism [3, 57, 58]. Similar tendencies were found in several other fish species, such as the Brazilian sardine [8], juvenile bluegill sunfish [55], and juvenile red spotted grouper [59]. The optimum dietary protein requirement for C. mongolicus is about 49%. This value was higher than the values reported for the fingerlings of similar sizes, such as those of Sardinella brasiliensis, 36.77% [8], Horabagrus brachysoma, 39.10% [60] and Lepomis macrochirus, 41.51%~42.37% [55]. However, it is similar to the dietary protein requirements for some commonly cultured carnivorous species, viz., Salmo salar (48%) and Oncorhynchus mykiss (48%) [3]. The possible reason for this is may be that most herbivorous and omnivorous fish need 250~350 g/kg of protein in their diets, while carnivorous species require a higher dietary protein contents ranging from 400~550 g/kg [1]. Moreover, the dietary protein requirements generally decrease with fish growth, a phenomenon reported in many fish species at different life stages [3].

Responses of digestive enzyme activities to dietary protein levels

Several studies have shown that dietary protein levels influence protease activity directly, but the protease activity varies among species. Protease activity in the digestive tract of Labeo rohita fingerlings was significantly lower than the optimum level when fed with either insufficient or excessive protein diets [61]. In contrast, the protease activity in Dentex dentex [62], Cyprinus carpio [63], and Anarhichas minor [64] was higher for diets with less protein and/or more carbohydrates. On the other hand, the protease activity was found to be unresponsive to varying dietary protein levels in Cherax quadricarinatus [65]. Trypsin activity was not affected by different protein levels diets in Dicentrarchus labrax larvae [66]. In the present study, trypsin activity increased with an increase in dietary protein levels. However, trypsin activity began to decrease when the dietary protein levels exceeded 47%. This can be explained by the fact that dietary protein insufficiency results in a reduction in the number amino acids that are responsible for the synthesis and secretion of trypsin and lipase. Carnivorous fish have higher protein requirements than omnivorous and herbivorous fish. Abundant dietary protein stimulates the synthesis and secretion of trypsin. In contrast, excessive protein cannot be fully digested and causes the accumulation of toxic nitrogen in the body, which restrains the activity of trypsin [67, 68]. Various studies have reported that lipase activity was the same across different dietary protein treatments because of the constant lipid content in the diet of some species, such as Pseudoplatystoma corruscans [69], Labeo rohita fingerlings [61], and Sardinella brasiliensis [8]. In the present study, we found that lipase activity showed a similar trend of variability to that of trypsin. This is in line with the result reported in Puntius gonionotus fingerlings [70]. Excess protein in the diet can be used for lipid deposition, but not for protein deposition [6, 55]. Excessive dietary protein may convert into massive lipids, thereby restraining the lipase activity. Similarly, an increase in dietary protein can induce an increase in amylase activity in fish [8, 67, 69]. Nevertheless, this is in contrast to the results of a study on Puntius gonionotus fingerlings [57]. Moreover, previous studies on Dentex dentex [62] and Labeo rohita fingerlings [61] indicated that dietary protein did not influence amylase activity. The present results suggest that amylase activity was significantly lower in the 47% protein group, while amylase activity in other treatments did not change. Amylase activity has been reported to decrease with a decrease in dietary carbohydrate content [4, 71]. The content of corn starch in our feed formula increases with decreasing protein to prepare isoenergetic diets. This may be the reason for the reduction in amylase activity when the protein level increased to 47%. On the other hand, according to a study on Colossoma macropomum [67], adaptation to the use of carbohydrate sources was also dependent on the lipid concentrations, an increase in dietary lipids reduced the amylase activity. Given the trends in trypsin and lipase activities, we presume that energy is derived from both carbohydrates and lipids. When there were abundant lipids transformed from proteins, the energy source was ample. Therefore, the demand for carbohydrates decreased, and the activity of amylase receded.

Immunological effects of dietary protein levels

In a recent study, Li et al. (2018) found that serum lysozyme activity in juvenile sturgeon increased with the increasing dietary protein levels but declined when fish were fed excessive protein [54]. In a similar study on grass carp, the optimal dietary protein levels increased the lysozyme activity, but decreased the MDA concentration [72]. In the present study, the maximum plasma lysozyme activity of C. mongolicus appeared in the group fed with 32% protein content, and the maximum MDA concentration observed in the group fed with 52% protein content. Interestingly, the lysozyme activity and the MDA concentration did not vary significantly in the other groups. Organisms have antioxidant defense mechanisms to bate oxidative stress and defend biological systems from free radical toxicity [73, 74]. Excessive dietary protein may have promoted the accumulation of incomplete metabolites and ammonia excretion, leading to increased stress. In addition, we found that SOD activity in this study was not significantly different among the groups with different dietary protein levels. Many factors, such as fish species, feeding duration, age, and environmental factors, could explain the variability in the results of similar studies [75]. Thus, further studies are necessary to clarify the effects of dietary proteins on antioxidant enzymes.

Conclusion

In summary, this study found that C. mongolicus fingerlings reached maximum growth when the dietary protein level was 48.97% to 49.31%. Excessive protein led to retarded growth of C. mongolicus, reduced intestinal trypsin and lipase activity, and higher plasma MDA production. Dietary protein levels may have complex effects on the immune system of fish, which requires further research. The present results provide a basis for optimization of artificial culture of C. mongolicus, and lay the foundation for further investigation of the nutritional requirements of this species in aquaculture. (XLSX) Click here for additional data file. 30 Dec 2021
PONE-D-21-25983
Effect of dietary protein levels on the growth, enzyme activity, and immunological status of Culter mongolicus fingerlings PLOS ONE Dear Dr. Jiashou Liu , Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process. Please submit your revised manuscript by Feb 09 2022 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file. Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript: A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'. A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'. An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'. If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.
If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols. We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript. Kind regards, Mahmoud A.O. Dawood, PhD Academic Editor PLOS ONE Journal requirements: 1. When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf 2. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure: “This work was financially supported by the National R & D Supporting Program (2015BAD25B01), Fund of the State Key Laboratory of Freshwater Ecology and Biotechnology and the earmarked fund for China Agriculture Research System (CARS-45), and the Shandong Provincial Agricultural Seed Engineering Project (No. 2017LZN003).” Please state what role the funders took in the study.  If the funders had no role, please state: ""The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript."" If this statement is not correct you must amend it as needed. Please include this amended Role of Funder statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf. 3. Thank you for stating the following in the Acknowledgments Section of your manuscript: “This work was financially supported by the National R & D Supporting Program (2015BAD25B01), Fund of the State Key Laboratory of Freshwater Ecology and Biotechnology and the earmarked fund for China Agriculture Research System (CARS-45), and the Shandong Provincial Agricultural Seed Engineering Project (No. 2017LZN003). We are grateful to postgraduate students Mantang Xiong, Zhan Mai, and Puze Wang, from the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences for their assistance for sampling. We appreciate the suggestions from Professor Xiaoming Zhu and Dong Han, and Ms. Yunxia Yang. We also thank the anonymous reviewers of the manuscript for their valuable comments and suggestions.” We note that you have provided funding information that is not currently declared in your Funding Statement. However, funding information should not appear in the Acknowledgments section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form. Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement. Currently, your Funding Statement reads as follows: “This work was financially supported by the National R & D Supporting Program (2015BAD25B01), Fund of the State Key Laboratory of Freshwater Ecology and Biotechnology and the earmarked fund for China Agriculture Research System (CARS-45), and the Shandong Provincial Agricultural Seed Engineering Project (No. 2017LZN003).” Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf. [Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.] Reviewers' comments: Reviewer's Responses to Questions Comments to the Author 1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions? The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented. Reviewer #1: Partly Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available? The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified. Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English? PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here. Reviewer #1: Yes Reviewer #2: Yes ********** 5. Review Comments to the Author Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters) Reviewer #1: Dear authors Your data are new and practical, the manuscript is well-written, and the amout of data should be enough, depending on the journals policies. Based on these, i would recommend your results for publication. Reviewer #2: The manuscript investigated the "Effect of dietary protein levels on the growth, enzyme activity, and immunological status of Culter mongolicus fingerlings." The manuscript is well, hence readable. The authors studied a species that appear to new in aquaculture. If it is a new species in aquaculture, this research very relevant as determining nutritional requirement in fish is an important step in the adoption of the fish species in aquaculture. However, before this manuscript is accepted in this prestigious journal minor revision is required. Keywords: avoid using words in the title of the manuscript. Line 68: this sentence needs to be specific on what is being referred to: is it fish or something else. Line 90: cite your earlier research for better reference. Line 107, what is the basis of the protein level, any reference? It is not clear in the introduction why protein requirement is being investigated on this particular species. Is it a new species in aquaculture, or old aquaculture species but there is lack of information on its nutritional requirement. Line 136: ‘’A third of the water was replaced at 19:00 daily. Was’nt this stressful to the fish if we have to take ethics in consideration. Was the rearing system not recirculating. Another issue is the stocking density, don’t the author think 70 fish for this experiment were too many? The use of too many fish for this experiment can be unethical. Explain why you used this number of fish per tank. Line 137: Although you mentioned that water parameters are presented as average, it is not clear. I suggest you use average/mean with standard deviation or standard error. Line 183 – Explain the regression formular; what each abbreviation stands for. Figure 3: The y-axis label needs to be revised. This figure does not represent digestive enzymes but rather non-specific immune parameters/ biochemical parameters. And you may want to change the colour of lysozyme and MDA so that they are clearly distinct. ********** 6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files. If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public. Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy. Reviewer #1: No Reviewer #2: Yes: Ndakalimwe Naftal Gabriel [NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.] While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.
11 Jan 2022 Reviewer #1: Dear authors Your data are new and practical, the manuscript is well-written, and the amout of data should be enough, depending on the journals policies. Based on these, i would recommend your results for publication. Response: Dear reviewer, thanks for your review and approving. Best wishes for you! Reviewer #2: The manuscript investigated the "Effect of dietary protein levels on the growth, enzyme activity, and immunological status of Culter mongolicus fingerlings." The manuscript is well, hence readable. The authors studied a species that appear to new in aquaculture. If it is a new species in aquaculture, this research very relevant as determining nutritional requirement in fish is an important step in the adoption of the fish species in aquaculture. However, before this manuscript is accepted in this prestigious journal minor revision is required. Response: Thank you very much for your support to our work. We carefully revised our manuscript according to your valuable comments and suggestions. Keywords: avoid using words in the title of the manuscript. Response: Thank you, we changed keywords to: Culter mongolicus, protein requirement, physiological and biochemical indexes Line 68: this sentence needs to be specific on what is being referred to: is it fish or something else. Response: It is fish. And the original text was amended to: “It is widely accepted that the level of fish digestive enzyme activity is a useful comparative indicator of food utilization, digestive capacity, and growth performance of the host” (Lines 67-68). Line 90: cite your earlier research for better reference. Response: We added the earlier paper, marked as NO.50, it is in Chinese with English abstract. Line 107, what is the basis of the protein level, any reference? Response: Culter mongolicus is a carnivorous species, and according to protein requirement of other carnivorous fish, we set experimental diets (Lines 233-234). It is not clear in the introduction why protein requirement is being investigated on this particular species. Is it a new species in aquaculture, or old aquaculture species but there is lack of information on its nutritional requirement. Response: Culter mongolicus is one new aquaculture species, people feed them with other carnivorous fish’s feed now, and there is lack of information on its nutritional requirement. Line 136: ‘’A third of the water was replaced at 19:00 daily. Was’nt this stressful to the fish if we have to take ethics in consideration. Was the rearing system not recirculating. Another issue is the stocking density, don’t the author think 70 fish for this experiment were too many? The use of too many fish for this experiment can be unethical. Explain why you used this number of fish per tank. Response: The new water has been aerated for one day, before slowly flowing into cylinders, so the temperature was the same with old water. With the water changing was slowly, the stress was ignored. And the rearing system was not recirculating. The Culter mongolicus fingerlings are small, according to pre-experimentation, 70 fish in one tank was not crowded, and their growth did not stunted. Line 137: Although you mentioned that water parameters are presented as average, it is not clear. I suggest you use average/mean with standard deviation or standard error. Response: We use air condition system for temperature control, and the new water has been aerated for one day, before slowly flowing into cylinders, so water parameters are presented as average. Line 183 – Explain the regression formular; what each abbreviation stands for. Response: weight-specific growth rate was estimated using broken-line regression analysis (y = L − U × (R − x), y means specific growth rate, x means protein content). Figure 3: The y-axis label needs to be revised. This figure does not represent digestive enzymes but rather non-specific immune parameters/ biochemical parameters. And you may want to change the colour of lysozyme and MDA so that they are clearly distinct. Response: Thank you for your suggestion, we revised Fig. 3 accordingly. Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.doc Click here for additional data file. 21 Jan 2022 Effect of dietary protein levels on the growth, enzyme activity, and immunological status of Culter mongolicus fingerlings PONE-D-21-25983R1 Dear Dr. Jing Qian, We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements. Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication. An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org. Kind regards, Mahmoud A.O. Dawood, PhD Academic Editor PLOS ONE Additional Editor Comments (optional): Reviewers' comments: 27 Jan 2022 PONE-D-21-25983R1 Effect of dietary protein levels on the growth, enzyme activity, and immunological status of Culter mongolicus fingerlings Dear Dr. Liu: I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org. If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org. Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access. Kind regards, PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff on behalf of Dr. Mahmoud A.O. Dawood Academic Editor PLOS ONE
  23 in total

1.  Innate immune responses in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss, Walbaum) induced by probiotics.

Authors:  Do-Hyung Kim; Brian Austin
Journal:  Fish Shellfish Immunol       Date:  2006-03-02       Impact factor: 4.581

Review 2.  Hormonal regulation of the fish gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  Randal K Buddington; Ashild Krogdahl
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.320

3.  Effects of dietary levels of protein on nitrogenous metabolism of Rhamdia quelen (Teleostei: Pimelodidae).

Authors:  José Fernando Bibiano Melo; Lícia Maria Lundstedt; Isidoro Metón; Isabel Vázquez Baanante; Gilberto Moraes
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol       Date:  2006-06-10       Impact factor: 2.320

Review 4.  Nutrition, feeding, and behavior of fish.

Authors:  Santosh P Lall; Sean M Tibbetts
Journal:  Vet Clin North Am Exot Anim Pract       Date:  2009-05

5.  Dietary protein levels regulated antibacterial activity, inflammatory response and structural integrity in the head kidney, spleen and skin of grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella) after challenged with Aeromonas hydrophila.

Authors:  Wei-Dan Jiang; Jing Xu; Xiao-Qiu Zhou; Pei Wu; Yang Liu; Jun Jiang; Sheng-Yao Kuang; Ling Tang; Wu-Neng Tang; Yong-An Zhang; Lin Feng
Journal:  Fish Shellfish Immunol       Date:  2017-07-08       Impact factor: 4.581

6.  Replacement of dietary fish oil by vegetable oils affects humoral immunity and expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines genes in gilthead sea bream Sparus aurata.

Authors:  D Montero; F Mathlouthi; L Tort; J M Afonso; S Torrecillas; A Fernández-Vaquero; D Negrin; M S Izquierdo
Journal:  Fish Shellfish Immunol       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 4.581

7.  Effects of dietary Bacillus licheniformis on growth performance, immunological parameters, intestinal morphology and resistance of juvenile Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) to challenge infections.

Authors:  Biao Han; Wei-Qing Long; Ju-Yun He; Yong-Jian Liu; Yu-Qi Si; Li-Xia Tian
Journal:  Fish Shellfish Immunol       Date:  2015-06-21       Impact factor: 4.581

8.  An evaluation of replacing fish meal with fermented soybean meal in the diet of Macrobrachium nipponense: Growth, nonspecific immunity, and resistance to Aeromonas hydrophila.

Authors:  Zhili Ding; Yixiang Zhang; Jinyun Ye; Zhenyu Du; Youqin Kong
Journal:  Fish Shellfish Immunol       Date:  2015-02-21       Impact factor: 4.581

9.  Generation of superoxide anion and SOD activity in haemocytes and muscle of American white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) as a response to beta-glucan and sulphated polysaccharide.

Authors:  A I Campa-Córdova; N Y Hernández-Saavedra; R De Philippis; F Ascencio
Journal:  Fish Shellfish Immunol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.581

10.  Impacts of hatchery-reared mandarin fish Siniperca chuatsi stocking on wild fish community and water quality in a shallow Yangtze lake.

Authors:  Wei Li; Brendan J Hicks; Mingli Lin; Chuanbo Guo; Tanglin Zhang; Jiashou Liu; Zhongjie Li; David A Beauchamp
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.