Ahmet Gulmez1, Hakan Harputluoglu2. 1. Adana Research and Training State Hospital, Adana, Turkey. doktor.ahmetgulmez@gmail.com. 2. Medical Oncology Department, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Hepatocellular cancer (HCC) is an aggressive tumor with an increasing incidence in recent years. Life expectancy is limited, especially due to limited effective treatments and tumor biology. In this study, we aimed to examine the effect of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), prognostic nutritional index (PNI) parameters of treatment efficacy of patients using sorafenib in primary systemic therapy, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, we retrospectively analyzed 78 patients who used sorafenib as a first-line systemic treatment. NLR, PLR, and PNI values were calculated with the existing formulas. Cut-off values for these markers were determined by performing ROC curve analysis. These values were determined respectively as 2.88, 111.05, and 38.25. Patients were divided into two groups according to this threshold value. OS and PFS values were calculated using a Cox proportional risk model. The effects of markers on OS and PFS were examined based on the cut-off value. RESULTS: The mean PFS was 7.1 (range 1-46) months, and the mean OS was 14.1 (range 1.5-94) months. The pre-treatment decreased NLR (< 2.88) value was prognostic for higher PFS and OS rates. These values were determined respectively as 9.23 ± 1.79 and 3.45 ± 0.32 months for PFS and 21.17 ± 4.53 and 5.32 ± 0.53 months for OS. Pre-treatment decreased PLR (< 111.05) was found to be a positively significant prognostic value for both survival. These values were determined respectively as 7.37 ± 1.43 months and 3.16 ± 0.47 months for PFS and 21.12 ± 5.52 months and 6.16 ± 0.87 months for OS. And also, low PNI (< 38.25) value was prognostic for lower PFS and rates. These values were determined respectively as 7.47 ± 0.59 months and 3.25 ± 0.21 months for PFS and 16.36 ± 4.37 months and 5.15 ± 0.42 for OS. All three parameters were found to be statistically significant (p < 0.05) for both OS and PFS as independent prognostic markers. CONCLUSION: Today, as the standard first-line treatment of HCC has shifted to combinations with immunotherapy (IO), IO transportation is not possible in most countries of the world. However, there are also patients who achieve great survival with only sorafenib. The important point is to identify the biomarkers that predict which patient will benefit better from which treatment. With the markers in our study and a scoring system that can be obtained with these markers, it can be evaluated which patient will be given IO combination and which patient will be given only TKI treatment. We think that such a scoring system can be used to identify suitable patients, especially in countries where, for financial reasons, not every patient can access Immunotherapy. The advantage of these tests is that they are inexpensive, easily calculable and standardized. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Number and date of registration: 2021/2088, 01-06-2021, retrospectively registered.
OBJECTIVE: Hepatocellular cancer (HCC) is an aggressive tumor with an increasing incidence in recent years. Life expectancy is limited, especially due to limited effective treatments and tumor biology. In this study, we aimed to examine the effect of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), prognostic nutritional index (PNI) parameters of treatment efficacy of patients using sorafenib in primary systemic therapy, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, we retrospectively analyzed 78 patients who used sorafenib as a first-line systemic treatment. NLR, PLR, and PNI values were calculated with the existing formulas. Cut-off values for these markers were determined by performing ROC curve analysis. These values were determined respectively as 2.88, 111.05, and 38.25. Patients were divided into two groups according to this threshold value. OS and PFS values were calculated using a Cox proportional risk model. The effects of markers on OS and PFS were examined based on the cut-off value. RESULTS: The mean PFS was 7.1 (range 1-46) months, and the mean OS was 14.1 (range 1.5-94) months. The pre-treatment decreased NLR (< 2.88) value was prognostic for higher PFS and OS rates. These values were determined respectively as 9.23 ± 1.79 and 3.45 ± 0.32 months for PFS and 21.17 ± 4.53 and 5.32 ± 0.53 months for OS. Pre-treatment decreased PLR (< 111.05) was found to be a positively significant prognostic value for both survival. These values were determined respectively as 7.37 ± 1.43 months and 3.16 ± 0.47 months for PFS and 21.12 ± 5.52 months and 6.16 ± 0.87 months for OS. And also, low PNI (< 38.25) value was prognostic for lower PFS and rates. These values were determined respectively as 7.47 ± 0.59 months and 3.25 ± 0.21 months for PFS and 16.36 ± 4.37 months and 5.15 ± 0.42 for OS. All three parameters were found to be statistically significant (p < 0.05) for both OS and PFS as independent prognostic markers. CONCLUSION: Today, as the standard first-line treatment of HCC has shifted to combinations with immunotherapy (IO), IO transportation is not possible in most countries of the world. However, there are also patients who achieve great survival with only sorafenib. The important point is to identify the biomarkers that predict which patient will benefit better from which treatment. With the markers in our study and a scoring system that can be obtained with these markers, it can be evaluated which patient will be given IO combination and which patient will be given only TKI treatment. We think that such a scoring system can be used to identify suitable patients, especially in countries where, for financial reasons, not every patient can access Immunotherapy. The advantage of these tests is that they are inexpensive, easily calculable and standardized. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Number and date of registration: 2021/2088, 01-06-2021, retrospectively registered.
Authors: Richard S Finn; Shukui Qin; Masafumi Ikeda; Peter R Galle; Michel Ducreux; Tae-You Kim; Masatoshi Kudo; Valeriy Breder; Philippe Merle; Ahmed O Kaseb; Daneng Li; Wendy Verret; Derek-Zhen Xu; Sairy Hernandez; Juan Liu; Chen Huang; Sohail Mulla; Yulei Wang; Ho Yeong Lim; Andrew X Zhu; Ann-Lii Cheng Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2020-05-14 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Lindsey A Torre; Freddie Bray; Rebecca L Siegel; Jacques Ferlay; Joannie Lortet-Tieulent; Ahmedin Jemal Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2015-02-04 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Graeme J K Guthrie; Kellie A Charles; Campbell S D Roxburgh; Paul G Horgan; Donald C McMillan; Stephen J Clarke Journal: Crit Rev Oncol Hematol Date: 2013-04-17 Impact factor: 6.312
Authors: Daniel Y C Heng; Wanling Xie; Meredith M Regan; Mark A Warren; Ali Reza Golshayan; Chakshu Sahi; Bernhard J Eigl; J Dean Ruether; Tina Cheng; Scott North; Peter Venner; Jennifer J Knox; Kim N Chi; Christian Kollmannsberger; David F McDermott; William K Oh; Michael B Atkins; Ronald M Bukowski; Brian I Rini; Toni K Choueiri Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-10-13 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Josep M Llovet; Sergio Ricci; Vincenzo Mazzaferro; Philip Hilgard; Edward Gane; Jean-Frédéric Blanc; Andre Cosme de Oliveira; Armando Santoro; Jean-Luc Raoul; Alejandro Forner; Myron Schwartz; Camillo Porta; Stefan Zeuzem; Luigi Bolondi; Tim F Greten; Peter R Galle; Jean-François Seitz; Ivan Borbath; Dieter Häussinger; Tom Giannaris; Minghua Shan; Marius Moscovici; Dimitris Voliotis; Jordi Bruix Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-07-24 Impact factor: 91.245